Forums / Discussion / General

169,289 total conversations in 5,522 threads

+ New Thread


I hate you Disney.....

Last posted Jun 30, 2011 at 12:00PM EDT. Added Jun 26, 2011 at 08:35AM EDT
52 posts from 34 users

They just announced “Planes” without devolopment of Pixar! It is indeed a Cars spinoff.

WHY?!?!?!? WHY CAN’T YOU STOP MILKING THE BLOOD OF YOUR FRANCHISES?!?!!?

Jun 26, 2011 at 08:35AM EDT
Quote

Well, at least we now know that that movie is going to suck.

Jun 26, 2011 at 08:43AM EDT
Quote

and the fourth one will be “feet”

Jun 26, 2011 at 09:17AM EDT
Quote

Nah, the fourth one will be “Boats”
The fifth one will be “Bikes”

Jun 26, 2011 at 09:32AM EDT
Quote

Derpy Hooves wrote:

Nah, the fourth one will be “Boats”
The fifth one will be “Bikes”

Then who could forget the “Bikes” sequal?

“Tricycle”. Yeah, I’m psyched.

Jun 26, 2011 at 09:47AM EDT
Quote

Dane wrote:

Then who could forget the “Bikes” sequal?

“Tricycle”. Yeah, I’m psyched.

don’t forget the prequel! “Unicycle”!

Last edited Jun 26, 2011 at 10:38AM EDT
Jun 26, 2011 at 10:37AM EDT
Quote

Dane wrote:

Then who could forget the “Bikes” sequal?

“Tricycle”. Yeah, I’m psyched.

Then they will make “Tanks”, which will be cool

Jun 26, 2011 at 10:37AM EDT
Quote

This is gonna be weird. Cars1 was a fine movie. I have a negative opinion of spinoffs and sequels, so I won’t be seeing this or Cars2.
.
And how do they get away with not including Pixar? Don’t they do all the animation for Disney? Why would they do this?

Jun 26, 2011 at 11:16AM EDT
Quote

Syndic wrote:

This is gonna be weird. Cars1 was a fine movie. I have a negative opinion of spinoffs and sequels, so I won’t be seeing this or Cars2.
.
And how do they get away with not including Pixar? Don’t they do all the animation for Disney? Why would they do this?

YOU CAN’T CUT PIXAR! YOU WILL REGRET THIS!

Jun 26, 2011 at 11:52AM EDT
Quote

Meh. Let Disney ruin Cars for all I care. They do it to all their franchises, and Rotten Tomatoes gave the second movie a 33% anyway.

I’m more mad that they decided to do two sequels in a row. Come on Pixar, don’t ruin your legacy with all these sequels! Come up with original stuff!

Jun 26, 2011 at 01:03PM EDT

Arcadian wrote:

Meh. Let Disney ruin Cars for all I care. They do it to all their franchises, and Rotten Tomatoes gave the second movie a 33% anyway.

I’m more mad that they decided to do two sequels in a row. Come on Pixar, don’t ruin your legacy with all these sequels! Come up with original stuff!

I was under the impression that Pixar had nothing to do with this.

Jun 26, 2011 at 01:08PM EDT
Quote

Arcadian wrote:

Meh. Let Disney ruin Cars for all I care. They do it to all their franchises, and Rotten Tomatoes gave the second movie a 33% anyway.

I’m more mad that they decided to do two sequels in a row. Come on Pixar, don’t ruin your legacy with all these sequels! Come up with original stuff!

The only movie that doesn’t apply to this is Toy Story 3. Anyone who insults that movie will

Jun 26, 2011 at 01:13PM EDT
Quote

Toy Story 3 is an exception, but I remember last year just worrying that they would screw it up somehow. I have no issues with Pixar, but I remember being quite pissed last year when they announced Cars 2 and Monster’s Inc 2. It was as if they were saying that they were starting a disney policy where every movie must have a sequel. IMO, sequels are a super lazy way to bring in revenue. Pixar just doesn’t really do sequels, and that’s what I liked about them.

EDIT: Disney owns Pixar, so they own some of the rights to the movies too, including what they want to do with the franchises.

Last edited Jun 26, 2011 at 01:25PM EDT
Jun 26, 2011 at 01:24PM EDT

angrypwnzer wrote:

Can we get a sequel to the Incredibles yet?

They probaly will, some day. They are making sequels to movies that don’t even allow room for a sequel, and the ending to The Incredibles makes it seem like a sequel is inevitable.
.
I doubt it would be a good one. The Incredibles isn’t a classic, nor was it as wildly popular as some other movies, so if they do continue with that one, they won’t feel bad about accepting a poor script.

Jun 26, 2011 at 02:32PM EDT
Quote

Then, for some odd reason, after all the critical and box office failure, they’ll make
Submarines.

Jun 26, 2011 at 02:45PM EDT
Quote

Disney’s new animated movie!





Wheelchairs!

Jun 26, 2011 at 03:57PM EDT
Quote

I like kids movies like Cars and such and i like transportation especially from kids shows. I want to see Cars 2 but i never heard of Planes…sounds interesting to me…but thats just me. Its for kids so of course alot of people here will be like “laaaammmme” but me a kid at heart like shows like that. So to me i wont find them lame or stupid.

Jun 26, 2011 at 06:46PM EDT
Quote


Is is okay if I dislike watching cartoons for children?

Jun 26, 2011 at 08:03PM EDT

I’ve always hated disney. Because I think it has bad messages for children to be absorbing. But I’m not really going to bore you with that.

Jun 26, 2011 at 09:47PM EDT
Quote

MDFification wrote:

I’ve always hated disney. Because I think it has bad messages for children to be absorbing. But I’m not really going to bore you with that.

You’re different, and that’s terrible.

Jun 26, 2011 at 09:59PM EDT
Quote

Wait, are you saying Disney reuses their material? I find this hard to believe…

Jun 27, 2011 at 08:54PM EDT
Quote

Well here’s the teaser trailer for Pixar’s 2013 movie, Brave. I predict it will do way better than Planes.

Jun 27, 2011 at 10:19PM EDT
Quote

Ugh, I haven’t seen Cars 2, but I enjoyed Cars 1, but this is just a DO NOT WANT situation, and how they managed to get away with it without Pixar’s permission is beyond me.

Jun 28, 2011 at 02:47PM EDT
Quote

Brucker wrote:

Wait, are you saying Disney reuses their material? I find this hard to believe…

I laughed.

Jun 28, 2011 at 03:46PM EDT
Quote

@RocketPropelledPanda – Having just recently reread Gyo, I find that amazing.

Jun 28, 2011 at 04:06PM EDT
Quote

FudgeGruck wrote:

Meh, I hated Cars anyway.
Pixar is like the Valve of Movies.

How is being the VALVe of movies a bad thing?

Jun 28, 2011 at 05:26PM EDT
Quote

Ashki wrote:

Ugh, I haven’t seen Cars 2, but I enjoyed Cars 1, but this is just a DO NOT WANT situation, and how they managed to get away with it without Pixar’s permission is beyond me.

Disney owns Pixar.

Jun 28, 2011 at 05:32PM EDT
Quote

Katie C. wrote:

Disney owns Pixar.

Oh yeah, I’m a moron, I meant without development.

Jun 28, 2011 at 05:38PM EDT
Quote

Because making original movies is too mainstream for hispter Disney.

Jun 29, 2011 at 05:12PM EDT
Quote

MDFification wrote:

Because making original movies is too mainstream for hispter Disney.

I’m pretty sure it’s well-known that Disney (excluding Pixar) has never made an original animated movie. The closest it ever came was “Lilo & Stitch”, which was based on a never-released children’s book by a Disney storyboard artist.

Jun 29, 2011 at 06:06PM EDT
Quote

The worst part of all: If they keep making moves like this, Disney will transform most of Pixar’s masterpieces into franchises zombies.

Remember what happened with The Land Before Time at TouchStone! DX

DISNEY IS CAPABLE OF DOING SOMETHING LIKE THAT!

Jun 29, 2011 at 11:16PM EDT
Quote

Frozenpwn The Prince of Indifference wrote:

And that’s how they “kill” another product

This one works better….but them I’m a huge BTTF nut.

Jun 30, 2011 at 12:59AM EDT
Quote
Skeletor-sm

This thread is closed to new posts.

Old threads normally auto-close after 30 days of inactivity.

Why don't you start a new thread instead?

'lo! You must login or signup first!