Forums / Discussion / General

168,563 total conversations in 5,399 threads

+ New Thread


Kerbal Space Program General

Last posted Oct 28, 2012 at 03:52AM EDT. Added Sep 04, 2012 at 03:33AM EDT
41 posts from 12 users


 
Kerbal Space Program is a multi-genre game where the players create their own space program.
 
In KSP, you must build a space-worthy craft, capable of flying its crew out into space, without killing them (optional). At your disposal is a collection of parts, which must be assembled to create a functional ship. Each part has its own function and will affect the way a ship flies (or doesn’t). So strap yourself in, and get ready to try some Rocket Science! (Taken from http://kerbalspaceprogram.com/about.php)
 

 

 

 
So, do any of you play KSP?
 

Last edited Sep 04, 2012 at 03:34AM EDT
Sep 04, 2012 at 03:33AM EDT
Quote

I don’t have it right now, but I’m definitely considering getting it. I just found this video, and it’s really making me want KSP (and a lot of KSP mods, as well!):

Last edited Sep 04, 2012 at 04:01AM EDT
Sep 04, 2012 at 04:00AM EDT
Quote

You should. It’s the best $18 you will ever spend.

Sep 04, 2012 at 04:02AM EDT
Quote

I’ve heard many many good things about this game. But…too many games are coming out for me to spare 18$ :(

Sep 04, 2012 at 05:06AM EDT
Quote

I’ve only got the demo but I’ve landed and crashed on the moon countless times before! I’ve only made one craft that is capable of easily landing on the moon.

Robbaz, anyone?

Sep 04, 2012 at 07:36AM EDT
Quote

I heard of this only a few days ago, and it sounds cool. I’m looking into getting it, but I’m not sure about it.

Sep 04, 2012 at 09:08PM EDT
Quote

Trollkeeper wrote:

I heard of this only a few days ago, and it sounds cool. I’m looking into getting it, but I’m not sure about it.

Try out the free demo to see if it is something you would like.
link here

Sep 05, 2012 at 01:12AM EDT
Quote

I downloaded the demo, but I’ll probably wait till tomorrow to try it out.

Sep 05, 2012 at 01:14AM EDT
Quote

I just spent seven hours playing the demo. This game is too addictive, and for the first time ever, that is actually going to be the reason that I do not buy it. Not yet anyway. And my lack of money would get in the way even if I did want to get it now. Anyway, the highest I could get my craft was one million meters. Not even close to the moon! I will have to build it bigger next time.

If I have one complaint though, I would say it is the automatic staging system. Any time I add a new component to the craft the game reorganized my entire staging tree. It is really annoying when I launch the ship and only three out of twelve thrusters go off, and then I have to spend ten minutes pinpointing which thruster should go where in the stages.

Last edited Sep 05, 2012 at 01:52AM EDT
Sep 05, 2012 at 01:50AM EDT
Quote

Heheh. That is how I felt for the first few hours. I have gotten the hang of it though, and have crashed on the moon several times. I will probably never manage to land there, but one can dream.

Sep 06, 2012 at 08:07AM EDT
Quote

I should attempt to screen record my attempt at landing on the moon and post it here.

Sep 06, 2012 at 12:40PM EDT
Quote

Lolrus wrote:

My screenshots:

Looking at these, I should REALLY buy this.

Sep 06, 2012 at 02:42PM EDT
Quote

Lolrus wrote:

My screenshots:

Haha, the Halo has got to be the best ship I’ve ever seen in KSP. And that includes anything that can handle the BFE-5000.

Sep 06, 2012 at 02:45PM EDT
Quote

Tahrdan Ismeh Wu-Temporis wrote:

Haha, the Halo has got to be the best ship I’ve ever seen in KSP. And that includes anything that can handle the BFE-5000.

Wait.

Something can handle the BFE?

Sep 06, 2012 at 05:51PM EDT
Quote

My first Mun landing. About twelve hours of construction and testing went into this.

Athen XII on the launch pad. There are a total of 22 rockets in the Athen series. The later models were all failed attempts at developing a craft capable of landing on Mun and returning to Kerbin.


Following takeoff and the shedding of solid fuel thrusters.


Finally, liquid thrusters are ejected.


Arrival at Mun. Approximate total of 2 tanks of fuel left.


Reverse thrusting to slow down as we approach the surface.


The rest of the craft was completely destroyed in the landing process.


MFW:


I have crashed into Mun five times while trying to land. This was my first glorious success. Our next mission is to create a ship capable of returning home, but I do not think it is feasible in the demo version. I will probably have to gather up enough cash to buy the full version before any of my Kerbals return home.

Sep 06, 2012 at 06:50PM EDT
Quote

量子 Meme wrote:

Wait.

Something can handle the BFE?

It was designed to go with those “3 metre wide” parts (as in the top of it matches those parts in width) so they tend to be able to handle it.

Sep 07, 2012 at 11:21AM EDT
Quote

@ Count Lionel

It is COMPLETELY possible to land on the Mun with the demo version. Here’s what you do:

Attach 3 radial decouplers at the bottom of your lander, then attach the larger winglets into the ends of the decouplers. Then, put a strut from the winglet to the top of your craft. It will function as landing gear. As long as you touch down real slow, you’ll be fine.

Sep 07, 2012 at 11:47AM EDT
Quote

@sting_auer:
That is almost exactly what I have been trying to do. I did not connect the winglets to the command module, which is probably where I went wrong. With my designs the ship was either too frail, and broke into pieces in the upper atmosphere, or it was too bulky and tumbled after liftoff.

I will keep trying though.

Sep 07, 2012 at 12:56PM EDT
Quote

Well I got into space this time with a 6-liquid rocket first stage. was able to somewhat aim at the moon, but I was just trying to get into space so I overshot it, mostly due to my one tank of fuel on stage 2. Now I’m hooked.

Sep 07, 2012 at 04:30PM EDT
Quote

Sorry for double post.

I have begun to work on the Hypnos series of rockets. The most recently tested version is Hypnos II:

Pic 1: Hypnos II after construction. 6 large solid boosters (Up from H1’s 3) for the first stage, 3 LV-T30 rockets with four FL-T400 fuel tanks in the second stage, an LV-T909 liquid rocket with 4 fuel tanks (this was designed to be the rocket to get to Mun, but it’s being changed to an LV-T45 for Hypnos III) for the third stage, and an LV-T45 with one tank for the eventual task of taking of from Mun, along with SAS and RCS systems, in stage 4.

Pic 2: Hypnos II on the launch pad.

Pic 3: Hypnos II in the third stage. In this iteration, it’s missing just enough thrust to reach escape velocity. It was slowly slowing at this point.

Pic 4: 120,000 feet up. I abandoned the goal of orbit/Mun landing and jettisoned the fourth stage.

Pic 5: A soft landing on Kerbal is confirmed by the capsule, Morpheus I.

Pic 6: Jebediah Kerman in front of Morpheus I.

Currently, I’m working on Hypnos III. Modifications include:

  • Struts attached to the liquid tanks (somehow this went unnoticed during the testing of Hypnos I, the additional tanks added in 2 helped me noticed the instability).
  • Removed some fins I don’t think are doing much.
  • An additional set of RCS boosters.

I’m hoping the reduced drag from the fins will help escape gravity. I want to hit orbit on my next flight, if I’m lucky.

Last edited Sep 07, 2012 at 10:08PM EDT
Sep 07, 2012 at 09:52PM EDT
Quote

Athen XII E-2 on the launch pad:

Thus far I have tested 34 different models, and only those of the XII series ever leave the atmosphere without collapsing, exploding, or tumbling. At the moment the only thing I have left to work on is increasing efficiency. I decided to ditch solid fuel thrusters, and not only did I manage to break the atmosphere without them, but I also got to Mun with most of my liquid thrusters intact, with fuel remaining. I might never use solid thrusters again!

THE MOST GLORIOUS DAWN.

Wait… something is wrong here…


GOD
FREAKING
DANGIT

To add insult to injury, I actually had three full fuel tanks left. Plenty enough to make it home. I am going to hook up fifty cables to that engine so that it never comes detached again.

Sep 08, 2012 at 02:15AM EDT
Quote

It’s official: the Hypnos series can achieve orbit.

The problem is, I use pretty much all my fuel to get into orbit; I’m on my “lander/return vehicle” stage by the time I get there. Next step: trying to reach a higher initial thrust, so I need less fuel for escape velocity and orbit establishment. Then beginning test fights towards moon orbit.

No pics this time, sorry. I forgot to take screenshots.

@Lionel: Is that the lowest you can get those fins? that might be part of the problem; I think it’s landing directly on the engine.

Last edited Sep 08, 2012 at 03:15AM EDT
Sep 08, 2012 at 03:14AM EDT
Quote

Have you considered utilizing liquid fuel drop tanks? Organize your stages so that you can drop your fuel the moment it is expended. You will shed weight much faster than when you use “tower” designs, in which you stack fuel tanks on top of the engine. Removing weight as quickly as possible is the key to reaching escape velocity with a sizable ship intact.

In order to get the landing fins any lower I would need to make the rocket taller, and the Athen XII presently seems to be at a “magic height.” If I add even a meter more to it the rocket tumbles a few minutes after takeoff, flipping around in the upper atmosphere. So yeah, that is as low as they get. Technically the engine should not hit the ground, unless I am on a very rough surface, or the fins bend as I land. I have attached a load of cables to the fins and the engine to prevent the latter of the two from ever happening again.

Sep 08, 2012 at 10:51AM EDT
Quote

Sorry for the double post, but I finally succeeded in my mission:

We did it. We are on the moon. The ship slid for quite a bit after landing; and on a rough slope, mind you. But it remained intact, probably because of all the extra cables I attached to the fins and engine.

But now for the tricky part:

Having escaped Mun’s gravity, we begin our return voyage. I still had three tanks of fuel left when the craft left Mun. I almost overshot Kerbin, hurtling out into space in a totally wrong direction, and the fact that the camera refused to let me move where I wanted it complicated things further. I had to guess and check by thrusting in almost random directions, but I got through it and aligned the craft correctly.


Now safely in orbit, I utilize the last bits of the drop tank fuel to put my craft in a position to collide with the surface.

One last look at Mun:

I still have an entire fuel tank left when I detached the empty drop tanks. I use this trying to move so that I land at the launch pad, but the planet’s rotation thwarts my efforts. Drop tanks are released, followed by final separation and a safe landing in the ocean.



Total mission time of 2 days, 9 hours, and 52 minutes.

Last edited Sep 08, 2012 at 03:56PM EDT
Sep 08, 2012 at 03:54PM EDT
Quote

I’m going to show you what my demo mods can do!

brb kerbalspaceprogram

Sep 08, 2012 at 05:30PM EDT
Quote

So the alt text on xkcd is about KSP today. I found it amusing.

Also, I’m improving my skills at orbiting. I got a nice round polar orbit at 200 km last night. I’m on the sixth iteration of the Hypnos line at this point. The main changes for Hypnos 6 are moving the boosters to the bottom of the craft, instead of the sides. They were swinging everywhere on V and messing with my thrust efficiency, probably. I’m gonna go onto Hypnos VII tonight, which will add extra liquid rockets to the 2nd stage’s first round of tanks (which were just tanks for four rockets), and just use them as a second escape stage after my solids.

Sep 10, 2012 at 10:45AM EDT
Quote


This is Eve. One of the new planets coming up in the .17 update. It has a small moon named Gilly which was an asteroid that was captured by Eve’s gravitational pull.
 

Gilly

Sep 11, 2012 at 12:58AM EDT
Quote

Sorry for the double post, but I felt my previous one was lacking.
These are development images from Squad. V.17.

Sep 11, 2012 at 01:47AM EDT
Quote

Twilitlord wrote:

Well I tried it, and this is all I have to say:

Well same feeling here. I have no idea what I am doing.

Sep 12, 2012 at 05:04AM EDT
Quote

I bought the full game. Definitely a wise purchase, but I am eagerly waiting for new content to be released. At the moment, the only significant differences between the demo and the full version are jet planes, a second moon, a few extra parts, and persistent space debris. The latter two are not significantly important being that the extra parts are basically just larger versions of parts we already had, and the space debris makes almost no effect on gameplay being that rendezvous with junk or prior missions is next to impossible.

In the meantime I have landed on Minmus, which is quite rugged and difficult to manage. The terrain is almost entirely constructed out of cliffs and steep slopes. My present project is to build a ship capable of recovering kerbonauts from other locations that have crashed or run out of fuel. I am thinking of using landing gear as a sort of docking clamp to grab onto a stranded kerbal, since they can not hold onto ladders while you are accelerating.

Sep 19, 2012 at 04:55PM EDT
Quote

UPDATE .17 IS OUT NOW!!!
but don’t get your hopes up if you want to play it soon. The website is experiencing very heavy traffic and is basically unusable. Try in the next few days.

Sep 20, 2012 at 03:32AM EDT
Quote

I am totally getting that docking mod that was released recently. I’ll use it to do an orbital rendezvous type planetary landing. I’ll detach from the mothership, send a lander down, then fly back up and dock with the mothership, then fly back home.

Sep 20, 2012 at 11:28AM EDT
Quote

@sting_auer: Better yet, use it to construct a massive interplanetary ship in orbit. Because honestly, can you really expect to build a ship awesome enough to travel to Duna and back and still have it lightweight enough to get off the ground? Of course not.

Sep 20, 2012 at 12:44PM EDT
Quote

Obligatory:

Go to Moho, land, tank off, and land on every planet in order from innermost to outermost, then fly back to moho and go back to kerbin and land on top of the tower.

Sep 21, 2012 at 07:08PM EDT
Quote

>Orbiting/landing on planets and moons
>Not orbiting the Sun billions of meters away for all eternity
>Not using only solid fuel
>getonmylevelplebs

This is my Blazing Saddle IV, the most successful in a series of solid fuel only rockets made entirely for going fast and far with no particular aim other than insane orbits. It has one kerbal inside, and it will never ever land.

Last edited Sep 21, 2012 at 10:33PM EDT
Sep 21, 2012 at 10:31PM EDT
Quote

Wow this thread died fast. To revive it, here are some screenshots that I have taken on my trip throughout the Solar System.
 

Oct 16, 2012 at 08:12PM EDT
Quote

Lolrus wrote:

Wow this thread died fast. To revive it, here are some screenshots that I have taken on my trip throughout the Solar System.
 

i made this video in the demo

http://youtu.be/isJprfsi4_s

Oct 28, 2012 at 03:52AM EDT
Quote
Skeletor-sm

This thread is closed to new posts.

Old threads normally auto-close after 30 days of inactivity.

Why don't you start a new thread instead?

O HAI! You must login or signup first!