Forums / Discussion / General
232,892 total conversations in 7,787 threads
Mitt Romney vows to ban porn
Last posted
Sep 17, 2012 at 03:37PM EDT.
Added
Sep 06, 2012 at 11:37PM EDT
49 posts
from
28 users
>Implying a politician would ever actually do something they've promised to do
Natsuru Springfield
ModeratorSr. Forum Moderator & Karma Tycoon & Karma Philanthropist & Community Artist & Shrine Maiden
And his online support drops like a rock.
Natsuru Springfield wrote:
And his online support drops like a rock.
For his online support to drop, he'd have to have some to begin with.
He can't do that, right?
Right?
Mitt v. The Entire Internet.
That would be something, all right.
Fun fact: Utah is the most republican state in the U.S.
It is also the state that looks at porn the most.
Yeah, this vow will never happen.
Mexx Android
Deactivated
@maplejet
Sauce?
"Corporations are people, my friend. We can raise taxes at- of course they are – everything that corporations earn ultimately goes to people. Where do you think it goes? Whose pockets? Whose pockets? People's pockets. Human beings, my friend." – Mitt Romney
Sometimes I think he is secretly a Democrat trying to sabotage the GOP.
Seriously, does Romney even realize what he'd be getting into if he tried this? Does he know how much we're even talking about? Or that this would certainly instill the wrath of Anonymous?
If he tries this, he's screwed.
angstyHoodie wrote:
He can't do that, right?
Right?
Right.
The president has a lot of power (Chief of State, Commander in Cheif, et cetera ad nauseum), but something like this would need to be passed by Congress. This is a mudslinging thing wherein Romney said something stupid to get the vote of old people and is now suffering the loss of voters that he never could have gotten I mean campaigned for.
Everyone can calm your tits. Our porn is safe, because Congress knows what the internet is for.
angstyHoodie wrote:
He can't do that, right?
Right?
I'd say no, because it would be unconstitutional, but it's not like the Supreme Court has much principle.
Methink's Romney vastly underestimates the power of the porn industry.
The porn industry is bigger than Hollywood. Attempting to reign than beast down would be like attempting to ban Alcohol. Only worse…much worse.
He doesn't stand a chance
OmniXVII
Deactivated
Daft Punkjet wrote:
Fun fact: Utah is the most republican state in the U.S.
It is also the state that looks at porn the most.
Yeah, this vow will never happen.
From Utah, can confirm half of those searches are on my part.
Papa Coolface
Banned
If Romney wins, I'll download a ton of porn, just in case.
Daft Punkjet wrote:
Fun fact: Utah is the most republican state in the U.S.
It is also the state that looks at porn the most.
Yeah, this vow will never happen.
Oh yeah, that's a common thing actually. Research in the Netherlands showed that the more religious communities and towns sold the most porn. It wouldn't suprise me if that was the same elsewhere.
RandomMan wrote:
Oh yeah, that's a common thing actually. Research in the Netherlands showed that the more religious communities and towns sold the most porn. It wouldn't suprise me if that was the same elsewhere.
We actually have one leg up on you though: We didn't name our religious right party the Christian Democrats
Katie C. wrote:
We actually have one leg up on you though: We didn't name our religious right party the Christian Democrats
One of the more right parties in the Netherlands is the 'ChristenUnie' (ChristianUnion), which, as the name implies, follows Christianity a lot. So no abortion, sunday national resting day, stuff like that.
The towns and communities where they get the most votes and support from matched awfully well with the selling and renting of pornography.
Katie C. wrote:
We actually have one leg up on you though: We didn't name our religious right party the Christian Democrats
I can't recall and Canadian religious parties by name, which means we win.
Where as the USA loses, because religion is a political issue but they misnamed their party the Republicans.
burning_phoneix
Deactivated
Romney will not ban porn. It is too valuable
Pornography is needed to keep the plebs in order and in a docile state so that the patricians may continue to guide us to a glorious Pax Americana.
In case you were wondering, it was a Harvard research study that showed that Utah consumed the most porn (Followed by Alaska)
GIANTDAD
Deactivated
Pfft.
Like he could ever take out something like porn…
@phoenix
Gee Alaska? Surprising
@burning_phoneix:
Is that per capita or in total? If the 377k residents of Alaska altogether consume a greater amount of porn than the 37 million residents of California… well, color me shocked.
Papa Coolface
Banned
Those Alaskans sure love to fap.
Maybe he's just having a hard time committing to No Fap September?
Jack Candle wrote:
Maybe he's just having a hard time committing to No Fap September?
The only reasonable excuse.
@Jack
If he goes into presidency then he'll have to do the 4 Year No Fap Challenge.
burning_phoneix
Deactivated
Count Lionel wrote:
@burning_phoneix:
Is that per capita or in total? If the 377k residents of Alaska altogether consume a greater amount of porn than the 37 million residents of California… well, color me shocked.
It's per capita. I'm not going to try and calculate the results in total.
Though it should be noted that this survey only covers subscriptions to Online porn websites. It doesn't really measure things like torrents or thing of that nature.
Nikolaki8
Banned
How votes has he lost now?
At the moment, he has probably lost around 259,561,000 votes due to internet surveys and data.
Nikolaki8 wrote:
How votes has he lost now?
At the moment, he has probably lost around 259,561,000 votes due to internet surveys and data.
>Implying that Mitt Romney hadn't already been sinking deep down to the depths of Internet support, and that 259,561,000 people would still have decided to vote for him after discovering more about his past, save for the conversatives here in my town (living in Michigan) who vote Republican regardless of policies. It annoys the hell out of me that people won't listen to me when I try to inform them about corrupt ideas central around energy policy, foreign policy, military budget, and in this case, Internet censorship. But then again, I'm also implying that most of Congress isn't like this, aren't I?
Note: As a liberal, you can ignore me if you want to. These are just my opinions.
No one is touching my porn collection, damn it! I have a right!
…
Well, then again, we always have our minds.
Deus Ex Machina wrote:
No one is touching my porn collection, damn it! I have a right!
…
Well, then again, we always have our minds.
Nope, not the same.
Nikolaki8
Banned
Trollkeeper wrote:
>Implying that Mitt Romney hadn't already been sinking deep down to the depths of Internet support, and that 259,561,000 people would still have decided to vote for him after discovering more about his past, save for the conversatives here in my town (living in Michigan) who vote Republican regardless of policies. It annoys the hell out of me that people won't listen to me when I try to inform them about corrupt ideas central around energy policy, foreign policy, military budget, and in this case, Internet censorship. But then again, I'm also implying that most of Congress isn't like this, aren't I?
Note: As a liberal, you can ignore me if you want to. These are just my opinions.
No fair, you live in America. Seriously though. I bow down to
that post, sir.
About internet support… this is from Memebase, I pulled it off at 7:45 Eastern Time (ish). Not a perfect sample of the internet, but it gives us an idea.
Twilitlord wrote:
About internet support… this is from Memebase, I pulled it off at 7:45 Eastern Time (ish). Not a perfect sample of the internet, but it gives us an idea.
Lionk?
Why, thank you, Niko. Out of curiosity, which country DO you live in?
Looks like some 3,000-odd people don't know about this. Or maybe they do, and they just don't care. Which brings me back to the post I made earlier.
Katie C. wrote:
Lionk?
Sauce. Now Obama is in the 22000s and Romney is in the 5000s, at 10:30 CST.
23019 people are voting for Obama.
I have a a few questions about this: What about porn I can get off of On-Demand? And what if I get my rock off to images and videos relating to my fetish as opposed to actual porn? Is he after them to?
ExudesAffluence
Deactivated
Mitt Romney Rule 34. Make and discuss.
Shop is bad because I am lazy.
Dr. Richard "Dick" Ballzenall Jr. wrote:
I have a a few questions about this: What about porn I can get off of On-Demand? And what if I get my rock off to images and videos relating to my fetish as opposed to actual porn? Is he after them to?
If it's porn (meaning if it qualifies and can be legally branded and sold as porn), he'll try to ban it.
Also, I just got ninja'd. FFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUU
>bans porn
>another thing everyone else can rub in U.S 's face.
ExudesAffluence wrote:
Mitt Romney Rule 34. Make and discuss.
Shop is bad because I am lazy.
Be careful, it's actually illegal to do shops like that, if they're actually done well.
Penz0id
Deactivated
I live in Canada, so either way….
HUEHUEHUEHUE
Hypercat-Z
Banned
The Proibitionism… The Berlin wall… Did american politics ever study history? Will they ever learn that such kind of action has only the backfire to raise criminality and/or make people emigrate in other countries?
When I was a little kid I often dreamed to live in U.S.A. but the more I learn from it, the more I feel happy to live in my little boot shaped country.
Hypercat-Z wrote:
The Proibitionism… The Berlin wall… Did american politics ever study history? Will they ever learn that such kind of action has only the backfire to raise criminality and/or make people emigrate in other countries?
When I was a little kid I often dreamed to live in U.S.A. but the more I learn from it, the more I feel happy to live in my little boot shaped country.
Hmm…
Hypercat-Z
Banned
^Well, at least he's not the kind of man that would ban porn, because HE IS porn!