Also, why would we put “Advice God”, “Scumbag Christian”, and “Westboro Baptist Church” under Religion when they are memes exclusive to Christianity?
I’m sorry, this is really bugging me.
• Do you ever actually read the articles you’re referencing, or just assume that because “God” is in there, it must be Christian specific?
“Advice God is an advice animal image macro series featuring a portrait of an old man with grey hair and a long flowing beard. The images are typically captioned with text that denounces religion (often christianity) by pointing out apparent biblical contradictions and attributing mischievous behaviors to God.”
Often ≠ Always/Specifically
You putting this under “Christianity” instead of “Religion” actually strips away some of this meme’s usage.
• While Christianity is the religious backing behind Westboro, the article itself doesn’t reference the word “Christ” even once except in the tags. The primary focus is on the anti-gay protests. It’s slightly more “Christian” focused than Tebowing, but not by much.
• “Scumbag Christian” is actually about Christianity. Good job. Well done.
Also, people in the comments were complaining about the quality of the article in its KYMIRL stage, so there was demand for its completion.
Actually, there are no comments in the article about its previous content. It didn’t even get most of its comments until after you decided to edit it. Provide evidence or I’m just going to assume you’re attempting to appeal as a group to try and make your argument stronger (read: talking out of your ass).
As for it being historical to KYM, who really cares?
It’s not like the staff would get mad at me for putting out a well-written, relevant article or anything. I feel like you’re the only one rejecting this article.
Multiple users and mods I’ve discussed this with on Skype think it’s inappropriate. I won’t quote them or force their opinions into the matter because I’d rather see them involve themselves instead of me bringing their opinions into this matter without them being here.
But several people are against it.
It’s not like the staff would get mad at me…
I’m sorry, have you run any of this past the staff? It seems you just jumped on it and decided to do with it what you liked. I know almost no actual staff visit the forums, so I’d like to see where you actually contacted someone and got approval for this.
Random 21 even said that the admin wanted them not to be deadpooled for the purpose of improving them later. (I’m assuming).
Quit assuming things. You have no clue what they’ll be used for, so wait until it’s decided on before you jump to something.
Let’s break from the quoting to point out something you have continued to ignore.
We already have a Jesus article.
How about we take a look at your suggested articles, and see which ones are already covered under “Jesus”, shall we?
Red means already covered.
Green means not covered.
Blue means special circumstance.
Jesus – This is the article we’re discussing.
Jesus is a jerk
Story Time Jesus
Last Supper Parodies
Jesus Take the Wheel
Ecce Homo – This article is about the botched painting itself, and doesn’t cover the religion.
Excuse Me Sir
Jesus Is My Friend – Could go under Jesus
Advice God – Commonly used in relation to Christianity, but non-specific.
Westboro – More about the anti-gay protesting than Christianity.
The vast majority of articles are already covered under “Jesus”. The ones that wouldn’t fall under that are very few, and should be simply tagged “religion”, as that’s the overall encompassing topic.
Please stop trying to undermine my work and get to more important things.
Why don’t you get down off of the idea that just because you worked on something means it’s worth anything, and go make a fucking article that’s actually needed.