Forums / Site-Related

16,352 total conversations in 1,291 threads

+ New Thread


In regards to people and image sources.

Last posted Dec 08, 2013 at 01:48PM EST. Added Dec 06, 2013 at 06:58AM EST
4 conversations with 2 participants

Not even sure if the thread goes here but it does feel “site related” to me so apologies if its in the wrong section :x

Anyway, how often do you see people post up fanart of something and not include a link to the original?

Sure to a lot of people it might not seem like a big deal but quite often people who paint/draw things don’t want their work to be shared without linking to the original, or maybe even don’t want it reposted by others at all, and while these pics could be jacked from another image hosting site it still feels a bit disrespectful to the original artist from my point of view.

Just wondering about other’s thoughts on this.

Dec 06, 2013 at 06:58AM EST
Quote

Being a website which prefers to document from an objective point of view, while offering sources on our information, we of course promote the correct sources being added to the media uploaded to our website. We give credit where its due, and promote our users to do the same.

That being said though, I hope you can understand how the sources tend to get hard to find on this large web, and we can’t always be certain that the place we found the image is by the actual creator. That’s why I like it when artists add their nick or autograph below an image, it allows them to be credited even when we fail on our part (image sharing hosts watermarks don’t fall within this, because fuck those).

There are of course some exceptions to this case, like art or photoshops which were first posted on 4chan. It’s next to impossible to properly source them, as in a lot of times the source isn’t anyone. It also occurs at times that Tumblr blogs change their nick or delete their account, which makes the source link generate an error.

But we’ve improved on our end as well, and offered options to make the adding of sources simpler. For example all our image pages offer a Claim Authorship button, which offers the creators or those familiar with them to claim authorship on the upload and have them edited in the notes. Recently we also introduced public tagging/sourcing to the userbase, which allows users with a certain milestone of image uploads to edit image pages as to add tags and sources. So even when either we or the uploader fails to find the source, someone viewing the image might not.

Last edited Dec 06, 2013 at 06:36PM EST
Dec 06, 2013 at 06:32PM EST
Quote

Blackgold wrote:

Alright that sounds good ^^

I wasn’t able to cover the artists that prefer to not have their art spread though, because I dunno how that’s best covered.

If an artist contacts us that his art was uploaded to our site while he rather doesn’t have that, I wouldn’t have trouble removing it, but I don’t know how to counter the uploading of such content.

Dec 08, 2013 at 01:48PM EST
Quote
Skeletor-sm

This thread is closed to new posts.

Old threads normally auto-close after 30 days of inactivity.

Why don't you start a new thread instead?

Sup! You must login or signup first!