Location: Pain... pain is my home. HA! But seriously, I live in darkness.
Joined Oct 08, 2012 at 09:31PM EDT
I’m a huge fan of That Guy With The Glasses, and regularly keep up on the Nostalgia Critic, Atop the Fourth Wall, Bad Movie Beatdown, Todd in the Shadows, Cinema Snob, and Anime Abandon, plus all of James Rolfe(aka Angry Video Game Nerd)‘s various projects, all of which give me absolutely no room to have a life. I also love math, as you probably already guessed, and would probably do something with that if the internet didn’t already own my mind, body and soul.
Oh, and if you’re wondering where my somewhat negative outlook on the world comes from, well…
Just remember ladies: As long as you claim that you’re going topless to protest decency laws, and you’re on public ground, it’s totally legal. Yay 1st Amendment!
Mmm… that’s some delicious ad hominem fallacy right there.
Well, the way I see it, as long as the human race is full of douchebags and assholes, bullying will always be constant, so this whole effort is a waste of time. Hell, it’s not like it goes away after we leave school, it just takes different forms, and sometimes pretty much the same ones. On the other hand, this person is pretty ballsy and I totally respect her. On the other other hand, I think the idea of her being grateful to God for making her look like that is pretty fucking stupid, though I don’t really blame her for having that perspective.
I’m just gonna leave this here:
Hail to the Redskins: NFL Must Save Name, Image, Legacy
Everyone uses the terms “black” and “white” even though they`re technically inaccurate, and there is virtually zero in the way of giving a shit. And to repeat other people here, it would be whole different story if the word had a history of use as a slur. But it doesn`t! So… there we go.
Me personally, I don’t respect people who identify as being a member of a third, fourth, or twenty-seventh gender for the same reason I don’t respect people who identify as having the soul of a pixie or hippopotamus.
anarchistcatowner: Agent of NAMBLA
Your marsupial sucks cocks in HELL.
Well, at least he isn’t starring in other Tim Curry movies.
“I’m just a sweet lunchboxite…”
That statement is bullshit!
Well how about you just go fuck yourself with a rusty salad fork.
The “it’s a part of their culture” argument does not fly with me as a reason to allow something anywhere. Lobbing off a baby girl’s clitoris is part of the culture in a lot of places, but that shit’s fucked up and should be banned everywhere. In this case, it’s not the act itself that’s harmful but the fact that it’s mandated by the central authority as a way to suppress a certain gender. Sure a lot of them want to wear it and believe it is moral, but the universal freedom to choose for yourself on these matters is something we should strive for as a species.
This is why theocracy is second only to true dictatorship in terms of horrifying systems of government.
I just know there’s some sweet David Hasselhoff playing in the background.
Because he knows he has to compete against Zack Snyder’s Superman, who’s stolen all of his character traits.
I don’t think you know what the purpose of deadpooling is.
So… for me that would be 100 days of funny internet reviews, bizarre porn, and the suffering of people I hate. Not exactly what I think the creators had in mind.
Hey look, it’s my life motto!
So what exactly is the point of the “rape culture” thread you started? Where is it supposed to go? It didn’t have any connection to anything that came before it in the forums or anywhere on the site, almost like a non sequitur. Nor did you say how or with what people were supposed to respond.
I know this response seems kind of weird to make, but it just baffles me because it’s such a hot button issue that you brought up for seemingly no good reason.
Anyway, in my opinion the so-called “rape culture” is a false construct created by the third-wave feminist movement for a few reasons, primarily to provide an easy, black-and-white explanation for the known low report and prosecution rate for rape incidents that fits in with its preexisting notion of “patriarchy”. This ignors the much more difficult and complex but much more rational explanation of the typically low amount of solid evidence in these cases and how that relates to the judicial precedent of “innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt”.
I was originally going to post something like this in the actual thread, but I want to avoid flame wars.
Actually guys, this isn’t entirely true. People DO have to “listen to your bullshit”, if only in certain situations. In Snyder v. Phelps, which some of you may remember, the Court ruled (or, to be more accurate, mostly reaffirmed) that any sort of speech, protest or symbolic action (that is not determined to represent or provoke “imminent lawless action” according to Brandenburg v. Ohio) on public ground and relating to a “public issue” must be allowed and, moreover, defended from outside threats. I wouldn’t be surprised if a new ruling that extents this precedent to certain parts of the Internet is forthcoming.
I guess it’s good for you that the internet was invented, because in real life stalking 500 people at the same time is really fucking difficult and time-consuming work.