Joined Apr 29, 2013 at 05:55AM EDT
What’s so disturbing about it?
Ew, there’s a slug on my book!
I’ll sort it out…
Nah, Windows is the best, no need for that complicated crap.
Fun fact: In Fire Emblem, Lances have a direct advantage over Swords.
After I heard of the effect of the Junkman parts on the starter cars, I now make the Cobalt my endgame vehicle (best way is probably to pick it at the start and just hold onto it until it’s time).
Figured that was the angle you were mentioning.
All I could say is it still seems like that would be quite a fluke, but I suppose it’s worth keeping in mind.
Huh, interesting. I knew that was the case for the Punto, Lexus and Cobalt, didn’t know the same thing applied for the CLK.
If I’m remembering correctly, doesn’t the CLK have bad stats and such in this game?
According to the comments, he gave away “Spaghetti” due to it being too loud.
Oh, sounds kinda counter-intuitive but okay. (Definitely knew about the latter half, just figured even Nintendos couldn’t stand up to being submerged in water)
Ah, that would make sense.
Only thing is, he put that Famicom under water…
Would that not horribly break it?
…As does just explaining yourself.
Here’s the thing, if someone didn’t understand something then just telling them to go back and look again is obviously just going to have the exact same result over again and not help anything at all, whereas if you explain you might actually be able to get the point across.
And explaining really does help that.
Yeah, I thought what Locks was saying what you mentioned in the second part (or more specifically, that the problems she was having weren’t a valid strike or point against having a vegan diet or weren’t a problem, which is obviously wrong (at least for her) as I was trying to point out).
The point you mention in the first half sounds a lot more reasonable (and you probably should’ve just explained that when I first asked instead of telling me to read the comment again, could’ve avoided all this then).
…So, point being?
Because I don’t see the contrast between that and anything else seen here.
Yes it does, she was saying there was no problem or it’s totally okay or whatever (if not, then a better explanation would be good AND POINTING ME BACK TO THE FIRST POST DOESN’T COUNT), but it DID cause problems for this person so it’s clearly not the case for her.
And I disputed that with my first comment.
Your point being?