Location: Up my own butt.
Joined Nov 28, 2012 at 12:01PM EST
That one guy with those unpopular opinions.
Why do you have to make it sound like I’m for circumcision? I simply stated that the procedure is not permanent, is it necessary to claim that I’m in the wrong for simply not being a part of the discussion?
There are two sides to every debate. I choose not to be on any side, because debates like this are simply not changing anything. You can’t change someone’s mind by shouting at them, telling them they’re wrong and evil, and that your argument is the only argument that makes sense and should be listened to.
What you can do, is educate people on the real facts of the situation. These arguments do no such thing, though. They make real change and debate harder to actually reach, because all it actually does is make people angry.
People you view as wrong or ignorant are not your enemy. They are your friend, and you should do your best to teach them and show them why they are wrong. Show them sources, and evidence, and demonstrations. Above all else, be friendly and accepting of different opinions and ideas, even if you don’t like them. I know that sounds hard to do, but it’s better than making enemies over the internet.
So, calm down. Find some source that support your claims, and then write, and remember, your goal is to teach, not to hate. Teaching can change things. Hate can’t.
I’m not going to say whether or not its morally correct to circumcise your children, that’s none of my business and I have no reason to get into such argument.
However, circumcision is not permanent. It takes time to reverse it, but from what I’ve seen, its very easy to repair your foreskin. Watch Penn and Teller’s show on the subject (the show, “Bullshit!”) for a full demonstration of how it works.
God hates white wall street.
…I’m not doing the game, I’m just saying that. It seems appropriate.
No no no, in this case ‘transfat’ means that they WANT to be fat, but aren’t (thus the cushion wearing).
Liberal genius, is that you?
No. It would be oh so right.
That’s the joke.
Actually, Mrs. Johnson is a hyper-intelligent horse woman from a parallel universe where everyone are hyper-intelligent horse people, who was banished to a parallel universe where she will live out the rest of her days in exile.
I think Kriegr would like to have a talk with you about that.
Urine Trouble… in my ass.
The thing is that the ranch land was taken by the government in the 1990s, despite the fact the land is supposed to be the ranchers’. Bundy refused to (and refuses to) pay the fines because the land is rightfully his, as his family has owned the land since western settlement.
It’s pretty obvious that they are digging. What really is unfortunate is that, despite saying that (basically): ‘the government is oppressing black people just as much as the slave-owners pre-emancipation, if not worse’, people will only ever remember his words as ’blacks should be enslave again."
Something about police brutality, sniper teams, helicopters (then cattle getting shot by those choppers), and an innocent getting shot with a taser, and the attempted seizure of property owned by a family of ranchers since the 1800s.
You know, trivial things.
I’ve bought three games from Early Access, Starbound, Sir You Are Being Hunted, and Paranautical Activity.
I was lucky with the first two, they’re both great, and Sir is actually closing in on being finished and its updates come by regularly.
Paranautical activity is the perfect example of the problems with Early Access, especially because the game and its devs are heralded by the youtube BoI community. When was the last time any content came out for it again?
Would be better if “abandon thread” or some such was overlayed onto it.
Excuse me, but he prefers to be called Elf Monster. Have some respect!
“Yes, and she was a dog.
They were all dogs.
The moral of this story is… Don’t be unlucky and…
BE A DOG."
Penis flip, bro.
I cried. This is the only game that ever made me cry, and damn, did I cry.
Additionally, the police could have been called on the white guy. No one wanted to fight him, however. It is entirely plausible, that if we assume that this video was filmed in roughly 32 minutes, that halfway through the first set of pranks, the cops were called and arrived within 20 minutes. We do not know the exact location of the incident, so we cannot say exactly how long it would take for the police to arrive.
Don’t believe in recently started youtube channels just because they made a video supporting a common stereotype/controversy.
And there are infinite explanations as to why he ignored the ‘crime’. The main one being that the cop never looked at the perp, not even a glance. He just rolled on by. The cop was negligent and that alone is a reason to distrust the police in this area.
Unless this is perhaps the third time that the prank has been pulled while he was in the area. Which is almost certain considering that our white perp pulled the prank at least 11 times in only ‘30 minutes’ (once every three minutes at least, maybe more). Most of the pedestrians would have still been around, and the cop could have been there for at most 9 minutes depending on how light or heavy traffic was.
Not to mention, without a time stamp, the black perp could have been doing the prank for another thirty minutes. We are never given a time this occurs, and with a video this heavily cut up, its more than likely that bias was put into this video.
Also, look at the channel history. One other prank video of peeing on people in a restroom. The channel is also brand new, with this being the second video ever posted. The first was popular, and so will this one. The most plausible conclusion is that this is a channel created to capitalize on the latest wave of controversial amateur prank videos, where getting arrested is the only acceptable punchline.