Location: Insert cliché location here
Joined Aug 26, 2011 at 12:09AM EDT
This month’s avatar made by this guy
I’m just gonna have to ask that you guys take your IRC circlejerk back to the IRC.
I really don’t give a shit about this GG thing, honestly. However, how can you guys claim to want nothing but productivity from the comments section when you’re basically going against your own wishes?
Hey Disturbed. I’ve been following the thread for a while now. Some funny stuff.
Did you guys actually read the article?
So, about your profile pic.
Aren’t the animatronics inhabited by the souls of dead children? Just saying.
Yeah, I’ve gotta contact Brad about that. I haven’t heard word from that for the last few weeks.
I’m asking a genuine question, you dunce.
Hey Twisty. Having fun?
That’s actually incorrect, Exbein.
Both Poison and Roxy were originally planned to be females. However, Capcom realized this may cause some controversy in America because this would mean players are beating up women.
To avoid that controversy, Capcom decided to have Poison and Roxy be transsexual females (I believe they were referred to as ‘newhalf’ in concept art though).
Unfortunately, it was decided to completely replace the characters with two male thugs in the localization.
Haha. It’s alright, man. I’m not gonna force you to watch it or anything. I would recommend them though.
Hey, no problem. Thanks for the follow.
And you, I actually applaud you. You managed to give a well thought out argument that didn’t jump to conclusions or make false claims.
The point I was making is that this place lumps everyone together far too quickly. Anyone who disagrees is instantly the enemy and must be made an example of.
So, you get 2 out of 3 there. 66%. Not bad. It’s a D, better than all the F’s in here.
And yet, here you are, still discussing.
If you’re going to say you abide by a code, then abide by the code. How can we respect your ideals if you cross them as you present them?
You throw the word maturity as if you were, somehow, a keeper of it. Like only things you deemed mature were mature and nothing more.
That in itself is immature. The idea that maturity is one solid, defined, attainable concept. A very juvenile idea.
So, to count off. I’ve only told you all what you needed to hear in a very opinionated way. That you’re quick to denounce anything you don’t approve of and that you’re quick to paint anyone that disagrees with you in an unreasonable light. All in a very strong and passionate manner.
How did you respond? By denounce my words and decide to view me in any way but a reasonable man. How quaint.
I have not been hostile since my initial post, yet you refuse to think otherwise. If anything, I’ve only put on a show for the IRC GG members. I plan on talking to them about this tomorrow. I thank you all for proving my points so thoroughly.
Gaogaigar and Gurren Lagann?
Hello, new best friend.
Also forgot to mention that you assume I don’t know my fallacies. A poor assumption to make, I assure you.
You also assume that you are afforded a right to kindness.
By association, you also assume that KYM is your personal hugbox.
I think that’s all.
- You assume far too much to be considered a credible asset for this discussion.
- You assume I hit the caps lock and didn’t just hold shift. Besides, the capitalization was just meant to get your collective attentions. I see it worked.
- You assume either me or Spider aren’t calm and are acting in hostile manners.
- You assume Lucas or Metal are acting calm.
- You assume that I was calling you cowards
- You assume that you have all listened to the right ways before
The fact of the matter is you need a lot of brushing up to do before injecting yourself into the middle of this discussion. So, allow me to refund your two cents. Go invest them in something you actually understand.
You say that the arguments I argue against “skim the edge” of the fallacies I claim. They do not. They are textbook examples of my claims. You cannot disregard fact because you do not appreciate the way they are stated. By doing so, you choose to wallow in ignorance.
You don’t need to respect an argument to respond to it. I’ve always felt that choosing to dodge and avoid is the tactic of cowards. After all, even a strategist approaches through different methods.
I never said you were censoring. You continue to fall back on this statement. At this point, you’re no better than Anti-GG when they bring up LW to defend themselves.
Oh ho. The strawman fallacy, that’s a classic.
You purposefully misconstrued my argument for your benefit. You assume because someone insults you, their arguments hold no merit. That’s what I’m saying. You’re a bad debater because you rely on the fallacy fallacy (the fallacy you’re falling on for protection being the “ad hominem”).
“Quod erat demonstrandum”, my friend.
Burying opinions is not censorship. If I hide opinions that don’t agree with me, I’m not stopping them from having those opinions.
Sorry, for the wait. It was a choice between Hyrule Warriors and this. Naturally, I prefer to entertain myself with a challenge, but here’s your response anyway.
I take it you consider yourself an expert on debates, right?
Insults in debates do not detract from a debate in any way. If you honestly believe they do, then you should probably pick a different area of interest, debate is clearly too much for you.
Also, I see you lack reading comprehension.
I never said you were out to censor discussion. To quote:
Censorship was not mentioned anywhere in there.
The reason I pointed out that I’d be downvoted was to save myself from being downvoted.
I take it none of you have ever won a game of chess. Have you?
“Retarded” wasn’t directed at you, stop pulling at straws.
It seems like you didn’t bother reading R21’s comment chain. Might want to do that before you attempt to tell me what I’ve done. You see, I’m not referring to R21, I’m referring to Spider-byte’s comments. They were pretty civil and reasonable. Still, you treated it like you did the others. Now would be the moment where I call you a retard. I won’t though, because you’d just use that to disregard my opinion.
The second link, you’re using the fallacy fallacy. You’re assuming that just because an fallacy or an inaccuracy was presented, that the statement holds no truth. If you’re trying to use fallacies you’re going to lose, I deal with both english and science majors daily.
disregard your opinions*
You stand against a movement that tries to bury your opinions and disregarding your words behind gigantic circlejerks. All the while, you’re burying other opinions and disregarding other people’s words behind a gigantic circlejerk.
Even worse, you all jumped a bandwagon to defend yourself. This thread was retarded in nature, that much is true. But you all jumped on it to fuel your beliefs that anyone disagreeing with you must just be some “le epok trul” competing in some contest. You’ve basically mirrored the entire “Gamers are all misogynists” rhetoric you’re all so adamantly against. And yet you people claim you’re on the right side? You can’t even keep yourselves from repeating the same actions the people you’re against did. As far as I can tell, YOU’RE ALL JUST FUCKING AWFUL.
I know my comment will be buried for this. And I know you’re going to disregard my comment, believing that I’m taking part in some game. That’s fine, you feel free to believe that. After all, you’ll only be reinforcing how toxic the rest of the site believes you all are.