Ogreenworld

Former Entry Moderator

Location: ...

Joined Dec 24, 2009 at 04:06PM EST


Contributions

Loading-blocks-red

Karma Received
+1,595 +1,679 (95%) -84 (5%)
Karma Given
+584 +615 (95%) -31 (5%)

About


Recent Activity

Commented on Ogreenworld's wall

I don’t do anything
that’s why i’m a former entry moderator o_o

Jan 16, 2014 at 02:35PM EST

Commented on RandomMan's wall

You may throw around swag, but I have class.

Nov 25, 2013 at 06:15PM EST

Commented on Maromi's wall

HEY!

SOMEONE ELSE WHO HAS SEEN PARANOIA AGENT!

UH

YAY!

Jul 26, 2013 at 08:07AM EDT

Commented on amanda b.'s wall

I guess now when I read it, it just seems like, “here are 4 different ways to solve it,” despite two of them are discouraged and/or wrong, and only two of them having legitimacy.

Oh wells

Jul 11, 2013 at 12:14AM EDT

Commented on amanda b.'s wall

Uhmmmm
Why did you change all the text on the 48÷2(9+3) = ? entry?

The infos i had were correct and did point out some solutions as being clearly incorrect, deprecated, or discouraged.

I thought it was relevant as commentary to the problem :(

Jul 10, 2013 at 10:24PM EDT

Commented on Ogreenworld's wall

lol
I completely forgot that existed

:B*~sparkle

Jun 29, 2013 at 10:09PM EDT

Commented on Ogreenworld's wall

I’M DOING OKAY
SORRY FOR NOT RESPONDING
I HAD OATMEAL FOR THE FIRST TIME TODAY
IT TASTED LIKE OATS
BUT IT WAS SOMEWHAT NOT BAD I GUESS I DUNNO
I MISSED YOU
BYE

Jun 29, 2013 at 09:58PM EDT

Commented on Jeane's wall

It’s from an anime called Working!!
It’s pretty funny.

Sorry for not responding :<

Jun 29, 2013 at 09:55PM EDT

Commented on Brucker's wall

WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE o_O

Cantor is a badass. I’ve always felt the same way about Godel, and that his ideas are seriously underrated. Unintuitive, brilliant, perceptive, and ballsy :D

Unfortunately, I’m not very good at crosswords. I don’t have a smooth enough broad set of knowledge on everything, just random scatter points where I have vaguely good knowledge. But if the British style crosswords are the way you describe, maybe I’d fare better there?

Also, surprised you didn’t call me out on BS here.
It ended up working for the wrong reasons.
… I’ve never taken a statistics class.

Also, never asked, but what’s your mathematics specialty? :o

May 03, 2013 at 08:25PM EDT

Commented on Jacob's wall

You looked at my entries? o///o
how embarrassing…

They’re remnants of a young high schooler not knowing what they’re doing .

Thanks though, and thanks again. Glad to see that there are many people who are interested in the historical/foreign entries too, and not on the latest popular fad :)

May 01, 2013 at 06:05PM EDT

Commented on Brucker's wall

Yea, I agree.
I love math because it’s the only thing that’s well defined in our lives. (Nearly) all the time, you know when you’re right or not. :)

I suppose I have the modern version of GAMES magazine, which would be project euler, a series of math puzzles that you solve with programming (and brute force stops working around problem 25).

Nevertheless, I sent you the article because it provides some interesting commentary in addition to the answer, such as the applicability of the hall marriage theorem, and also if and how we can generalize the method to different types of cards. Like if we vary how many cards we show, how many cards are in the deck, how many suits there are, etc. Clearly the standard deck is really elegant (as you pointed out, it’s like it was made for the trick to work), but perhaps there are some more inelegant ways for different decks? I found it interesting.

Also, yea, I understand the grammar thing, but didn’t you formerly correct people in the forums? :o
Maybe I forgot u_u
oh wells
But yea, no, good grammar on entries is really important, and I’m a stickler for good grammar in formal settings too >_>

May 01, 2013 at 06:01PM EDT

Hi! You must login or signup first!