opspe

How’s this? http://www.mediafire.com/?0v6bcf7q6g5jxxi

Hopefully not exactly like it. I doubt I could make it just right.

A melody?

Made another song. This one’s about Everfree Forest. Have a listen. http://www.mediafire.com/?m99r9xv862qtf7m

Sent it to Youtube. Let’s hope that the parasprites do not interfere with the critiquing.

Just making sure. Most people think all Wiccans use black magic. There are only some who are foolish enough to do so. And thanks. Is it Youtube worthy yet?

Here. I’ve improved the Octavia song. http://www.mediafire.com/?he7qiac4zwsux34

Two things. 1. You know that not all Wiccand are bad, right? 2. I’m more of a solitary Wiccan.

you have to tell me were you went to edit your gif i want to christmas too

Microbrew you say? What kind?

Me? I’m planning for my Masters, coding websites and also listening to loud D&B.

Guess I’ll have to look it up.

How much are houses/apartments in Portland, OR?

Not a bad idea. I was thinking of Salem but that’s not a bad idea. Plus it’s more city-based than Salem. I’m also hoping there will be other Wiccans in college. I’m in a FB group called Wiccans/Pagans of Massachusettes. A bit ironic but it’s sort of a kick in the ass to the Christians.

I wish. My journey had a rough start. Being an adult, I just started it on my own. I have a makeshift yet small altar hidden in my room along with a Book of Shadows. And yes, neopaganism is neat. Wicca is not only centered around nature and magic but our ideals are quite excellent.

Well, Wiki was lacking a bit so I turned to an internet search and the closest thing I found was the Tree of Life. From what I know, its origin is from the Celtic pagan belief. Knowing how Wicca has borrowed somethings from pagan religions (mostly Celtic), the tree might have some possible significance,

Hmmmm. I’m a newbie Wicca and my first Yule is this year. I may have to rely on Wikipedia. My practice isn’t the only thing that I’ve been neglecting.

Biology isn’t fake science, its just applied chemistry.

See XKDC for more details on the scientific hierarchy

Well, when I said ‘the physicists at my uni’, I probably should have said ‘the very small sample of physicists at my uni that I’ve met’. There are almost certainly string theorists at my uni. The ones I’ve met are all experimental physicists working on optoelectronics, so they’re bound to have some bias when it comes to obscure fields of theoretical physics.

I don’t really know what to think when it comes to string theory. The physicists at my uni all seem to share the opinion that it’s a load of bullcrap, but most of them have never even studied general relativity, so I don’t know if their opinions can be trusted. They seem to think that ‘near-untestable’ implies ‘incorrect’, which is something I’d definitely have to disagree with. It’s fine to remain skeptical, but I don’t think we can discount it entirely just yet. The simple fact that it’s internally mathematically consistent should be enough for people to pay it more attention. Of course, I say that without having read from the opposing side of the argument, so my opinion is liable to change.

That does look like an interesting book. I’ve read Brian Greene’s ‘The Elegant Universe’, so I’ve seen string theory from the point of view of one of it’s greatest proponents. It’ll be interesting to see the other side of the argument. I’ll have to add that to my reading list (which is unfortunately very long at the moment).

Extremely late reply:
I don’t like hip hop much, really. Just never was my thing. I only got into electronica a couple months ago after listening to a couple Skrillex songs.

Sadly, I haven’t studied much quantum mechanics. It’s a shame, since it looks like one of the most interesting areas of physics. I had a brief introduction to the Schrodinger equation in chemistry classes last term, though it was only used in the context of electron orbitals. There was a very small amount of it covered in my high school physics classes too, but we only covered the absolute basics. Otherwise, I’ve only ever encountered it in my own reading, so my knowledge is patchy at best. I think I’ll have a chance to study it properly next term.

Ok, I think I’m following you so far. That backs up what Algernon was saying too. I guess we will invent portals sooner than we will invent warp drives.

I never studied physics when I had the chance, wish I did. The subject still interests me as does astronomy.

Still, although Algernon seems convinced that CERN’s latest discoveries with nutrino’s were some kind of error; I feel that speeds faster than light cannot be ruled out so easily

My reasoning for that is more probability than mathematics: The universe is huge. Somewhere in that vast 99.999999999999999% of the universe that we have never observed, could there be something achieving tachyonic speed right now? We just haven’t seen it

Okay….

F major