Location: United Kingdom
Joined Dec 13, 2011 at 10:26AM EST
Hello it’s your friendly neighbourhood Spider-byte here. Big comic book and video game fan. Mostly into Marvel but I like pretty much all companies. Not really a fan of Anime/Manga in general but I enjoy a few the best being Dragonball/Z/GT1.Fallout
3.The Elder Scrolls
4.Gears of War
6.Ratchet and Clank
7.Dragonball Z Budokai Tenkaichi
And don’t forget to bow down to Dr Doom.
Uploaded an image to Absolutely Disgusting.
Uploaded an image to Marvel Comics.
Uploaded an image to Marvel Comics.
NSFW’ed for X-Men film spoilers.
Well with Deadpool we can see he is different. He looks like the proper Deadpool unlike that thing in Origins: Wolverine. Well because just in case you didn’t know, Days of Future Past set a different timeline. In this time line X-Men and X2 still happened however The Last Stand didn’t.
But the important bit for Deadpool is that in this new timeline X-Men Origins: Wolverine can play out differently now that in this new timeline, Mystique killed Stryker. What this means is Wolverine will still go to Weapon X, but run by the mad scientist guy instead of Stryker. The new Weapon X guy will still preform experiments on Wolverine, but also other members, including Deadpool.
Then instead of stealing everyone’s powers and just slapping them in Wade, he will just get Wolverine’s healing and wont have his mouth stitched up.
There’s one thing I think I haven’t worked out. Nightcrawlers dad is Azazel, the red demon from DoFP and Mystique is his mother. In DoFP it is mentioned Azazel is one of the mutants Trask tested on, I’m pretty sure you see a photograph of him (and I assume he’s dead) before the timeline splits, so it’s happened in both timelines. I’m wondering how Nightcrawler fits in the timelines.
Roy’s Pussy Room.
Yeah DoFP was a good film. This second quadrilogy has been great so far First Class despite being nothing like the book it was named after was fun and I really enjoyed it, The Wolverine was a nice spin on the Silver Samurai and was pretty good, Days of Future Past is probably the best X-Men film yet and finally I look forward to Age of Apocalypse based on that one scene plus the info we got on it. If I’m honest I didn’t like the first quadrilogy (X-Men, X2, The Last Stand and Origins: Wolverine).
Also do you want to know my theory on the new Deadpool film?
Getting away from the issue. Can I just ask am I the only one who still finds Laci Green’s voice annoying?
Sam. It’s a joke. Calm down. Or at least if you’re joking too then it’s not funny.
“A few comments ago:
“Really because a quick look in the dictionary says “Hostility: hostile behaviour; unfriendliness or opposition.””
Yes. And you don’t have to be hostile to reply to someone. There is such thing as just being nice. It’s not hard to disagree without being a condescending dick.
“Well, we are not allowed to downvote or state a parallel opinion because that is hostile. You said it yourself. So, in that context, yes.”
Yet again saying stuff I never said. I said you can argue. Just be damn respectful when doing it. You don’t achieve that when you downvote and say shit to others.
To me GamerGate is secondary in this discussion. This isn’t the only entry that will only allow one opinion. Look at any “controversial” entry and look at the comments against the majority opinion.
A great example is post on feminism and some LGBT related pages. Especially that of a user named Twee. I will admit I have said things that contradict some of the stuff I said here. But I have changed my stance. GamerGate is just one of the bigger and probably one of the worse for this issue. Fair discussion on KYM entries is something that will improve the site.
I know this will cause more downvotes on my end but I don’t care much about GamerGate. I care about KYM and to see a problem that just bigger with each entry is stupid
““I ask time and time again for peace here, but I all I’ve seen is Yea, but” as the continuing argument, which disappoints me. Make an accord or continue with what you may to get that answer you like to prove yourself right.”
Wait so I’m not allowed to continue a discussion and reply? I’m sorry to me each thing you have started saying in this discussion is either more confusing, it sounds like you are saying stop talking about it or you are saying everyone should stop being hostile. In the first case I can’t help because I don’t even understand what you mean. If you are asking me to stop talking that’s against my whole point or you are saying people should stop being hostile and that’s what I’mt trying to achieve.
Everyone seems to believe they aren’t trying to make a circle and I believe them. But if you were the vocal majority why is this still happening?
I don’t think you understand. This is so people can have these kinds of arguments we have been having, but with people treating each other with more respect. The point is I’m not trying to force anyone into agreeing with my GamerGate opinions. I’m trying to get them to just have a fair discussion where people are treated better. There are some who do welcome the idea. This isn’t aimed at them. This is aimed at people who don’t want to see any opinions against the majority in this comment section.
“I thought we made ground..I thought there was an understanding, and a need to focus on the issue. Then I see this entire post. I have no idea what your trying to prove. I just want peace, and to continue focus on documenting the event on KYM.”
Ah but you see I respect you and believe we made ground. I believe that even though you understand and eventually treated me with respect, you don’t reflect the majority of commenters. In the end when I first stated R21s opinion, you called my opinion wasted time among with a few others and of course those who just use the little downvote button as a "I disagree but I’m not going to attempt to validate or even say my opinion.
“I just want peace, and to continue focus on documenting the event on KYM. Not this finger pointing shenanigans.”
But to document in the best way possible we have to remove as much bias as possible.
“Than your just making things worse by destroying bridges than building them.”
“True. You talked about retards and circle-jerking. I haven’t done any name-calling or made any suggestions about your intellect or abilities. You and Bob did. How am I being hostile here?”
I never said you were. I’m not directing it at you. Sure I still think you’re condescending but never said you were hostile, or at least didn’t meant to.
Nor did I assume your intellect either. And I said circle-jerking not as an insult. Circle-jerking means (or at least the way I define it) is a discussion in which opinions that are not the opinion the majority in a discussion hold is spoke over, disregarded and met with hostility.
Also this isn’t about me. If I felt that I couldn’t argue and debate I wouldn’t post. I don’t let this stuff bring me down and stop me from debating without convincing arguments. Instead this focuses on the users that feel unwelcome here. Believe it or not some people don’t want to deal with tons of downvotes and people being dicks to them for a differing opinion. In fact the whole reason I made the bet with R21 was because he didn’t even feel there was a point in having a discussion on here anymore due to the previous times he has spoken.
“That is not oppression.”
Did I say it was?
“Hostility means you are silencing others with name-calling and Ad Hominems and so on.”
Really because a quick look in the dictionary says “Hostility: hostile behaviour; unfriendliness or opposition.”
Being hostile is aggressiveness, hatred or rudeness to another person. It also means you don’t treat those who oppose you with respect.
“A small button that can be pressed by anyone to read the opinion? Again, how is that oppresive?”
Never said oppressive. I was saying it discourages debating because people refuse to answer with worded discussion. The few that do are hostile.
“What hostility? Ad Homimens are hostility, like the insults you throw at pro-GG people’s faces! Also; rebuttals/=hostility!”
No, but downvoting people that don’t agree with you. It’s the content in such rebuttals.
“Try not wasting our time with your opinion piece.” ~ Scavger
Now my opinion is time wasting but theirs isn’t?
“So… what was your point again?”
Thanks for literally just proving it. At first I thought you didn’t understand that you were not necessarily the problem because you are making reasonable arguments. But I think your condescending attitude and the fact you just point out how ‘weak’ my argument is rather then addressing the points. You aren’t even doing the fair rebuttals you claim you are doing.
“You’re just saying ’I’m getting downvoted! that is oppresive!’”
No. You are ignoring the point. Instead of looking at as if it’s the downvotes actually look at the effect the downvotes have. Look at it beyond face value.