Joined Mar 19, 2012 at 03:27PM EDT
“Help, I’m trapped in a-
[Hero building intensifies]
It’s called the “Dim Effect”
Another fun fact:
The 12 famous labours were actually the way to redeem himself, why? He murdered his sons and his wife.
Also, he fucked the Greek equivalent of a Naga (which happens to be the mother of Cerberus,Chimera and many other monsters)
I NEED AN ADULT!!
ponies are MLP gallery
If your name is Isaac and your father happens to be a guy called Abraham, this might trigger bad memories.
Don’t fuck with this centaur!!
That was a dream, not a memory….
…or was it?
I was thinking more about the knights of the round table (minus the table).
Not even close
Maybe it’s Dunkin’ Donuts…
I’d vote that!
I would disagree with you in the case of TFU 1.
The second one, on the other hand….
I think it’s more credible that Vader had at some point an apprentice (Sidious did have one WHILE Plagueis was his master) that Anakin, who wasn’t mature enough to be a master, had an apprentice in the Clone Wars.
You know, at least they could show some fucking respect to the EU media that made Lucascompanies more rich in first place. Why else did they have Lucasarts and Lucasbooks, for fun??
For me it wasn’t a bit surprise at all (George also said similar things about the EU, but where does the profit of those books, games and comics went? His wallet!).
Even then, everytime Disney touches Star Wars (since their purchase) it only brings bad news. So if the new films are a disaster, don’t expect me to accept them as canon.
What about the original Clone Wars series, it was a small screen event, yet it isn’t canon?
“Imperial Navy, reporting in.”
“Rebel Alliance, coming in. This bastard won’t be able to repel firepower of this magnitude”
“Grand Army of the Republic, reporting for duty. Vode an!”
“The armies of the CIS are at your disposition, Roger Roger.”
The Fandom Wars have begun, may the force be with you.
Sorry for the misunderstanding, but I was refering to the Hypothesis of evolution of hominids (in this case the Aquatic Ape Hypothesis)
Talking about evolution as in the process of change over time of all the species is referring to the fact (evolution IS a fact, the theories simply explain how it happens).
Talking about the process of evolution due to natural selection, variability of individuals,genes etc it’s referring to the Theory of evolution (in this case, the neodarwinsim).
And talking about evolution of a certain group (ursids, lizards, birds, humans or whatever) methinks that would correspond to an hypothesis of evolution of [organism group] (or theory if it’s more accurate to what could happen , I don’t know). Specially the AAH, which is nearly as accurate as a minigun.
Also I wouldn’t call doubtful the evolution or the theory of evolution. So I think we can agree that the use of the sea elephant from tumblr of the word theory in “Aquatic Ape Theory” is incorrect, that’s why I emphasized the word hypothesis.