Joined Jan 17, 2010 at 08:53AM EST
| || |
>especially on Tumblr where people who mockingly called “social justice warriors” will attempt to find any excuse to fight for their beliefs.
Implying that there’s a place on the internet where everyone doesn’t do that … ?
IDK, that stuff’s all too complicated for me! :S
The somegreybloke character isn’t sarcastically mocking, he’s just clueless. It’s the animator (Mike Booth) who’s doing the sarcastic mocking.
I’ve still never seen this film …
This is pretty much accurate. They actually had to bus in crates of condoms during the last Winter Olympics, because they ran out.
She reminds me of Hugh Laurie for some reason.
Uploaded an image to Flappy Bird.
While that’s cute and all with your “reason” and “logic” and “empathy for fellow human beings”, I’m afraid you’re not towing the line of the KYM comments circlejerk, so you can take your White Knight ass (haha he’s seriously speaking out against some form of injustice, lolz what a dweeb) out of here and back to your “actually good” communities.
(In seriousness, please stay.)
Uploaded an image to Ruined Childhood.
Did you just take my post seriously?~
That’s wrong, “Milhouse is not a meme” is the only one of those that’s a meme.
“Milhouse is not a meme is a meme is a not a meme is not a meme” is not a meme, any more than Milhouse or “Milhouse is not a meme is a meme” is a meme – you don’t hear people saying “Milhouse is not a meme is a meme is a not a meme is not a meme” very often, do you? Whereas “Milhouse is not a meme” is mentioned frequently enough to be considered a meme and have a meme entry on Know Your Meme. Q.E.D.
Most true, but pretty sure pansexuality is actually where people are attracted to people irrespective of whatever their gender identity is (it’s of no consequence to them and their attraction), as opposed to bisexuality where people are attracted to people of male and female genders but not necessarily to the same extent or in the same way.
BTW, you can be attracted to “traps” and still be a straight guy, since the attraction presumably comes from their gender presentation and secondary sexual characteristics.
So I looked into it, and the phrase apparently translates to: “Our relationship could be as excellent as this example [the couple seen in the picture], but you are not currently putting in the effort needed in order to get our relationship to that state.” Makes sense.
I don’t understand what this means …
She actually sent out stickers with basically this on as part of her Kickstarter rewards:
“I would have gotten away with it too if it weren’t for those meddling SHIVs!”
Synecdoche, New York, movie of the year, all years.
Added a video to Fedora Shaming.
I thought it was going to be a remix of this:
Uploaded an image to Beauty Retouching.
One year later, Gabe releases his response: