@Advance
In practicality, yes, we chose a different method, because people were upset with "Twilight Sparkle and the Deathly Hallows." But I don't think we ever came to any mass opinion that the idea should be just thrown out.
In theory, we chose a different method, because a very quick and dirty "majority" won the day for the Harry Potter reference, and many others were terribly upset with it. The thinking wasn't so much that "Twilight Sparkle and the Deathly Hasbro" was a terrible name objectively. It was that it seemed a lot of users liked it, but many users hated it.
Going by preliminary polls though, most people voted for "Twilight Sparkle and the Deathly Hasbro" over ">Implying we talk about ponies here" in the final runoff.
If you ask me objectively, then I'd actually dislike how the runoffs turned out. (I'm going to regret this as soon as I say it…)
Even though I need to do a recount and ask for volunteers to do the runoffs to check my math, "Are you a Princess Too?" and "Live Free or Twi Hard" were in the next to last round. However, after removing the candidates with the lower preferred vote counts and distributing them to other candidates:
- "Twilight Sparkle and the Deathly Hasbro" – 8
- ">Implying we talk about ponies here" – 8
- "Are You a Princess Too?" – 7
- "Live Free or Twi Hard" – 7
So for that round, both "Are you a Princess Too?" and "Live Free or Twi Hard" were eliminated…by one vote. Had "Live Free or Twi Hard" or "Are You a Princess Too?" had one more vote, then it likely would have won, because they were often ranked higher than "Twilight Sparkle and the Deathly Hasbro" and ">Implying we talk about ponies here" even though they didn't have as many first place votes.
I think the system failed, because overall, I think "Live Free or Twi Hard" and "Are You a Princess Too?" were probably more universally liked.
Would I propose a new method though?
Hahano. That would be ridiculous. It really ain't that serious, and honestly, I'd consider it to be petty. I'm running this at the suggestion of upset users. If more users ask for another method, then I won't be involved. Sorry.
@Dac
Hm…I'd say go with what Crimson Locks suggested. However, I'm not a "eye-for-an-eye" kind of person, so if you think she's genuinely into you, then perhaps she couldn't grasp how drunk you were or she made a mistake (but then again rape is rape. Mistakes are still punishable, but perhaps that should be saved for a court of law.)
So if you cant set her straight, then do so. I think calling her is something between taking time and meeting her in person and texting her. If you ignore a person who's hung up on you then they simply may continue to contact you (unless you block them.)
And poni.