Forums / Discussion / General

I'm glad literally everyone else in thwt wikipedia discussion kept their wits about them a d denied this edit in the face of superior evidence

Those words not only indicate a narrow-minded and control freak sort of nature, but one of immaturity as well.

Also, I heard Brianna Wu tried to change the Wikipedia article herself and has since complained about transphobia in gamer culture when her article was denied.

Well, that and "Go to hell. You won't be laughing after I contact the sysops to revert your vandalism. Have a nice day, you transmisogynist fuck."

This person was an editor only identified by IP address. Someone claimed it was Wu, but there's really no way to check that unless you happen to know her IP.

Now they are going ballistic on tweeter based on the fact they got owned.
This is becoming one of the most hilarious things i can think about this whole Gender Politics.

>. You won’t be laughing after I contact the sysops to revert your vandalism.

Running to an adult to complain about the mean kids not liking their fan theory. The absolute mark of maturity.

What I don't understand is why they think its important to make Samus transgendered to the point of basically lying. If you want trans-gendered characters so badly… why not make some? Heck its even more embarassing when you realize that revolution 60 had an all female cast… and under no circumstances did Briana make the game have trans-gendered cast or character's whose body shapes didn't match stereotypical gender roles.

Just why the heck would you want Samus to be trans anyway? Let's look at her history:
1. Has deep seated issues with both parents and guidance
2. Has obsessive worship of a Male individual who has attempted to kill her.
3. Under the guidance of said Male individual, she demonstrates no self-dependence.
4. She has basically no friends of any kind (who she regularly talks to).
5. She has committed and probably would continue to commit genocide.
6. She solves her problems with violence… which I should point out is the Feminist Narrative's No No.
7. "Samus is a woman who is poor at coping with life's problems" – Iwata
http://iwataasks.nintendo.com/interviews/#/wii/metroid-other-m/0/3
8. The above quote implies she has an abnormal psyche and therefore is a mentally unstable individual.

Yeah gee, I sure want to have trans gendered people to be partially (or completely) represented by an individual who is suicidal, mentally unstable, a loner, and is possibly a socialpath. My guess is they want Samus to be statistically accurate?

For extra fun, every time someone says "(so and so source) specifically says Samus is a woman" there's a particular person who chimes in with "Trans women are women, so you should rephrase that".

I think they just want to hijack an already popular and recognizable character for their cause

well if that is what wikipedia considers a source then no wonder none of my professors accepted wikipedia.
also wasn't there a secret ending in one of the metroid prime games that showed samus's childhood? in which she was female?

Adrian Chmielarz writes…an interestingly titled article Games Are the Reason Why Story-Telling in Games Sucks

"Games have a different kind of problem. Interacting with stuff is magical. It’s so magical that people often keep on interacting with the game despite its story-telling layer sucking harder than a nuclear vacuum cleaner. It is one of the reasons -- if not the reason -- why the improvements in the quality of story-telling in games are much slower compared, say, to the cinema’s first decades."

This implies that cinema has improved.

https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3jbuv0/after_getting_debunked_the_author_of_the_samus_is/ Also, this salty madness is gutbusting.

"A lie told often enough becomes the truth."
A quote attributed to a number of nazi and communist personalities, as well as a number of psychologists talking about delusions and brainwashing

It speaks volumes that SJWs pretty much outright admit to operate on this exact bases
shows exactly what kind of people they truly are, always were, and always will be

Why do these people constantly insist that there must be 1 style of game for all of video games? It keeps reading like they want every game to be indigo prophecy and heavy rain, that anything with good mechanic is killing the medium because folks whose stories he finds better but who put in poor gameplay can't get customers cause their gameplay stinks.

Gaming is big enough that a whole cornucopia of games and genres can exist. RPG's offer a vastly larger amount of narrative then say an FPS. And an action-shooter is gonna pursue the action faster then a horror, or mystery, or any sort of drama game.

It doesn't have to all be 1 thing. It's big enough that gameplay centric, narrative centric, and a mix between the two, can all thrive together in peace.

I prefer "McActivism", myself.

Ghazi is defending Sarah Nyberg and claim all the evidence about it being a pedophile is false.

^ you know what they say, birds of the same feather flock together

I hardly posts in the forums but when stuff like this happens it's an all-time low.

#Buttsgate

Well that Atlanta News Station retracts the report about the WDBJ shooter being part of gamergate.

https://archive.is/21pZK
Butts confirms the chatlog being real.
Ghazi is censoring anybody who doesnt buy their "Evidence", even when is obvious something fishy is going on.

Ghazi: Where it's okay to be a pedophile as long as you hold a certain ideology.

^ Any heinous act for that matter

They're past the point of self-satire by now.

^ I do not believe they are capable of satire
or any kind of humor for that matter

Brianna Wu, you fucking dunce.

https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3jqgzm/drama_further_proof_of_srhbutts_logs_from_another/
This keeps getting better.

https://twitter.com/nintendofiorida
Welcome to the un-official Nintendo profile for gaming news! We’re not listening, too. For ESRB ratings go to http://esrb.org
HAHAHAHA THIS KEEPS GETTING BETTER!!!

What's sad about this is that this isn't the first time anti-GG members have been caught circulating pedophilic content. I'm pretty sure the first time was some troll thought 8chan GG members posted child pornography and then proceeded to copy that content and spread it over the internet to 'pwn' 8chan (to clarify how stupid this is, this is like spotting a hole in the wall and then bashing the hole with a hammer instead of contacting authorities or putting cement on the hole).

I'm noticing a trend that whatever the Anti-GG accuses GG of being, Anti-GG is actually guilty of the accusations. I mean we've the seen pedophile accusations backfire… and the "colluding to remove women" accusation backfire… what's next?

We may as well assume that the murder accusations will come at some point

So this guy responds to tweets he was sent after he appeared on Huffington Post Live. He clears some things up and has a pretty sexy voice.

And I sincerely hope that Anti-GG doesn't become guilty of those because lets be honest, no one needs to die here to prove anything. And of course, I inherently believe they are better than that.

Why Milo is mad at KiA?

Uhhh… I might be bad at this, but what exactly is incriminating about those chatlogs?

Cough.

and let's not forget the LA shooting. at an intersection that doesn't even exist.

Its posting urls of pictures of childrens in bikini or naked.

As the person above stated, its urls and such. But it also includes nyberg stating that they identify as a pedophile and stating the pictures are erotic to her, while berating others about being shocked thst a self professed pedophile enjoys pictures of children naked and/or in swimwear.

Its all very disgusting.

So, Leigh; What's your choice? Either you betray Butts and Anti-GG goes into a civil war, or you defend Butts, who's a pedophile that being investigated into by a major news outlet and the police, and ruin your and the rest of Anti-GG's reputation. This is a Xanatos Gambit if I've ever seen one.

Victory draws closer by the minute.

Did I miss something big?

Checks recent posts

Yep, I have. What's the story for the day?

@TOSO

Butts got exposed as a pedo by LEOpirate, Milo is now doing an article on her, her family is going to law enforcement, AntiGamer has gone into full-on Jonestown meltdown mode as they decided to circle the wagons and defend her and some are now starting to get a clue how unwise a hill they decided to die on:

Brigading from multiple SJW subreddits, Butts trying to DMCA the evidence away (thereby activating the mega-Streisand, screwing herself over in the legal system by confirming the logs authenticity, and it won't work because IRC logs aren't copy-writable in the USA), and 8chan getting hit with a massive CP raid by what looks like a decent chunk of the Goonswarm.

AntiGamer is collapsing in front of us.

Also for everyone here, Arthur Chu is fucking creepy:

As much as I want to say something, everything has already been said.

And from the looks of it, major storms will be happening?

@TOSO

And from the looks of it, major storms will be happening?

Yes.

We can only hope

the next einstein or the next unabomber.
and which one is he?

So. Ladies and gents, could I ask you for sources on the disreputability of Polygon and A_Man_In_Black?

For Polygon we've got the Deepfreeze article and the GG Wiki article.

As for A Man In Black, there's this:

And what KIA has on him.

There's going to be more on both of them but that's the big stuff.

Now that I think about it, with our pedophile being in the crossfire of legal trouble and Leigh being the decider, I was wondering what the domino effects or chain reactions would be like:

I know that if Leigh would defending Sarah, aGG would hold together, but their credibility would be shot somewhere past the borders of whatever hell that might exist. But on the other hand, if Leigh were to throw her under a bus (or a few buses given the nature of being a pedophile and how it just really doesn't fly), she saves herself, but aGG literally tears itself apart and falls underneath it's own weight.

What I'm wondering is: how far can the chain reaction go if either decision happens? I imagine far, but given that I'm just an outside observer, watching as these things happen, I can't really say.

Milo

Thank you, sah. A good friend of mine made use of Man_in_Black tweets on Jack Thompson as a source, and I needed the documents to prove his untrustworthiness.

Also, the poor fellow had been using Polygon as his source of gaming news for years without suspecting something was wrong. He's neutral (largly for not wanting trouble), but I think he's coming around, little by little.

Thank you, sah. A good friend of mine made use of Man_in_Black tweets on Jack Thompson as a source, and I needed the documents to prove his untrustworthiness.

Also, the poor fellow had been using Polygon as his source of gaming news for years without suspecting something was wrong. He's neutral (largly for not wanting trouble), but I think he's coming around, little by little.