They're tearing me apart!
Forums / Fun! / Just For Fun
320,842 total conversations in 9,947 threads
All These smugleafs
Last posted
Jan 20, 2011 at 02:37PM EST.
Added
Jan 16, 2011 at 07:29AM EST
28 posts
from
13 users
meh
Deactivated
Oh c'mon, just look on the bright side. If it wasn't for this epidemic, the meme would probably still in the submissions by now.
Oh well. Thanks to me I guess.
Adam DeLand wrote:
Oh c'mon, just look on the bright side. If it wasn't for this epidemic, the meme would probably still in the submissions by now.
Oh Adam, you little chubby troll is so crazy!
Tomberry wrote:
Oh Adam, you little chubby troll is so crazy!
Who you callin' chubby?
Just curious, how many users are apart of this epidemic? All I see is dane, three or four smugleafs, and adam(I'd say stoffe but I think he's just here to hate on excalibur). I am no longer a part of this.
Adam DeLand wrote:
Who you callin' chubby?
Do you prefer I call you "fat"?
I don't want to call you "fat" because it can be disrespectful, just like it's considered disrespectful to say "dwarfs" instead of "midgets", and "midgets" instead of "people with a lower height".
That's a strange way of life. A way of life I can never fully comprehend. We can't call things by their own names. "Black" seems less nice than "coloured people" but there is no racism intended to begin with.
Bless you politically correct.
Ashbot wrote:
Just curious, how many users are apart of this epidemic? All I see is dane, three or four smugleafs, and adam(I'd say stoffe but I think he's just here to hate on excalibur). I am no longer a part of this.
I was, but I'm about to change back to being normal Len.
Ashbot wrote:
Just curious, how many users are apart of this epidemic? All I see is dane, three or four smugleafs, and adam(I'd say stoffe but I think he's just here to hate on excalibur). I am no longer a part of this.
I'm switching back tomorrow probably.
It seems some of us just aren't meant to be smugleaf. Let's leave it to the professional.
Ashbot wrote:
Just curious, how many users are apart of this epidemic? All I see is dane, three or four smugleafs, and adam(I'd say stoffe but I think he's just here to hate on excalibur). I am no longer a part of this.
I count six:
Smugleaf
Smugleaf
Smug Leaf
Smugleaf (Dane)
Trick Smugleaf
Jackal Lantern the Smug Haunter
I'll probably change back tomorrow. I'm gonna kinda miss this cute avatar, though.
Tomberry wrote:
Do you prefer I call you "fat"?
I don't want to call you "fat" because it can be disrespectful, just like it's considered disrespectful to say "dwarfs" instead of "midgets", and "midgets" instead of "people with a lower height".That's a strange way of life. A way of life I can never fully comprehend. We can't call things by their own names. "Black" seems less nice than "coloured people" but there is no racism intended to begin with.
Bless you politically correct.
Well how did you know I was fat in the first place?
Adam DeLand wrote:
Well how did you know I was fat in the first place?
…. Seriously?
Doc wrote:
I count six:
Smugleaf
Smugleaf
Smug Leaf
Smugleaf (Dane)
Trick Smugleaf
Jackal Lantern the Smug Haunter
The search function never picked it up right for some reason (part of it being that one user was "Lugsmeaf") but I got the impression that at its height, there were about 10 of us with some variation of the name. I think it's dead now, but I haven't decided on a new username yet.
Trick Lobo wrote:
I'll probably change back tomorrow. I'm gonna kinda miss this cute avatar, though.
Yes, that pic is rather nice.
Adam DeLand wrote:
Well how did you know I was fat in the first place?
So…
"Smugleafs" or "Smugleaves"?
Smugleafs. It's a proper name.
Changed back, but can't seem decide on a profile picture, as I can't seem to find my old 'Straight Cash Homey' pic.
angrypwnzer wrote:
Smugleafs. It's a proper name.
Probably smugleafs, but no, I don't think it's a proper name. It's supposedly a kind of animal and not a specific animal, right?
Brucker wrote:
Probably smugleafs, but no, I don't think it's a proper name. It's supposedly a kind of animal and not a specific animal, right?
Technically speaking, it's reference to a character.
angrypwnzer wrote:
Technically speaking, it's reference to a character.
A "night elf" is a reference to a WoW character, but a group of them is still referred to as "night elves."
Really, in Pokemon, the plural form of Pokemon is like sheep, there is no "s" added. Examples, five Pikachu, 7 Jigglypuff, and 289 Smugleaf.
Intriguing. Is this because it's a Japanese thing?