Forums / Media / Moving Images

>Another SJWs are bad and we must do something about it thread.

Nah, I'm just tired of people whining about them. Just ignore them for now.

Albert Heinz is an idiot who used Judaism as a strawman, we decide who is accountable in a court of law, not on the internet, and Twatter Blue Check Marks are notorious AND documented for using their influence to stamp out livelihoods of people they deem beneath them.

This happened months ago. Never saw people talking about it that much though. No entries or updates here either even though i thought it was a shitty thing for them to do. I know we can't see how it exactly started, was it the driver or Tara and her friend but the fact that after the uber driver was fired and Tara removed the video makes me believe that she got mad at him first. It's pretty sad how this was just buried away and seems like they never looked more into it. Tara and her friend got away with all of that while a man doing his job got fired because he had different opinions or that's what it looks like. I don't really understand how this kind of shit can be ignored.

>while they continue ruin more people's lives.

SJWs have very very little political power,

Amen to that.

"sjw" isn't a threat anymore nor even a word you should take seriously anyways.

as a mob, and a darling of the establishment media, they have plenty of power.
by using public outrages, mass-flagging and do massive protests they made people lose their jobs, deplatformed from social media, stop activists from speaking in public rallies and nearly drove someone to suicide.

Shut up meg I’ve had it up to here with your bs

Epic Gamer Moment

who gives a shit bro there's real problems in this world

if their employers are fully willing to do what the SJW mobs want, then they do have power. that's how influence works.

also, when right-wing poiticians/activists are kicked off university campuses, or are refused a public stage because the police is afraid of violent mobs, it's direct power SJW's have.

when a mob of SJW's threaten they will boycott a company unless X person gets fired, till the company caves in because of bad press – which is again, spread by SJW journalists.
all of this is SJW's having power. and the fact that no one is trying to challenge this power and do something about is terrible.
because, as I already said. people are getting their lives ruined. and people just go business as usual

>if their employers are fully willing to do what the SJW mobs want, then they do have power.

No. If a police officer gives a ticket to a man speeding, would you say its the police officer's fault that the driver got a ticket?
The person responsible is the one who committed the action, not the one who witnessed it and reported it.

>people are getting their lives ruined.

Yes, because of their own doing.

Let’s fill threads like this with Family Guy quotes. Eventually they’ll be too annoyed to do another pointless thread like this

Umm no. Remember when you spammed the forums with what-ifs threads? We're not doing that shit again.

I'd argue that some of the things that they've "witnessed and reported" either -

A: They themselves provoked the response out of the individual.
B: Was selectively edited to skew the perception of the situation.
C: Not bad enough to warrant the punishment that ends up being dished out.

Or are we just going to forget about the whole Covington High School debacle, for example?

Beyond that, I can't see how you can honestly argue that SJWs don't have any sort of power when there have been examples of video games being removed from stores because they contain a confederate flag… in a game about the US civil war… And then of course there's the "core values"…

"im usually respectful"

The lie you tell you whe you wake up.

@lesserangel

a) doesn't matter. It just doesn't
b) is there anything specific you are talking about where that happened?
c) SJWs don't decide the punishment.

>Covington

Whats the connection to that and SJWs?

>civil war

see above

@jolly jew

See b) and also explain the connection

…I can't believe I actually have to explain this.

a) doesn't matter. It just doesn't

And this is why bullies get away with shit in schools, folks. It is human nature to retaliate. Some people can restrain themselves better than others, but everybody has a breaking point. All you gotta do, is push them to it.

b) is there anything specific you are talking about where that happened?

I literally mentioned it in the same post, the Covington High School fiasco.

c) SJWs don't decide the punishment.

Technically true but missing the point. They don't have to decide the punishment if they know what the punishment is to begin with, and operate in such a way to ensure said punishment is enacted on whoever they don't like. To be fair, this can apply to any type of fanatic.

*>Covington

Whats the connection to that and SJWs?*

Are you seriously going to try and argue that some of the people that were trying to frame the incident as "Look what these evil white kids did to this poor native american man!" aren't "SJWs" to some extent?

*>civil war

see above*

See above as well, the only type of people that would be asinine enough to try and get games about the US civil war banned because they contain confederate flags, almost certainly matches the profile of a "SJW".

While the exact amount of power "SJWs" have is debatable, they are most certainly able to influence more than a few things, and I'd rather not have their seeming propensity for censorship and manipulation of information to serve their own ends become more commonplace. To make myself clear on this matter, my opinions on this applies to any type of ideology.

For someone who loves to bitch about SJWs, you sure aren't doing anything about these SJWs.

and what exactly am I supposed to do???

make rant videos? call them mean names in social media? raid their blogs with gore pics?

if I was some celebrity influence of course I would have called them out and and tried to publicly challenge them. but as an average joe what can I do? do enlighten me.
the way you demonstrate Is to simply ignore them. and that obviously doesn't work, because more and more people have their lives ruined because of them.

P.S why am I getting karma bombed if im basically saying what Angel says?

Maybe don't make a big deal out of something so trivial especially with a clickbait title.

@LesserAngel
>And this is why bullies get away with shit in schools, folks.

?? bullies only get away with stuff if the victim doesn't report the issue to a teacher or if the teacher/school administration is awful and doesn't care.

>Technically true but missing the point.
>They don't have to decide the punishment if they know what the punishment is to begin with, and operate in such a way to ensure said punishment is enacted on whoever they don't like.
That.. doesn't change anything.

>Are you seriously going to try and argue that some of the people that were trying to frame the incident as "Look what these evil white kids did to this poor native american man!" aren't "SJWs" to some extent?

No, i'm not arguing that. I thought you meant SJWs had some prominent role in it, but since thats not what your saying, then how are you putting blame on SJWs for that? Or if you aren't doing that, then why bring it up?
Also, its the fact he had a racist/sexist/bigoted hat, not because he was white. Not a good sign to wear a bigoted hat standing in the face of native american with a smug face.

>almost certainly matches the profile of a "SJW".

So you are literally just calling people who do stuff you don't like SJWs. Can't believe you are actually admitting that you don't know if these people are actually SJWs, yet still call them one anyways.

@Jolly Jew
>if I was some celebrity influence of course I would have called them out and and tried to publicly challenge them.

That is literally what you are complaining about.

via ytCropper

"?? bullies only get away with stuff if the victim doesn't report the issue to a teacher or if the teacher/school administration is awful and doesn't care."

You must've gone to the only school that actually does something then. Consider yourself lucky.

>They don't have to decide the punishment if they know what the punishment is to begin with, and operate in such a way to ensure said punishment is enacted on whoever they don't like.
That.. doesn't change anything.

Yes, it does. It's effectively a form of blackmail or framing someone. Just because it's legal, doesn't make it right.

Also, its the fact he had a racist/sexist/bigoted hat, not because he was white. Not a good sign to wear a bigoted hat standing in the face of native american with a smug face.

The fact that people are getting offended over a friggen hat is a bit of my point here. Not to mention, he was standing on public property well before the Native American man got in HIS face. You don't care about the actual circumstances, but only that he was wearing a hat you disagreed with, and that's the friggen problem.

So you are literally just calling people who do stuff you don't like SJWs. Can't believe you are actually admitting that you don't know if these people are actually SJWs, yet still call them one anyways.

Oh, there are plenty of people I don't like that aren't SJWs. As for these specific individuals, they most closely follow the standard "SJW" mindset (Which I'm defining as being in support of censorship, public shaming, and otherwise punishing people in the name of being "socially progressive"), so for lack of a better term, it's what I'm using, as "asshole" is too broad a title. Also, do you think an SJW is gonna always out themselves as one? I mean, hell, most KKK members even know not to announce the fact that they're in the KKK.

Also, hypocrite much? Complaining about profiling yet you do it yourself with anyone wearing a MAGA hat. At least TRY to remain consistent.

Oh, and before you try to bring it up, the difference is that I'm making my judgements on people based on what they do, not what they wear. There's a certain, acceptable limit to that, but to suggest that someone somehow "deserved" something for wearing a MAGA hat is victim blaming.

In the end, I guess that's actually what this boils down to, getting someone punished for something that isn't even a crime, and then blaming them for it.

@LesserAngel
>You must've gone to the only school that actually does something then. Consider yourself lucky.

Not sure were you've gotten the idea that bullies getting punished is rare.

>It's effectively a form of blackmail or framing someone.

What does "it" refer to? If someone makes a racist tweet and a bunch of people get mad about it, what does that have to do with blackmail or framing?

>The fact that people are getting offended over a friggen hat is a bit of my point here.

I would hope most people get offended over discrimination against innocent people. The fact you find that troubling is troubling in of it self.

>he was standing on public property well before the Native American man got in HIS face.

That wasn't revealed until later.

>but only that he was wearing a hat you disagreed with

I'm not upset that he was wearing a hat I disagree with. If his hat said that pineapple makes for a good pizza topping, I wouldn't care. I am upset over his display of discrimination towards women and minorities by insisting we go back to a time where those people had little to no rights.

>they most closely follow the standard "SJW" mindset (Which I'm defining as being in support of censorship, public shaming, and otherwise punishing people in the name of being "socially progressive")

I'd imagine you'd find it very hard to find anyone who doesn't support those first two things. The 3rd thing would fit a large amount of people too. Most people support things like interraction/same-sex marriage, for example, and those are socially progressive things.

>Also, do you think an SJW is gonna always out themselves as one?

No and its not relevant. You can't just make up a definition of what an sjw is and randomly call people one and expect to be taken seriously.

>Complaining about profiling yet you do it yourself with anyone wearing a MAGA hat.

I'm not complaining about profiling, i'm complaining about you labeling people as something with a made up broad definition. Nearly everyone could fit under your definition of SJW

>but to suggest that someone somehow "deserved" something for wearing a MAGA hat is victim blaming.

so? Victims are sometimes to blame.

>getting someone punished for something that isn't even a crime, and then blaming them for it.

Believe it or not, but actions have consequences, whether legal or not.

Ooh, another case of a famous person in media being an SJW.

Don’t mind me. Please do explain how shit like this isn’t a blatant witchhunt while #MeToo is?

*has a nice badonkadonk

Not sure were you've gotten the idea that bullies getting punished is rare.

School. It was fairly common that the retaliator to a bully got punished more often while the bully them self frequently got away with it. Once again consider yourself lucky. Then again, maybe YOU were the bully, I don't know.

What does "it" refer to? If someone makes a racist tweet and a bunch of people get mad about it, what does that have to do with blackmail or framing?

"it" refers to purposely trying to provoke a specific response out of someone to get them in trouble. I already covered this, stop playing dumb, FFS.

I would hope most people get offended over discrimination against innocent people. The fact you find that troubling is troubling in of it self.

And who is being discriminated against by someone wearing a fucking hat?

That wasn't revealed until later.

Exactly, and so many people were willing to instantly jump on the kinds despite not having all the info, because they early info was specifically framed to make them look like the bad guys.

I'm not upset that he was wearing a hat I disagree with. If his hat said that pineapple makes for a good pizza topping, I wouldn't care. I am upset over his display of discrimination towards women and minorities by insisting we go back to a time where those people had little to no rights.

While I disagree with some of the specifics here (I fail to see how minorities are specifically targeted by a group of Catholic High School students attending an anti-abortion rally), I don't have anything against the general point. You are perfectly free to have a contrary opinion or view on something. However, I'm reluctant to actually believe this, because you said, and I quote. "Also, its the fact he had a racist/sexist/bigoted hat". Get your shit together Tyrone.

I'd imagine you'd find it very hard to find anyone who doesn't support those first two things. The 3rd thing would fit a large amount of people too. Most people support things like interraction/same-sex marriage, for example, and those are socially progressive things.

You're missing the point again. I'm, generally, not opposed to many of the issues that are considered to be "socially progressive". What I do have a problem is 1: Some of the lengths people will go to in pursuit of it, straight up denying the rights of others at times. and 2: Trying to push something as "progressive" when it's really not.

No and its not relevant. You can't just make up a definition of what an sjw is and randomly call people one and expect to be taken seriously.

Kind of like Racist/Sexist or just about any kind of bigotry these days, or are you gonna try and argue that those titles don't get thrown around like free candy on Halloween?

I'm not complaining about profiling, i'm complaining about you labeling people as something with a made up broad definition. Nearly everyone could fit under your definition of SJW

I highly, HIGHLY doubt that that "Nearly Everyone" is in support of censorship, public shaming, and disproportionate punishment in the name of "Social Progressiveness", and if everyone you know is, I question if you only associate with Chinese Government Officials.

so? Victims are sometimes to blame.

Sometimes, such as people ignoring railroad crossing gates, but considering that some people are being targeted by SJWs based simply on their appearance or political affiliation (among other things), I'm inclined to disagree on this.

Believe it or not, but actions have consequences, whether legal or not.

My point here isn't so much about whether it's legal or not, it's about it being right. Just because the Government can't censor or punish someone for their believes, doesn't mean you should try to get the person silenced or fired from their job just because you can. That's the kind of shit that only serves to further someone's position from your own. People wondering why radicalism seems to be on the rise? I'm willing to wager that that kind of shit is part of the reason. As soon as you say "it's ok to do this to this person", they're immediately going to think "ok, I can do it to them back!"

"That is literally what you are complaining about."
no… im complaining about how SJW's ruin people's lives. challanging them in an open public debate is nothing like that at all.

i really don't know where to begin or even end with you. you think that the massive smear campagin and demonization against the kid of Covington was justified simply because you think his hat is "racist"
you think its ok to ruin people's lives for expressing the wrong opinions. and that this is just "actions that have consequnces"

now ignore for a moment how utterly delliusional and inane it is to claim that MAGA hats are "racist and sexit" despite the fact that people of color and women wear it.
do you have any idea how dangerous your ideals are? what if one day the rage mobs will decide that YOUR opinions are bad and you deserve to have your life ruined? will you endure being doxxed, harassed and fired from your workplace because the mobs decided your opinion is problematic?

this is how tyrannies were formed. these are the same rage mobs that used to be the brown-shirts in Germany, the black-shirts in italy. that's how corrupt establishment changed public opinion and silences opposition until nothing was left to challange them.

but whatever. it seems this forum is infested with SJW's who simply karma bomb anyone who dares to express anything against them.
so there isn't much point going on.

shame it has to be begause of Tara Strong. i really do hope that she actually did the right thing and that the driver did something to deserved it.

@LesserAngel
>it was fairly common that the retaliator to a bully got punished more

Thats why you don't retaliate by fighting back, you report the issue to a teacher or school administrator.

>Once again consider yourself lucky. Then again, maybe YOU were the bully, I don't know.

During high school, I had to personally be guarded by teachers while walking to my car at the end of the day due to how serious threats against me were. Safe to say I wasn't the bully.

>"it" refers to purposely trying to provoke a specific response out of someone to get them in trouble.

"they started it!" isn't a very good excuse for anything. It just isn't an excuse.

>And who is being discriminated against by someone wearing a fucking hat?

women and minorities.

>I fail to see how minorities are specifically targeted by a group of Catholic High School students attending an anti-abortion rally

They were wearing maga hats. What do you think maga means? It means "make america great again for straight white men", unless you want to convince me there was a point in time where non-straight white men consider the past to be better than the future. The only people who lived more comfortably in the past than present are straight white men.

>Kind of like Racist/Sexist or just about any kind of bigotry these days

Those are wrong too. two wrongs don't make a right.

>I highly, HIGHLY doubt that that "Nearly Everyone" is in support of censorship, public shaming, and disproportionate punishment in the name of "Social Progressiveness"

Good luck finding people that support distribution of child porn, disprove of public arrest record, and disprove of anti-discrimination laws. Maybe a few libertarians, but thats it.

>some people are being targeted by SJWs based simply on their appearance or political affiliation (among other things)

Thats irrelevant to a person getting in trouble for something they say or do.

>doesn't mean you should try to get the person silenced or fired from their job just because you can.

Why not? If you want to try and get me kicked off a platform, feel free to.

@Jolly Jew
>im complaining about how SJW's ruin people's lives. challanging them in an open public debate is nothing like that at all.

But thats the same thing. "challanging them in an open public debate" exposes them and that leads to "ruin people's lives". Its literally what those evil sjws do. The video in OP is literally of people debating.

"challanging people to open debate leads to ruining their lives"
WHAT?
are you for real? i sure hope you are just pretending to be dumb.

because in no possible reality, you can compare saying "you are terribly wrong, and i want to openly argue about it" to saying "you are a terrible person for having this opinion and you deserved to be fired/doxxed/boycotted.
pretty sure these differences are not subtle.
Tara Strong got that Uber driver fired by sending a formal complaint, she didn't debate him at all, hell you can hear her saying "im gonna get you fired"

"MAGA hats mean 'make america great for straight white men"
WOMEN AND PEOPLE OF COLOR WEAR MAGA HATS
also, Trump never did anything bad to the LGBT community.
you do actually know that america was a graet place to live for everyone also in the 80's right?

ok dude, you are a lost cause, i don't think there is a point talk logic into you, not when you openly support the censorship and unpersoning of people for having the "wrong" opinions, and repeating fake news mantras like a religious fanataic

>because in no possible reality, you can compare saying "you are terribly wrong, and i want to openly argue about it" to saying "you are a terrible person for having this opinion and you deserved to be fired/doxxed/boycotted.

The 1st causes the 2nd.

>WOMEN AND PEOPLE OF COLOR WEAR MAGA HATS

ok? Whats your point?

>Trump never did anything bad to the LGBT community.

he made Pence his VP

>you do actually know that america was a graet place to live for everyone also in the 80's right?

There is a CNN documentary called "the 80s" on Netflix that has an episode on the aids epidemic. Its my favorite documentary on the subject, but there are many others such as here
Aids was cheered by many for killing gay people, and ignored by others. Only a few people actually cared enough about gay men to actually want to do something to stop the spread of aids and research treatment. The 1980s was possibly the worst decade to be a gay man in America.

Bit of advice , do not try to debate Pooch. Unless you like running debate circles and getting nowhere. Go outside, play some catchball. Do something productive besides watching a dog chase its tail.

thanks for the info.
i had my suspicions but the last post, and how absolutly none of my points were countered or even mentioned, pretty much proves he is a moron.

ill stick to more productive things now

> also, Trump never did anything bad to the LGBT community.

> you do actually know that america was a graet place to live for everyone also in the 80's right?

I literally quoted your replies. what do you mean "none of my points were countered or even mentioned"?
You said the 1980s were a good time for gay people in america. How much more out of touch can you be.

"This person don't agree with me.

What an intolerant prick an it should be forsaken for it!"

A statement that might mean something if it wasn't coming from you, the biggest hypocrite this website has ever had.

The sheer lack of self-awareness in this post is unbelievable.

"When you don't have argument, lie."

-The Black Knight

A liar, am I? You know we can all view everything you've posted on this website. don't you? Such as:

"Your are a terrible pedagogue.

I hope you never add kids because they will grew up terribly whit your mediocre vision of education."

Or:
"Forget it.

Is just a typical /Pol/lack."

Or perhaps:

"The comics gate is just a bunch of a whiny fanboy who are outraged by the existance of non white,male,heterosexual character!

Granted some of them are less stupid and oppresive and can recognize when one of this character is goodly written, but the kind are rare, some of the most influent have build a personality cult , use their brainwash to get easy money and fame.

The comics industry is currently not in a good shape and this bozo make thing worse!"

But you're right, of course, I'm just a liar. Perhaps you'll listen to the only person's opinion that you care for: Your own:

"People who live in the denied, like you, sure are ugly has a sin."
-Monsieur Safior

How that make me an hypocrite ?

They are sentence who sense in context.

But using the context would have destriy you'r pathetic attemp at attack, like the little dishonest troll you are.

It's very simple how it makes you a hypocrite. You criticised someone for on the based on the assumption that they have problem entirely with the fact someone has a differing opinion to their own.

But 90% of everything you say and do on this website is doing exactly that, acting like a spiteful, hate-filled child who can't handle the fact that people think differently than you. I don't know where you get off criticising anybody for anything, considering how you conduct yourself.