EU Copyright Directive / Article 13 - Images

Sorted By:

ÖEFLkmsaedöiokurfhjesdiurfhj


EU Copyright Directive / Article 13
odsijodijr article 13 monitor graph

Lets flight EU Article 13 with best meme contest!

Nordvpn encourages to create more memes and express yourself to protest against copyright directive. Everyone is welcome to participate!
Nordvpn encourages to create more memes and express yourself to protest against copyright directive. Everyone is welcome to participate!

EU Copyright Directive / Article 13
nordvpn article13 european union eu protest copyrightdirective memeban news trending pika pikachu technology copyright law vpn contest politics

2000 people protesting against Article 13 in Cologne


EU Copyright Directive / Article 13
cologne protest article 13 eu copyright directive

So I made something In regards to Article13 supporters

What?! You don't agree that the blind pursuit of power and money is a wonderful thing? TO THE RE-EDUCATION CAMPS FOR YOU!!!
What?! You don't agree that the blind pursuit of power and money is a wonderful thing? TO THE RE-EDUCATION CAMPS FOR YOU!!!

EU Copyright Directive / Article 13
npc article13

News

Julia Reda@Senficon 3h The trilogue negotiation planned for Monday has apparently been cancelled by the Council. There may still be a trilogue before the election, if Council can agree on a text later. I'll blog as I get more news. #SaveYourInternet #Article13 6ti 72 163 Show this thread Julia Reda@Senficon 3h BREAKING: Council has failed to find an agreement on its #copyright position today. This doesn't mean that #Article11 and #Article13 are dead, but their adoption has just become a lot less likely. Let's keep up the pressure now! twitter.com/LauKaya/status.., #SaveYourinternet Laura Kayali@LauKaya #Copyright major plot twist: Monday's #copyright trilogue is canceled because EU countries couldn't agree on a new text. politico.eu/pro/romanian-p.. Julia Reda@Senficon 1h Verhandlungen auf Eis gelegt: EU-Ministerrat erteilt #Uploadfilter und #Leistungsschutzrecht vorerst eine Absage. Diese 11 Länder haben gegen die Verhandlungsposition der Rates gestimmt: juliareda.eu/2019/01/urhebe... #SaveYourInternet#Artikel 11 #Artikel13 Translated from German by Microsoft Negotiations put on hold: EU Council of Ministers #Uploadfilter issued and #Leistungsschutzrecht, for the time being, a rejection. These 11 countries voted against the Council's negotiating position: juliareda.eu/2019/01/urhebe... #SaveYourInternet#Artikel 11 #Artikel13
Julia Reda@Senficon 3h The trilogue negotiation planned for Monday has apparently been cancelled by the Council. There may still be a trilogue before the election, if Council can agree on a text later. I'll blog as I get more news. #SaveYourInternet #Article13 6ti 72 163 Show this thread Julia Reda@Senficon 3h BREAKING: Council has failed to find an agreement on its #copyright position today. This doesn't mean that #Article11 and #Article13 are dead, but their adoption has just become a lot less likely. Let's keep up the pressure now! twitter.com/LauKaya/status.., #SaveYourinternet Laura Kayali@LauKaya #Copyright major plot twist: Monday's #copyright trilogue is canceled because EU countries couldn't agree on a new text. politico.eu/pro/romanian-p.. Julia Reda@Senficon 1h Verhandlungen auf Eis gelegt: EU-Ministerrat erteilt #Uploadfilter und #Leistungsschutzrecht vorerst eine Absage. Diese 11 Länder haben gegen die Verhandlungsposition der Rates gestimmt: juliareda.eu/2019/01/urhebe... #SaveYourInternet#Artikel 11 #Artikel13 Translated from German by Microsoft Negotiations put on hold: EU Council of Ministers #Uploadfilter issued and #Leistungsschutzrecht, for the time being, a rejection. These 11 countries voted against the Council's negotiating position: juliareda.eu/2019/01/urhebe... #SaveYourInternet#Artikel 11 #Artikel13

EU Copyright Directive / Article 13
article 13 copyright europe copyright law copyright europe julia reda

Google News Example

Google latest news Settings Tools l News Videos ShoppingImagesMore About 16,320,000,000 results (0.58 seconds) Top stories Liverpool Echo The Telegraph Daily Star Liverpool Echo 4 hours ago The Telegraph 9 hours ago Daily Star 55 mins ago More for latest news Daily Star https://www.dailystar.co.uk. News ▼ UK-BBC News https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk Sky News https://news.sky.com/world
Google latest news Settings Tools l News Videos ShoppingImagesMore About 16,320,000,000 results (0.58 seconds) Top stories Liverpool Echo The Telegraph Daily Star Liverpool Echo 4 hours ago The Telegraph 9 hours ago Daily Star 55 mins ago More for latest news Daily Star https://www.dailystar.co.uk. News ▼ UK-BBC News https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk Sky News https://news.sky.com/world

EU Copyright Directive / Article 13
google news internet

Google Search Example

Google latest news Settings Tools Al News Videos ShoppingImages More About 16,320,000,000 results (0.75 seconds) Top stories Liverpool Echo 4 hours ago The Telegraph 9 hours ago Daily Star 54 mins ago More for latest news https://www.dailystar.co.uk> News https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk https://news.sky.com/world
Google latest news Settings Tools Al News Videos ShoppingImages More About 16,320,000,000 results (0.75 seconds) Top stories Liverpool Echo 4 hours ago The Telegraph 9 hours ago Daily Star 54 mins ago More for latest news https://www.dailystar.co.uk> News https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk https://news.sky.com/world

EU Copyright Directive / Article 13
google search internet

Happiness, awaits

MEMES IN EUROPE MEMES IN EUROPE EFF BREAKING: In a huge victory, the European Parliament has voted 318-278 against #Article13 and #Article11-the disastrous #CensorshipMachine and #LinkTax copyright proposals. That means we're close to stopping these terrible proposals-and we're gaining momentum
MEMES IN EUROPE MEMES IN EUROPE EFF BREAKING: In a huge victory, the European Parliament has voted 318-278 against #Article13 and #Article11-the disastrous #CensorshipMachine and #LinkTax copyright proposals. That means we're close to stopping these terrible proposals-and we're gaining momentum

EU Copyright Directive / Article 13
know your meme meme article 13 exploitable

You get used to it EU

Internet users from China You get used to it. EU COPYRIGHT DIRECTNE Internet users from EU
Internet users from China You get used to it. EU COPYRIGHT DIRECTNE Internet users from EU

EU Copyright Directive / Article 13
article 13 eu copyright directive you get used to it goblin slayer

Voss wants to end it!

YOUR,MEMES END HERE
YOUR,MEMES END HERE

EU Copyright Directive / Article 13
eu axel voss metal gear rising raiden article 13

Keep Calm and SAVE YOUR INTERNET

Article 13 is not good!
Article 13 is not good!

EU Copyright Directive / Article 13
keep calm #saveyourinternet article 13

official text from official site

Amendments 156, 157, 158, 159, 160 and 161 Proposal for a directive Article 13 Article 13 Use of protected content by information society service providers storing and giving access to large amounts of works and other subject-matter uploaded by their users 1. Information society service providers that store and provide to the public access to large amounts of works or other subject- matter uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation with rightholders, take measures to ensure the functioning of agreements concluded with rightholders for the use of their works or other subject-matter or to prevent the availability on their services of works or other subject-matter identified by rightholders through the cooperation with the service providers. Those measures, such as the use of effective content recognition technologies, shall be appropriate and proportionate. The service providers shall provide rightholders with adequate information on the functioning and the deployment of the measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate reporting on the recognition and use of the works and other subject-matter. 2. Member States shall ensure that the service providers referred to in paragraph 1 put in place complaints and redress mechanisms that are available to users in case of disputes over the application of the measures referred to in paragraph 1 3. Member States shall facilitate, where appropriate, the cooperation between the information society service providers and rightholders through stakeholder dialogues to define best practices, such as appropriate and proportionate content recognition technologies, taking into account, among others, the nature of the services, the availability of the technologies and their effectiveness in light of technological developments Article 13 Use of protected content by online content sharing service providers storing and giving access to large amounts of works and other subject-matter uploaded by their users 1. Without prejudice to Article 3(1) and (2) of Directive 2001/29/EC, online content sharing service providers perform an act of communication to the public. They shall therefore conclude fair and appropriate licensing agreements with right holders 2. Licensing agreements which are concluded by online content sharing service providers with right holders for the acts of communication referred to in paragraph 1, shall cover the liability for works uploaded by the users of such online content sharing services in line with the terms and conditions set out in the licensing agreement, provided that such users do not act for commercial purposes 2a. Member States shall provide that where right holders do not wish to conclude licensing agreements, online content sharing service providers and right holders shall cooperate in good faith in order to ensure that unauthorised protected works or other subject matter are not available on their services. Cooperation between online content service providers and right holders shall not lead to preventing the availability of non-infringing works or other protected subject matter, including those covered by an exception or limitation to copyright. 2b. Members States shall ensure that online content sharing service providers referred to in paragraph 1 put in place effective and expeditious complaints and redress mechanisms that are available to users in case the cooperation referred to in paragraph 2a leads to unjustified removals of their content. Any complaint filed under such mechanisms shall be processed without undue delay and be subject to human review. Right holders shall reasonably justify their decisions to avoid arbitrary dismissal of complaints. Moreover, in accordance with Directive 95/46/EC, Directive 2002/58/EC and the General Data Protection Regulation, the cooperation shall not lead to any identification of individual users nor the processing of their personal data. Member States shall also ensure that users have access to an independent body for the resolution of disputes as well as to a court or another relevant judicial authority to assert the use of an exception or limitation to copyright rules. 3. As of [date of entry into force of this directivel, the Commission and the Member States shall organise dialogues between stakeholders to harmonise and to define best practices and issue guidance to ensure the functioning of licensing agreements and on cooperation between online content sharing service providers and right holders for the use of their works or other subject matter within the meaning of this Directive. When defining best practices, special account shall be taken of fundamental rights, the use of exceptions and limitations as well as ensuring that the burden on SMEs remains appropriate and that automated blocking of content is avoided Amendments 78 and 252 Proposal for a directive Article 13 a (new) Article 13a Member States shall provide that disputes between successors in title and information society services regarding the application of Article 13(1) may be subject to an alternative dispute resolution system. Member States shall establish or designate an impartial body with the necessary expertise, with the aim of helping the parties to settle their disputes under this system. The Member States shall inform the Commission of the establishment of this body no later than (date mentioned in Article 21(1)) Amendment 79 Proposal for a directive Article 13 b (new) Article 13b Use of protected content by information society services providing automated image referencing Member States shall ensure that information society service providers that automatically reproduce or refer to significant amounts of copyright-protected visual works and make them available to the public for the purpose of indexing and referencing conclude fair and balanced licensing agreements with any requesting rightholders in order to ensure their fair remuneration. Such remuneration may be managed by the collective management organisation of the rightholders concerned.
Amendments 156, 157, 158, 159, 160 and 161 Proposal for a directive Article 13 Article 13 Use of protected content by information society service providers storing and giving access to large amounts of works and other subject-matter uploaded by their users 1. Information society service providers that store and provide to the public access to large amounts of works or other subject- matter uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation with rightholders, take measures to ensure the functioning of agreements concluded with rightholders for the use of their works or other subject-matter or to prevent the availability on their services of works or other subject-matter identified by rightholders through the cooperation with the service providers. Those measures, such as the use of effective content recognition technologies, shall be appropriate and proportionate. The service providers shall provide rightholders with adequate information on the functioning and the deployment of the measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate reporting on the recognition and use of the works and other subject-matter. 2. Member States shall ensure that the service providers referred to in paragraph 1 put in place complaints and redress mechanisms that are available to users in case of disputes over the application of the measures referred to in paragraph 1 3. Member States shall facilitate, where appropriate, the cooperation between the information society service providers and rightholders through stakeholder dialogues to define best practices, such as appropriate and proportionate content recognition technologies, taking into account, among others, the nature of the services, the availability of the technologies and their effectiveness in light of technological developments Article 13 Use of protected content by online content sharing service providers storing and giving access to large amounts of works and other subject-matter uploaded by their users 1. Without prejudice to Article 3(1) and (2) of Directive 2001/29/EC, online content sharing service providers perform an act of communication to the public. They shall therefore conclude fair and appropriate licensing agreements with right holders 2. Licensing agreements which are concluded by online content sharing service providers with right holders for the acts of communication referred to in paragraph 1, shall cover the liability for works uploaded by the users of such online content sharing services in line with the terms and conditions set out in the licensing agreement, provided that such users do not act for commercial purposes 2a. Member States shall provide that where right holders do not wish to conclude licensing agreements, online content sharing service providers and right holders shall cooperate in good faith in order to ensure that unauthorised protected works or other subject matter are not available on their services. Cooperation between online content service providers and right holders shall not lead to preventing the availability of non-infringing works or other protected subject matter, including those covered by an exception or limitation to copyright. 2b. Members States shall ensure that online content sharing service providers referred to in paragraph 1 put in place effective and expeditious complaints and redress mechanisms that are available to users in case the cooperation referred to in paragraph 2a leads to unjustified removals of their content. Any complaint filed under such mechanisms shall be processed without undue delay and be subject to human review. Right holders shall reasonably justify their decisions to avoid arbitrary dismissal of complaints. Moreover, in accordance with Directive 95/46/EC, Directive 2002/58/EC and the General Data Protection Regulation, the cooperation shall not lead to any identification of individual users nor the processing of their personal data. Member States shall also ensure that users have access to an independent body for the resolution of disputes as well as to a court or another relevant judicial authority to assert the use of an exception or limitation to copyright rules. 3. As of [date of entry into force of this directivel, the Commission and the Member States shall organise dialogues between stakeholders to harmonise and to define best practices and issue guidance to ensure the functioning of licensing agreements and on cooperation between online content sharing service providers and right holders for the use of their works or other subject matter within the meaning of this Directive. When defining best practices, special account shall be taken of fundamental rights, the use of exceptions and limitations as well as ensuring that the burden on SMEs remains appropriate and that automated blocking of content is avoided Amendments 78 and 252 Proposal for a directive Article 13 a (new) Article 13a Member States shall provide that disputes between successors in title and information society services regarding the application of Article 13(1) may be subject to an alternative dispute resolution system. Member States shall establish or designate an impartial body with the necessary expertise, with the aim of helping the parties to settle their disputes under this system. The Member States shall inform the Commission of the establishment of this body no later than (date mentioned in Article 21(1)) Amendment 79 Proposal for a directive Article 13 b (new) Article 13b Use of protected content by information society services providing automated image referencing Member States shall ensure that information society service providers that automatically reproduce or refer to significant amounts of copyright-protected visual works and make them available to the public for the purpose of indexing and referencing conclude fair and balanced licensing agreements with any requesting rightholders in order to ensure their fair remuneration. Such remuneration may be managed by the collective management organisation of the rightholders concerned.

EU Copyright Directive / Article 13
article 13 eu copyright directive official

Article 13 Kills Memers

Made in GIMP, poorly because it's one of my very first memes. Memes forever! Unholy carnage to Article 13!
Made in GIMP, poorly because it's one of my very first memes. Memes forever! Unholy carnage to Article 13!

EU Copyright Directive / Article 13
#saveourinternet the backyardigans article 13

the most unlikely of team ups

The Internet Never thought Id die fighting side by side with Youtube Tube How about side by side with a friend? The Internet Aye, l could do that Article 13 -
The Internet Never thought Id die fighting side by side with Youtube Tube How about side by side with a friend? The Internet Aye, l could do that Article 13 -

EU Copyright Directive / Article 13
lord of the rings aye i could do that gimli legolas youtube article 13 eu eu copyright directive / article 13

A Day Under the EU Copyright Directive

A DAY UNDER THE EU COPYRIGHT DIRECTIVE TL:DR WE ARE BLOCKING REDDIT IN THE EU TODAY FROM 09:00 -17:00 CET Weve repeatedly warned about how an overbroad EU Copyright Directive could restrict Europeans' equal access to the open Internet-and to Reddit. But time is running out. To drive home this point, we are blocking Reddit in the EU today from 09:00-17:00 CET. (moderators can still go here to login, dismiss this message, and access the site). To make sure the European Parliament doesn't turn this restriction into reality, click below for what you can do. CLICK HERE TO SAVE YOUR INTERNET
A DAY UNDER THE EU COPYRIGHT DIRECTIVE TL:DR WE ARE BLOCKING REDDIT IN THE EU TODAY FROM 09:00 -17:00 CET Weve repeatedly warned about how an overbroad EU Copyright Directive could restrict Europeans' equal access to the open Internet-and to Reddit. But time is running out. To drive home this point, we are blocking Reddit in the EU today from 09:00-17:00 CET. (moderators can still go here to login, dismiss this message, and access the site). To make sure the European Parliament doesn't turn this restriction into reality, click below for what you can do. CLICK HERE TO SAVE YOUR INTERNET

EU Copyright Directive / Article 13
reddit internet european union

6 myths about Article 13 and why they are false. #SaveYourInternet

Article 13 Article 13 will protect small creators and artists while ensuring they are paid fairly for their work. YouTube is against Article 13 and there is no room for compromise. We support the premise of Article 13 to pay writen carefully. Working with industry and lawmakers, we can find a solution within Article 13 in which rightsholders have the responsibility to identify their copyrighted material and platforms work to make sure rightsholders can control and earn revenue from identified content. This solution would require technology companies to provide tools that make it easy for rightsholders to control the use of their content andd requires rightsholders to work with technology companies to identify the content they own. Platforms that follow these rules, and help rightsholders identify their content, shouldn't be held directly liable for copyright infringement for every potentially copyrighted work in every single piece of content FACT: FACT: Rightsholders should be protected from piracy and compensated fairly for their work, but the current Parliament proposal of Article 13 unintentionally harms the small creators, artists and businesses it intends to protect by forcing sites like YouTube to block most user uploads. YouTube pays the majority of revenue generated on its platform to creators and artists of all sizes. Over the last 12 months, YouTube paid over 800 million to content owners in the EU. And, over the years YouTube has paid the music industry over s billion. The majority of revenue earned from EU viewers could disappear if Article 13 imposes direct liability on platforms before notice of potential copyright infringement, because this would create uncapped financial liability that could force us to block most of YouTube's content in Europe rightsholders fairly, but this legislation must be that a user uploads. ARTICLE 13 COULD PUT HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF EU JOBS AT RISK. Article 13 is already law in the EU. Right now, Article 13, as part of the European Union Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, is being finalized in the EU's trilogue negotiations. This process could be concluded by the end of the year, and EU member states may have up to two years to make the directive into national law Article 13 as written threatens to shut down the ability of millions of people to upload content to platforms like YouTube, including those of European creators, businesses, artists and the people that they employ The digital advertising model is destroying the creative industry. Unintended FACT: Ads and subscription businesses are growing and that revenue is accelerating, fueling the fastest growth for the music industry in 20 years. In the last 12 months, YouTube paid the music industry over 1.5 billion generated from ad revenue alone. This twin-engine revenue machine provides two sources of income to creators and artists. Ad-supported content also helps drive consumption and promotion for global music moments, like Despacito, in countries where people may not be able to afford a monthly subscription service. IF ARTICLE 13 IS INSTATED Managing rights today on big platforms is an impossible case of whack-a- mole, making it too difficult for record labels to withdraw their works EU CHANNELS WILL BE BLOCKED FACT: rightsholders manage their copyrighted works automatically and at scale, but it can make them money too. Over 98% of copyright management on YouTube takes place through Content ID. In fact. to date, Content ID has paid rightsholders over 2.5 billion for third party uses of their content. However, Content ID only works if rightsholders use it and make it clear what belongs to them. Technology like YouTube's Content ID not only helps WHICH MEANS YouTube already has the technology needed to comply with Article 13. FACT: manage their copyrighted content at scale on YouTube. But it only works if rightsholders use the tool, make it clear what belongs to them Under the current proposal Article 13 would make YouTube liable for every potential copyright violation, even without being on notice. It's similar to holding a bookstore owner responsible if one of the books on its shelves contains plagiarized work Even rightsholders dont always know who owns what, and at YouTube's scale--400 hours of video are uploaded every minute-this is an impossible expectation to meet, It should be clear in the directive that collaboration between rightsholders and platforms is essential, and that collaboration will better serve the underlying purpose of Article 13. YouTube's Content ID automates rightsholders ability to MORE THAN 8 MILLION CHANNELS IN FRANCE&GERMANY ALONE WILL BE BLOCKED. tps7fen.wikipeda.or/wik/Formal Tloque meeing
Article 13 Article 13 will protect small creators and artists while ensuring they are paid fairly for their work. YouTube is against Article 13 and there is no room for compromise. We support the premise of Article 13 to pay writen carefully. Working with industry and lawmakers, we can find a solution within Article 13 in which rightsholders have the responsibility to identify their copyrighted material and platforms work to make sure rightsholders can control and earn revenue from identified content. This solution would require technology companies to provide tools that make it easy for rightsholders to control the use of their content andd requires rightsholders to work with technology companies to identify the content they own. Platforms that follow these rules, and help rightsholders identify their content, shouldn't be held directly liable for copyright infringement for every potentially copyrighted work in every single piece of content FACT: FACT: Rightsholders should be protected from piracy and compensated fairly for their work, but the current Parliament proposal of Article 13 unintentionally harms the small creators, artists and businesses it intends to protect by forcing sites like YouTube to block most user uploads. YouTube pays the majority of revenue generated on its platform to creators and artists of all sizes. Over the last 12 months, YouTube paid over 800 million to content owners in the EU. And, over the years YouTube has paid the music industry over s billion. The majority of revenue earned from EU viewers could disappear if Article 13 imposes direct liability on platforms before notice of potential copyright infringement, because this would create uncapped financial liability that could force us to block most of YouTube's content in Europe rightsholders fairly, but this legislation must be that a user uploads. ARTICLE 13 COULD PUT HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF EU JOBS AT RISK. Article 13 is already law in the EU. Right now, Article 13, as part of the European Union Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, is being finalized in the EU's trilogue negotiations. This process could be concluded by the end of the year, and EU member states may have up to two years to make the directive into national law Article 13 as written threatens to shut down the ability of millions of people to upload content to platforms like YouTube, including those of European creators, businesses, artists and the people that they employ The digital advertising model is destroying the creative industry. Unintended FACT: Ads and subscription businesses are growing and that revenue is accelerating, fueling the fastest growth for the music industry in 20 years. In the last 12 months, YouTube paid the music industry over 1.5 billion generated from ad revenue alone. This twin-engine revenue machine provides two sources of income to creators and artists. Ad-supported content also helps drive consumption and promotion for global music moments, like Despacito, in countries where people may not be able to afford a monthly subscription service. IF ARTICLE 13 IS INSTATED Managing rights today on big platforms is an impossible case of whack-a- mole, making it too difficult for record labels to withdraw their works EU CHANNELS WILL BE BLOCKED FACT: rightsholders manage their copyrighted works automatically and at scale, but it can make them money too. Over 98% of copyright management on YouTube takes place through Content ID. In fact. to date, Content ID has paid rightsholders over 2.5 billion for third party uses of their content. However, Content ID only works if rightsholders use it and make it clear what belongs to them. Technology like YouTube's Content ID not only helps WHICH MEANS YouTube already has the technology needed to comply with Article 13. FACT: manage their copyrighted content at scale on YouTube. But it only works if rightsholders use the tool, make it clear what belongs to them Under the current proposal Article 13 would make YouTube liable for every potential copyright violation, even without being on notice. It's similar to holding a bookstore owner responsible if one of the books on its shelves contains plagiarized work Even rightsholders dont always know who owns what, and at YouTube's scale--400 hours of video are uploaded every minute-this is an impossible expectation to meet, It should be clear in the directive that collaboration between rightsholders and platforms is essential, and that collaboration will better serve the underlying purpose of Article 13. YouTube's Content ID automates rightsholders ability to MORE THAN 8 MILLION CHANNELS IN FRANCE&GERMANY ALONE WILL BE BLOCKED. tps7fen.wikipeda.or/wik/Formal Tloque meeing

EU Copyright Directive / Article 13
article 13 myths false youtube creators