Rosanna Pansino vs. MrBeast Ivanka Trump Photo Controversy - Images

Sorted By:

October 28th, 2024 tweet by @DramaAlert

#Drama Alert DramaAlert @DramaAlert COULD ROSANNA AND DOGPACK FACE PRISON TIME? If you are convicted of making a false statement to the FBI, you could face up to 5 YEARS in federal PRISON... #Drama Alert CONSEQUENCES OF LYING TO THE FBI UP TO FIVE YEARS IN FEDERAL PRISON. 6:24 PM Oct 28, 2024 150.4K Views •. Rosanna Pansino @RosannaPansino I have reported what I found and my concerns to the authorities @FBI. Hopefully they will look into these MrBeast Telegram Company Chats Logs and other concerns. Youtube @Team YouTube #mrbeast.
#Drama Alert DramaAlert @DramaAlert COULD ROSANNA AND DOGPACK FACE PRISON TIME? If you are convicted of making a false statement to the FBI, you could face up to 5 YEARS in federal PRISON... #Drama Alert CONSEQUENCES OF LYING TO THE FBI UP TO FIVE YEARS IN FEDERAL PRISON. 6:24 PM Oct 28, 2024 150.4K Views •. Rosanna Pansino @RosannaPansino I have reported what I found and my concerns to the authorities @FBI. Hopefully they will look into these MrBeast Telegram Company Chats Logs and other concerns. Youtube @Team YouTube #mrbeast.

Rosanna Pansino vs. MrBeast Ivanka Trump Photo Controversy
rosanna pansino mrbeast dogpack youtube fbi ivanka trump 13 gq telegram kris tyson dogpack404

October 28th, 2024 tweet by @DogPack404

DogPack404 @DogPack404 Just to clarify, the claim that Ro and I reacted to uncensored CP is a blatant lie, I have the original screen recording of exactly what I showed Ro, every picture was sufficiently censored, thus not constituting CP. I downloaded the work chats and deleted the uncensored images as soon as I believed they could be illegal. Neither Ro or her editors ever saw the uncensored picture. It is a fact that I never knowingly saved the uncensored image. It is also a fact that I never distributed the uncensored image either knowingly or accidentally. I'm happy to invite the FBI to verify these facts. Also as I explain multiple times in the video the only source I could find for it being a 13 year old was Ava who distributed the uncensored photo to a company work chat. I have found no other evidence verifying the individuals age. My exact quote in the video is "In my best judgement if this is a 13-year- old as Ava alleges, I would say that this constitutes as CP in my opinion". (Basing my opinion on Federal Law, Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code: "...A picture of a naked child may constitute illegal CP if it is sufficiently sexually suggestive.") We never claimed the image was in fact CP, we would not make that claim based on one source and a vague legal code. Our point was that Ava knowingly distributed an uncensored explicit photo of someone they believed could be underage in a company work chat. Everything was reported properly to the authorities and handled in accordance to the law. Screen Recording 2024-10-18 at 1.19.nscript DO illegal CP if it is sufficiently T Now in these chats Jimmy changed his name to John Smith, so here are some messages to show that John Smith is Jimmy: You modified Oct 25, 2024 suggestive that image was suggestive yeah in my best judgment if this is a 13-year-old as Ava alleges uh I would say that this constitutes a CP in my opinion agreed let's see if Jimmy knew 11:06 AM · Oct 28, 2024 5,984 Views 17 1720 3 288 ☐ 32
DogPack404 @DogPack404 Just to clarify, the claim that Ro and I reacted to uncensored CP is a blatant lie, I have the original screen recording of exactly what I showed Ro, every picture was sufficiently censored, thus not constituting CP. I downloaded the work chats and deleted the uncensored images as soon as I believed they could be illegal. Neither Ro or her editors ever saw the uncensored picture. It is a fact that I never knowingly saved the uncensored image. It is also a fact that I never distributed the uncensored image either knowingly or accidentally. I'm happy to invite the FBI to verify these facts. Also as I explain multiple times in the video the only source I could find for it being a 13 year old was Ava who distributed the uncensored photo to a company work chat. I have found no other evidence verifying the individuals age. My exact quote in the video is "In my best judgement if this is a 13-year- old as Ava alleges, I would say that this constitutes as CP in my opinion". (Basing my opinion on Federal Law, Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code: "...A picture of a naked child may constitute illegal CP if it is sufficiently sexually suggestive.") We never claimed the image was in fact CP, we would not make that claim based on one source and a vague legal code. Our point was that Ava knowingly distributed an uncensored explicit photo of someone they believed could be underage in a company work chat. Everything was reported properly to the authorities and handled in accordance to the law. Screen Recording 2024-10-18 at 1.19.nscript DO illegal CP if it is sufficiently T Now in these chats Jimmy changed his name to John Smith, so here are some messages to show that John Smith is Jimmy: You modified Oct 25, 2024 suggestive that image was suggestive yeah in my best judgment if this is a 13-year-old as Ava alleges uh I would say that this constitutes a CP in my opinion agreed let's see if Jimmy knew 11:06 AM · Oct 28, 2024 5,984 Views 17 1720 3 288 ☐ 32

Rosanna Pansino vs. MrBeast Ivanka Trump Photo Controversy
rosanna pansino mrbeast dogpack youtube fbi ivanka trump 13 gq telegram kris tyson dogpack404

October 28th, 2024 tweet by @wavywebsurf

wavywebsurf @wavywebsurf dude you are going to get sued DogPack404 @DogPack404 12h UPDATE: I have received the original source of the Ivanka photo. Subscribe It's from a April 2000 British GQ Magazine photoshoot. Surprisingly it is ... Show more zines Magazines ankal ✓ BRITISH G TRUMP "D JIM'S Ma 100% po US $100.C or Best Offer No Interest if pai Condition: Bran say that this constitutes a CP in my opinion agreed let's- MrBeast KNEW All Along... (1,000+ Leaked Messages) Rosanna Pandino 145 Shipping: II 0:00 4:42 PM - Oct 28, 2024 - 193K Views Subscribe 44K 57 Downlo Thanks
wavywebsurf @wavywebsurf dude you are going to get sued DogPack404 @DogPack404 12h UPDATE: I have received the original source of the Ivanka photo. Subscribe It's from a April 2000 British GQ Magazine photoshoot. Surprisingly it is ... Show more zines Magazines ankal ✓ BRITISH G TRUMP "D JIM'S Ma 100% po US $100.C or Best Offer No Interest if pai Condition: Bran say that this constitutes a CP in my opinion agreed let's- MrBeast KNEW All Along... (1,000+ Leaked Messages) Rosanna Pandino 145 Shipping: II 0:00 4:42 PM - Oct 28, 2024 - 193K Views Subscribe 44K 57 Downlo Thanks

Rosanna Pansino vs. MrBeast Ivanka Trump Photo Controversy
rosanna pansino mrbeast dogpack youtube fbi ivanka trump 13 gq telegram kris tyson dogpack404

October 28th, 2024 tweet by @DogPack404

DogPack404 @DogPack404 UPDATE: I have received the original source of the Ivanka photo. It's from a April 2000 British GQ Magazine photoshoot. Surprisingly it is actually her and she was 18 at the time. I'm sure now people will flip and say I should've reverse image searched the photo more before going to the authorities the media. Also Ro first visited the FBI BEFORE filming the Youtube video (Another lie that's being spread). Everything was handled in accordance with the law. And again Ro and I never reported Ava's allegation of "13" as fact. I showed what Ava alleged, I showed the law, I said that IF it actually was a 13 year old it would constitute as CP in my opinion. Other people ran CP as fact. Not us. zines Magazines ankat BRITISH G TRUMP "D JIM'S Ma 100% po US $100.C or Best Offer No Interest if pai Condition: Bran 13-year-old as Ava alleges uh I would say that this constitutes a MrBeast KNEW All Along... (1,000+ Leaked Messages) Rosanna Pandino e 14 Shipping: II 0:02 4:30 PM - Oct 28, 2024 522.1K Views 44K 52
DogPack404 @DogPack404 UPDATE: I have received the original source of the Ivanka photo. It's from a April 2000 British GQ Magazine photoshoot. Surprisingly it is actually her and she was 18 at the time. I'm sure now people will flip and say I should've reverse image searched the photo more before going to the authorities the media. Also Ro first visited the FBI BEFORE filming the Youtube video (Another lie that's being spread). Everything was handled in accordance with the law. And again Ro and I never reported Ava's allegation of "13" as fact. I showed what Ava alleged, I showed the law, I said that IF it actually was a 13 year old it would constitute as CP in my opinion. Other people ran CP as fact. Not us. zines Magazines ankat BRITISH G TRUMP "D JIM'S Ma 100% po US $100.C or Best Offer No Interest if pai Condition: Bran 13-year-old as Ava alleges uh I would say that this constitutes a MrBeast KNEW All Along... (1,000+ Leaked Messages) Rosanna Pandino e 14 Shipping: II 0:02 4:30 PM - Oct 28, 2024 522.1K Views 44K 52

Rosanna Pansino vs. MrBeast Ivanka Trump Photo Controversy
rosanna pansino mrbeast dogpack youtube fbi ivanka trump 13 gq telegram kris tyson dogpack404

October 27th, 2024 tweet by @RosannaPansino

Rosanna Pansino @RosannaPansino I have reported what I found and my concerns to the authorities @FBI. Hopefully they will look into these MrBeast Telegram Company Chats Logs and other concerns. @Youtube @Team YouTube #mrbeast 5:28 PM Oct 27, 2024 8.3M Views •
Rosanna Pansino @RosannaPansino I have reported what I found and my concerns to the authorities @FBI. Hopefully they will look into these MrBeast Telegram Company Chats Logs and other concerns. @Youtube @Team YouTube #mrbeast 5:28 PM Oct 27, 2024 8.3M Views •

Rosanna Pansino vs. MrBeast Ivanka Trump Photo Controversy
rosanna pansino mrbeast dogpack youtube fbi ivanka trump 13 gq telegram kris tyson dogpack404