Russiagate - Images

Sorted By:

I never said Russia did not meddle in the election, I said “it may be Russia, or China or another country or group, or it may be a 400 pound genius sitting in bed and playing with his computer.” The Russian “hoax” was that the Trump campaign colluded with

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump Follow I never said Russia did not meddle in the election, I said "it may be Russia, or China or another country or group, or it may be a 400 pound genius sitting in bed and playing with his computer." The Russian "hoax" was that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia it never did!

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump Follow I never said Russia did not meddle in the election, I said "it may be Russia, or China or another country or group, or it may be a 400 pound genius sitting in bed and playing with his computer." The Russian "hoax" was that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia it never did!

@realdonaldtrump russia hox 400 pound genius

FBI Priorities

LEFT CXIT 12 POTENTIAL SCHOOL SHOOTER PRESIDENT TRUMP SMILED ATA RUSSIAN FBl

LEFT CXIT 12 POTENTIAL SCHOOL SHOOTER PRESIDENT TRUMP SMILED ATA RUSSIAN FBl

The United States upon finding out Russia has interfered with their democratic process

The United States upon finding out Russia has interfered with their democratic process.

The United States upon finding out Russia has interfered with their democratic process.

russia united states hypocrisy

Didn't Plan to Win

Trump didn't plan to win and also he colluded with Russia in order to win Donald Trump Didn't Want to Be President and the administration's shocked first days. Must atios JEFFREY SMITH Elecion NIght I Toched a: fhe had zeen phot 81153 am n the afternoon ofNovember 8, 2016, Kele Conway settled into her glass office at Trump Toiver. Right up until the last weeks of the race, the campaign headquarters had remained a list less place. All that seemed to a corporate back office were a few posters with right-wing distinguish it fro slogans. 5:44 PM - 3 Jan 2018 57 Retweets 152 Likes https://archive.is/rNrlI

Trump didn't plan to win and also he colluded with Russia in order to win Donald Trump Didn't Want to Be President and the administration's shocked first days. Must atios JEFFREY SMITH Elecion NIght I Toched a: fhe had zeen phot 81153 am n the afternoon ofNovember 8, 2016, Kele Conway settled into her glass office at Trump Toiver. Right up until the last weeks of the race, the campaign headquarters had remained a list less place. All that seemed to a corporate back office were a few posters with right-wing distinguish it fro slogans. 5:44 PM - 3 Jan 2018 57 Retweets 152 Likes https://archive.is/rNrlI

russiagate donald trump twitter russia

Crazy stupid

Natasha Bertrand@NatashaBertrand 2h @chrisgeidner spoke to a senior GSA lawyer, who said of the Trump transition team: "In using our devices," transition team members were informed that materials "would not be held back in any law enforcement" actions. Therefore, no expectation of privacy can be assumed." informed that materials "would not be held back in any law enforcement" actions Loewentritt read to BuzzFeed News a series of agreements that anyone had to agree to whern using GSA materials during the transition, including that there could be monitoring and auditing of devices and that, "Therefore, no expectation of privacy can be assumed." Loewentritt told BuzzFeed News that the GSA initially "suggested a warrant or subpoena" for the materials, but that the Special Counsel's Office determined the letter route was sufficient. As to whether the Trump campaign should have been informed of the request, Loewentritt said, 111 1.3K 1.8K Catherine @catheriness61 Follow Replying to @NatashaBertrand @chrisgeidner Why should they be worried? Surely the Trump transition team knew better than to discuss anything incriminating on email? Especially govt email? Right? 'caus would be crazy stupid... e that

Natasha Bertrand@NatashaBertrand 2h @chrisgeidner spoke to a senior GSA lawyer, who said of the Trump transition team: "In using our devices," transition team members were informed that materials "would not be held back in any law enforcement" actions. Therefore, no expectation of privacy can be assumed." informed that materials "would not be held back in any law enforcement" actions Loewentritt read to BuzzFeed News a series of agreements that anyone had to agree to whern using GSA materials during the transition, including that there could be monitoring and auditing of devices and that, "Therefore, no expectation of privacy can be assumed." Loewentritt told BuzzFeed News that the GSA initially "suggested a warrant or subpoena" for the materials, but that the Special Counsel's Office determined the letter route was sufficient. As to whether the Trump campaign should have been informed of the request, Loewentritt said, 111 1.3K 1.8K Catherine @catheriness61 Follow Replying to @NatashaBertrand @chrisgeidner Why should they be worried? Surely the Trump transition team knew better than to discuss anything incriminating on email? Especially govt email? Right? 'caus would be crazy stupid... e that

russiagate robert mueller special counsel donald trump gsa emails richard beckler obstruction of justice perjury treason

Mueller played them like a fiddle

Mueller and his team told everyone they were interviewing to bring the emails and then those people all cherry-pick which emails they wanted to bring, and then when they get there, Mueller didn't actually need them to bring the emails because he already had them all LOL DUMB-ASS FC GIF 1:42 PM 16 Dec 2017

Mueller and his team told everyone they were interviewing to bring the emails and then those people all cherry-pick which emails they wanted to bring, and then when they get there, Mueller didn't actually need them to bring the emails because he already had them all LOL DUMB-ASS FC GIF 1:42 PM 16 Dec 2017

russiagate robert mueller donald trump gsa emails obstruction of justice perjury special counsel richard beckler

Trump allies don't law so good

Experts Debunk, Mock Trump Lawyers Claims Mueller Obtained Transition Emails Unlawfully GSA: Trump Transition Team Informed Communications Could Be Handed Over To Law Enforcement Specifically, Loewentritt said, "in using our devices," transition team members were informed that materials "would not be held back in any law enforcement" actions. (Buzzfeed) Renato Mariotti, Former Prosecutor: Not inappropriate or Unusual "Of course Mueller obtained emails from a third party," wrote former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti. "Prosecutors in most white collar criminal investigations do that. It's not 'inappropriate' or even unusual. Anyone who claims otherwise has no idea what they're talking about." (Business Insider Jeffrey Cramer, white collar former federal prosecutor: "Not a problem” This is not a problem," he said, referring to the way Mueller's team got a hold of the emails. "The server owner, in this case GSA, properly has the emails and can turn them over if there was a subpoena or court order," in the same way that internet providers and banks can provide emails and records about clients to law enforcement. More than that, Cramer added, the special counsel's team may not even have needed a subpoena to obtain the emails. An administrative request- a legally authorized and judicially enforceable demand for records issued by a government authoritymay have sufficed, he said. (BusinessS Insider Norm Eisen, Former White House Special Counsel for Ethics and Government Reform: "Executive privilege does not apply” "Executive privilege does not apply until you are the executive; these documents are from the transition, before Trump became the executive, QED no executive privilege. Grasping at straws here. (Twitter) William Jeffress, white collar defense attorney: No evidence of privileged information ."I seriously doubt there is anything here to taint the [Mueller] investigation," said William Jeffress, a white-collar defense attorney who represented Vice President D--- Cheney's senior aide, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, during the Valerie Plame CIA leak investigation. Jeffress added the letter included no evidence to prove any privileged information had been obtained by Mueller's team and that even if it were, there are procedures for retrieving them. (Politico) The Hill: Swalwell mocks report that Mueller obtained Trump transition emails illegally ."Private documents' on a US Government, public email system? What are they afraid was found? Baloney. This is another attempt to discredit Mueller as his #TrumpRussia probe tightens"

Experts Debunk, Mock Trump Lawyers Claims Mueller Obtained Transition Emails Unlawfully GSA: Trump Transition Team Informed Communications Could Be Handed Over To Law Enforcement Specifically, Loewentritt said, "in using our devices," transition team members were informed that materials "would not be held back in any law enforcement" actions. (Buzzfeed) Renato Mariotti, Former Prosecutor: Not inappropriate or Unusual "Of course Mueller obtained emails from a third party," wrote former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti. "Prosecutors in most white collar criminal investigations do that. It's not 'inappropriate' or even unusual. Anyone who claims otherwise has no idea what they're talking about." (Business Insider Jeffrey Cramer, white collar former federal prosecutor: "Not a problem” This is not a problem," he said, referring to the way Mueller's team got a hold of the emails. "The server owner, in this case GSA, properly has the emails and can turn them over if there was a subpoena or court order," in the same way that internet providers and banks can provide emails and records about clients to law enforcement. More than that, Cramer added, the special counsel's team may not even have needed a subpoena to obtain the emails. An administrative request- a legally authorized and judicially enforceable demand for records issued by a government authoritymay have sufficed, he said. (BusinessS Insider Norm Eisen, Former White House Special Counsel for Ethics and Government Reform: "Executive privilege does not apply” "Executive privilege does not apply until you are the executive; these documents are from the transition, before Trump became the executive, QED no executive privilege. Grasping at straws here. (Twitter) William Jeffress, white collar defense attorney: No evidence of privileged information ."I seriously doubt there is anything here to taint the [Mueller] investigation," said William Jeffress, a white-collar defense attorney who represented Vice President D--- Cheney's senior aide, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, during the Valerie Plame CIA leak investigation. Jeffress added the letter included no evidence to prove any privileged information had been obtained by Mueller's team and that even if it were, there are procedures for retrieving them. (Politico) The Hill: Swalwell mocks report that Mueller obtained Trump transition emails illegally ."Private documents' on a US Government, public email system? What are they afraid was found? Baloney. This is another attempt to discredit Mueller as his #TrumpRussia probe tightens"

russiagate robert mueller special counsel fox news gsa obstruction of justice perjury richard beckler treason

Robert Mueller obtained Transition emails from GSA

Specifically, Loewentritt said, "in using our devices," transition team members were informed that materials "would not be held back in any law enforcement" actions. Loewentritt read to BuzzFeed News a series of agreements that anyone had to agree to when using GSA materials during the transition, including that there could be monitoring and auditing of devices and that, "Therefore, no expectation of privacy can be assume Loewentritt told BuzzFeed News that the GSA initially "suggested a warrant or subpoena" for the materials, but that the Special Counsel's Office determined the letter route was sufficient. As to whether the Trump campaign should have been informed of the request, Loewentritt said, "That's between the Special Counsel and the transition team."

Specifically, Loewentritt said, "in using our devices," transition team members were informed that materials "would not be held back in any law enforcement" actions. Loewentritt read to BuzzFeed News a series of agreements that anyone had to agree to when using GSA materials during the transition, including that there could be monitoring and auditing of devices and that, "Therefore, no expectation of privacy can be assume Loewentritt told BuzzFeed News that the GSA initially "suggested a warrant or subpoena" for the materials, but that the Special Counsel's Office determined the letter route was sufficient. As to whether the Trump campaign should have been informed of the request, Loewentritt said, "That's between the Special Counsel and the transition team."

russiagate robert mueller special counsel gsa emails obstruction of justice treason perjury richard beckler

Their Emails!

Axios @axios Follow Scoop: Special Counsel Robert Mueller has obtained many tens of thousands" of Trump transition emails, includinq sensitive emails of Jared Kushner

Axios @axios Follow Scoop: Special Counsel Robert Mueller has obtained many tens of thousands" of Trump transition emails, includinq sensitive emails of Jared Kushner

russiagate robert mueller donald trump jared kushner axios gsa emails obstruction of justice perjury richard beckley treason

But Their Emails!

How it happened: The sources say Mueller obtained the emails from the General Services Administration, the government agency that hosted the transition email system, which had addresses ending in "ptt.gov, for Presidential Transition Team. Axios has asked the Special Counsel's Office for comment and vwill update this story with the response. The transition sources said they were surprised about the emails because they have been in touch with Mueller's team and have cooperated. "They ask us to waive NDAs [nondisclosure agreements] and things like that," a second source said. "We have never said no' to anything."

How it happened: The sources say Mueller obtained the emails from the General Services Administration, the government agency that hosted the transition email system, which had addresses ending in "ptt.gov, for Presidential Transition Team. Axios has asked the Special Counsel's Office for comment and vwill update this story with the response. The transition sources said they were surprised about the emails because they have been in touch with Mueller's team and have cooperated. "They ask us to waive NDAs [nondisclosure agreements] and things like that," a second source said. "We have never said no' to anything."

russiagate robert mueller donald trump gsa obstruction of justice perjury treason fail epic fail richard beckler

Linux sure has a lot of weird features these days

STRZOK (3) Linux Programmer's Manual STRZOK (3) NAME St rzok remove a string from memoryifltis Repub lican, otherwise do nothing #include <string.h> char *strzok (const char *s); SYNOPSIS DESCRIPTION The strzok) function detects whether or not the contents of a string are Democratic or Republican. If the string's contents are Democratic, no action is taken. If the string's contents are Republican, the string is deallocated and removed from the system memory. RETURN VALUE If the string remains allocated, the strzok) function returns a pointer to the string's Location in memory.on successfutty removing a Republican string, the strzok ) function returns NULL. ERRORS strzok) may be interrupted by the Inspector General of the Department of Justice CONFORMING TO strzok() conforms to SVr4, 4.3BSD, POSIX.1-2001, Fahrenheit -451, and 1984 SEE ALSO strfry (3) Manual page strzok (3) 11ne 1/34 94% (press h for help or to quit)

STRZOK (3) Linux Programmer's Manual STRZOK (3) NAME St rzok remove a string from memoryifltis Repub lican, otherwise do nothing #include <string.h> char *strzok (const char *s); SYNOPSIS DESCRIPTION The strzok) function detects whether or not the contents of a string are Democratic or Republican. If the string's contents are Democratic, no action is taken. If the string's contents are Republican, the string is deallocated and removed from the system memory. RETURN VALUE If the string remains allocated, the strzok) function returns a pointer to the string's Location in memory.on successfutty removing a Republican string, the strzok ) function returns NULL. ERRORS strzok) may be interrupted by the Inspector General of the Department of Justice CONFORMING TO strzok() conforms to SVr4, 4.3BSD, POSIX.1-2001, Fahrenheit -451, and 1984 SEE ALSO strfry (3) Manual page strzok (3) 11ne 1/34 94% (press h for help or to quit)

peter strzok man page linux republican democratic politics string

Trump, Flynn, FBI and Russia Analysis

File: 5196584984948.jpg (89 KB, 1280x720) https://archive.is/UYbeS Trump just fcked himself over. /pol/ Anonymous (ID muXtyps) R 12/03/17(Sun)05:21:24 No.151775754 15177648151778172 151779202 151798081 151798585 151798905 151799249 151799636 151800508 151800621 151802406151802521 151802668 151805644 151805695 151806191151806530 151807755 151811556 151812645 151815208 >151816506 151816933 Assumption 1: Flynn lied to the FBl on 29 December 2016 Proof: That's when he stated "refrain from escalation of the situation in response to the sanctions that the U.S. imposed against Russia on the same day." and which he recently confessed was false Assumption 2: Trump fired Flynn on 13 February 2017 Proof. Factual Assumption 3: Trump pressured Comey into dropping the Russia investigation on 14 February 2017 Proof. Dicey. Only James Comey's testimony really (or potential) tapes, depending on if you believe him. Assumption 4: Trump states today that he fired Flynn because he lied to the FBl Proof. His tweet Conclusion 1: Trump knew on 13 February 2017 that Flynn lied to the FEl Conclusion 2. Trump knew on 14 February 2017 that Flynn lied to the FEl Conclusion 3: Trump knew while he was pressuring Comey that Flynn lied to the FBl Conclusion 4: Trump is f----- Either one of these assumptions is false, or Trump is ked for committing obstruction of justice (e.g. knew of a crime, and pressured an investigator to drop the crime) The only real question is remaining which assumption is false, if any. Assumption 3 is the weakest. I personally don't trust Comey. But if there are tapes, then Trump is going to jail

File: 5196584984948.jpg (89 KB, 1280x720) https://archive.is/UYbeS Trump just fcked himself over. /pol/ Anonymous (ID muXtyps) R 12/03/17(Sun)05:21:24 No.151775754 15177648151778172 151779202 151798081 151798585 151798905 151799249 151799636 151800508 151800621 151802406151802521 151802668 151805644 151805695 151806191151806530 151807755 151811556 151812645 151815208 >151816506 151816933 Assumption 1: Flynn lied to the FBl on 29 December 2016 Proof: That's when he stated "refrain from escalation of the situation in response to the sanctions that the U.S. imposed against Russia on the same day." and which he recently confessed was false Assumption 2: Trump fired Flynn on 13 February 2017 Proof. Factual Assumption 3: Trump pressured Comey into dropping the Russia investigation on 14 February 2017 Proof. Dicey. Only James Comey's testimony really (or potential) tapes, depending on if you believe him. Assumption 4: Trump states today that he fired Flynn because he lied to the FBl Proof. His tweet Conclusion 1: Trump knew on 13 February 2017 that Flynn lied to the FEl Conclusion 2. Trump knew on 14 February 2017 that Flynn lied to the FEl Conclusion 3: Trump knew while he was pressuring Comey that Flynn lied to the FBl Conclusion 4: Trump is f----- Either one of these assumptions is false, or Trump is ked for committing obstruction of justice (e.g. knew of a crime, and pressured an investigator to drop the crime) The only real question is remaining which assumption is false, if any. Assumption 3 is the weakest. I personally don't trust Comey. But if there are tapes, then Trump is going to jail

trump michael flynn fbi russiagate probe investigation 4chan /pol/ james comey russia

Guccifer 2.0 edited DNC emails before publishing

All three leak-branded sites have distanced themselves from Moscow. DCLeaks claimed to be run by American hacktivists. WikiLeaks said Russia wasn't its source. Guccifer 2.o claimed to be Romanian. But there were signs of dishonesty from the start. The first document Guccifer 2.o published on June 15 came not from the DNC as advertised but from Podesta's inbox, according to a former DNC official who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the press The official said the word "CONFIDENTIAL" was not in the original document Guccifer 2.o had airbrushed it to catch reporters' attention.

All three leak-branded sites have distanced themselves from Moscow. DCLeaks claimed to be run by American hacktivists. WikiLeaks said Russia wasn't its source. Guccifer 2.o claimed to be Romanian. But there were signs of dishonesty from the start. The first document Guccifer 2.o published on June 15 came not from the DNC as advertised but from Podesta's inbox, according to a former DNC official who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the press The official said the word "CONFIDENTIAL" was not in the original document Guccifer 2.o had airbrushed it to catch reporters' attention.

russiagate guccifer 2.0 dnc john podesta forgery espionage

Donald Trump setting up to fire Mueller?

Rachel Maddow MSNBC@maddow -18h Anyone figured out why the Trump Administration unexpectedly fired senior DOJ official and US Attorney Dana Boente last week? Rolling Podium @Rolling_Podium 18h Then gave NYT a cal today saying he is "not upset about Mueller 8 15 157 paladine @paladine 18h That's it. He asked Boente to fire Mueller? Huge if it pans out. 9 26 288 Rolling Podium @Rolling Podium Follow Replying to paladine @maddow Sort of...He asked Boente if he would show "Loyalty" if he fired Rosenstien. We now know Boente's answer. 2:58 PM - 1 Nov 2017 @ : : ( 106 Retweets 609 Likes 22 106 609 paladine @paladine 18h 以, Replying to @Rolling.Podium @maddow 4 34 Sybill Trelawney@SybilT2 17h ow could Boente fire Rosenstein, who is higher up in the food chain? ((Rob Leduc)) @rleduc123 17h Trump fires Rosenstein if he won't fire Mueller. Boente is next in line, and also won't fire Mueller. So looking to replace Boente. 9 64 237

Rachel Maddow MSNBC@maddow -18h Anyone figured out why the Trump Administration unexpectedly fired senior DOJ official and US Attorney Dana Boente last week? Rolling Podium @Rolling_Podium 18h Then gave NYT a cal today saying he is "not upset about Mueller 8 15 157 paladine @paladine 18h That's it. He asked Boente to fire Mueller? Huge if it pans out. 9 26 288 Rolling Podium @Rolling Podium Follow Replying to paladine @maddow Sort of...He asked Boente if he would show "Loyalty" if he fired Rosenstien. We now know Boente's answer. 2:58 PM - 1 Nov 2017 @ : : ( 106 Retweets 609 Likes 22 106 609 paladine @paladine 18h 以, Replying to @Rolling.Podium @maddow 4 34 Sybill Trelawney@SybilT2 17h ow could Boente fire Rosenstein, who is higher up in the food chain? ((Rob Leduc)) @rleduc123 17h Trump fires Rosenstein if he won't fire Mueller. Boente is next in line, and also won't fire Mueller. So looking to replace Boente. 9 64 237

russiagate donald trump robert mueller special counsel dana boente rod rosenstein rachel maddow msnbc twitter collusion conspiracy obstruction of justice saturday night massacre watergate impeachment

Sam Clovis encouraged Russia meetings

But they quote one unidentified campaign "supervisor" as emailing him in August 2016 that "l would encourage you" to make a trip to Moscow to arrange such a meeting. A Trump campaign source identified the supervisor as Sam Clovis,a conservative radio host who was co-chairman of the campaign. Another "high ranking" official identified by the source as campaign chairman Paul Manafort - received an email from Papadopoulos saying that "Russia has been eager to meet Mr. Trump for quite some time and has been reaching

But they quote one unidentified campaign "supervisor" as emailing him in August 2016 that "l would encourage you" to make a trip to Moscow to arrange such a meeting. A Trump campaign source identified the supervisor as Sam Clovis,a conservative radio host who was co-chairman of the campaign. Another "high ranking" official identified by the source as campaign chairman Paul Manafort - received an email from Papadopoulos saying that "Russia has been eager to meet Mr. Trump for quite some time and has been reaching

russiagate sam clovis george papadopolous donald trump vladimir putin collusion conspiracy treason paul manafort

Intent to disguise involvement

17. On or about May 13, 2016, the Professor emailed defendant PAPADOPOULOs with "an update" of what they had discussed in their "recent conversations," including: "We will continue to liaise through you with the Russian counterparts in terms of what is needed for a high level meeting of Mr. Trump with the Russian Federation 18. The next day, on or about May 14, 2016, defendant PAPADOPOULOS emailed the High-Ranking Campaign Official and stated that the "Russian government[] ha[s] also relayed to me that they are interested in hosting Mr. Trump." 19. On or about May 21, 2016, defendant PAPADOPOULOS emailed another high ranking Campaign official, with the subject line "Request from Russia to meet Mr. Trump." The email included the May 4 MFA Email and added: "Russia has been eager to meet Mr. Trump for quite sometime and have been reaching out to me to discuss."2 20. On or about June, 2016, defendant PAPADOPOULOS emailed the High Ranking Campaign Official and asked about Russia. The High-Ranking Campaign Official referred him to the Campaign Supervisor because "Thle is running point." Defendant PAPADOPOULOS then emailed the Campaign Supervisor, with the subject line "Re: Messages from Russia": "I have the Russian MFA asking me if Mr. Trump is interested in visiting Russia The government notes that the official forwarded defendant PAPADOPOULOS's email to another Campaign official (without including defendant PAPADOPOULOS) and stated: "Letl'ls discuss. We need someone to communicate that DT is not doing these trips. It should be someone low level in the campaign so as not to send any signa Case 1:17-cr-00182-RDM Document 19 Filed 10/05/17 Page 9 of 14 at some point. Wanted to pass this info along to you for you to decide what's best to do with it and what message I should send (or to ignore). 21. From mid-June through mid-August 2016, PAPADOPOULOS pursued an "off the record" meeting between one or more Campaign representatives and "members of president putin's office and the mfa."

17. On or about May 13, 2016, the Professor emailed defendant PAPADOPOULOs with "an update" of what they had discussed in their "recent conversations," including: "We will continue to liaise through you with the Russian counterparts in terms of what is needed for a high level meeting of Mr. Trump with the Russian Federation 18. The next day, on or about May 14, 2016, defendant PAPADOPOULOS emailed the High-Ranking Campaign Official and stated that the "Russian government[] ha[s] also relayed to me that they are interested in hosting Mr. Trump." 19. On or about May 21, 2016, defendant PAPADOPOULOS emailed another high ranking Campaign official, with the subject line "Request from Russia to meet Mr. Trump." The email included the May 4 MFA Email and added: "Russia has been eager to meet Mr. Trump for quite sometime and have been reaching out to me to discuss."2 20. On or about June, 2016, defendant PAPADOPOULOS emailed the High Ranking Campaign Official and asked about Russia. The High-Ranking Campaign Official referred him to the Campaign Supervisor because "Thle is running point." Defendant PAPADOPOULOS then emailed the Campaign Supervisor, with the subject line "Re: Messages from Russia": "I have the Russian MFA asking me if Mr. Trump is interested in visiting Russia The government notes that the official forwarded defendant PAPADOPOULOS's email to another Campaign official (without including defendant PAPADOPOULOS) and stated: "Letl'ls discuss. We need someone to communicate that DT is not doing these trips. It should be someone low level in the campaign so as not to send any signa Case 1:17-cr-00182-RDM Document 19 Filed 10/05/17 Page 9 of 14 at some point. Wanted to pass this info along to you for you to decide what's best to do with it and what message I should send (or to ignore). 21. From mid-June through mid-August 2016, PAPADOPOULOS pursued an "off the record" meeting between one or more Campaign representatives and "members of president putin's office and the mfa."

russiagate george papadopolous robert mueller special counsel collusion conspiracy cover up obstruction of justice espionage treason indictment donald trump

Bannon wants Mueller investigation to end

Renato Mariotti @renato_mariotti Follow 1/ While I was on @CNNTonight just now, @DanaBashCNN reported that Bannon is telling Trump to get Congress to cut Mueller's funding 7:36 PM-30 Oct 2017 5,740 Retweets 6,913 Likes 724 t 5.7K 6.9K Renato Mariotti@renato_mariotti 11h Replying to @renato_mariotti @CNNTonight @DanaBashCNN 2/ She also said Bannon told Trump to deny documents to Mueller and challenge the charges as beyond his mandate. 61 t1.1 2.6K Renato Mariotti @renato_mariotti 11h justice and views himself as above the law 3/ If Trump does this, it will be powerful evidence that he wants to obstruct 56t 1.2K 4.K Renato Mariotti @renato_mariotti 11h Anyone involved has no respect for the Constitution. 4/ As an American, I'm deeply disturbed that this is even being discussed 65 t 1.0K 4.5K Renato Mariotti @renato_mariotti 11h 5/ If they try to do this, every patriotic American should stand together against it. end 136 .1 5.K

Renato Mariotti @renato_mariotti Follow 1/ While I was on @CNNTonight just now, @DanaBashCNN reported that Bannon is telling Trump to get Congress to cut Mueller's funding 7:36 PM-30 Oct 2017 5,740 Retweets 6,913 Likes 724 t 5.7K 6.9K Renato Mariotti@renato_mariotti 11h Replying to @renato_mariotti @CNNTonight @DanaBashCNN 2/ She also said Bannon told Trump to deny documents to Mueller and challenge the charges as beyond his mandate. 61 t1.1 2.6K Renato Mariotti @renato_mariotti 11h justice and views himself as above the law 3/ If Trump does this, it will be powerful evidence that he wants to obstruct 56t 1.2K 4.K Renato Mariotti @renato_mariotti 11h Anyone involved has no respect for the Constitution. 4/ As an American, I'm deeply disturbed that this is even being discussed 65 t 1.0K 4.5K Renato Mariotti @renato_mariotti 11h 5/ If they try to do this, every patriotic American should stand together against it. end 136 .1 5.K

russiagate steve bannon donald trump robert mueller special counsel cnn dana bash twitter renato mariotti breitbart obstruction of justice collusion conspiracy

"Have Guccifer post them first."

Trump's campaign and the Kremlin, in part because he seemed to know in advance that WiklLeaks would be publishing emails hacked from Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta's account. Last month, he testified before th House Intelligence Committee about his communications with Guccifer 2.0 and WikiLeaks, saying that he never communicated directly with WikiLeaks mastermind Julian Assange but learned about the site's plans to publish emails damaging to Clinton from an intermediary. He described the intermediary as a journalist, but has refused to identify him on the grounds that their conversations were off the record. Committee leaders said this week they may subpoena Stone to require him to identify the intermediary. Stranahan said it's not him. "I don't know anything about that, he said. "I have no relationship with anyone at all at WikiLeaks,." However, Stranahan did confirm he connected Stone to the hacker. He also said Guccifer 2.0 offered him documents that his editors at Breitbart were wary of publishing "Breitbart didn't want to run with them for whatever reason, and they were like, Have Guccifer post them first," Stranahan said. Stranahan noted he has discussed his interactions with Guccifer publicly on Twitter and in video broadcasts. He doesn't believe the Justice Department has any reason to be concerned about his communications with the hacker. "I didn't do anything wrong," Stranahan said Fionda also alerted law enforcement about another colleague who claimed to be Justice Department, he included copies of Twitter messages in which Cassandra information Fionda gavet

Trump's campaign and the Kremlin, in part because he seemed to know in advance that WiklLeaks would be publishing emails hacked from Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta's account. Last month, he testified before th House Intelligence Committee about his communications with Guccifer 2.0 and WikiLeaks, saying that he never communicated directly with WikiLeaks mastermind Julian Assange but learned about the site's plans to publish emails damaging to Clinton from an intermediary. He described the intermediary as a journalist, but has refused to identify him on the grounds that their conversations were off the record. Committee leaders said this week they may subpoena Stone to require him to identify the intermediary. Stranahan said it's not him. "I don't know anything about that, he said. "I have no relationship with anyone at all at WikiLeaks,." However, Stranahan did confirm he connected Stone to the hacker. He also said Guccifer 2.0 offered him documents that his editors at Breitbart were wary of publishing "Breitbart didn't want to run with them for whatever reason, and they were like, Have Guccifer post them first," Stranahan said. Stranahan noted he has discussed his interactions with Guccifer publicly on Twitter and in video broadcasts. He doesn't believe the Justice Department has any reason to be concerned about his communications with the hacker. "I didn't do anything wrong," Stranahan said Fionda also alerted law enforcement about another colleague who claimed to be Justice Department, he included copies of Twitter messages in which Cassandra information Fionda gavet

russiagate breitbart guccifer 2.0 lee stranahan cassandra rules house of representatives intelligence committee collusion conspiracy john podesta espionage treason wikileaks roger stone jr.

....Also, there is NO COLLUSION!

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump ....Also, there is NO COLLUSION!

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump ....Also, there is NO COLLUSION!

@realdonaldtrump

Sorry, but this is years ago, before Paul Manafort was part of the Trump campaign. But why aren't Crooked Hillary & the Dems the focus?????

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump Sorry, but this is years ago, before Paul Manafort was part of the Trump campaign. But why aren't Crooked Hillary & the Dems the focus?????

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump Sorry, but this is years ago, before Paul Manafort was part of the Trump campaign. But why aren't Crooked Hillary & the Dems the focus?????

@realdonaldtrump hillary clinton