GamerGate - Images

Sorted By:

Gamers unite

VOTE
VOTE

GamerGate
gamergate notyourshield faux cyrillic

Spot the shill

"We need a leader!" I want to murder Anita." It's over, we loet!" "Liana blah blah blah" Who cares? Take it to/pol/. "I just don't know anymore." Don't act yet, just wait." Do not believe next poster." "Prove you aren't all oexists. You)" DISTRACTION CRACKING DEFEATISM BAITING MISDIRECTION SLIDING UNCERTAINTY CELEBRATION FALSE FLAGS FEAR THE SHILL HAS MANY TOOLS THE SHILL HAS MANY FACES SPOT THE SHILL TO BEAT HIM #GamerGate
"We need a leader!" I want to murder Anita." It's over, we loet!" "Liana blah blah blah" Who cares? Take it to/pol/. "I just don't know anymore." Don't act yet, just wait." Do not believe next poster." "Prove you aren't all oexists. You)" DISTRACTION CRACKING DEFEATISM BAITING MISDIRECTION SLIDING UNCERTAINTY CELEBRATION FALSE FLAGS FEAR THE SHILL HAS MANY TOOLS THE SHILL HAS MANY FACES SPOT THE SHILL TO BEAT HIM #GamerGate

GamerGate

They don't want a discussion

Block Bot Sign-Up Page How People Against #GamerGate React to wanting Discussion Links: More Information Click on the Twitter icon at the bottom of the page and authorise The (Privacy/How it Works)& Contact @The Block Bot or the A+ forum if you are blocked and want to complain . Or if you want to be a blocker and have access to add to the blocklist then Bot to block on your behalf. If you are having issues try clearing y For more information on blocking consult Twitter's help center ascendedtyrant 242. aschops 243. asgardianrabbit 244. ash_816 245. ashbeyhere 246. ashleyostoja 247. ashtonxeuphoni There are three levels to choose from: a collection of cyberbullies, bigots, MRAS. anti-feminists. TERis and SWERfs- 257. atchashamrock 258. atevera 259, athalie17 260. atheistgamer100 261. athenasbow 262.atohithered 263. atruusmoovnig Review the block list below then -> Choose your level: Level 1: Mostly unpleasantly abusive and bigoted Tweeps, some doxers, stalkers and tweeps that are fakes of real accounts Level 2: Some abusive, but most are unapologetically wedded to MRA, anti-feminist or TERf/SWERf ideology (Plus you will block Level 1) Level 3: The least hostile. Lacking in knowledge about and openness to feminist, trans*, anti-racist, etc. issues. (Plus you will block Levels 1 and 282. b10logicalvirus 283. b_gladstone 284. b_isback 285. babydollsworld 286. bachelorlessons 287. bad1ass_ike 288. badassc Blocker (Mr. Fart) Can someone point me in the direction of the anti #GamerGate bots 290. badratsbarrett 291. baepernick292.balahast 293. balls_solo 294. bandhbrother 295 314. beastitity 315. beastscriber 316. beckdomee 317. beefsuprym 318. beenhacked911319. beerknight1 320. bekkalina13 Spinzig @spinzig @FartToContinue The blockbot originates from Atheism+ and the creator is a total smug, snarky little s-------. 1. benkremling 332. benlawson 333. benninyett 334. benwpww 335. benzoholic19 336. berk09897635 337. bervose 338 Blocktogether org list of all #GamerGate hashtaggers. We only have a subset of these. blocktogether.org/show-blocks/7e 55. bigmac,_stark 356. bigrigs69 357. bigtimstrange 358. bigtitie sharr 359. billy inton 360. bikini bridge 361. bikini_ bridge sarah Brown @spinzig @FartToContinue Endorsement indeed! @oolon 371.bikinibridges1 372.bikinibridgexx 373. bikinibridgeyes 374. biknibridge 375 bilevans2000 376. bilifirill 377 bill 199 blaze142035 397 blckmssh 398. bleed420 399. bleedingfame 400. bling219 401. blockbotkiller 402. bluebloodcunts 4 404. blueplastic1 405. blueshitthino 406. blumbizzle 407 blundadownunda 408. blurofblaze 409. bmorin 410.bnp 411.bnp 413. bobaobaggins 414.bobfrommumbai 415. bobjim94410830 416. boblafleur1 417. bobryan88655493 418. bobshango 419. Babbling Brooke @auntysarah @spinzig @FartToContinue He's a real peach... I think this searcih will go well o_O twitter.com/spinzig/status. uies 442. breath sean They label you and put you on a target l tses is eraena aS HR merarAa b bridgspiration 449. britbongreturns 450. 452 brofrea 453 sarah Brown @auntysarah 1m @oolon @spinzig @FartToContinue "Having sex is on my bucket list 480. buttr 481. buzzlitebeersr 482. bvnvnbjk 483. byogpengooin 484.cofman 485. ctt Hide conversation
Block Bot Sign-Up Page How People Against #GamerGate React to wanting Discussion Links: More Information Click on the Twitter icon at the bottom of the page and authorise The (Privacy/How it Works)& Contact @The Block Bot or the A+ forum if you are blocked and want to complain . Or if you want to be a blocker and have access to add to the blocklist then Bot to block on your behalf. If you are having issues try clearing y For more information on blocking consult Twitter's help center ascendedtyrant 242. aschops 243. asgardianrabbit 244. ash_816 245. ashbeyhere 246. ashleyostoja 247. ashtonxeuphoni There are three levels to choose from: a collection of cyberbullies, bigots, MRAS. anti-feminists. TERis and SWERfs- 257. atchashamrock 258. atevera 259, athalie17 260. atheistgamer100 261. athenasbow 262.atohithered 263. atruusmoovnig Review the block list below then -> Choose your level: Level 1: Mostly unpleasantly abusive and bigoted Tweeps, some doxers, stalkers and tweeps that are fakes of real accounts Level 2: Some abusive, but most are unapologetically wedded to MRA, anti-feminist or TERf/SWERf ideology (Plus you will block Level 1) Level 3: The least hostile. Lacking in knowledge about and openness to feminist, trans*, anti-racist, etc. issues. (Plus you will block Levels 1 and 282. b10logicalvirus 283. b_gladstone 284. b_isback 285. babydollsworld 286. bachelorlessons 287. bad1ass_ike 288. badassc Blocker (Mr. Fart) Can someone point me in the direction of the anti #GamerGate bots 290. badratsbarrett 291. baepernick292.balahast 293. balls_solo 294. bandhbrother 295 314. beastitity 315. beastscriber 316. beckdomee 317. beefsuprym 318. beenhacked911319. beerknight1 320. bekkalina13 Spinzig @spinzig @FartToContinue The blockbot originates from Atheism+ and the creator is a total smug, snarky little s-------. 1. benkremling 332. benlawson 333. benninyett 334. benwpww 335. benzoholic19 336. berk09897635 337. bervose 338 Blocktogether org list of all #GamerGate hashtaggers. We only have a subset of these. blocktogether.org/show-blocks/7e 55. bigmac,_stark 356. bigrigs69 357. bigtimstrange 358. bigtitie sharr 359. billy inton 360. bikini bridge 361. bikini_ bridge sarah Brown @spinzig @FartToContinue Endorsement indeed! @oolon 371.bikinibridges1 372.bikinibridgexx 373. bikinibridgeyes 374. biknibridge 375 bilevans2000 376. bilifirill 377 bill 199 blaze142035 397 blckmssh 398. bleed420 399. bleedingfame 400. bling219 401. blockbotkiller 402. bluebloodcunts 4 404. blueplastic1 405. blueshitthino 406. blumbizzle 407 blundadownunda 408. blurofblaze 409. bmorin 410.bnp 411.bnp 413. bobaobaggins 414.bobfrommumbai 415. bobjim94410830 416. boblafleur1 417. bobryan88655493 418. bobshango 419. Babbling Brooke @auntysarah @spinzig @FartToContinue He's a real peach... I think this searcih will go well o_O twitter.com/spinzig/status. uies 442. breath sean They label you and put you on a target l tses is eraena aS HR merarAa b bridgspiration 449. britbongreturns 450. 452 brofrea 453 sarah Brown @auntysarah 1m @oolon @spinzig @FartToContinue "Having sex is on my bucket list 480. buttr 481. buzzlitebeersr 482. bvnvnbjk 483. byogpengooin 484.cofman 485. ctt Hide conversation

GamerGate

Who do you trust?

his stuft was clearly in place beforehand and was certainly not vague. It even applies to receiving a review copy (indeed, FTC 16 CFR Part 255-Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising references an example of reviewing a blogger reviewing a videogame system-source-httpbity1BHpmmc and in fact several traditional gaming websites seem to fall afoul of this (IGN for example as far as I can see does not disclose in their reviews that they received a review copy, Kotakus disclosure appears spotty, their recent Trap Team review does not mention receiving it from the publisher, though its possible that they bought it themseives and did not, their Alen Isolation review mentions it in passing by saying "the version that SEGA sent us was the Nostramo edition" whereas Polygon does disclose at the bottom of the page with a link to their ist of ethical standards). It's possible that 'm misinterpreting exactly who these rules apply to however Devin Faraci What hard evidence is there that Adam Baldwin doesnt j------- goats into his open, willing mouth? Devin Faraci @leighalexander l'm not saying he does, I'm just asking questions.I Leigh Alexander @devincf it seems like he probably d like to see the evidence that he does does not. 3.58 AM-04 Oct 14 The FTC regulation clarifications were aimed primarily at "consumer generated media", ie. Youtube and blogs enthusiast press if you will, though many traditional gaming websites straddle that line, bloggers at times journalists at others what梠certainty clear however, are the rules and regulations in place that cover both Youtube and Twitch streams. The onus of compliance is on the content creator, not the content host. Twitch has stepped forward with clarifications, likely in the wake of a heightened awareness of these deals going on and because Twitch also arranges some of these deals themselves for their partners, thereby they would also at that point have to play ball with FTC regulations. This is also the reason that any contract you see regarding a brand deal wl feature a clause requiring said disclosure in compliance with FTC regulations. I've seen many of these agreements and the only one that didnt seem to require disclosure was the intamous XB1M13 contract, which is why it blew up Devin Faraci AVORITES leighalexander I'm not saying he does, I'm just asking questions. I would like to see the evidence that he does not 3:58 AM- 04 Oct 14 t3 Leigh Alexander @leighal @devincf these are completely reasonable ethical questions and the ongoing avoidance of a public dialogue confirms he likely jacks off the way that it aid last year, It also seems ikely that Muti Channel Networks hold some responsibility for ensuring the enforcement of disclosure, particularly since they too facilitate some of these deals and profit from them both directly (with a cut of the budget/finders fee) and indirectly (through their revenue share agreements with TotalBiscuit, Youtuber Devin Faraci & Leigh Alexander Games "Journalists" Responses to Questions about Transparency Who do *you* trust?
his stuft was clearly in place beforehand and was certainly not vague. It even applies to receiving a review copy (indeed, FTC 16 CFR Part 255-Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising references an example of reviewing a blogger reviewing a videogame system-source-httpbity1BHpmmc and in fact several traditional gaming websites seem to fall afoul of this (IGN for example as far as I can see does not disclose in their reviews that they received a review copy, Kotakus disclosure appears spotty, their recent Trap Team review does not mention receiving it from the publisher, though its possible that they bought it themseives and did not, their Alen Isolation review mentions it in passing by saying "the version that SEGA sent us was the Nostramo edition" whereas Polygon does disclose at the bottom of the page with a link to their ist of ethical standards). It's possible that 'm misinterpreting exactly who these rules apply to however Devin Faraci What hard evidence is there that Adam Baldwin doesnt j------- goats into his open, willing mouth? Devin Faraci @leighalexander l'm not saying he does, I'm just asking questions.I Leigh Alexander @devincf it seems like he probably d like to see the evidence that he does does not. 3.58 AM-04 Oct 14 The FTC regulation clarifications were aimed primarily at "consumer generated media", ie. Youtube and blogs enthusiast press if you will, though many traditional gaming websites straddle that line, bloggers at times journalists at others what梠certainty clear however, are the rules and regulations in place that cover both Youtube and Twitch streams. The onus of compliance is on the content creator, not the content host. Twitch has stepped forward with clarifications, likely in the wake of a heightened awareness of these deals going on and because Twitch also arranges some of these deals themselves for their partners, thereby they would also at that point have to play ball with FTC regulations. This is also the reason that any contract you see regarding a brand deal wl feature a clause requiring said disclosure in compliance with FTC regulations. I've seen many of these agreements and the only one that didnt seem to require disclosure was the intamous XB1M13 contract, which is why it blew up Devin Faraci AVORITES leighalexander I'm not saying he does, I'm just asking questions. I would like to see the evidence that he does not 3:58 AM- 04 Oct 14 t3 Leigh Alexander @leighal @devincf these are completely reasonable ethical questions and the ongoing avoidance of a public dialogue confirms he likely jacks off the way that it aid last year, It also seems ikely that Muti Channel Networks hold some responsibility for ensuring the enforcement of disclosure, particularly since they too facilitate some of these deals and profit from them both directly (with a cut of the budget/finders fee) and indirectly (through their revenue share agreements with TotalBiscuit, Youtuber Devin Faraci & Leigh Alexander Games "Journalists" Responses to Questions about Transparency Who do *you* trust?

GamerGate

Having discussion is a previlege

Ben Kuchera Aug 19 HORRORest IMPALER Follo @forrest taylor I mean, if nothing else now we KNOW the post contains demonstrably untrue things about real people. Serious allegations. Is THAT enough to get you to @GGatelntegrity Having discussion is aconsider taking it down? What does it take before the Escapist says "Maybe we shouldn't be giving this a home - show quoted text privilege, not a right. The site owners and moderators have ultimate discretion わReply t구 Retweet ★ Favorite More 6:56 PM-5 Oct 2014 Anti-GG @forrest taylor & Ben "Shut It Down" Kuchera on the rules of discussion Discussion is a privilege, not a right." Maybe it's time for them to realize that THIS is why we Reply to @torest taylor #GamerGate Burt Maclin @GGatelntegrity 1m @forrest_taylor "Discussion is a privilege, not a right." What a wonderful ideology you encourage. I disagree with u, but I won't stifle u Support: Discussion Condemn: Censorship
Ben Kuchera Aug 19 HORRORest IMPALER Follo @forrest taylor I mean, if nothing else now we KNOW the post contains demonstrably untrue things about real people. Serious allegations. Is THAT enough to get you to @GGatelntegrity Having discussion is aconsider taking it down? What does it take before the Escapist says "Maybe we shouldn't be giving this a home - show quoted text privilege, not a right. The site owners and moderators have ultimate discretion わReply t구 Retweet ★ Favorite More 6:56 PM-5 Oct 2014 Anti-GG @forrest taylor & Ben "Shut It Down" Kuchera on the rules of discussion Discussion is a privilege, not a right." Maybe it's time for them to realize that THIS is why we Reply to @torest taylor #GamerGate Burt Maclin @GGatelntegrity 1m @forrest_taylor "Discussion is a privilege, not a right." What a wonderful ideology you encourage. I disagree with u, but I won't stifle u Support: Discussion Condemn: Censorship

GamerGate

Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist

Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist by H. Michael Sweeney Sa anoid.com> copyright (c) 1997, 2000 All rights reserved (Revised April 2000 - formerly SEVEN Traits) 1) Avoidance. They never actually discuss issues head-on or provide constructive input, generally avoiding citation of references or credentials. Rather, they merely imply this, that, and the other. Virtually everything about their presentation implies their authority and expert knowledge in the matter without any further justification for credibility. 2) Selectivity. They tend to pick and choose opponents carefully, either applying the hit-and-run approach against mere commentators supportive of opponents, or focusing heavier attacks on key opponents who are known to directly address issues. Should a commentatorbecome argumentative with any success, the focus will shift to include the commentator aswe 3) Coincidental. They tend to surface suddenly and somewhat coincidentally with a new controversial topic with no clear prior record of participation in general discussions in the particular public arena involved. They likewise tend to vanish once the topic is no longer of general concern. They were likely directed or elected to be there for a reason, and vanish with the reason. 4) Teamwork. They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and complementary packs or teams. Of course, this can happen naturally in any public forum, but there will likely be an ongoing pattern of frequent exchanges of this sort where professionals are involved. Sometimes one of the players will infiltrate the opponent camp to become a source for straw man or other tactics designed to te opponent presentation strength. 5) Anti-conspiratorial. They almost always have disdain for 'conspiracy theorists' and, usually, for those who in any way believe JFK was not killed by LHO. Ask yourself why, if they hold such disdain for conspiracy theorists, do they focus on defending a single topic discussed in a NG focusing on conspiracies? One might think they would either be trying to make fools of everyone on every topic, or simply ignore the group they hold in such disdain.Or, one might more rightly conclude they have an ulterior motive for their actions in going out of their way to focus as they do 6) Artificial Emotions. An odd kind of'artificial emotionalism and an unusually thick skin-- an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming criticism and unacceptance. This likely stems from intelligence community training that, no matter how c artist is that emotions can seem artificial. Most people, if responding in anger, for instance, will express their animosity throughout their rebuttal. But disinfo types usually have trouble maintaining the 'image' and are hot and cold with respect to pretended emotions and their usually more calm or unemotional communications style. It's just a job, and they often seem unable to 'act their role in character as well in a communications medium as they might be able in a real face-to-face conversation/confrontation. You might have outright rage and indignation one moment, ho-hum the next, and more anger later - an emotional yo-yo. With respect to being thick-skinned, no amount of criticism will deter them from doing their job, and they will generally continue their old disinfo patterns without any adjustments to criticisms of how obvious it is that they play that game - where a more rational individual who truly cares what others think might seek to improve their communications style, substance, and so forth, or simply give up ing the evidence, deny everything, and never become emotionally involved or reactive. The net result for a disinfo 7) Inconsistent. There is also a tendency to make mistakes which betray their true self/motives. This may stem from not really knowing their topic, or it may be somewhat 'freudian', so to speak, in that perhaps they really root for the side of truth deep within. I have noted that often, they will simply cite contradictory information which neutralizes itself and the author. For instance, one such player claimed to be a Navy pilot, but blamed his poor communicating skills (spelling, grammar, incoherent style) on having only a grade-school education. I'm not aware of too many Navy pilots who don't have a college degree. Another claimed no knowledge of a particular topic/situation but later claimed first-hand knowledge of it. 8) BONUS TRAIT: Time Constant. Recently discovered, with respect to News Groups, is the response time factor. There are three ways this can be seen to work, especially when the government or other empowered player is involved in a cover up operation: 1) ANY NG posting by a targeted proponent for truth can result in an IMMEDIATE response. The government and other empowered players can afford to pay people to sit there and watch for an opportunity to do some damage. SINCE DISINFO IN A NG ONLY WORKS IF THE READER SEES IT - FAST RESPONSE IS CALLED FOR, or the visitor may be swayed towards truth. 2) When dealing in more direct ways with a disinformationalist, such as email, DELAY IS CALLED FOR - there will usually be a minimum of a 48-72 hour delay. This allows a sit-down team discussion on response strategy for best effect, and even enough time to 'get permission' or instruction from a formal chain of command. 3) In the NG example 1) above, it will often ALSO be seen that bigger guns are drawn and fired after the same 48-72 hours delay - the team approach in play. This is especially true when the targeted truth seeker or their comments are considered more important with respect to potential to reveal truth. Thus, a serious truth sayer will be attacked twice for the same sin. I close with the first paragraph of the introduction to my unpublished book, Fatal Rebirth: Truth cannot live on a diet of secrets, withering within entangled lies. Freedom cannot live on a diet of lies, surrendering to the veil of oppression. The human spirit cannot live on a diet of oppression, becoming subservient in the end to the will of evil. God, as truth incarnate, will not long let stand a world devoted to such evil. Therefore, let us have the truth and freedom our spirits require... or let us die seeking these things, for without them, we shall surely and justly perish in an evil world.
Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist by H. Michael Sweeney Sa anoid.com> copyright (c) 1997, 2000 All rights reserved (Revised April 2000 - formerly SEVEN Traits) 1) Avoidance. They never actually discuss issues head-on or provide constructive input, generally avoiding citation of references or credentials. Rather, they merely imply this, that, and the other. Virtually everything about their presentation implies their authority and expert knowledge in the matter without any further justification for credibility. 2) Selectivity. They tend to pick and choose opponents carefully, either applying the hit-and-run approach against mere commentators supportive of opponents, or focusing heavier attacks on key opponents who are known to directly address issues. Should a commentatorbecome argumentative with any success, the focus will shift to include the commentator aswe 3) Coincidental. They tend to surface suddenly and somewhat coincidentally with a new controversial topic with no clear prior record of participation in general discussions in the particular public arena involved. They likewise tend to vanish once the topic is no longer of general concern. They were likely directed or elected to be there for a reason, and vanish with the reason. 4) Teamwork. They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and complementary packs or teams. Of course, this can happen naturally in any public forum, but there will likely be an ongoing pattern of frequent exchanges of this sort where professionals are involved. Sometimes one of the players will infiltrate the opponent camp to become a source for straw man or other tactics designed to te opponent presentation strength. 5) Anti-conspiratorial. They almost always have disdain for 'conspiracy theorists' and, usually, for those who in any way believe JFK was not killed by LHO. Ask yourself why, if they hold such disdain for conspiracy theorists, do they focus on defending a single topic discussed in a NG focusing on conspiracies? One might think they would either be trying to make fools of everyone on every topic, or simply ignore the group they hold in such disdain.Or, one might more rightly conclude they have an ulterior motive for their actions in going out of their way to focus as they do 6) Artificial Emotions. An odd kind of'artificial emotionalism and an unusually thick skin-- an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming criticism and unacceptance. This likely stems from intelligence community training that, no matter how c artist is that emotions can seem artificial. Most people, if responding in anger, for instance, will express their animosity throughout their rebuttal. But disinfo types usually have trouble maintaining the 'image' and are hot and cold with respect to pretended emotions and their usually more calm or unemotional communications style. It's just a job, and they often seem unable to 'act their role in character as well in a communications medium as they might be able in a real face-to-face conversation/confrontation. You might have outright rage and indignation one moment, ho-hum the next, and more anger later - an emotional yo-yo. With respect to being thick-skinned, no amount of criticism will deter them from doing their job, and they will generally continue their old disinfo patterns without any adjustments to criticisms of how obvious it is that they play that game - where a more rational individual who truly cares what others think might seek to improve their communications style, substance, and so forth, or simply give up ing the evidence, deny everything, and never become emotionally involved or reactive. The net result for a disinfo 7) Inconsistent. There is also a tendency to make mistakes which betray their true self/motives. This may stem from not really knowing their topic, or it may be somewhat 'freudian', so to speak, in that perhaps they really root for the side of truth deep within. I have noted that often, they will simply cite contradictory information which neutralizes itself and the author. For instance, one such player claimed to be a Navy pilot, but blamed his poor communicating skills (spelling, grammar, incoherent style) on having only a grade-school education. I'm not aware of too many Navy pilots who don't have a college degree. Another claimed no knowledge of a particular topic/situation but later claimed first-hand knowledge of it. 8) BONUS TRAIT: Time Constant. Recently discovered, with respect to News Groups, is the response time factor. There are three ways this can be seen to work, especially when the government or other empowered player is involved in a cover up operation: 1) ANY NG posting by a targeted proponent for truth can result in an IMMEDIATE response. The government and other empowered players can afford to pay people to sit there and watch for an opportunity to do some damage. SINCE DISINFO IN A NG ONLY WORKS IF THE READER SEES IT - FAST RESPONSE IS CALLED FOR, or the visitor may be swayed towards truth. 2) When dealing in more direct ways with a disinformationalist, such as email, DELAY IS CALLED FOR - there will usually be a minimum of a 48-72 hour delay. This allows a sit-down team discussion on response strategy for best effect, and even enough time to 'get permission' or instruction from a formal chain of command. 3) In the NG example 1) above, it will often ALSO be seen that bigger guns are drawn and fired after the same 48-72 hours delay - the team approach in play. This is especially true when the targeted truth seeker or their comments are considered more important with respect to potential to reveal truth. Thus, a serious truth sayer will be attacked twice for the same sin. I close with the first paragraph of the introduction to my unpublished book, Fatal Rebirth: Truth cannot live on a diet of secrets, withering within entangled lies. Freedom cannot live on a diet of lies, surrendering to the veil of oppression. The human spirit cannot live on a diet of oppression, becoming subservient in the end to the will of evil. God, as truth incarnate, will not long let stand a world devoted to such evil. Therefore, let us have the truth and freedom our spirits require... or let us die seeking these things, for without them, we shall surely and justly perish in an evil world.

GamerGate
gamergate

Twenty-Five Ways to Supress Truth

Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation (Includes The 8 sinformationalist) by Permission to reprint/distribute hereby granted for any non commercial use provided information reproduced in its entirety and with author information in tact. For more Intel/Shadow Built upon Thirteen Techniques for Truth Suppression by David Martin, the folowing may be useful to the initiate in the world of dealing with veiled and half-truth, lies, and suppression of truth when serious crimes are studied in public forums. This, sadly, includes every day news media, one of the worst offenders with respect to being a source of disinformation. Where the crime involves a conspiracy, or a conspiracy to cover up the crime, there will invariably be a disinformation campaign launched against those seeking to uncover and expose the truth and or the conspiracy. There are specific tactics which disinfo artists tend to apply, as revealed here. Also included with this material are seven common traits of the disinfo artist which may also prove useful The more a particular party fits the traits and is guilty of following the rules, the more likely they are a professional disinfo artist with a vested motive. People can be bought, threatened, into prov can be suspect in many cases. rational person participating as one interested in the truth will evaluate that chain of evidence and conclude either that the links are solid and conclusive, that one or more links are weak and need further development before conclusion can be arrived at, or that one or more links can be broken, usually invalidating (but not necessarily so, if paralle links already exist or can be found, a particular link was merely supportive, but not in itself key to) the argument. The game is played by raising issues which either strengthen or weaken (preferably to the point of breaking) these links. It is the job of a disinfo artist to interfere with these evaluations... to at least make people think the links are weak or broken when, in truth, they are not... or to propose alternative solutions leading away from the truth. Often, by simply impeding and slowing down the process through disinformation tactics, a level of victory is assured because apathy increases with time and It would seem true in almost every instance, that if one cannot break the chain of evidence for a given solution, revelation of truth has won out. If the chain is broken either a new link must be forged, or a whole new chain developed, or the solution is invalid and a new one must be found... but truth still wins out. There is no shame in being the creator or supporter of a failed solution, chain, or link, if done with honesty in search of the truth. This is the rational approach. While it is understandable that a person can become emotionally involved with a particular side of a given issue, it is really unimportant who wins, as long as truth wins. But the disinfo artist will seek to emotionalize and chastise any failure (real or false claims thereof), and will seek by means o s the disinfo artist and those who may pull their strings (those who stand to suffer should the crime be solved) MUST seek to prevent rational and complete examination of any chain ofevidence which would hang them. Since fact and truth seldom fall on their own, they must be overcome with lies and deceit. Those who are professional in the art of lies and deceit, such as the intelligence community and the professional criminal (often the same people public at large is not well armed against such weapons, and is often easily ledastray by these time-proven tactics. Remarkably, not even media and law enforcement have NOT BEEN TRAINED to deal with these issues. For the most part, only the players themselves understand the rules of the game. least working together), tend to apply fairly well defined and observable tools in this process However, the such disinformationalists, the overall aim is to avoid discussing links in the chain of evidence which cannot be broken by truth, but at all times, to use clever deceptions or lies to make select links seem weaker than they are, create the illusion of a break, or better still, cause any who are considering the chain to be distracted in any number of ways, including the method of questioning the credentials of the presenter. Please understand that fact is fact, regardless of the source. Likewise, truth is truth, regardless of the source. This is why criminals are allowed to testify against other criminals. Where a motive to lie may truly exist, only actual evidence that the testimony itself IS a lie renders it completely invalid. Were a known iar's' testimony to stand on its own without supporting fact, it might certainly be of questionable value, but if the testimony (argument) is based on verifiable or otherwise demonstrable facts, it matters not who does the presenting what their motives are, or if they have lied in the past or even if motivated to lie in this instance the facts or links would and should stand or fall on their own merit and their part in the matter will Moreover, particularly with respects to public forums such as newspaper letters to the editor, and Internet chat and news groups, the disinfo type has a very important role. In these forums, the principle topics of discussion are generally attempts by individuals to cause other persons to become interested in their own particular position, idea, or solution very much in development at the time. People often use such mediums as a sounding board and in hopes of pollination to better form their ideas. Where such ideas are critical of government or powerful, vested groups (especially if their criminality is the topic), the disinfo artist has yet another rolethe role of nipping it in the bud. They also seek to stage the concept, the presenter, and any supporters as less than credible should any possible future confrontation in more public forums result due to their early successes. You can often spot the disinfo types at work here by the unique application of "higher standards" of discussion than necessarily warranted. They will demand that those presenting arguments or concepts back everything up with the same level of expertise as a professor, researcher, or investigative wrter. Anything less renders anydiscussion meaningless and unworthy in their opinion, and anyone who disagrees is obviously stupid and they generally put it in So, as you read any such discussions, particularly so in Internet news groups (NG), decide for yourself when a rational argument is being applied and when disinformation, psyops (psychological arfare operations) or trickery is the tool. Accuse those guilty of the latter freely. They (both those deliberately seeking to lead you astray, and those who are simply foolish or misguided thinkers) generally run for cover when thus illuminated, or put in other terms, they put up or shut up (a perfectly acceptable outcome either way, since truth is the goal.) Here are the twenty-five methods and seven traits, some of which don't apply directly to NG application. Each contains a simple example in the form of actual (some paraphrased for simplicity) from NG comments on commonly Accusations should not be overused reserve for repeat offenders and those who use multiple tactics. Responses should avoid falling into emotional traps or informational sidetracks, unless it i feared that some observers will be easily dissuaded by the trickery. Consider quoting the complete rule rather than simply citing it, as others will not have reference. Offer to provide a complete copy of the rule set upon request Note: The first rule and last i key players, six, depending on situation) rules are generally not directly within the ability of the traditional disinfo artist to apply. These rules are generally used more conspiracy to cover u Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don't discuss it -especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it's not reported, it didn't happen, and you never have to deal with the issues Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group theme. This is also known as the How dare vou!' gambit. reate rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well This method which works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such 'arguable rumors'. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a wild rumor' from a bunch of kids on the Interneť which can have no basis in fact Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponen's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues. h name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as kooks', right-wing', 'liberal, left-wing'. terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs, radicals', 'militia', 'racists', religious fanatics, 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues. 6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism, reasoning simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent's viewpoint. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could be taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces 8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough jargon' and 'minutia to illustrate you are 'one who knows, and simply say it o matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make thout discussing issues a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man- -usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with - a kind of investment for the future should the matter not be so easily contained.) Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually then be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the high road' and 'confess' with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, just isn't so.' Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later, and even publicly 'call for an end to the nonsense' because you have already 'done the right thing. Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for 'coming clean' and 'owning up' to your mistakes Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards or with an apparent deductive logic Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best with issues qualifying for rule 1 causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to lose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues. which forbears any actual material fact. it the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place. nish evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won't have to address the issue 7. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can 'argue with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the 'play dumb rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed withheld, such as a murder weapon.) In order to completely avoid discussing issues, it may be required that you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations--as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications. r empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed and unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed. Usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim. 22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own experts) groups), authors), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create treat Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention blackmail or destruction of theircharacter by release of blackmail information, or merely by destroying them financially, emotionally, or severely damaging anish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen. Note: There are other ways to attack truth, but these listed are the most common, and others are likely derivatives of these. In the end, you can usually spot the professional disinfo players by one more
Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation (Includes The 8 sinformationalist) by Permission to reprint/distribute hereby granted for any non commercial use provided information reproduced in its entirety and with author information in tact. For more Intel/Shadow Built upon Thirteen Techniques for Truth Suppression by David Martin, the folowing may be useful to the initiate in the world of dealing with veiled and half-truth, lies, and suppression of truth when serious crimes are studied in public forums. This, sadly, includes every day news media, one of the worst offenders with respect to being a source of disinformation. Where the crime involves a conspiracy, or a conspiracy to cover up the crime, there will invariably be a disinformation campaign launched against those seeking to uncover and expose the truth and or the conspiracy. There are specific tactics which disinfo artists tend to apply, as revealed here. Also included with this material are seven common traits of the disinfo artist which may also prove useful The more a particular party fits the traits and is guilty of following the rules, the more likely they are a professional disinfo artist with a vested motive. People can be bought, threatened, into prov can be suspect in many cases. rational person participating as one interested in the truth will evaluate that chain of evidence and conclude either that the links are solid and conclusive, that one or more links are weak and need further development before conclusion can be arrived at, or that one or more links can be broken, usually invalidating (but not necessarily so, if paralle links already exist or can be found, a particular link was merely supportive, but not in itself key to) the argument. The game is played by raising issues which either strengthen or weaken (preferably to the point of breaking) these links. It is the job of a disinfo artist to interfere with these evaluations... to at least make people think the links are weak or broken when, in truth, they are not... or to propose alternative solutions leading away from the truth. Often, by simply impeding and slowing down the process through disinformation tactics, a level of victory is assured because apathy increases with time and It would seem true in almost every instance, that if one cannot break the chain of evidence for a given solution, revelation of truth has won out. If the chain is broken either a new link must be forged, or a whole new chain developed, or the solution is invalid and a new one must be found... but truth still wins out. There is no shame in being the creator or supporter of a failed solution, chain, or link, if done with honesty in search of the truth. This is the rational approach. While it is understandable that a person can become emotionally involved with a particular side of a given issue, it is really unimportant who wins, as long as truth wins. But the disinfo artist will seek to emotionalize and chastise any failure (real or false claims thereof), and will seek by means o s the disinfo artist and those who may pull their strings (those who stand to suffer should the crime be solved) MUST seek to prevent rational and complete examination of any chain ofevidence which would hang them. Since fact and truth seldom fall on their own, they must be overcome with lies and deceit. Those who are professional in the art of lies and deceit, such as the intelligence community and the professional criminal (often the same people public at large is not well armed against such weapons, and is often easily ledastray by these time-proven tactics. Remarkably, not even media and law enforcement have NOT BEEN TRAINED to deal with these issues. For the most part, only the players themselves understand the rules of the game. least working together), tend to apply fairly well defined and observable tools in this process However, the such disinformationalists, the overall aim is to avoid discussing links in the chain of evidence which cannot be broken by truth, but at all times, to use clever deceptions or lies to make select links seem weaker than they are, create the illusion of a break, or better still, cause any who are considering the chain to be distracted in any number of ways, including the method of questioning the credentials of the presenter. Please understand that fact is fact, regardless of the source. Likewise, truth is truth, regardless of the source. This is why criminals are allowed to testify against other criminals. Where a motive to lie may truly exist, only actual evidence that the testimony itself IS a lie renders it completely invalid. Were a known iar's' testimony to stand on its own without supporting fact, it might certainly be of questionable value, but if the testimony (argument) is based on verifiable or otherwise demonstrable facts, it matters not who does the presenting what their motives are, or if they have lied in the past or even if motivated to lie in this instance the facts or links would and should stand or fall on their own merit and their part in the matter will Moreover, particularly with respects to public forums such as newspaper letters to the editor, and Internet chat and news groups, the disinfo type has a very important role. In these forums, the principle topics of discussion are generally attempts by individuals to cause other persons to become interested in their own particular position, idea, or solution very much in development at the time. People often use such mediums as a sounding board and in hopes of pollination to better form their ideas. Where such ideas are critical of government or powerful, vested groups (especially if their criminality is the topic), the disinfo artist has yet another rolethe role of nipping it in the bud. They also seek to stage the concept, the presenter, and any supporters as less than credible should any possible future confrontation in more public forums result due to their early successes. You can often spot the disinfo types at work here by the unique application of "higher standards" of discussion than necessarily warranted. They will demand that those presenting arguments or concepts back everything up with the same level of expertise as a professor, researcher, or investigative wrter. Anything less renders anydiscussion meaningless and unworthy in their opinion, and anyone who disagrees is obviously stupid and they generally put it in So, as you read any such discussions, particularly so in Internet news groups (NG), decide for yourself when a rational argument is being applied and when disinformation, psyops (psychological arfare operations) or trickery is the tool. Accuse those guilty of the latter freely. They (both those deliberately seeking to lead you astray, and those who are simply foolish or misguided thinkers) generally run for cover when thus illuminated, or put in other terms, they put up or shut up (a perfectly acceptable outcome either way, since truth is the goal.) Here are the twenty-five methods and seven traits, some of which don't apply directly to NG application. Each contains a simple example in the form of actual (some paraphrased for simplicity) from NG comments on commonly Accusations should not be overused reserve for repeat offenders and those who use multiple tactics. Responses should avoid falling into emotional traps or informational sidetracks, unless it i feared that some observers will be easily dissuaded by the trickery. Consider quoting the complete rule rather than simply citing it, as others will not have reference. Offer to provide a complete copy of the rule set upon request Note: The first rule and last i key players, six, depending on situation) rules are generally not directly within the ability of the traditional disinfo artist to apply. These rules are generally used more conspiracy to cover u Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don't discuss it -especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it's not reported, it didn't happen, and you never have to deal with the issues Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group theme. This is also known as the How dare vou!' gambit. reate rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well This method which works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such 'arguable rumors'. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a wild rumor' from a bunch of kids on the Interneť which can have no basis in fact Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponen's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues. h name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as kooks', right-wing', 'liberal, left-wing'. terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs, radicals', 'militia', 'racists', religious fanatics, 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues. 6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism, reasoning simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent's viewpoint. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could be taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces 8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough jargon' and 'minutia to illustrate you are 'one who knows, and simply say it o matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make thout discussing issues a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man- -usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with - a kind of investment for the future should the matter not be so easily contained.) Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually then be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the high road' and 'confess' with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, just isn't so.' Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later, and even publicly 'call for an end to the nonsense' because you have already 'done the right thing. Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for 'coming clean' and 'owning up' to your mistakes Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards or with an apparent deductive logic Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best with issues qualifying for rule 1 causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to lose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues. which forbears any actual material fact. it the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place. nish evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won't have to address the issue 7. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can 'argue with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the 'play dumb rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed withheld, such as a murder weapon.) In order to completely avoid discussing issues, it may be required that you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations--as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications. r empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed and unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed. Usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim. 22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own experts) groups), authors), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create treat Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention blackmail or destruction of theircharacter by release of blackmail information, or merely by destroying them financially, emotionally, or severely damaging anish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen. Note: There are other ways to attack truth, but these listed are the most common, and others are likely derivatives of these. In the end, you can usually spot the professional disinfo players by one more

GamerGate
gamergate

Reviewer's play time on Total Wars: Rome II

These s ame nd a urs ore re Global Gameplay Stats Total War: ROMEI ROMi Auxilia Complete 1 hour of gameplay Weapon of Mass Destruction 5000 men in satie with siege arsiery duing the course ot a campaign ame Did you know that the stats of the review copies of games are recorded on steam? the mainan rank wih an army or navy uring a campaign game First Time Lucky 1 soecal abity during a campaign bae pic related, let's see how much of the game reviewers played Your Ground a campagn defend your encampoment without losing a singe victory point Dock of the Bay a combined land andnaval siege bae during a campaign e at least 3 dierent spedial abdses during a campaige bate a Barbaran rbe, sack In the Navy Mare Nostrum ompete thourodiganepl Them Out... All of Them of 1000 men, before ctaiming dor This Forest Has Eyes en with siege atdery in any single bate a campaign sato, using oney caarrunts , wthout tonesehrg to the Defences 1000,000 ents in your reasury uring a singe campi Praefectus Classis Beyond the Dreams of Avarice ast 10 utiplayer baes A League of Their Own Macedon, estabksh wts, Eprus and Boana as ckent states When in Rome... is a campaign ty Cural vitor uccessty caphure all of the great obes of the andert world, Rome,Athens Cathage and Aleand in balle duing a single aommeahotathedwin On Land and Sea a combined bate, using land and naval forces, during a campaign Great Balls of Fire Champion of the Geds onager atery ant in a siege bae during a campaige gane Win a campaige on Legendaty diflicuty stay capture on, gfthe great c ses gran ancent wend Rome. Ahens, Cartage er 샤eca ( t bam ane amam rank with a general/ail during a campain Walled Crown Win 25 siege atack baties duing campaign pa tain the masmam rank wth a sptype agent during a campain In the Footsteps of Rome Wasn't Built in a Day Recover all hree ionary eagles thom Teuobung Forest on naimal oaty or highe Crown of the Preserver 25 siege defence bates durng campsign play This Army Will Fight On Recover at least two leponary eagles barn Teuoburg Faestonaerm osuuty or nget in a single campaign or Carhage, cheose not to estabish an empire fodowing a ovl war erme campaign, wring every bum except one witout ever auto-oeseling The Alexandrine War This is Sparta Vent Vidi, Vicil God of War Every Day The Die is Cast The Great Escape a campaign ambush base wit, at least 75% at your utts I Will Find a Way or Make One Roma Invicta It o Carthago Delenda Est Boat that Rocked The New Xerxes Compiete a campaign as Pathi Furor Gemanicus The Lost Eagle nos han 10 ane ships in a singla carnpagn b This is Total War British Empire ight 100 b es in 귀 single campugn wteut adoresolving Some of the reviews out at this time Eurogamer 7/10 PCGamesN 7/10 Rock, Paper, Shotgun No Score PC Gamer 85/100 Digital Spy 4/5 NowGamer-9.5/10 CVG 9/10 oystiq 3.5/5 s 86/100 GamesVillage 9.6/10 8/10 awe Eu em Expansive DLC 'No Score GameStar Hungary 8.7/10 Co cted Dig 9.5/10 ery Games.it 9.5/1
These s ame nd a urs ore re Global Gameplay Stats Total War: ROMEI ROMi Auxilia Complete 1 hour of gameplay Weapon of Mass Destruction 5000 men in satie with siege arsiery duing the course ot a campaign ame Did you know that the stats of the review copies of games are recorded on steam? the mainan rank wih an army or navy uring a campaign game First Time Lucky 1 soecal abity during a campaign bae pic related, let's see how much of the game reviewers played Your Ground a campagn defend your encampoment without losing a singe victory point Dock of the Bay a combined land andnaval siege bae during a campaign e at least 3 dierent spedial abdses during a campaige bate a Barbaran rbe, sack In the Navy Mare Nostrum ompete thourodiganepl Them Out... All of Them of 1000 men, before ctaiming dor This Forest Has Eyes en with siege atdery in any single bate a campaign sato, using oney caarrunts , wthout tonesehrg to the Defences 1000,000 ents in your reasury uring a singe campi Praefectus Classis Beyond the Dreams of Avarice ast 10 utiplayer baes A League of Their Own Macedon, estabksh wts, Eprus and Boana as ckent states When in Rome... is a campaign ty Cural vitor uccessty caphure all of the great obes of the andert world, Rome,Athens Cathage and Aleand in balle duing a single aommeahotathedwin On Land and Sea a combined bate, using land and naval forces, during a campaign Great Balls of Fire Champion of the Geds onager atery ant in a siege bae during a campaige gane Win a campaige on Legendaty diflicuty stay capture on, gfthe great c ses gran ancent wend Rome. Ahens, Cartage er 샤eca ( t bam ane amam rank with a general/ail during a campain Walled Crown Win 25 siege atack baties duing campaign pa tain the masmam rank wth a sptype agent during a campain In the Footsteps of Rome Wasn't Built in a Day Recover all hree ionary eagles thom Teuobung Forest on naimal oaty or highe Crown of the Preserver 25 siege defence bates durng campsign play This Army Will Fight On Recover at least two leponary eagles barn Teuoburg Faestonaerm osuuty or nget in a single campaign or Carhage, cheose not to estabish an empire fodowing a ovl war erme campaign, wring every bum except one witout ever auto-oeseling The Alexandrine War This is Sparta Vent Vidi, Vicil God of War Every Day The Die is Cast The Great Escape a campaign ambush base wit, at least 75% at your utts I Will Find a Way or Make One Roma Invicta It o Carthago Delenda Est Boat that Rocked The New Xerxes Compiete a campaign as Pathi Furor Gemanicus The Lost Eagle nos han 10 ane ships in a singla carnpagn b This is Total War British Empire ight 100 b es in 귀 single campugn wteut adoresolving Some of the reviews out at this time Eurogamer 7/10 PCGamesN 7/10 Rock, Paper, Shotgun No Score PC Gamer 85/100 Digital Spy 4/5 NowGamer-9.5/10 CVG 9/10 oystiq 3.5/5 s 86/100 GamesVillage 9.6/10 8/10 awe Eu em Expansive DLC 'No Score GameStar Hungary 8.7/10 Co cted Dig 9.5/10 ery Games.it 9.5/1

GamerGate

"I stopped being a journalist"

lan Miles Cheong @stillgray 13m @tehoriman @ofgloriouslife I don't care if "many women agree" with that transphobic statement. Expand @OfGlorious Life 11m Anime Avatar This is literally all I ever see you do Pick out little statements from average people that you don't like & blast. @stillgray @tehorimarn Expand lan Miles Cheong @stillgray 11m @ofgloriouslife @tehoriman Milo is an average person now? I've been blasting him all night. Expand @OfGlorious Life 9m Anime Avatar Yes, you've only ever blasted people like Milo My apologies. @stillgray Expand lan Miles Cheong @stillgray 9m @ofgloriouslife Dude, I want to know, what happened to you? You used to be so cool and now you're this GamerGater Expand Wall Meat retweeted Anime Avatar @OfGloriousLife 7m That one's simple I stopped being a journalist. @stillgray
lan Miles Cheong @stillgray 13m @tehoriman @ofgloriouslife I don't care if "many women agree" with that transphobic statement. Expand @OfGlorious Life 11m Anime Avatar This is literally all I ever see you do Pick out little statements from average people that you don't like & blast. @stillgray @tehorimarn Expand lan Miles Cheong @stillgray 11m @ofgloriouslife @tehoriman Milo is an average person now? I've been blasting him all night. Expand @OfGlorious Life 9m Anime Avatar Yes, you've only ever blasted people like Milo My apologies. @stillgray Expand lan Miles Cheong @stillgray 9m @ofgloriouslife Dude, I want to know, what happened to you? You used to be so cool and now you're this GamerGater Expand Wall Meat retweeted Anime Avatar @OfGloriousLife 7m That one's simple I stopped being a journalist. @stillgray

GamerGate

Level victorious

Level Complete #GamerGate Is Victorious!
Level Complete #GamerGate Is Victorious!

GamerGate
gamergate notyourshield

Black Fridaiy Is Coming

BLACK FRIDAY IS COMING #GAMERGATE
BLACK FRIDAY IS COMING #GAMERGATE

GamerGate
gamergate notyourshield

False Flag

MASSIVE LAND MINE FALSE FLAG ALERT PLEASE RETWEET There is a new tag growing hard right now, I've been turned on to it by colleagues #academicANDfeminist DO NOT ENGAGE. DO NOT THIS IS NOT ANTIGG the tag was started by an academic who is NOT antiGG, just a bystander When asked if she was looking into it, she said no. I highly doubt she likes GG (because, you know, the commonly held narrative in press) but this is NOT antiGG. Sasha Costanza-Chock schock Od 2 tybika are you writing about GamerGate? 152 AM-2 041 2014 Detais Colapse Reply to 4Dschock entka 因TL Taylorahifindittasenatngbutwouldrater spendmyenergy elsewhere schock nah. i find it fascinating but would rather spend my energy elsewhere Expand Pumpkin Spiee Bossntne Oct 2 coybika schock Yeah same, more or less Expand However, if antiGG are smart, they will use this tag to goad the not so great people in Gamer- Gate into attacking it Already, there is crossover with some academics in antiGG, but again, this is NOT a group targeting GamerGate, or gamers. IF YOU ATTACKTHIS GROUP YOU WILL ONLY CREATE NEW ANTI-GAMERGATE PEOPLE don't do it, be smart KEEP YOUR DAMN FOCUS PLEASE. So far, only ONE tweet in the tag references gamergate, and that person sucks for doing it, but let the person go and talk to himself Results for #academicANDfeminist gam. TopIA Save Al Pierson Browne 20h academioANDfeminist Is it bad that I feel left out by not being implicated as a feminist by GamerGate? want to be boh and proudy sol Esxpand You ve reached the end of the Top Tweets for gamerBate iew all Tweets IF YOU SEE A GAMERGATE PERSON GO ATTHE TAG, CALL THEM OUT. POINT OUT FALSE FLAG
MASSIVE LAND MINE FALSE FLAG ALERT PLEASE RETWEET There is a new tag growing hard right now, I've been turned on to it by colleagues #academicANDfeminist DO NOT ENGAGE. DO NOT THIS IS NOT ANTIGG the tag was started by an academic who is NOT antiGG, just a bystander When asked if she was looking into it, she said no. I highly doubt she likes GG (because, you know, the commonly held narrative in press) but this is NOT antiGG. Sasha Costanza-Chock schock Od 2 tybika are you writing about GamerGate? 152 AM-2 041 2014 Detais Colapse Reply to 4Dschock entka 因TL Taylorahifindittasenatngbutwouldrater spendmyenergy elsewhere schock nah. i find it fascinating but would rather spend my energy elsewhere Expand Pumpkin Spiee Bossntne Oct 2 coybika schock Yeah same, more or less Expand However, if antiGG are smart, they will use this tag to goad the not so great people in Gamer- Gate into attacking it Already, there is crossover with some academics in antiGG, but again, this is NOT a group targeting GamerGate, or gamers. IF YOU ATTACKTHIS GROUP YOU WILL ONLY CREATE NEW ANTI-GAMERGATE PEOPLE don't do it, be smart KEEP YOUR DAMN FOCUS PLEASE. So far, only ONE tweet in the tag references gamergate, and that person sucks for doing it, but let the person go and talk to himself Results for #academicANDfeminist gam. TopIA Save Al Pierson Browne 20h academioANDfeminist Is it bad that I feel left out by not being implicated as a feminist by GamerGate? want to be boh and proudy sol Esxpand You ve reached the end of the Top Tweets for gamerBate iew all Tweets IF YOU SEE A GAMERGATE PERSON GO ATTHE TAG, CALL THEM OUT. POINT OUT FALSE FLAG

GamerGate

Der Führer's Face


GamerGate
ian miles cheong alejandro argandona

Fight corruption

WE ARE UNITED AS ONE VOICE GAMERGATE REJECTS CORRUPTION-2 FIGHTOR DIE WORKING HARD FOR THE GO0D OF GAMING INDUSTRY
WE ARE UNITED AS ONE VOICE GAMERGATE REJECTS CORRUPTION-2 FIGHTOR DIE WORKING HARD FOR THE GO0D OF GAMING INDUSTRY

GamerGate
gamergate notyourshield

Fight corruption

GAMERGATE NOTYOURSHIELD IGHT CORRUPTION
GAMERGATE NOTYOURSHIELD IGHT CORRUPTION

GamerGate
gamergate notyourshield

How many emails have you sent?

HON MANJ EMAILS HAVE JOU SENT ?
HON MANJ EMAILS HAVE JOU SENT ?

GamerGate
gamergate notyourshield

An Issue With Agendas

An Issue With Agendas Why do gamers From the point of view of the journalist, their agenda is a positive thing They are trying to pet more female protagonists in games and making games trying to pet more LGBT representation in games, and trying to pet more racial diversity in games So when readers say that their sendup of Final Fantasy for having no playable female characters and the op ed about heterosexual white man being life's easiest difficulty setting" are bad because they are agenda driven, they react with confusion and hostility Its easy to assume the majority of gamers are just misogynist assholes when faced with this reaction, but in my opinion is not so black and white Gamers aren't against progress, they've just against your approach to roges supporters of bottom-up progress; which in this case is providing diverse games that mathod, tearing dows works for no mocing thair lofty standands. I wantto examine the issues with this practice, and why i【 pisses so) many games t and games chemselves. You seldom hea praise from the big sites about how the new Laca Crodt is a capable protagonist. But you will hear that she's "agiel trying to escape a man's world" that her constanc lnjuries are feeishistie and one death scene in game The joumalists behind these articles lnow that there are more clicks in a This game promoces misogyny!" article than there ave in a "This game ls a good esample of a strong female charactes" article, so almost all of thei critique trends towards the negacve We see reviews that mack a game down that this video game makes us equate kissing with killing Their method of to find something they perceive as objectionable and then denounce it. When you're told over and ver that everything you libe is terrible, its easy to become frustrated wich those doing the telling My Equality is Better Than Your Equality I believe it would be hard to find a gamer who believes that amyone should be restricted from making games, writing about games or becoming imvohred in the the ripht to pursue their goals, whether that poel is to write, to write about prevenking that, they should be removed.If everyone has the opportunity to contribute we will have more diversity of product and the market will choose who deserves an audience This is the kind of equality I, and I believe many other gamers believe in The prevailing attitude of gaming media seems to be that of equality of results Every person in this case ones who they perceive as margnalized or oppressed) deserves to enjoy the same level of success, unless you disagree with them of course So when a Semale developer or critic produces something,it cannot be criticied lest we deive more women out of the industry. If it is not nursed on a steady diet of ueved pras, we will lo these important voices in our indusitty The media needs to understand that While gaming journalists may beliave they are doing chis for the b, the delicate fowees froem criticism, this atitudo barms the creatoes COOT woest thing you can do for somsone's act is to tell them it is perfect whan it isn't When you hear nothing bur universal praise and dismiss cricicism by its very nacure, where then is t gaming industry trom cricicism you ace telling them "this is good enough, do yourselr This is what gamers hate about the modern industry, success does not seem to be achieved theough skuill, bu by playing by the nules. When chese is a megaphone" walting to crush your dreams, why divert from the narrative? wane good games. If people to take criticism then they shouldn't be in this Iindustry This is an argument that has been made since we were able to make sprites bigper than a few plooels. And we've won. The Supreme Court ruled that video games are protected under the same laws that peotect other art. Games courses exist alongside fine arts Mamy parts of development teams are known personally and professionaly s artists. Games are Now,like other forms of art they are experiencing external censorship and If someone creates a painting that you hate, a painting that you find horrible and is a representation of all that is ou still have no right to change it You can choose not to look at it or you can refuse to bay a print but the artist is under no obligation to change it based on your opinion For better or worse, everything in that painting is the choice of the actist Game critics don't seem to asp this idea Games appear to be the only art form that must appeal to and sepeesent every demographic simutaously They will demand pluryable female characters when the game was not written for a playable female character, Mighty No g, Assassin Creed Unity. They will decry freedom of choice bul into a game because if as sexist, HiIman GA ame And they wall claim 3o year old gamas are eamples of modens societal issues Drogon's Lair,Ms Pa The trapc part is that these were the people who led the"games are art" charpe They campaigned for legitimacy and respect for our medium and when they got it they set about burning it down They told game developers Yes what you made is art, now lets start talking about how your art can What I, and I believe marry gamers would love to see is less attacking of tng and more provision of against diversity of sex, race or sersual oeientation on sczeen or in would just trips. Yelling at a game for featuring peimacily white men is the negative approach, providing oppoctunities for minority dvelopers to gee th industry and change that is the positive Tearing down a game bacause it uses he negative approach, trying to go gicls insoested in ga and ented as all things forcaed upon you are. If it comes Erom a grasstoots movemet, it will be much mone lkely to be embraced as a cepeesentation of This is why gamers loved The Fine attacking video games, it wasn't teling us that wonen are special by their a wary to show the wold "Women have good ideas for video games too and we're going to prove they can make money" The reason it got funded Is not spite, it is because this is the way we wan to see women succeed in the gaming industry, on the strength of their ideas, not the It's all about the money And at the end of the day, thats a major issue with an agenda driven crusade Games developers and games publishers, while they have varying degrees of passion for the art, are driven by money For years gamers have bought wha they're currently buying, games like CoD, Assassin's Creed and Battlefield are licenses to print money, so diverting from the foremula that made these for not being diverse enough, not being going to fall on deaf ears when they see that they made 1.3 bilion dollars last There will be token efforts of course; such hiring "consultants" and engaging with these big as video games, none of the big companies want to be the first to take a drastic risk To change what is produced in the industry, you cannot relr on changing the current mindsets of the people in power, you need to focus on getting people into the industry But the cucrent practice is the opposite of this, it breaks down into a vicious cycle of Journalists decry video games- game devs make token efforts->It isn't good enough-Journalists decry video games I level, but in If these game journalists are true believers and not just clickbaiters they meed to see the necessity of breaking that cycle If a particularh egregious example of sexism or racism agpears ina video game, by all means report on , but that cannot be the sum of your efforts When you ignone effoets to pet womer into gaming like The Fine Yong Capitalists in favour of writing anticles about how gamers are dead it comes across as abhorrently self serving You are shouting from a platform about an issue while real people are below you If you tnuly believe the best way tox video games is to do whar you currently doing, thin I won't change your mind. You'se going to call ma a seyou'll just asume I'm scill to tell you that what we hace is gamer but the means bry which you addeess it We doet hate women in gaming Jade are all great examples of women whose success in gaming came as a result od chele skill, not their gender do is hate women and promote misogyny, we will stand in your way
An Issue With Agendas Why do gamers From the point of view of the journalist, their agenda is a positive thing They are trying to pet more female protagonists in games and making games trying to pet more LGBT representation in games, and trying to pet more racial diversity in games So when readers say that their sendup of Final Fantasy for having no playable female characters and the op ed about heterosexual white man being life's easiest difficulty setting" are bad because they are agenda driven, they react with confusion and hostility Its easy to assume the majority of gamers are just misogynist assholes when faced with this reaction, but in my opinion is not so black and white Gamers aren't against progress, they've just against your approach to roges supporters of bottom-up progress; which in this case is providing diverse games that mathod, tearing dows works for no mocing thair lofty standands. I wantto examine the issues with this practice, and why i【 pisses so) many games t and games chemselves. You seldom hea praise from the big sites about how the new Laca Crodt is a capable protagonist. But you will hear that she's "agiel trying to escape a man's world" that her constanc lnjuries are feeishistie and one death scene in game The joumalists behind these articles lnow that there are more clicks in a This game promoces misogyny!" article than there ave in a "This game ls a good esample of a strong female charactes" article, so almost all of thei critique trends towards the negacve We see reviews that mack a game down that this video game makes us equate kissing with killing Their method of to find something they perceive as objectionable and then denounce it. When you're told over and ver that everything you libe is terrible, its easy to become frustrated wich those doing the telling My Equality is Better Than Your Equality I believe it would be hard to find a gamer who believes that amyone should be restricted from making games, writing about games or becoming imvohred in the the ripht to pursue their goals, whether that poel is to write, to write about prevenking that, they should be removed.If everyone has the opportunity to contribute we will have more diversity of product and the market will choose who deserves an audience This is the kind of equality I, and I believe many other gamers believe in The prevailing attitude of gaming media seems to be that of equality of results Every person in this case ones who they perceive as margnalized or oppressed) deserves to enjoy the same level of success, unless you disagree with them of course So when a Semale developer or critic produces something,it cannot be criticied lest we deive more women out of the industry. If it is not nursed on a steady diet of ueved pras, we will lo these important voices in our indusitty The media needs to understand that While gaming journalists may beliave they are doing chis for the b, the delicate fowees froem criticism, this atitudo barms the creatoes COOT woest thing you can do for somsone's act is to tell them it is perfect whan it isn't When you hear nothing bur universal praise and dismiss cricicism by its very nacure, where then is t gaming industry trom cricicism you ace telling them "this is good enough, do yourselr This is what gamers hate about the modern industry, success does not seem to be achieved theough skuill, bu by playing by the nules. When chese is a megaphone" walting to crush your dreams, why divert from the narrative? wane good games. If people to take criticism then they shouldn't be in this Iindustry This is an argument that has been made since we were able to make sprites bigper than a few plooels. And we've won. The Supreme Court ruled that video games are protected under the same laws that peotect other art. Games courses exist alongside fine arts Mamy parts of development teams are known personally and professionaly s artists. Games are Now,like other forms of art they are experiencing external censorship and If someone creates a painting that you hate, a painting that you find horrible and is a representation of all that is ou still have no right to change it You can choose not to look at it or you can refuse to bay a print but the artist is under no obligation to change it based on your opinion For better or worse, everything in that painting is the choice of the actist Game critics don't seem to asp this idea Games appear to be the only art form that must appeal to and sepeesent every demographic simutaously They will demand pluryable female characters when the game was not written for a playable female character, Mighty No g, Assassin Creed Unity. They will decry freedom of choice bul into a game because if as sexist, HiIman GA ame And they wall claim 3o year old gamas are eamples of modens societal issues Drogon's Lair,Ms Pa The trapc part is that these were the people who led the"games are art" charpe They campaigned for legitimacy and respect for our medium and when they got it they set about burning it down They told game developers Yes what you made is art, now lets start talking about how your art can What I, and I believe marry gamers would love to see is less attacking of tng and more provision of against diversity of sex, race or sersual oeientation on sczeen or in would just trips. Yelling at a game for featuring peimacily white men is the negative approach, providing oppoctunities for minority dvelopers to gee th industry and change that is the positive Tearing down a game bacause it uses he negative approach, trying to go gicls insoested in ga and ented as all things forcaed upon you are. If it comes Erom a grasstoots movemet, it will be much mone lkely to be embraced as a cepeesentation of This is why gamers loved The Fine attacking video games, it wasn't teling us that wonen are special by their a wary to show the wold "Women have good ideas for video games too and we're going to prove they can make money" The reason it got funded Is not spite, it is because this is the way we wan to see women succeed in the gaming industry, on the strength of their ideas, not the It's all about the money And at the end of the day, thats a major issue with an agenda driven crusade Games developers and games publishers, while they have varying degrees of passion for the art, are driven by money For years gamers have bought wha they're currently buying, games like CoD, Assassin's Creed and Battlefield are licenses to print money, so diverting from the foremula that made these for not being diverse enough, not being going to fall on deaf ears when they see that they made 1.3 bilion dollars last There will be token efforts of course; such hiring "consultants" and engaging with these big as video games, none of the big companies want to be the first to take a drastic risk To change what is produced in the industry, you cannot relr on changing the current mindsets of the people in power, you need to focus on getting people into the industry But the cucrent practice is the opposite of this, it breaks down into a vicious cycle of Journalists decry video games- game devs make token efforts->It isn't good enough-Journalists decry video games I level, but in If these game journalists are true believers and not just clickbaiters they meed to see the necessity of breaking that cycle If a particularh egregious example of sexism or racism agpears ina video game, by all means report on , but that cannot be the sum of your efforts When you ignone effoets to pet womer into gaming like The Fine Yong Capitalists in favour of writing anticles about how gamers are dead it comes across as abhorrently self serving You are shouting from a platform about an issue while real people are below you If you tnuly believe the best way tox video games is to do whar you currently doing, thin I won't change your mind. You'se going to call ma a seyou'll just asume I'm scill to tell you that what we hace is gamer but the means bry which you addeess it We doet hate women in gaming Jade are all great examples of women whose success in gaming came as a result od chele skill, not their gender do is hate women and promote misogyny, we will stand in your way

GamerGate
gamergate

Parody of the Megaphone

Why gamers are literally the worst f------ people ever I often say I'm a video game culture writer, but I f------ hate video games and video game culture. I especially f------ hate gamers. When you think of "gamers," you think of a physically repulsive creature with Flamin' Hot Cheeto dust in its disgusting neckbeard. "I like playing video games," it vomits out of its s------- before masturbating itself into a diabetic coma. September 4, 2014 1 By Lee Axelberg 6 comments More: Console/PC, Social/Online, Smartphone/Tablet, Indie, Programming, Art, Design, Business/Marketing, Exclusive 8+1
Why gamers are literally the worst f------ people ever I often say I'm a video game culture writer, but I f------ hate video games and video game culture. I especially f------ hate gamers. When you think of "gamers," you think of a physically repulsive creature with Flamin' Hot Cheeto dust in its disgusting neckbeard. "I like playing video games," it vomits out of its s------- before masturbating itself into a diabetic coma. September 4, 2014 1 By Lee Axelberg 6 comments More: Console/PC, Social/Online, Smartphone/Tablet, Indie, Programming, Art, Design, Business/Marketing, Exclusive 8+1

GamerGate
parody satire gamergate

Operation Vox Populi

THIS PLRCE outer-heaven.rogue-star-industries.com
THIS PLRCE outer-heaven.rogue-star-industries.com

GamerGate
op gamergate notyourshield operation vox populi

Operation Vox Populi

#GamerGate #OperationVoxPopuli ay
#GamerGate #OperationVoxPopuli ay

GamerGate
op gamergate not your shield operation vox populi