NPC Wojak - Images

Sorted By:

many NPCs

NPC angry noises!

ANGRY NPC NOISES

ANGRY NPC NOISES

NPC showering

NPC news

NPC NEWS

NPC NEWS

npc national broadcasting corporation nbc

NPC

OH LOOK ANOTHER WOJAK IT'S IT'S A MOSSAD PSYOPS OH LO0K ANOTHER WOJAK IT'S A MOSSAD PSYOPS OH LOOK ANOTHER WOJAK IT'S A MOSSAD PSYOPS OH LOOK ANOTHER WOJAK IT'S A MOSSAD PSYOPS OH LOOK ANOTHER WOJ AK NPleCeen

OH LOOK ANOTHER WOJAK IT'S IT'S A MOSSAD PSYOPS OH LO0K ANOTHER WOJAK IT'S A MOSSAD PSYOPS OH LOOK ANOTHER WOJAK IT'S A MOSSAD PSYOPS OH LOOK ANOTHER WOJAK IT'S A MOSSAD PSYOPS OH LOOK ANOTHER WOJ AK NPleCeen

THE GREAT AWAKENING, ENLIGHTENMENT HAS ARRIVED

This NPC s--- is real talk. Turning point in human progress. The enlightenment has arrived

This NPC s--- is real talk. Turning point in human progress. The enlightenment has arrived

NPC error

error

error

NPC hmmm

npc thinking face emoji 🤔

NPC tweet 2

MikeStuchbery'sSpookyUnivers.. @MikeStuchbery_ Follow /Pol/ is a cancer. kotaku.co.uk 1:04 AM-9 Oct 2018 の罼鲁 .,。 ) s: 11 Retweets 59 Likes

MikeStuchbery'sSpookyUnivers.. @MikeStuchbery_ Follow /Pol/ is a cancer. kotaku.co.uk 1:04 AM-9 Oct 2018 の罼鲁 .,。 ) s: 11 Retweets 59 Likes

NPC tweet 1

John Skullen円 @nellucnhoj Follow Just saw my first example of someone using "NPC" as a pejorative in the wild. So that's another codeterm (like SJW) I'll have to keep an eye on. If you're not familiar with it and what it means, this article explains everything: kotaku.com 12:33 AM -9 Oct 2018 64 Retweets 132 likes

John Skullen円 @nellucnhoj Follow Just saw my first example of someone using "NPC" as a pejorative in the wild. So that's another codeterm (like SJW) I'll have to keep an eye on. If you're not familiar with it and what it means, this article explains everything: kotaku.com 12:33 AM -9 Oct 2018 64 Retweets 132 likes

scared wokejaks

NPC dab

virgin vs chad

The Virgin Programm The Chad Reality OOK AT THESE PEOPLE. GLASSY-EYED AUTOMATONS LOOK AT THESE PEOPLE. GLASSY-EYED AUTOMATONS GOING ABOUT THEIR DAILY LVES, NEVER STOPPING GOING ABOUT THEIR DAILY LVES, NEVER STOPPING TO LOOK AROUND AND 께nKI IM THE ONLY 11 TO LOOK AROUND AND 7mK! IM THE ONLY CONSCIOUS HUMAN IN A WORUD OF SHEEP CONSCIOUS HUMAN IN A WORUD OF SHEEP áb.nocCO t-a(b panded if(dlI(d-b. ent(".dr atedTa toggle-"ta dea (this dass("active") end ctive" Thoughts are a inner monolocue too abstract for NPCs to grasp Has to visualize things. Thinks about stuff only because he is programmed to

The Virgin Programm The Chad Reality OOK AT THESE PEOPLE. GLASSY-EYED AUTOMATONS LOOK AT THESE PEOPLE. GLASSY-EYED AUTOMATONS GOING ABOUT THEIR DAILY LVES, NEVER STOPPING GOING ABOUT THEIR DAILY LVES, NEVER STOPPING TO LOOK AROUND AND 께nKI IM THE ONLY 11 TO LOOK AROUND AND 7mK! IM THE ONLY CONSCIOUS HUMAN IN A WORUD OF SHEEP CONSCIOUS HUMAN IN A WORUD OF SHEEP áb.nocCO t-a(b panded if(dlI(d-b. ent(".dr atedTa toggle-"ta dea (this dass("active") end ctive" Thoughts are a inner monolocue too abstract for NPCs to grasp Has to visualize things. Thinks about stuff only because he is programmed to

NPC Jesus

NPC's have no real ethics

Anonymous (ID: Gm+FGIS) 10/09/18(Tue)20:35:40 No. 188747828、>>188747931 188747261 (You) As I see it there are three paths to generate your view of right and wrong in the world 1. Law path: you think the law is the one that decides what is right and what is wrong. This is where the extreme NPCs lurk, they are not required to think beyond obey what amounts to a manual of what is right and what is wrong. No introspection or complex thought required 2. Moral path: this is similar to the previous one but at least it will require you to question the law path and abide by a different set of codes provided by the group you belong to, be it religious, political or whatever. The result is almost always dogmatic so a lot of NPCs end up here since they also just have to follow a code or manual (many times unwritten). I think most of this board falls in here 3. Ethics path: this is the only path that NPCs would be unable to follow since it requires that you question the law and moral paths, namely, those codes that were provided to you as the way to distinguish between good versus evil either by the state or by the group or groups you belong to. I think the ethics path will, ironically, reveal universal truths about what constitutes right and wrong more often for us as human beings than the law or moral paths. But of course all the paths intertwine now and then.

Anonymous (ID: Gm+FGIS) 10/09/18(Tue)20:35:40 No. 188747828、>>188747931 188747261 (You) As I see it there are three paths to generate your view of right and wrong in the world 1. Law path: you think the law is the one that decides what is right and what is wrong. This is where the extreme NPCs lurk, they are not required to think beyond obey what amounts to a manual of what is right and what is wrong. No introspection or complex thought required 2. Moral path: this is similar to the previous one but at least it will require you to question the law path and abide by a different set of codes provided by the group you belong to, be it religious, political or whatever. The result is almost always dogmatic so a lot of NPCs end up here since they also just have to follow a code or manual (many times unwritten). I think most of this board falls in here 3. Ethics path: this is the only path that NPCs would be unable to follow since it requires that you question the law and moral paths, namely, those codes that were provided to you as the way to distinguish between good versus evil either by the state or by the group or groups you belong to. I think the ethics path will, ironically, reveal universal truths about what constitutes right and wrong more often for us as human beings than the law or moral paths. But of course all the paths intertwine now and then.

NPC

Not Everyone Conducts Inneir Speech Inner speech is frequent but not for everyone Russell T Hurlburt Ph.D. Pristine Inner Experience Posted Oct 26, 2011 Consider inner speech. Subject experienced themselves as innerly talking to themselves in 26% of all samples, but there were large individual differences: some subjects never experienced inner speech; other subjects experienced inner speech in as many as 75% of their samples. The median percentage across subjects was 20%. Heavey, C. L., & Hurlburt, R. T., The phenomena of inner experience, Consciousness and Cognition (2008), doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.12.006 Inner speech 096 17% 1796 20% 33% 50% <50% >50% -75% 3% 3% Sectional 30% 17% Cumulative 80% 20% Summary: ·17% of people have no inner speech, and confirmed it when being individually probed about their results -50% of people use their inner speech less than 20% of the time 80% of people use their inner speech less than 50% of the time The variance was high enough to assume that different people indeed use different ways of thinking Males are 40% more likely to use inner speech than females - Inner speech is the only mode of thinking that's associated with lower psychological distress - Both factors (male, lower psychological distress) have been associated with higher intelligence in other studies . The cohorts were first world university students so the general world population might be worse off The sample size was 30 because the authors wanted to make sure the cohorts understood the methodology - The results had a p<0.05 so they are statistically significant The study has a citation index of 90 so it's been peer-reviewed Some People Can't Conjure Mental Images. Are You One of Them? Robble Gonzalez 6/2515 2:00pm-Filed to: NEUROSCIENCE 204 23 Mentally count the windows in your home. Did you close your eyes? Visualize your house's layout in your head? I did, when I tried this task. f Share Tweet

Not Everyone Conducts Inneir Speech Inner speech is frequent but not for everyone Russell T Hurlburt Ph.D. Pristine Inner Experience Posted Oct 26, 2011 Consider inner speech. Subject experienced themselves as innerly talking to themselves in 26% of all samples, but there were large individual differences: some subjects never experienced inner speech; other subjects experienced inner speech in as many as 75% of their samples. The median percentage across subjects was 20%. Heavey, C. L., & Hurlburt, R. T., The phenomena of inner experience, Consciousness and Cognition (2008), doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.12.006 Inner speech 096 17% 1796 20% 33% 50% <50% >50% -75% 3% 3% Sectional 30% 17% Cumulative 80% 20% Summary: ·17% of people have no inner speech, and confirmed it when being individually probed about their results -50% of people use their inner speech less than 20% of the time 80% of people use their inner speech less than 50% of the time The variance was high enough to assume that different people indeed use different ways of thinking Males are 40% more likely to use inner speech than females - Inner speech is the only mode of thinking that's associated with lower psychological distress - Both factors (male, lower psychological distress) have been associated with higher intelligence in other studies . The cohorts were first world university students so the general world population might be worse off The sample size was 30 because the authors wanted to make sure the cohorts understood the methodology - The results had a p<0.05 so they are statistically significant The study has a citation index of 90 so it's been peer-reviewed Some People Can't Conjure Mental Images. Are You One of Them? Robble Gonzalez 6/2515 2:00pm-Filed to: NEUROSCIENCE 204 23 Mentally count the windows in your home. Did you close your eyes? Visualize your house's layout in your head? I did, when I tried this task. f Share Tweet