Fallout - Images

Sorted By:

I don't even know

fallout 4 bike synths elder maxson

Find

fallout 4 fallout horse

Nirnroot in Fallout 4

EXPERIMENTAL PLANT HP Rads Weight Value O 10 0.1 @PREV ⑩NEXT ZOOM IN @ZOOM OUT ( ) EXIT

EXPERIMENTAL PLANT HP Rads Weight Value O 10 0.1 @PREV ⑩NEXT ZOOM IN @ZOOM OUT ( ) EXIT

fallout fallout 4 nirnroot elder scrolls easter eggs skyrim

Milk

Strong Strong find milk. Drink milk. Make super mutants stronger than humans WHY FIND MILK?ⓕ NOT YET COME WITH ME

Strong Strong find milk. Drink milk. Make super mutants stronger than humans WHY FIND MILK?ⓕ NOT YET COME WITH ME

fallout fallout 4 mutant milk strong

And then Buzz became a Space Marine.

fallout 4 paladin danse buzz lightyear toy story

I can't wait for the issue where Nick goes up against the Mysterious Stranger

etective COMICS NONEN $11 Unlikely alentine GETTING A CLUE! HC

etective COMICS NONEN $11 Unlikely alentine GETTING A CLUE! HC

fallout 4 nick valentine best companion

Something is a bit different...

girl armor wat head is gone underwear creepy

Where's that reload button?

making decisions solely based on what your companion liKes

making decisions solely based on what your companion liKes

the walking dead companion fallout 4 rick grimes daryl dixon textpost

I don't remember how to shoot

"Playing Fallout 4 after months immersed in Skyrim."

"Playing Fallout 4 after months immersed in Skyrim."

skyrim fallout 4 transistioning lord of the rings gandalf

Story of the century

STAT INV DATA MAP RADIO Completed STORY OF THE CENTUR Classical Radio Diamond City Radio e AF95 ADIO ower

STAT INV DATA MAP RADIO Completed STORY OF THE CENTUR Classical Radio Diamond City Radio e AF95 ADIO ower

fallout 4 fallout piper

Priorities

Ou your Son yet? SON?

Ou your Son yet? SON?

fallout 4 sole survivor piper nick valentine

kym.jpg

ALLO A BARTE Mason I've got a few minutes to browse

ALLO A BARTE Mason I've got a few minutes to browse

fallout know your meme kym 4 power armor t-51b barter

BRAVO BETHESDA

LUCKY TATUM 45 TORSO 65 78 68] 76 76 Raider Waster 0h f--- me. Bullet in the knee 018 093 AP HP Q) SELECTEACCEPT ab) RETURN WS BODY PART AD) CYCLETARGET

LUCKY TATUM 45 TORSO 65 78 68] 76 76 Raider Waster 0h f--- me. Bullet in the knee 018 093 AP HP Q) SELECTEACCEPT ab) RETURN WS BODY PART AD) CYCLETARGET

fallout 4 arrow to the knee skyrim memes reference bullet to the knee damnit bethesda

Let's go, pal

fallout 4 puella magi madoka magica homura akemi kyubey

Making a Statement

fallout 4 personal fortress git offa my property ya varmints

Nate Church from breitbart.com on Fallout 4 buggy release

Wired published an article by Zak McClendon arguing that Fallout 4's expansive list of bugs were actually features. While I can respect Zak's perspective and industry experience, I think the argument he makes is as deeply flawed as the development philosophy he defends First of all, there's a glaring omission from the argument. These games aren't janky beyond repair, they're just a mess at launch. Within six months to a year, every single instance of a "goofy" Bethesda world has received enough polish to provide what is obviously the intended experience Quality assurance has nothing to do with "focusing on the right things." It's a separate process that Bethesda deliberately trims to get the product out with a bare minimum level of functionality. No doubt that it's effective in widening already obscene profit margins, but it's no more indicative of a player-focused design than Call of Duty commercials are constructive information for consumers. No one is arguing that the game should be "polished in the same way that other games are." They're arguing for time and money to be spent on making the experience good on day one, as opposed to when sales finally start dropping off and people are willing to pony up full retail price to get the game they were promised in the beginning Bethesda's approach to growth and development probably is an asset, but it doesn't justify ignoring its glaring issues, especially when those same issues have been present from the very beginning. If the engine is buckling under the stress, license one that won't. If you are determined to work with your own, make sure that it holds up through basic player experience. This isn't magic, this is due diligence The real kicker is that modders repair most of these issues for free, on their own, within days sometimes mere hours - of identifying a problem. You know who else could do that? Bethesda, alongside a dedicated team of QA testers. Not a single one of the biggest issues in Fallout 4 is difficult to reproduce. For the most part, they're difficult not to reproduce. A release this undercooked isn't the merry foibles of a quirky team of artistic geniuses, it's cost-cutting by a company that knows how much their fans will excuse It's especially sad when compared to the merciless crucifixion of Fallout: New Vegas, which was developed by Obsidian Entertainment, not Bethesda. That title launched with less of a budget, on an old and still-broken engine, and still remains for many the truest modern interpretation of the Fallout franchise. It was by far the most interesting Fallout has been since its inception for me, but without Bethesda's die-hard loyalists defending it, thegame was thrown under the bus for the same qualities defended in other incarnations The bottom line is that consumers aren't unreasonable for expecting a product as advertised, nor is it impossible to achieve this. It is, in fact, reliably achieved within a year of each release. By excusing a company that can gross nearly a billion dollars in 24 hours on faith alone, what we're really doing is proving to them that we don't deserve enough respect to warrant spending a little bit of extra time

Wired published an article by Zak McClendon arguing that Fallout 4's expansive list of bugs were actually features. While I can respect Zak's perspective and industry experience, I think the argument he makes is as deeply flawed as the development philosophy he defends First of all, there's a glaring omission from the argument. These games aren't janky beyond repair, they're just a mess at launch. Within six months to a year, every single instance of a "goofy" Bethesda world has received enough polish to provide what is obviously the intended experience Quality assurance has nothing to do with "focusing on the right things." It's a separate process that Bethesda deliberately trims to get the product out with a bare minimum level of functionality. No doubt that it's effective in widening already obscene profit margins, but it's no more indicative of a player-focused design than Call of Duty commercials are constructive information for consumers. No one is arguing that the game should be "polished in the same way that other games are." They're arguing for time and money to be spent on making the experience good on day one, as opposed to when sales finally start dropping off and people are willing to pony up full retail price to get the game they were promised in the beginning Bethesda's approach to growth and development probably is an asset, but it doesn't justify ignoring its glaring issues, especially when those same issues have been present from the very beginning. If the engine is buckling under the stress, license one that won't. If you are determined to work with your own, make sure that it holds up through basic player experience. This isn't magic, this is due diligence The real kicker is that modders repair most of these issues for free, on their own, within days sometimes mere hours - of identifying a problem. You know who else could do that? Bethesda, alongside a dedicated team of QA testers. Not a single one of the biggest issues in Fallout 4 is difficult to reproduce. For the most part, they're difficult not to reproduce. A release this undercooked isn't the merry foibles of a quirky team of artistic geniuses, it's cost-cutting by a company that knows how much their fans will excuse It's especially sad when compared to the merciless crucifixion of Fallout: New Vegas, which was developed by Obsidian Entertainment, not Bethesda. That title launched with less of a budget, on an old and still-broken engine, and still remains for many the truest modern interpretation of the Fallout franchise. It was by far the most interesting Fallout has been since its inception for me, but without Bethesda's die-hard loyalists defending it, thegame was thrown under the bus for the same qualities defended in other incarnations The bottom line is that consumers aren't unreasonable for expecting a product as advertised, nor is it impossible to achieve this. It is, in fact, reliably achieved within a year of each release. By excusing a company that can gross nearly a billion dollars in 24 hours on faith alone, what we're really doing is proving to them that we don't deserve enough respect to warrant spending a little bit of extra time

source :http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2015/11/21/wireds-defense-of-fallout-4-leaves-consumers-stranded-in-the-wasteland/ fallout 4 breitbart nate church bugs article

Not creepy

0161 ome inew to HI POWER PLANT

0161 ome inew to HI POWER PLANT

fallout shelter ???

how to break into a house

fallout gif couch dat couch

Synth Strider

fallout 4 synth strider institute rifle

It Spreads Elsewhere

KILL OR BE 60 40 80 AP% 40 50 60 70 ー20 20 50 AMMO 10 90 RADS CORE 100- 000O 100 HP% 1I 23 NEIE

KILL OR BE 60 40 80 AP% 40 50 60 70 ー20 20 50 AMMO 10 90 RADS CORE 100- 000O 100 HP% 1I 23 NEIE

4 undertale flowey goodneighbor psychology gun store sign i have 33 cores how many does everyone else have