Phil is a shining example of resisting the corrupting stupidity of a blue checkmark

first off its a she

second off she is arguing that you should keep people from having sex, not because it WILL be an issue for their kids, but because it MIGHT be an issue for their kids. also its arbitrary. who decides what particular genetic diseases are worth cutting people balls off? alztimers? liver disease? kidney disease? heart disease? obesity? low IQ? high resistance to brainwashing? Where is the line? how often will the line move? what happens when people move away from disease and move towards race or religion or member of the wrong party at the wrong time? because all that shit has happened already so it could happen again. And what, you are gonna have the eugenics police test people and cut off their balls against their will if their kids have a 51% chance of dying of cancer at the age of 60?

does that help you see how that might be morally wrong? You ARE gassing those with those issues, you are just using a much slower poison.