Battlefield - R.I.P C.O.D

WW1:
>All the countries involved are more or less at the same "tech level"
>Less of a clear bad guy than in WW2
>New weapons and strategies are being developed remarkably fast in response to the enemy's own developments
>Dogfighting is still a thing
>Computer assisted targeting is out of the picture (I think)
>As bloody and horrible as it's gonna get… Until WW2
>Around the time when cool old stuff was still being used (Like cavarly and airships)
-
Modern war armed conflict:
>You are from the USA or any of their allies but still very USA-centric
>It is (mostly) not a conflict between nations or ideologies, but between corporate interests
>Target-seeking weaponry makes much of the combat "fire and forget"
>Nukes, nukes everywhere
>Seriously, your mission is to fuck up the enemy without warranting a nuclear response
>Much more emphasis in stealth based missions than in front line combat
>There is a heavy "tech gap" between you and your enemies, favoring you as long as Evil Corp is arming the arab/latino people
>More PMCs than you can shake a Metal Gear at!
>Terrorist, Terrorism, TERROR
>Emphasis on your being a hero over being a soldier
>Marine, marine, marine. When do i get to play as someone from the Air Force? Navy? Nope, Marine!
-
I think the War to End all Wars is a better setting for a videogame, looking forward to it.
To anyone that knows more history than i do (As if that's hard) feel free to correct any stupidity i commited here

>battlefield developer mocks Infinity Warfare trailer
>faggot group starts mass-disliking the trailer
>retards join on the bandwagon
>everyone praises battlefield 1 for being the same but in WW1
>everyone hates CoD for being the same but later

Why is everyone so retarded?