Christianity - Images

Sorted By:

Turn the Other Cheek (Extended)

File nide): 1452109491897 jpg (500.77 KB, 1377x1545, 459:515, Bloch-SermononTheMount ipa) - Anonymous 01/06/16 (Wed) 20:44:51 ID: 1641cb No.240352 >240359 22240410 [Watch Thread] >But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. What did He mean by this? Anonymous 01/06/16 (Wed) 21:04:01 ID: 4c7187 No.240359 >2403e9 >240403 22240031 >>240352 (OP) I've posted before about this but it's better translated as "do not diametrically oppose an evildoer" and the reason you were supposed to turn the other cheek is because >1. In antiquity, you only hit someone with your right hand (the clean one) >2. Backhands were insult, a frontal slap showed equality and challenge. >3. By turning your cheek the aggressor was forced to stop hitting you or acknowledge you as an equal; that was quite a statement to a Roman by a conquered Jew. So, Jesus was telling us to fight back smartly, using public shame as a weapon, not just attack head on like a moron Anonymous 01/07/16 (Thu) 08:30:46 ID: 994133 No.240519 >240031 >240034 >>240408 Matthew 5:39 έγ δέ λέγω ύμν μή άντιστήναι τ ποηρ άλλ ' δστις σε ραπίσει έπί τήν δεξιάν σου σιαγόνα στρέψον αύτ και την άλλην First off, what you are translating as "do not resist" is "ávrIoTivai." ávToTĪvai has more to it than resist, Strong's Concordance at 436 notes to take a -complete- stand against" and it derived from a -military- term to diametrically oppose one's foes. Thayer's notes to set oneself against" "Resist" here is passive, but the term ávrIotĪvai clearly denotes an aggressive posture. Better might be "but I say unto you, do not square off against an evil doer" Especially in the context of the examples all being examples of how to engage in intelligent resistance - "Turn the other cheek" I already explained. "Give him your cloak too" is Christ referencing Exodus 22:26 to shame your opponent. Exodus 22:26 compels creditors to return the cloak at night so that the poor can sleep in it. By giving up your cloak you shame the creditor who is willing to sue for your tunic - and God will hear the cries of the debtor, Exodus promises this. As for walking the extra mile, that's a reference to the Roman law of impressment which allowed a Roman soldier to compel a person of a conquered state to carry his pack for one mile but no further. By carrying it the 2nd mile, the soldier would be forced to comically beg you to put it down lest his commanding officer see and he get in trouble. So, it clearly does not mean to not fight back - it means to fight back smartly. This is what happens when people try to read scripture with no reference for the history or culture it was written in, not to mention reading a bad rendering of the Greek in order to keep the poor in their place. Remember Christians, Christ taught us to fight smartly, not to not fight. Of course a Christian fights against evill How could we not? Anonymous (ID: GqK+D9hz) - 03/22/18(Thu)21:26:37 No.165006658 ► File: 1487039009734.jpg (159 KB, 472x640) Some have complained that there is no citation for the backhanded slap but that it is just a theory. The reason why scholars do not readily provide a citation is it comes from the Talmud. There are a number of references to various to traditions in the Talmud that are found in the gospels, because of Jesus' debates with Pharisees and St. Paul who was one himself. This is what scholars have when they do have a citation. I add this to anon's (thank you anon) original work as request from some atheists. Anonymous (ID: GqK+D9hz) - 03/22/18(Thu)21:26:57 No.165006695 ► File: 1506716547285.jpg (363 KB, 1344x1344) Originally to use a backhand slap against a superior was a serious offense since was meant for the slave class, or those goyim that did not bathe, since the back of the hand was used so to touch an unclean person as little as possible while still striking them. Touching something unclean with the palm of the hand made that hand generally unusable. So the Jews Jesus is speaking to would see this not just as dishonorable but also a baseless insult. To turn the other cheek would force the ones backhanding them to recognize that Jews indeed bathe just as the civilized Romans and Greeks did by slapping them with front. So if a goy were to turn his cheek to a Jew that is backhanding him, then the goy would be forcing the Jew to recognize that he is clean as he is. In a personal argument, to force a Jew to recognize that he is your equal is more effective than just punching him. If he does not recognize his equality with you, then observers would have been redpilled on kikery. Anonymous (ID: GqK+D9hz ) 4 03/22/18(Thu)21:27:15 No.165006738 ► File: 1518390022960.jpg (109 KB, 432x600) >Since the famous edition of the New Testament by Johann Jakob Wettstein at least, New testament scholars have been avware that in some rabbinic texts a backhanded slap was considered particularly blameworthy. (1) The commentary on the New Testament by Hermann Strack and Paul Billerbeck advanced Wettstein's research. (2) The key text is m. B. Qam. 8.6: “If one cuff his fellow, he must pay him a sela." R. Yehuda in the name of R. Jose the Galilean says, "A maneh . If he slapped him, he must pay him two hundred zuz; [if he hit him] with the back of his hand [IT' nnx] he must pay him four hundred zuz". (3) Samuel Greengus has shown that the offense in a number of different Babylonian laws including the Laws of Hammurapi. In the Laws of Hammurapi (§ § 202-205) a social inferior who struck the side of a superior's face was flogged, and a slave who did the same to a free person who lost an ear. (4) He thinks that talion is naturally associated with the slapping of a face, since m. B. Qam. 8.6 and the Hammurapi Laws (§ § 202-205) are in sections dealing with “serious bodily injuries". If talion was the "ancient literary and legal setting for a discussion of dignitory torts", then the similarity between the Mishnaic passage and Matthew is explained. (5) Anonymous (ID: GqK+D9hz ) 03/22/18(Thu)21:28:24 No.165006871 File: 1493440161082.jpg (113 KB, 450x618) >R. Yehuda ha Nasi (fourth generation Tannaitic teacher who died 217 AD and who redacted the Mishnah) took his view from R. Jose the Galilean (2nd generation Tannaitic teacher) concerning the fine for slapping one's friend. (6) One can assume that the Mishnaic teaching may well have it's origins in the 1st century AD or before. The commentator Yom-Tove Lippman Heller (17th century AD) calls such a strike "extreme humiliation" (7) .(11' j177) t. B. Qam. 9.31 requires the same payment for a similar transgression: "If one has struck another with one's backhand [IT' Da], with a paper, with a pinaz, with untanned hides, or with a role of documents that are in one's hands, then one pays 400 zuz. Not because it is a blow of pain, but because it is a blow of [public] shame (8) ".(j!'|2) Greengus interprets this to mean that the fine is not so high because of the pain, but because of the public dishonor. (9) The Mishnaic text on the “backhanded slap" appears in the Palestinian and Babylonian Talmuds. (10) Anonymous (ID: GqK+D9hz ) 03/22/18(Thu)21:29:08 No.165006937 ► File: Gates of Paradise.jpg (287 KB, 728x1013) >Good men undertake wars, when they find themselves in such a position as regards the conduct of human affairs, that right conduct requires them to act, or to make others act in this way. Otherwise John, when the soldiers who came to be baptized asked, What shall we do? Would have replied, Throw away your arms; give up the service; never strike, or wound, or disable any one. But knowing that such actions in battle were not murderous but authorized by law, and that the soldiers did not thus avenge themselves, but defend the public safety, he replied, "Do not extort (shake 'em up/õiaoeiw/CONCVTERE), accuse no man falsely, and be content with your wages." Luke 3:14 But as the Manichæans are in the habit of speaking evil of John, let them hear the Lord Jesus Christ Himself ordering this money to be given to Cæsar, which John tells the soldiers to be content with. "Give," He says, "to Cæsar the things that are Cæsar's." Matthew 22:21 For tribute-money is given on purpose to pay the soldiers for war. Again, in the case of the centurion who said, "I am a man under authority, and have soldiers under me: and I say to one, Go, and he goes; and to another, Come, and he comes; and to my servant, Do this, and he does it," Christ gave due praise to his faith; Matthew 8:9-10 He did not tell him to leave the service. But there is no need here to enter on the long discussion of just and unjust ways. [Unlike the woman caught in adultery who he told to "go and sin no more" John 8:11] St. Augustine Against Faustas 22.74 His quotation of Luke 3:14 is as follows "Neminem concusseritis" The Vulgata reads "Neminem concutiatis" Anonymous (ID: GqK+D9hz) - 03/22/18(Thu)21:29:51 No.165007022 ► File: 1489904433546.jpg (155 KB, 465x600) This entire passage (Matthew 5:38-42) is not about bloodshed but personal retaliation. The "Eye for an Eye" was wrongly taught to extend beyond court ruling (what Torah puts) and into personal private quarrels by Pharisees. To sum it all up Jesus' words are: When one is in a dispute with a neighbor it is better to strike a man by revealing his own nature and thereby condemning him publicly, than to strike him back with a slap to dishonor him and the matter escalates into violence and that you are condemned with him. Anonymous (ID: GqK+D9hz) = 03/22/18(Thu)21:30:08 No.165007049 ► File: 1492652408816.jpg (86 KB, 762x1000) 1. J. J. Wettstein (ed.), Novum Testamentum Graecum c-- variis lectionibus et commentario duobus tomis (2 vols.; Amsterdam: Dommer, 1751-52), I, p.309 2. Str-B, I, p. 342. 3. P. Blackman (ed), Mishnayoth (trans. P. Blackman; 7 vols.; New York: Judaica, 1963), IV, p. 66. According to Blackman, p.67 apparatus, a maneh = 100 zuz = 25 selah. 4. S. Greengus, 'Filling Gaps: Laws Found in Babylonia and in the Mishna but Absent in the Hebrew Bible', Maarav 7 (1991), pp. 149-71 (152-55). Cf. Laws of Eshnunna §42. 5. Greengus, 'Filling Gaps', pp. 154-44. 6. Scholars take this as a reference to the generations of the Tannaim from H.L. Strack and G. Stemberger, Introduction to the Talmud and Midrash (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1996), pp. 73, 76. 7. C. Albeck (ed.), Shisha Sedre Mishnah (Hebrew) (3. vols.; Jerusalem: Eshkol, 1955), II, p. 20 (m. B. Qam.). 8. t. B. Qam. 9.31 (see Liberman [ed.], Tosefta [5 vols.; New York: Jewish Theological Seminary, 1955-73], IV, p. 49 [Nezikin]). Cf. Sifra Emor 14 to Lev 24.19-20 for a similar tradition. Cf. The texts in P. Fiebig, Jesu Bergpredigt: Rabbinische Texte zum Verständnis der Bergpredigt, ins ihren Ursprachen dargeboten und mit Erläuterungen und Lesarten versehen (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1924), Teil I, pp. 95-96 (German), Teil II, pp 44-45 (Hebrew). 9. Greengus, 'Filling Gaps', p.155. 10. b. B. Qam. 90a, y. B. Qam. 7, 7a (Venice ed.). Cf. P. Schäfer and H.-J. Becker (eds.), Synopse zum Talmud Yerushalmi. IV. Ordnung Nezikin Ordnung Toharot: Nidda (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1995), p. 48. J. Weismann believes the tradition in b. B. Qam. 90a goes back to the time of Jesus ('Zur Erklärung einer Stelle der Bergpredigt', ZNW 14 [1913], pp. 175-76).

File nide): 1452109491897 jpg (500.77 KB, 1377x1545, 459:515, Bloch-SermononTheMount ipa) - Anonymous 01/06/16 (Wed) 20:44:51 ID: 1641cb No.240352 >240359 22240410 [Watch Thread] >But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. What did He mean by this? Anonymous 01/06/16 (Wed) 21:04:01 ID: 4c7187 No.240359 >2403e9 >240403 22240031 >>240352 (OP) I've posted before about this but it's better translated as "do not diametrically oppose an evildoer" and the reason you were supposed to turn the other cheek is because >1. In antiquity, you only hit someone with your right hand (the clean one) >2. Backhands were insult, a frontal slap showed equality and challenge. >3. By turning your cheek the aggressor was forced to stop hitting you or acknowledge you as an equal; that was quite a statement to a Roman by a conquered Jew. So, Jesus was telling us to fight back smartly, using public shame as a weapon, not just attack head on like a moron Anonymous 01/07/16 (Thu) 08:30:46 ID: 994133 No.240519 >240031 >240034 >>240408 Matthew 5:39 έγ δέ λέγω ύμν μή άντιστήναι τ ποηρ άλλ ' δστις σε ραπίσει έπί τήν δεξιάν σου σιαγόνα στρέψον αύτ και την άλλην First off, what you are translating as "do not resist" is "ávrIoTivai." ávToTĪvai has more to it than resist, Strong's Concordance at 436 notes to take a -complete- stand against" and it derived from a -military- term to diametrically oppose one's foes. Thayer's notes to set oneself against" "Resist" here is passive, but the term ávrIotĪvai clearly denotes an aggressive posture. Better might be "but I say unto you, do not square off against an evil doer" Especially in the context of the examples all being examples of how to engage in intelligent resistance - "Turn the other cheek" I already explained. "Give him your cloak too" is Christ referencing Exodus 22:26 to shame your opponent. Exodus 22:26 compels creditors to return the cloak at night so that the poor can sleep in it. By giving up your cloak you shame the creditor who is willing to sue for your tunic - and God will hear the cries of the debtor, Exodus promises this. As for walking the extra mile, that's a reference to the Roman law of impressment which allowed a Roman soldier to compel a person of a conquered state to carry his pack for one mile but no further. By carrying it the 2nd mile, the soldier would be forced to comically beg you to put it down lest his commanding officer see and he get in trouble. So, it clearly does not mean to not fight back - it means to fight back smartly. This is what happens when people try to read scripture with no reference for the history or culture it was written in, not to mention reading a bad rendering of the Greek in order to keep the poor in their place. Remember Christians, Christ taught us to fight smartly, not to not fight. Of course a Christian fights against evill How could we not? Anonymous (ID: GqK+D9hz) - 03/22/18(Thu)21:26:37 No.165006658 ► File: 1487039009734.jpg (159 KB, 472x640) Some have complained that there is no citation for the backhanded slap but that it is just a theory. The reason why scholars do not readily provide a citation is it comes from the Talmud. There are a number of references to various to traditions in the Talmud that are found in the gospels, because of Jesus' debates with Pharisees and St. Paul who was one himself. This is what scholars have when they do have a citation. I add this to anon's (thank you anon) original work as request from some atheists. Anonymous (ID: GqK+D9hz) - 03/22/18(Thu)21:26:57 No.165006695 ► File: 1506716547285.jpg (363 KB, 1344x1344) Originally to use a backhand slap against a superior was a serious offense since was meant for the slave class, or those goyim that did not bathe, since the back of the hand was used so to touch an unclean person as little as possible while still striking them. Touching something unclean with the palm of the hand made that hand generally unusable. So the Jews Jesus is speaking to would see this not just as dishonorable but also a baseless insult. To turn the other cheek would force the ones backhanding them to recognize that Jews indeed bathe just as the civilized Romans and Greeks did by slapping them with front. So if a goy were to turn his cheek to a Jew that is backhanding him, then the goy would be forcing the Jew to recognize that he is clean as he is. In a personal argument, to force a Jew to recognize that he is your equal is more effective than just punching him. If he does not recognize his equality with you, then observers would have been redpilled on kikery. Anonymous (ID: GqK+D9hz ) 4 03/22/18(Thu)21:27:15 No.165006738 ► File: 1518390022960.jpg (109 KB, 432x600) >Since the famous edition of the New Testament by Johann Jakob Wettstein at least, New testament scholars have been avware that in some rabbinic texts a backhanded slap was considered particularly blameworthy. (1) The commentary on the New Testament by Hermann Strack and Paul Billerbeck advanced Wettstein's research. (2) The key text is m. B. Qam. 8.6: “If one cuff his fellow, he must pay him a sela." R. Yehuda in the name of R. Jose the Galilean says, "A maneh . If he slapped him, he must pay him two hundred zuz; [if he hit him] with the back of his hand [IT' nnx] he must pay him four hundred zuz". (3) Samuel Greengus has shown that the offense in a number of different Babylonian laws including the Laws of Hammurapi. In the Laws of Hammurapi (§ § 202-205) a social inferior who struck the side of a superior's face was flogged, and a slave who did the same to a free person who lost an ear. (4) He thinks that talion is naturally associated with the slapping of a face, since m. B. Qam. 8.6 and the Hammurapi Laws (§ § 202-205) are in sections dealing with “serious bodily injuries". If talion was the "ancient literary and legal setting for a discussion of dignitory torts", then the similarity between the Mishnaic passage and Matthew is explained. (5) Anonymous (ID: GqK+D9hz ) 03/22/18(Thu)21:28:24 No.165006871 File: 1493440161082.jpg (113 KB, 450x618) >R. Yehuda ha Nasi (fourth generation Tannaitic teacher who died 217 AD and who redacted the Mishnah) took his view from R. Jose the Galilean (2nd generation Tannaitic teacher) concerning the fine for slapping one's friend. (6) One can assume that the Mishnaic teaching may well have it's origins in the 1st century AD or before. The commentator Yom-Tove Lippman Heller (17th century AD) calls such a strike "extreme humiliation" (7) .(11' j177) t. B. Qam. 9.31 requires the same payment for a similar transgression: "If one has struck another with one's backhand [IT' Da], with a paper, with a pinaz, with untanned hides, or with a role of documents that are in one's hands, then one pays 400 zuz. Not because it is a blow of pain, but because it is a blow of [public] shame (8) ".(j!'|2) Greengus interprets this to mean that the fine is not so high because of the pain, but because of the public dishonor. (9) The Mishnaic text on the “backhanded slap" appears in the Palestinian and Babylonian Talmuds. (10) Anonymous (ID: GqK+D9hz ) 03/22/18(Thu)21:29:08 No.165006937 ► File: Gates of Paradise.jpg (287 KB, 728x1013) >Good men undertake wars, when they find themselves in such a position as regards the conduct of human affairs, that right conduct requires them to act, or to make others act in this way. Otherwise John, when the soldiers who came to be baptized asked, What shall we do? Would have replied, Throw away your arms; give up the service; never strike, or wound, or disable any one. But knowing that such actions in battle were not murderous but authorized by law, and that the soldiers did not thus avenge themselves, but defend the public safety, he replied, "Do not extort (shake 'em up/õiaoeiw/CONCVTERE), accuse no man falsely, and be content with your wages." Luke 3:14 But as the Manichæans are in the habit of speaking evil of John, let them hear the Lord Jesus Christ Himself ordering this money to be given to Cæsar, which John tells the soldiers to be content with. "Give," He says, "to Cæsar the things that are Cæsar's." Matthew 22:21 For tribute-money is given on purpose to pay the soldiers for war. Again, in the case of the centurion who said, "I am a man under authority, and have soldiers under me: and I say to one, Go, and he goes; and to another, Come, and he comes; and to my servant, Do this, and he does it," Christ gave due praise to his faith; Matthew 8:9-10 He did not tell him to leave the service. But there is no need here to enter on the long discussion of just and unjust ways. [Unlike the woman caught in adultery who he told to "go and sin no more" John 8:11] St. Augustine Against Faustas 22.74 His quotation of Luke 3:14 is as follows "Neminem concusseritis" The Vulgata reads "Neminem concutiatis" Anonymous (ID: GqK+D9hz) - 03/22/18(Thu)21:29:51 No.165007022 ► File: 1489904433546.jpg (155 KB, 465x600) This entire passage (Matthew 5:38-42) is not about bloodshed but personal retaliation. The "Eye for an Eye" was wrongly taught to extend beyond court ruling (what Torah puts) and into personal private quarrels by Pharisees. To sum it all up Jesus' words are: When one is in a dispute with a neighbor it is better to strike a man by revealing his own nature and thereby condemning him publicly, than to strike him back with a slap to dishonor him and the matter escalates into violence and that you are condemned with him. Anonymous (ID: GqK+D9hz) = 03/22/18(Thu)21:30:08 No.165007049 ► File: 1492652408816.jpg (86 KB, 762x1000) 1. J. J. Wettstein (ed.), Novum Testamentum Graecum c-- variis lectionibus et commentario duobus tomis (2 vols.; Amsterdam: Dommer, 1751-52), I, p.309 2. Str-B, I, p. 342. 3. P. Blackman (ed), Mishnayoth (trans. P. Blackman; 7 vols.; New York: Judaica, 1963), IV, p. 66. According to Blackman, p.67 apparatus, a maneh = 100 zuz = 25 selah. 4. S. Greengus, 'Filling Gaps: Laws Found in Babylonia and in the Mishna but Absent in the Hebrew Bible', Maarav 7 (1991), pp. 149-71 (152-55). Cf. Laws of Eshnunna §42. 5. Greengus, 'Filling Gaps', pp. 154-44. 6. Scholars take this as a reference to the generations of the Tannaim from H.L. Strack and G. Stemberger, Introduction to the Talmud and Midrash (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1996), pp. 73, 76. 7. C. Albeck (ed.), Shisha Sedre Mishnah (Hebrew) (3. vols.; Jerusalem: Eshkol, 1955), II, p. 20 (m. B. Qam.). 8. t. B. Qam. 9.31 (see Liberman [ed.], Tosefta [5 vols.; New York: Jewish Theological Seminary, 1955-73], IV, p. 49 [Nezikin]). Cf. Sifra Emor 14 to Lev 24.19-20 for a similar tradition. Cf. The texts in P. Fiebig, Jesu Bergpredigt: Rabbinische Texte zum Verständnis der Bergpredigt, ins ihren Ursprachen dargeboten und mit Erläuterungen und Lesarten versehen (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1924), Teil I, pp. 95-96 (German), Teil II, pp 44-45 (Hebrew). 9. Greengus, 'Filling Gaps', p.155. 10. b. B. Qam. 90a, y. B. Qam. 7, 7a (Venice ed.). Cf. P. Schäfer and H.-J. Becker (eds.), Synopse zum Talmud Yerushalmi. IV. Ordnung Nezikin Ordnung Toharot: Nidda (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1995), p. 48. J. Weismann believes the tradition in b. B. Qam. 90a goes back to the time of Jesus ('Zur Erklärung einer Stelle der Bergpredigt', ZNW 14 [1913], pp. 175-76).

christian bible /pol/ 4chan turn the other cheek jesus christ jesus christ matthew gospel gospel of matthew sermon on the mount talmud

Athanasius Quote

You cannot put straight in others what is warped in yourself. SAINT ATHANASIUS OF LEXANDRIA DING St Athanasius the Great Monastery of st Dionysios the Areopagite

You cannot put straight in others what is warped in yourself. SAINT ATHANASIUS OF LEXANDRIA DING St Athanasius the Great Monastery of st Dionysios the Areopagite

athanasius st. athanasius saint athanasius st athanasius athanasius of alexandria christian catholic catholicism orthodox orthodoxy quote inspirational patristic patristics church father church fathers

John Chrysostom Quote

ÍDAN Is it not excessively ridiculous to seek the good opinion of those whom you would NHG, O XPYCOS cósomg never wish to be like? St. John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Gospel of Saint John, Homily II Brotherhood of St Dionysios the Arcopagite

ÍDAN Is it not excessively ridiculous to seek the good opinion of those whom you would NHG, O XPYCOS cósomg never wish to be like? St. John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Gospel of Saint John, Homily II Brotherhood of St Dionysios the Arcopagite

john chrysostom chrysostom st john chrysostom saint john chrysostom st. john chrysostom saint catholic catholicism orthodox orthodoxy christian quote inspirational church father church fathers patristic patristics

3 avi types of catholic twitter

Kaiser @BasedMorrowind 3 avi types, of Catholic twitter Translate Tweet 11:21 AM - Oct 18, 2020 · Twitter for iPhone > 4342

Kaiser @BasedMorrowind 3 avi types, of Catholic twitter Translate Tweet 11:21 AM - Oct 18, 2020 · Twitter for iPhone > 4342

catholic catholicism twitter profile picture pfp

Correction of errors taught by all churches

youtube christian

Hot takes about the church

Laughing at Luther and then you realise you've posted way more than 95 hot takes about the Church. 日= imgflip.com

Laughing at Luther and then you realise you've posted way more than 95 hot takes about the Church. 日= imgflip.com

luther catholic catholicism protestant protestantism reformation 95 theses church christian simpsons homer simpson the simpsons ned flanders meme

Epic rapture meme

Walter mogus Trollface BIg Chung Stuff WObama DYING nade with Crime On the day of his crucifixion I mocked The Lord and have been cursed to wonder the land until the rapture comes It is ok my child, you have been forgiven and I have returned, you may now join your companions in heaven gameRS die Espawn

Walter mogus Trollface BIg Chung Stuff WObama DYING nade with Crime On the day of his crucifixion I mocked The Lord and have been cursed to wonder the land until the rapture comes It is ok my child, you have been forgiven and I have returned, you may now join your companions in heaven gameRS die Espawn

God made the universe big

God made man small and the universe BIG to say something about himself. - John Piper

God made man small and the universe BIG to say something about himself. - John Piper

christianity christian god john piper

just for you

MASS Ran Survey (MRSs) Christianity The belief that a god created a universe 13.75 billion light years across containing 200 billion galaxies, each of which contains an average of more than 200 billion stars, just so he could have a personal relationship with you.

MASS Ran Survey (MRSs) Christianity The belief that a god created a universe 13.75 billion light years across containing 200 billion galaxies, each of which contains an average of more than 200 billion stars, just so he could have a personal relationship with you.

christianity christian atheism atheist

What Happened at the Council of Nicaea

325 AD 1 WHAT Wesley Huff ) MAY AUGUST THE FIRST CONVENED BY HOSIUS OF CORDUBA (MOST LIKELY) PRESIDED OVER THE ECUMENICAL CONSTANTINE COUNCIL COUNCIL THE GREAT COUNCIL 318 DID NOT ECOUNCIL OF NICAEA ADDRESS HAD ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TRADITIONALLY THOUGHT TO BE IN ATTENDANCE THE BOOKS OF THE BIBLE FORMED THE ORIGINAL INVENTING THE CHOOSING9 NICENE CREED, 20 CANONS, TO DO WITH THE AND A SYNODAL EPISTLE DEITY OF CHRIST ARIUS THE BOOKS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT Presbyter in Alexandria (256-336 AD) CREATION OF THE TRINITY "The Son, being begotten apart from time by the Father, and being created and founded before ages, SUPPRESSION OF WOMEN REINCARNATION WHAT THE COUNCIL DID ADDRESS did not exist before his generation... the Son is not eternal or co-equal or co-unoriginate with the Father." ARIANISM (o) DATE OF EASTER A secondary issue of the council concerneda definitive date on the Nicaea's main purpose was to sort out the Arian Controversy, a Trinitarian view teaching not only that the Son of God was eternally subordinate to the Father, but that the Son was not everlasting but was created by the Father at a specific point in time. Arias, celebration of Easter. Letter to Alexandria 4:458 GRISTD SECITYE INTENE

325 AD 1 WHAT Wesley Huff ) MAY AUGUST THE FIRST CONVENED BY HOSIUS OF CORDUBA (MOST LIKELY) PRESIDED OVER THE ECUMENICAL CONSTANTINE COUNCIL COUNCIL THE GREAT COUNCIL 318 DID NOT ECOUNCIL OF NICAEA ADDRESS HAD ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TRADITIONALLY THOUGHT TO BE IN ATTENDANCE THE BOOKS OF THE BIBLE FORMED THE ORIGINAL INVENTING THE CHOOSING9 NICENE CREED, 20 CANONS, TO DO WITH THE AND A SYNODAL EPISTLE DEITY OF CHRIST ARIUS THE BOOKS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT Presbyter in Alexandria (256-336 AD) CREATION OF THE TRINITY "The Son, being begotten apart from time by the Father, and being created and founded before ages, SUPPRESSION OF WOMEN REINCARNATION WHAT THE COUNCIL DID ADDRESS did not exist before his generation... the Son is not eternal or co-equal or co-unoriginate with the Father." ARIANISM (o) DATE OF EASTER A secondary issue of the council concerneda definitive date on the Nicaea's main purpose was to sort out the Arian Controversy, a Trinitarian view teaching not only that the Son of God was eternally subordinate to the Father, but that the Son was not everlasting but was created by the Father at a specific point in time. Arias, celebration of Easter. Letter to Alexandria 4:458 GRISTD SECITYE INTENE

christianity christian atheism atheist nicaea nicea nikaea constantine bible arius arian arianism

How You Got Your Bible (read Notes, please)

HOW YOU GOT YOUR BIBLE Constantine and his bishops VOTED a bunch of books AS THE WORD OF GOD. (325 AD) Dont just believe me. Go look it up. They pick and chose what they want in the bible. Then burn all other pre-christian document that proved the religion was fictitious. (391 AD) ach Ankhwahening In order to make the religion popular they kill everyone who dont agree with the new religion and made laws prohibiting any public talk about religion. it was illegal to disagree with the church. (380 AD). But today christians running around with the bible dont know that what they are believing in was purposely planned out for them to believe by men.

HOW YOU GOT YOUR BIBLE Constantine and his bishops VOTED a bunch of books AS THE WORD OF GOD. (325 AD) Dont just believe me. Go look it up. They pick and chose what they want in the bible. Then burn all other pre-christian document that proved the religion was fictitious. (391 AD) ach Ankhwahening In order to make the religion popular they kill everyone who dont agree with the new religion and made laws prohibiting any public talk about religion. it was illegal to disagree with the church. (380 AD). But today christians running around with the bible dont know that what they are believing in was purposely planned out for them to believe by men.

christianity nicaea nicea constantine christian atheist atheism

While We Were Still Sinners

WHILE WE WERE STILL SINNERS CHRIST DIED FOR US

WHILE WE WERE STILL SINNERS CHRIST DIED FOR US

romans 5:8 romans 5.8 christianity christian wojak

Thank You All For Serving (Not You) Our Lord And Sharing The Gospel

THANK YOU ALL FOR Peter Andrew Philip Nathanael SERVING NOT YOU U OUR- LORD Thomas Judas James John AND SHARING THE GÖSPEL Matthew Thaddeus Simon James

THANK YOU ALL FOR Peter Andrew Philip Nathanael SERVING NOT YOU U OUR- LORD Thomas Judas James John AND SHARING THE GÖSPEL Matthew Thaddeus Simon James

judas christianity christian apostles

Virgin or Vixen

IRRATIONAL ENQUIAR VIRGIN? OR... VIXEN! Mary TELLS ALL! Joseph outraged! TRUTH ABOUT SURROGATE FATHER LOVE NEST MANGER "I'l take my A REAL band saw to the snake!" DONE IT! WHO www.AtheistCards.com

IRRATIONAL ENQUIAR VIRGIN? OR... VIXEN! Mary TELLS ALL! Joseph outraged! TRUTH ABOUT SURROGATE FATHER LOVE NEST MANGER "I'l take my A REAL band saw to the snake!" DONE IT! WHO www.AtheistCards.com

christian christianity atheism atheist mary virgin mary

Matthew 19:21

Matthew 19:21 Jesus answered, "If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me." You're doing it wrong

Matthew 19:21 Jesus answered, "If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me." You're doing it wrong

matthew 19:21 atheist atheism christian christianity catholic catholicism jesus pope

Flowchart

Do you have no understanding of science but say the word science in every sentence? Yes No Is gay marriage okay? Yes Atheism No Does God hate you? Episcopalianism or Presbyterianism No Yes Is your mom also your cousin? Yes No Calvinism Do you go on CARM.org daily? Southern No Yes Baptism Do you manipulate stuff that disagrees with you? Non-Denominational Yés NQ Do you argue with people Lutheranism who agree with you? Yes Nó Catholicism Eastern Orthodoxy

Do you have no understanding of science but say the word science in every sentence? Yes No Is gay marriage okay? Yes Atheism No Does God hate you? Episcopalianism or Presbyterianism No Yes Is your mom also your cousin? Yes No Calvinism Do you go on CARM.org daily? Southern No Yes Baptism Do you manipulate stuff that disagrees with you? Non-Denominational Yés NQ Do you argue with people Lutheranism who agree with you? Yes Nó Catholicism Eastern Orthodoxy

flowchart christian atheist atheism anglican anglicanism episcopalian episcopalianism presbyterian presbyterianism calvinist calvinism southern baptist southern baptists anglicans episcopalians presbyterians calvinists non-denominational baptist baptists lutheran lutheranism lutherans eastern orthodox eastern orthodoxy orthodox orthodoxy catholic catholicism catholics atheists meme parody chart

Plain Meaning

FINALLY THE PLAIN MEANING OF THE TEXT

FINALLY THE PLAIN MEANING OF THE TEXT

bible christian literalism

Plain Meaning

Christians who say they just believe in "the plain meaning of the text" P4922 The sudden realization that all meaning is understood by interpretation

Christians who say they just believe in "the plain meaning of the text" P4922 The sudden realization that all meaning is understood by interpretation

bible christian literalism

Apostles Creed II: Nicaea

APOSTLE'S CREED II- NICAEA Senope BM BEGOTTEN, NOT MADE. НО. НО. НО. MERRY CHRISTMAS FROM RATIO CHKISTI UNIVEKSITY OF TENNESSEE. KNOXVILLE

APOSTLE'S CREED II- NICAEA Senope BM BEGOTTEN, NOT MADE. НО. НО. НО. MERRY CHRISTMAS FROM RATIO CHKISTI UNIVEKSITY OF TENNESSEE. KNOXVILLE

st. nicholas saint nicholas st nicholas christian trinity nicaea nicene nicea nikaea nikea council arian arianism ecummenical catholic catholicism orthodox orthodoxy nicholas saint santa santa clause

Alcoholism

The Trinity is like drinking too much and then being so drunk you can't remember if you had 1 drink or 3. That's alcoholism, Yeah, Patrick Patrick Come on.

The Trinity is like drinking too much and then being so drunk you can't remember if you had 1 drink or 3. That's alcoholism, Yeah, Patrick Patrick Come on.

christian beer drinking alcohol drink drunk trinity