GamerGate - Images

Sorted By:

That about sums things up

GATORGATETHCREASE GATORGATE OHSHuT utp You ARE NOT FOOLING ANYoNE EHTICS! COLLUS ON! GATORGATE INCREASE OR I'LL KILL You AND YoUR FANILY, DECREASE COLLUSiON! STUPID WENcH!

GATORGATETHCREASE GATORGATE OHSHuT utp You ARE NOT FOOLING ANYoNE EHTICS! COLLUS ON! GATORGATE INCREASE OR I'LL KILL You AND YoUR FANILY, DECREASE COLLUSiON! STUPID WENcH!

gamergate gatorgater alligator

"Games didn't have kick ass women until now."

!https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/877/551/283.gif!

!https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/877/551/283.gif!

jason schreier alec kubas meyer sjw

One of these articles is real

That's right GamerGate, because of "unethical" gam developers added women to their games. e journalists, Fallout 4 and Tomb Raider E3 shows thatthe $100 billion dollarindustry is ours now Bv Jason Cicter on kunelóch, 2015 Square Enix PROGRESS 06.23.15 5:15 AM E -Gamergate Fail: The Rise of Ass- Kicking Women in Video Games Alec Kaba Meper ONE OF THESE ARTICLES IS REAL The other is a complete FABRICATION! Can you tell the difference? 90% of journalists fail this simple test!!

That's right GamerGate, because of "unethical" gam developers added women to their games. e journalists, Fallout 4 and Tomb Raider E3 shows thatthe $100 billion dollarindustry is ours now Bv Jason Cicter on kunelóch, 2015 Square Enix PROGRESS 06.23.15 5:15 AM E -Gamergate Fail: The Rise of Ass- Kicking Women in Video Games Alec Kaba Meper ONE OF THESE ARTICLES IS REAL The other is a complete FABRICATION! Can you tell the difference? 90% of journalists fail this simple test!!

comparison infographic

One of the unbiased wiki editors for the gg page.

"KIA Thread":http://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3b2fy3/one_of_the_unbiased_wiki_editors_for_the_gg_page/
"Archive":https://archive.is/YBRWP

"KIA Thread":http://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3b2fy3/one_of_the_unbiased_wiki_editors_for_the_gg_page/
"Archive":https://archive.is/YBRWP

wikipedia bias kotakuinaction

#GamerGate Reference in Batman Arkham Knight

"Archive":https://archive.is/QxKjh

"Archive":https://archive.is/QxKjh

batman arkham knight

The New Narrative. SJWs declare gaming has "finally grown up"

"KIA Thread":http://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3b003e/the_new_narrative_sjws_declare_gaming_has_finally/
"KIA Thread Archive":https://archive.is/YHwzX

"The Truth About E3 2015 and Female Protagonists":https://medium.com/@adrianchm/the-truth-about-e3-2015-and-female-protagonists-b006094e44b1
"The Truth About E3 2015 and Female Protagonists Archive":https://archive.is/htqMr

"KIA Thread":http://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3b003e/the_new_narrative_sjws_declare_gaming_has_finally/
"KIA Thread Archive":https://archive.is/YHwzX

"The Truth About E3 2015 and Female Protagonists":https://medium.com/@adrianchm/the-truth-about-e3-2015-and-female-protagonists-b006094e44b1
"The Truth About E3 2015 and Female Protagonists Archive":https://archive.is/htqMr

kotakuinaction sjw narrative

The Hypocrisy is stunning

I found this while browsing AH.com and I thought I like to show this kind of nonsense; I mean let this post speak for itself.

Keep in mind, this is coming from a guy who wrote a timeline scenario thing where the Nazis won a war against the Soviet Union and proceeded to bring hell and horror to Eastern Europe and almost all of Europe to a degree.

(P.S. don't get this the wrong way, I'm definitely not saying Holocaust denial is A-Okay, it's not)

I found this while browsing AH.com and I thought I like to show this kind of nonsense; I mean let this post speak for itself.

Keep in mind, this is coming from a guy who wrote a timeline scenario thing where the Nazis won a war against the Soviet Union and proceeded to bring hell and horror to Eastern Europe and almost all of Europe to a degree.

(P.S. don't get this the wrong way, I'm definitely not saying Holocaust denial is A-Okay, it's not)

hypocrisy ah.com gamergate alternate history alternate history discussion board

"Journalists"

_snort_

_snort_

Sunset developer blames gamers for the failure of their game

Maybe next time, you should talk to the actual gamers, instead relying on Polygon, Destructoid, Kotaku, and Leigh Alexander to advertise your game.
!https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/181/362/reggie_shrug_4515.jpg!

Maybe next time, you should talk to the actual gamers, instead relying on Polygon, Destructoid, Kotaku, and Leigh Alexander to advertise your game.
!https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/181/362/reggie_shrug_4515.jpg!

auriea harvey michaël samyn sunset

Pong: The Original Source of Video Game Bigotry

Pong: The Original Source of Video Game Bigotry Similar to Polygon's statement that "all video games are stupid" I'd like to state that "all video games are racist and sexist." All of them. You see the problem stems from the very first successful video game back in 1972. While there were games before Pong, it can be said Pong is when the industry truly begun. It's massive success lead to video games exploding in popularity. Without Pong it is reasonable to assume that video games would not be as popular nor the industry be as large as it is today. However, while video games since have copied Pong's formula for success, in doing so they have also brought over Pong's awful bigotry resulting in all modern video games having horrendous social issues. Let's start with Pongs horrible racism and diversity problem. In Pong you can are either one of two white protagonists. There are no people of colour in this game at all. Diversity is non-existent. It's as if this game was designed by Stormfront. Not only are you two white men (more on that later) you are playing over a "black" background. This is obviously a metaphor for the white man completely running over black people as if they were nothing. Think about how much whites stand out when black people are put in the back. This was all purposely done to symbolize white superiority Now in regards to Pong's sexism problem you may wonder how anyone could assume that the player characters in Pong are male given their complete lack of detail. Well if you are wondering that you obviously don't possess a progressive mind like mine, that can find bigotry and outrage in even the minutest details (it truly is a curse). The two Pong "paddles" are clearly two phalluses which are a representation of male sexuaity. This also re-iterates the white male patriarchy Now you may assume that this game has no female representation which makes it sexist but the truth is actually far worse. You see as Jonathan McIntosh, and later Anita stated (it's uncanny, it's like they're the same person!), "In the game of patriarchy, women are the ball." So that ball that you're hitting around is actually a woman, a woman being passed around from one male to the other by being slapped around by a hard white penis. Children were being taught at a young age that passing a woman around like currency was fun Even more horribly sexist is the scoring system. If you manage to hit the woman so hard she avoids being r---- by the other player you get a point. Do this enough and you win. It demonstrates that the most important thing is the patriarchal domination of females. You are meant to own that woman/ball and wreck her so hard that "if you can't have her, no one else can." It would have been better there were no females in the game instead we get a deplorable domestic violence simulator To further prove the point of sexism look at the controller for the home version of Pong does it remind you of anything? (Once again you may need a "progressive mind" to notice this.) The home controller is clearly two breasts that you are meant to fondle to play and have fun. The twisting nob is clearly a nipple, areola and all. Even worse is the idea that you're meant to harass this controller with a friend or family at the same time. If sexual molestation isn't bad enough, Pong was teaching people that for maximum enjoyment you need to double team the woman It is no wonder that video games are the atrocious cesspool of racism and misogyny they currently are when Pong was what started it all. This appalling, ghastly piece of technical bigotry was the grandfather of all modern games so I think it is fair to blame it for the downfall of all humanity. If only Gone Home was that original trendsetting game back in 1972 then video games wouldn't need saving Read more high quality journalism on STOPGAMERGATE.com

Pong: The Original Source of Video Game Bigotry Similar to Polygon's statement that "all video games are stupid" I'd like to state that "all video games are racist and sexist." All of them. You see the problem stems from the very first successful video game back in 1972. While there were games before Pong, it can be said Pong is when the industry truly begun. It's massive success lead to video games exploding in popularity. Without Pong it is reasonable to assume that video games would not be as popular nor the industry be as large as it is today. However, while video games since have copied Pong's formula for success, in doing so they have also brought over Pong's awful bigotry resulting in all modern video games having horrendous social issues. Let's start with Pongs horrible racism and diversity problem. In Pong you can are either one of two white protagonists. There are no people of colour in this game at all. Diversity is non-existent. It's as if this game was designed by Stormfront. Not only are you two white men (more on that later) you are playing over a "black" background. This is obviously a metaphor for the white man completely running over black people as if they were nothing. Think about how much whites stand out when black people are put in the back. This was all purposely done to symbolize white superiority Now in regards to Pong's sexism problem you may wonder how anyone could assume that the player characters in Pong are male given their complete lack of detail. Well if you are wondering that you obviously don't possess a progressive mind like mine, that can find bigotry and outrage in even the minutest details (it truly is a curse). The two Pong "paddles" are clearly two phalluses which are a representation of male sexuaity. This also re-iterates the white male patriarchy Now you may assume that this game has no female representation which makes it sexist but the truth is actually far worse. You see as Jonathan McIntosh, and later Anita stated (it's uncanny, it's like they're the same person!), "In the game of patriarchy, women are the ball." So that ball that you're hitting around is actually a woman, a woman being passed around from one male to the other by being slapped around by a hard white penis. Children were being taught at a young age that passing a woman around like currency was fun Even more horribly sexist is the scoring system. If you manage to hit the woman so hard she avoids being r---- by the other player you get a point. Do this enough and you win. It demonstrates that the most important thing is the patriarchal domination of females. You are meant to own that woman/ball and wreck her so hard that "if you can't have her, no one else can." It would have been better there were no females in the game instead we get a deplorable domestic violence simulator To further prove the point of sexism look at the controller for the home version of Pong does it remind you of anything? (Once again you may need a "progressive mind" to notice this.) The home controller is clearly two breasts that you are meant to fondle to play and have fun. The twisting nob is clearly a nipple, areola and all. Even worse is the idea that you're meant to harass this controller with a friend or family at the same time. If sexual molestation isn't bad enough, Pong was teaching people that for maximum enjoyment you need to double team the woman It is no wonder that video games are the atrocious cesspool of racism and misogyny they currently are when Pong was what started it all. This appalling, ghastly piece of technical bigotry was the grandfather of all modern games so I think it is fair to blame it for the downfall of all humanity. If only Gone Home was that original trendsetting game back in 1972 then video games wouldn't need saving Read more high quality journalism on STOPGAMERGATE.com

gamergate pong parody sjw

_yandere intensifies_

"sauce":http://kukuruyo.com/comic/gamergate-life-48-english/

"sauce":http://kukuruyo.com/comic/gamergate-life-48-english/

vivian james lillian woods kukuruyo yandere e3

GamerGate and devs

GamerGate Class 307: Why GamerGate does not run organized boycotts of game developers Over the past several weeks there has been a concerted effort by elements of the GamerGate consumer revolt to expand the efforts into a boycott of games developers who have either taken an openly hostile position against GamerGate, or have employees which are hostile. While it's always tempting to meet hostility with a response, boycotts are not actions to be taken lightly. Pulling off a successful boycott requires key elements for success, and the consequences for failure are severe and embarrassing. What is required for a successful boycott? Harvard Business Review's Daniel Diermeier outlines four key factors for a successful boycott: 1 Customers must care passionately 2. The cost of participation must be low BOYCOT There is no doubt that GamerGate participants are passionate about gaming. While getting people to boycott unethical games sites is easy, since there are dozens of other sources of information, asking gamers to not purchase the game they've been looking forward to playing for months or even years is a high price for participation. #2 is where a game dev boycott begins to stumble. 3. The issues must be easy to understand Communicating our desire to establish ethical guidelines in games journalism can be tricky, but add in another level, where we're punishing game developers who don't support establishing those guidelines muddies the waters to the point where no neutral is going take the boycott seriously let alone participate 4. Mass media support is crucial. Like it or not, boycotts cannot garner widespread support without media backing them. “While social media platforms have made it easier for activists to gain support, activists need coverage in the mass media for a boycott to be successful." (Diermeier) Add in issues where devs who already support #GamerGate are put into a situation where they can be accused of violations in law, as well as the fact that the game journalists and their supporters would desperately love for us to focus on attacking devs instead of their unethical behaviors, there simply isn't a good justification for going down this road. GamerGate does not dictate game content, nor do we attack game devs who make the games they want. We all understand the desire to make devs thick twice about bashing their customers, but keep in mind you don't go into a losing battle on principle, if it puts the entire war effort at risk of failure. https://hbr.org/2012/08/when-do-company-boycotts-work/

GamerGate Class 307: Why GamerGate does not run organized boycotts of game developers Over the past several weeks there has been a concerted effort by elements of the GamerGate consumer revolt to expand the efforts into a boycott of games developers who have either taken an openly hostile position against GamerGate, or have employees which are hostile. While it's always tempting to meet hostility with a response, boycotts are not actions to be taken lightly. Pulling off a successful boycott requires key elements for success, and the consequences for failure are severe and embarrassing. What is required for a successful boycott? Harvard Business Review's Daniel Diermeier outlines four key factors for a successful boycott: 1 Customers must care passionately 2. The cost of participation must be low BOYCOT There is no doubt that GamerGate participants are passionate about gaming. While getting people to boycott unethical games sites is easy, since there are dozens of other sources of information, asking gamers to not purchase the game they've been looking forward to playing for months or even years is a high price for participation. #2 is where a game dev boycott begins to stumble. 3. The issues must be easy to understand Communicating our desire to establish ethical guidelines in games journalism can be tricky, but add in another level, where we're punishing game developers who don't support establishing those guidelines muddies the waters to the point where no neutral is going take the boycott seriously let alone participate 4. Mass media support is crucial. Like it or not, boycotts cannot garner widespread support without media backing them. “While social media platforms have made it easier for activists to gain support, activists need coverage in the mass media for a boycott to be successful." (Diermeier) Add in issues where devs who already support #GamerGate are put into a situation where they can be accused of violations in law, as well as the fact that the game journalists and their supporters would desperately love for us to focus on attacking devs instead of their unethical behaviors, there simply isn't a good justification for going down this road. GamerGate does not dictate game content, nor do we attack game devs who make the games they want. We all understand the desire to make devs thick twice about bashing their customers, but keep in mind you don't go into a losing battle on principle, if it puts the entire war effort at risk of failure. https://hbr.org/2012/08/when-do-company-boycotts-work/

gamergate boycott vivian james

Oh Anita

You can notice in her picture she was lying.

You can notice in her picture she was lying.

gamergate gamer gate gamer gate

Well, Palle Hoffstein seems to hate us........for some reason.

"Source":https://archive.is/n1fCB

Palle Hoffstein is the Creative Director at Ubisoft Blue Byte, the studio behind the upcoming _Anno 2205_. And no, I have no idea what the hell this guy's problem is nor what _Anno 2205_ is.

"Source":https://archive.is/n1fCB

Palle Hoffstein is the Creative Director at Ubisoft Blue Byte, the studio behind the upcoming _Anno 2205_. And no, I have no idea what the hell this guy's problem is nor what _Anno 2205_ is.

gamergate palle hoffstein i have never heard of this guy until now

It's Because We Love This Industry and The People In It.

"Source":http://archive.is/yl8yV

For those who don't know, Ethan was the lead writer for _Watch Dogs: Bad Blood_

"Source":http://archive.is/yl8yV

For those who don't know, Ethan was the lead writer for _Watch Dogs: Bad Blood_

gamergate ethan james petty we love gaming

Lessons in videogames with Vivian James and Occulas

Occulass and Vivian Occulass demands devs change things in games she'll never play. just plays games that interest her. OM Occulass complains online about things keeping women out of gaming Vivian makes her own games.

Occulass and Vivian Occulass demands devs change things in games she'll never play. just plays games that interest her. OM Occulass complains online about things keeping women out of gaming Vivian makes her own games.

gamergate vivian james