GamerGate - Images

Sorted By:

ISTE DO NOT QUESTION

ISTE DO NOT QUESTION

they live gamergate xoxo festival

The Purpose Of A Game Review And How To Write One With Minimal Subjectivity By Oliver Campbell

ver Capbell onSep25 The Purpose Of A Game Review and How To Write One With Minimal Subjectivity In the continuing consum er revolt that is #gamergate, more than once has the subject of game reviews come up. Qualms are usually focused around how they are frequently slanted, skewed, heavily biased, or just not informative. So I've decided to sit down and tell you how to go about crafting il quality review. Why do we write reviews? Any review boiled down into its basic form is written in order to help the reader (YOUR customer) make an informed decision about what they MIGHT purchase, or otherwise utilize. The fact of the matter is this; game journalism and game reviews are a customer oriented business. Your readers are your customers, except rather than paying you upfront with cash (unless you're still subscribing to a magazine) they're paying you with clicks of your articles. Nevertheless, your ultimate job is to serve your customer and serve them well. Assume that every customer has a limited entertainment budget: your job is to make sure that they are getting the best value for their dollar Over the past week I've seen more than a few people make the mostly false claim that a review can't be objective in its nature. Not only do I disagree with that, I tend to make it a point in the reviews that I write to avoid unnecessarily interjecting my opinion into it as much as reasonably possible. A good written review is more or less an informative essay that is flavored with your unique personality with a sprinkling of your personal interpretation. To build the structure of a good review, I go back to the 4E's: Educate, Explain, Elaborate, Emphasize. Let's go ahead and take a look at each of those in detail. Educate Explain to the customer WHAT they are buying. Follow the What, Who, When, Where (the 4 W's) method. WHAT game are yow reviewing? WHO developed and published it? WHEN did it,or does it,ese WHEREwhich platforms) did it, or will it, release Explain After you've covered the basic fucts sheet, in this section of the review is where yo talk about emctly what the game is, What do you do in the game? What is the purpose of it? Are there aaditional under explained or not explained features (not shown on the box or in pre-release material)? How euch entertainment time should the average customer get out of this tirle? What genre is it? How much time did you spend with the product? There are more questions to be asked depending on the product, but this shod give you the general idea of what this section is about. Elaborate In this section is where you go into further necessary detail on featares in the game that are big enongh topics to not eusily fit into basic explanation. What is the big hook for the game that sets it apart from others of its genre? Does the game do something that no one else has done? This is its own section becanse yon may need to go into complex detafl to explain a mechanic in-depth, meique title features, ete In this section of the review is where you shouid put more dctail on quality oflife and quality of build. If it's a eent gen title with achievements (such as Steam Achievements, Xbox Achievements, PlayStation Trophies, etc) you wonld taik about them here. Does the game run at industry standard resolutions? Are there additional microtnansactions Will DLC be availabie? Are there big, notable issues such as bugs, screen-tearing, poor performance,cnashes, so on and so fortk? You will often hear people say "How are the graphics? Interpretation of artistic STYLE is suhjective QUALITY ofwork it as much as you'd think. Are the textures wushed out and muddy? Is it difieralt to see properiy? Are there clear and obvions typos? Is the audio for the game clear and free of baciground noise es, this kind of stuf DOES happen)? You should talk abot all ofthese things here Closing The final portion of your review should talk about your own eoperience with the titie and how you enjoyed it, ifat al. THIS is wbere the subjectivity of your review comes into play, as opposed to the other sections. Every person consume the content differently. Yow can talk about how much ficn that you had or whether your disliked the eoxperience overall. What were your impressions? What did you think of the art style and direction? How does it compare to other games of its genre, in your view? Does it do things worse than its competitors or better in your view? How did you enjoy the story, if applicable? Again, there is plenty of space here for you to show the reader YOUR interpretation of the facts preseuted in the majority af the product review is sunique and wil I typically avoid providing scores on my reviews. The reason being that no one can seem to actually agree on WHAT scale to use. People use stars, yes no, scale of to s and scale of i to o, usually. My general problem with these scoring systems is that the meanin名of them can vary wildly depending on who is looking at it. A 3 star review is 'supposed' to be average, but to many people it's considered mediocre and not worth your time. Instead, I say who is likely to purchase the title and who is likely to avoid the title. If, for example, the game falls into the 'brawler genre and you didn't have a bad experience with it, you can safely say that "Fans of brawlers will probably enjoy this title." This achieves two final goals: It defines who the intended audience of the title was, and who would do better to avoid it altogether. Now bear in mind, this isn't necessarily a blocked-out template for every review, it's here to explain to you WHAT should be talked about in review, why you're talking about it, and how to do so well. Your job, as a reviewer isn't to tell the customer what to buy. Your job is to INFORM the customer of what they COULD buy, should they be inclined to. You are their eyes and ears in places that they cannot venture, you are there to provide them with the data that they could not easily glean on their own. Happy reviewing. Oliver Campbell nter ema Responses Inspired to write your own story? TRAIN PEOPLE The paradoxes of organization of PEORE of agity

ver Capbell onSep25 The Purpose Of A Game Review and How To Write One With Minimal Subjectivity In the continuing consum er revolt that is #gamergate, more than once has the subject of game reviews come up. Qualms are usually focused around how they are frequently slanted, skewed, heavily biased, or just not informative. So I've decided to sit down and tell you how to go about crafting il quality review. Why do we write reviews? Any review boiled down into its basic form is written in order to help the reader (YOUR customer) make an informed decision about what they MIGHT purchase, or otherwise utilize. The fact of the matter is this; game journalism and game reviews are a customer oriented business. Your readers are your customers, except rather than paying you upfront with cash (unless you're still subscribing to a magazine) they're paying you with clicks of your articles. Nevertheless, your ultimate job is to serve your customer and serve them well. Assume that every customer has a limited entertainment budget: your job is to make sure that they are getting the best value for their dollar Over the past week I've seen more than a few people make the mostly false claim that a review can't be objective in its nature. Not only do I disagree with that, I tend to make it a point in the reviews that I write to avoid unnecessarily interjecting my opinion into it as much as reasonably possible. A good written review is more or less an informative essay that is flavored with your unique personality with a sprinkling of your personal interpretation. To build the structure of a good review, I go back to the 4E's: Educate, Explain, Elaborate, Emphasize. Let's go ahead and take a look at each of those in detail. Educate Explain to the customer WHAT they are buying. Follow the What, Who, When, Where (the 4 W's) method. WHAT game are yow reviewing? WHO developed and published it? WHEN did it,or does it,ese WHEREwhich platforms) did it, or will it, release Explain After you've covered the basic fucts sheet, in this section of the review is where yo talk about emctly what the game is, What do you do in the game? What is the purpose of it? Are there aaditional under explained or not explained features (not shown on the box or in pre-release material)? How euch entertainment time should the average customer get out of this tirle? What genre is it? How much time did you spend with the product? There are more questions to be asked depending on the product, but this shod give you the general idea of what this section is about. Elaborate In this section is where you go into further necessary detail on featares in the game that are big enongh topics to not eusily fit into basic explanation. What is the big hook for the game that sets it apart from others of its genre? Does the game do something that no one else has done? This is its own section becanse yon may need to go into complex detafl to explain a mechanic in-depth, meique title features, ete In this section of the review is where you shouid put more dctail on quality oflife and quality of build. If it's a eent gen title with achievements (such as Steam Achievements, Xbox Achievements, PlayStation Trophies, etc) you wonld taik about them here. Does the game run at industry standard resolutions? Are there additional microtnansactions Will DLC be availabie? Are there big, notable issues such as bugs, screen-tearing, poor performance,cnashes, so on and so fortk? You will often hear people say "How are the graphics? Interpretation of artistic STYLE is suhjective QUALITY ofwork it as much as you'd think. Are the textures wushed out and muddy? Is it difieralt to see properiy? Are there clear and obvions typos? Is the audio for the game clear and free of baciground noise es, this kind of stuf DOES happen)? You should talk abot all ofthese things here Closing The final portion of your review should talk about your own eoperience with the titie and how you enjoyed it, ifat al. THIS is wbere the subjectivity of your review comes into play, as opposed to the other sections. Every person consume the content differently. Yow can talk about how much ficn that you had or whether your disliked the eoxperience overall. What were your impressions? What did you think of the art style and direction? How does it compare to other games of its genre, in your view? Does it do things worse than its competitors or better in your view? How did you enjoy the story, if applicable? Again, there is plenty of space here for you to show the reader YOUR interpretation of the facts preseuted in the majority af the product review is sunique and wil I typically avoid providing scores on my reviews. The reason being that no one can seem to actually agree on WHAT scale to use. People use stars, yes no, scale of to s and scale of i to o, usually. My general problem with these scoring systems is that the meanin名of them can vary wildly depending on who is looking at it. A 3 star review is 'supposed' to be average, but to many people it's considered mediocre and not worth your time. Instead, I say who is likely to purchase the title and who is likely to avoid the title. If, for example, the game falls into the 'brawler genre and you didn't have a bad experience with it, you can safely say that "Fans of brawlers will probably enjoy this title." This achieves two final goals: It defines who the intended audience of the title was, and who would do better to avoid it altogether. Now bear in mind, this isn't necessarily a blocked-out template for every review, it's here to explain to you WHAT should be talked about in review, why you're talking about it, and how to do so well. Your job, as a reviewer isn't to tell the customer what to buy. Your job is to INFORM the customer of what they COULD buy, should they be inclined to. You are their eyes and ears in places that they cannot venture, you are there to provide them with the data that they could not easily glean on their own. Happy reviewing. Oliver Campbell nter ema Responses Inspired to write your own story? TRAIN PEOPLE The paradoxes of organization of PEORE of agity

Tyrion Lannister

When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say Tyrion Lannister Game of Thrones Frank Decapio @FrankDecapio 36m With regards to the anti-#GamerGate censorship pic.twitter.com/J5NLMKBPqx Reply t3 Retweet * Favorite

When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say Tyrion Lannister Game of Thrones Frank Decapio @FrankDecapio 36m With regards to the anti-#GamerGate censorship pic.twitter.com/J5NLMKBPqx Reply t3 Retweet * Favorite

game of thrones tyrion lannister a song of ice and fire gamergate twitter

Do you feel like GG is slowly leaning to simply promoting figureheads (such as yourself no offence) while backing off from actually having their own voices in the debate? Listen I understand the arguments from both sides in reference to some sort of leadership but here is thee reality 1) Leadership can work if you have a great leader but only if you have a great leader. They have to be on point at all times, they have to be eloquent, they have to be a great orator, a great organizer, and a host of other things. If they fail at any of these they kill what they try to promote. The greatest danger to any cause is the person who promotes it most. They become a target and their foibles and faults become those of the group they represent. 2) Groups have fallen apart without good leadership. Look at OWS, look at Chanology. You either have a complete absence of someone in charge or those that gain power, through their own character faults, hurt those they try and lead 3) GamerGate or whatever you want to refer to it as is different though. It's not a real world protest, it requires no physical action. You have no marches to organize, no protests to gather, no parks to camp in. It works as a decentralized consumer movement because it doesn't require the logistical support that a real world movement would 4) People are falling for a very simple ploy that has killed a lot of good ideas in the past. The idea is that to win the day they need to appeal to the middle/moderates/independents/uniformed and to do so they need structure and a refined message. This is false. What happens is that you go so far to the middle from your original position to sway those residing there that you are no longer distinguishable from those you are trying to convince; your message becomes diluted and loses meaning People are being suckered into fighting this on the terms the other side dictates, Behave a certain way, do PR a certain way, promote a message a certain way. But you see the other side is losing so why adopt thei tactics? People should continue to do what they think works, whoever wants to voice an opinion let them and if it has merit it will be adopted and if it does not it will be ignored. There are no leaders, simply envoys carrying the message of the whole about 4 hours ago 1 person likes this

Do you feel like GG is slowly leaning to simply promoting figureheads (such as yourself no offence) while backing off from actually having their own voices in the debate? Listen I understand the arguments from both sides in reference to some sort of leadership but here is thee reality 1) Leadership can work if you have a great leader but only if you have a great leader. They have to be on point at all times, they have to be eloquent, they have to be a great orator, a great organizer, and a host of other things. If they fail at any of these they kill what they try to promote. The greatest danger to any cause is the person who promotes it most. They become a target and their foibles and faults become those of the group they represent. 2) Groups have fallen apart without good leadership. Look at OWS, look at Chanology. You either have a complete absence of someone in charge or those that gain power, through their own character faults, hurt those they try and lead 3) GamerGate or whatever you want to refer to it as is different though. It's not a real world protest, it requires no physical action. You have no marches to organize, no protests to gather, no parks to camp in. It works as a decentralized consumer movement because it doesn't require the logistical support that a real world movement would 4) People are falling for a very simple ploy that has killed a lot of good ideas in the past. The idea is that to win the day they need to appeal to the middle/moderates/independents/uniformed and to do so they need structure and a refined message. This is false. What happens is that you go so far to the middle from your original position to sway those residing there that you are no longer distinguishable from those you are trying to convince; your message becomes diluted and loses meaning People are being suckered into fighting this on the terms the other side dictates, Behave a certain way, do PR a certain way, promote a message a certain way. But you see the other side is losing so why adopt thei tactics? People should continue to do what they think works, whoever wants to voice an opinion let them and if it has merit it will be adopted and if it does not it will be ignored. There are no leaders, simply envoys carrying the message of the whole about 4 hours ago 1 person likes this

internetaristocrat gamergate

GamerGate Part 1: The Path We've Taken [InternetAristocrat] o en r 、 submitted 8 hours ago by give-me-sugar [H] [N] 280 comments share save hide give gold report nsfw flair reports: 1 spam remove reapprove ignore reports (youtu.be 540 Gamerate - user reports: 3: spam 1: contributing part of ongoing harassment and doxxing campaign 1: Ban this garbage 1: vote manipulation

GamerGate Part 1: The Path We've Taken [InternetAristocrat] o en r 、 submitted 8 hours ago by give-me-sugar [H] [N] 280 comments share save hide give gold report nsfw flair reports: 1 spam remove reapprove ignore reports (youtu.be 540 Gamerate - user reports: 3: spam 1: contributing part of ongoing harassment and doxxing campaign 1: Ban this garbage 1: vote manipulation

reddit internetaristocrat gamergate

Give it up for the neutral internet encyclopedia, everybody!

Nobody cares what the pro-GG crowd (which to be honest if one is saying they are po GG" then they are in effect pro sexual harassment thinks or feels in this situation their point-of-view is decidedly fringe. The sooner you and a few others get over the misunderstanding that "pro-GG" is an equal-weight opinion alongside what this is actually about, the better. Tarc (talk) 00:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC) Connecting... (cur) difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m-minor edit, → section edit, ← (newest I oldest) View (newer 50 | older 50) (201501 100 | 250 1500) automatic edit summary Compare selected revisions cur prev) ⓔ 1948, 28 September 2014 Cuchu an talk contribs) m (49824 bytes) (0 Changed protection ever f Gamerga e controversy Edi romy administrators] (expires 19:48, 5 October 2014 (UTC) [Move Allow only administrators] (expires 19:48, 5 October 2014 (UTC)) cur prev . ○ 1946, 28 September 2014 Cuchullan talk contribs) m 49,824 bytes) (0 Changed protection level of Game gate controversy: Edit warring content dispute ([Edit Allow only administrators] (expires 18:49, 18 September 2015 (UTC)) Move Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) (cur I prev) O 19:27,28 September 2014 Tar (talk I contribs) .(49,824 bytes) (1,076) (Undid revision 627446884 by Masem (talk) -not a chance that any of that private mailing list nuttery is going to be her,e in any form) . (cur I prev) 18:54, 28 September 2014 Masem (talk | contribs) .(50,900 bytes) (+1,076). . (Undid revision 627444078 by TheRedPenorDoom (talk) this is actually reasonable to include (it's not fringe), but it needs to be written to be a separate concept as I have done) . (cur | prev) O O 18:30, 28 September 2014 TheRedPenofDoom (talk | contribs) . (49,824 bytes) (-984). (Undid revision 627443919 by Bosstopher (talk) undue weight to fringe conspiracy theorist) (cur | prev) O O 18:29, 28 September 2014 Bosstopher (talk | contribs) (50,808 bytes) (+984) (Undid revision 627441233 by NorthBy SouthBaranof (talk) You seem to have reverted based off of a misreading of the sources used. Please look at the Orland source . (cur | prev) O O 18:06, 28 September 2014 NorthBySouthBaranof (talk | contribs). (49,824 bytes) (-984) (We don't really care what someone from Breitbart said. We just don't) (cur I prev)O 17:55, 28 September 2014 Diego Moya (talk | contribs) m (50,808 bytes) (+984). (Reverted edits by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) to last version by Diego Moya) (Tag: HHVM) (cur | . (cur r(cur prev) O 17:55, 28 September 2014 prev)。 17:48. 28 September 2014 prev) O O 17:47 28 September 2014 NorthBySouthBaranof (talk | contribs) (49,824 bytes) (-984) (Breitbart garbage has no place in this article) Diego Moya (talk contribs) m (50808 bytes) (+3) ( Soc a media campagn and backlash clam (Tag: HHV Diego Moya (talk contribs) (50,805 bytes) (+62) (+Social media campaign and backlash this is at Forbes too Tag:

Nobody cares what the pro-GG crowd (which to be honest if one is saying they are po GG" then they are in effect pro sexual harassment thinks or feels in this situation their point-of-view is decidedly fringe. The sooner you and a few others get over the misunderstanding that "pro-GG" is an equal-weight opinion alongside what this is actually about, the better. Tarc (talk) 00:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC) Connecting... (cur) difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m-minor edit, → section edit, ← (newest I oldest) View (newer 50 | older 50) (201501 100 | 250 1500) automatic edit summary Compare selected revisions cur prev) ⓔ 1948, 28 September 2014 Cuchu an talk contribs) m (49824 bytes) (0 Changed protection ever f Gamerga e controversy Edi romy administrators] (expires 19:48, 5 October 2014 (UTC) [Move Allow only administrators] (expires 19:48, 5 October 2014 (UTC)) cur prev . ○ 1946, 28 September 2014 Cuchullan talk contribs) m 49,824 bytes) (0 Changed protection level of Game gate controversy: Edit warring content dispute ([Edit Allow only administrators] (expires 18:49, 18 September 2015 (UTC)) Move Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) (cur I prev) O 19:27,28 September 2014 Tar (talk I contribs) .(49,824 bytes) (1,076) (Undid revision 627446884 by Masem (talk) -not a chance that any of that private mailing list nuttery is going to be her,e in any form) . (cur I prev) 18:54, 28 September 2014 Masem (talk | contribs) .(50,900 bytes) (+1,076). . (Undid revision 627444078 by TheRedPenorDoom (talk) this is actually reasonable to include (it's not fringe), but it needs to be written to be a separate concept as I have done) . (cur | prev) O O 18:30, 28 September 2014 TheRedPenofDoom (talk | contribs) . (49,824 bytes) (-984). (Undid revision 627443919 by Bosstopher (talk) undue weight to fringe conspiracy theorist) (cur | prev) O O 18:29, 28 September 2014 Bosstopher (talk | contribs) (50,808 bytes) (+984) (Undid revision 627441233 by NorthBy SouthBaranof (talk) You seem to have reverted based off of a misreading of the sources used. Please look at the Orland source . (cur | prev) O O 18:06, 28 September 2014 NorthBySouthBaranof (talk | contribs). (49,824 bytes) (-984) (We don't really care what someone from Breitbart said. We just don't) (cur I prev)O 17:55, 28 September 2014 Diego Moya (talk | contribs) m (50,808 bytes) (+984). (Reverted edits by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) to last version by Diego Moya) (Tag: HHVM) (cur | . (cur r(cur prev) O 17:55, 28 September 2014 prev)。 17:48. 28 September 2014 prev) O O 17:47 28 September 2014 NorthBySouthBaranof (talk | contribs) (49,824 bytes) (-984) (Breitbart garbage has no place in this article) Diego Moya (talk contribs) m (50808 bytes) (+3) ( Soc a media campagn and backlash clam (Tag: HHV Diego Moya (talk contribs) (50,805 bytes) (+62) (+Social media campaign and backlash this is at Forbes too Tag:

censorship wikipedia gamergate

Alexander again

Leigh Alexander @leighalexander Follow @melissagira @calebhannan congrats dude, your lethal absence of ethics will be the defining moment of the rest of your career わReply Retweet ★ Favorite More RETWEETS FAVORITES 17 4:13 PM-17 Jan 2014

Leigh Alexander @leighalexander Follow @melissagira @calebhannan congrats dude, your lethal absence of ethics will be the defining moment of the rest of your career わReply Retweet ★ Favorite More RETWEETS FAVORITES 17 4:13 PM-17 Jan 2014

twitter hypocrisy leigh alexander

Stephen's Conversation On The Middle Ground Fallacy.

Stephen @greyinkling Follow As predicted we are getting a number of false middle of the road criticisms about #GamerGate saying we're going in the wrong direction わReply t Retweet * Favorite More RETWEE TS FAVORITES 8 2:14 PM- 28 Sep 2014 Smug Anime Girl @mylittlepwnies3 53m @greyinkling It's really amazing how transparent it is Stephen @greyinkling 52m @mylittlepwnies3 What amazes me is how timely it is. Just like the sympathy trolling last week. Exactly as predicted weeks in advance Jackie Brown @GOBBBluth 51m @greyinkling "Middle Ground" fallacy users are the absolute worst. #GamerGate Smug Anime Girl mylittlepwnies3-51m @greyinkling "Anonymous" really does have an amazing ability to detect shills Chaz Davis @ChazDM 48m @greyinkling I missed some of that, give me some examples please #GamerGate Stephen @greyinkling 44m @ChazDM As soon as I speak up I can't find the tweets that made me write that. I'm referring to people complaining about politics' for one Chaz Davis @ChazDM 43m @grevinkling what politics? is anyone on #GamerGate talking about the debt ceiling or some s--- like that? Stephen @greyinkling 42m @ChazDM Insisting tweets that say we're talking about politics now, and never should have been. Even when we aren't talking about it at all Stephen @greyinkling 41m @ChazDM Oh no, not like that. People saying GG has become 'about politics This following a few days of the usual trolls complaining Chaz Davis @ChazDM 41m @greyinkling just another flavor of "stop talking about zoe quinn" when nobody was talking about her Stephen @greyinkling 40m @ChazDM .about us "only talking about SJWs and not journalism". One example still. Just keep an open ear for it. Stephen @greyinkling 40m @ChazDM Pretty much. It's like when there was a push for us to make a list of demands. Trolls have been doing this in a smaller form as well Stephen @greyinkling 39m @ChazDM asking us to specify EXACTLY to the letter what we are standing for so they can then find a hole to poke and argue semantics Chaz Davis @ChazDM·39m @greyinkling Yeah the whole list of demands was not a good idea from the start, good thing vanguard opposed it and I agreed with him Stephen @greyinkling 38m @ChazDM It was another thing that many predicted, because this is the most predictable trolling I have ever seen on such a grand scale

Stephen @greyinkling Follow As predicted we are getting a number of false middle of the road criticisms about #GamerGate saying we're going in the wrong direction わReply t Retweet * Favorite More RETWEE TS FAVORITES 8 2:14 PM- 28 Sep 2014 Smug Anime Girl @mylittlepwnies3 53m @greyinkling It's really amazing how transparent it is Stephen @greyinkling 52m @mylittlepwnies3 What amazes me is how timely it is. Just like the sympathy trolling last week. Exactly as predicted weeks in advance Jackie Brown @GOBBBluth 51m @greyinkling "Middle Ground" fallacy users are the absolute worst. #GamerGate Smug Anime Girl mylittlepwnies3-51m @greyinkling "Anonymous" really does have an amazing ability to detect shills Chaz Davis @ChazDM 48m @greyinkling I missed some of that, give me some examples please #GamerGate Stephen @greyinkling 44m @ChazDM As soon as I speak up I can't find the tweets that made me write that. I'm referring to people complaining about politics' for one Chaz Davis @ChazDM 43m @grevinkling what politics? is anyone on #GamerGate talking about the debt ceiling or some s--- like that? Stephen @greyinkling 42m @ChazDM Insisting tweets that say we're talking about politics now, and never should have been. Even when we aren't talking about it at all Stephen @greyinkling 41m @ChazDM Oh no, not like that. People saying GG has become 'about politics This following a few days of the usual trolls complaining Chaz Davis @ChazDM 41m @greyinkling just another flavor of "stop talking about zoe quinn" when nobody was talking about her Stephen @greyinkling 40m @ChazDM .about us "only talking about SJWs and not journalism". One example still. Just keep an open ear for it. Stephen @greyinkling 40m @ChazDM Pretty much. It's like when there was a push for us to make a list of demands. Trolls have been doing this in a smaller form as well Stephen @greyinkling 39m @ChazDM asking us to specify EXACTLY to the letter what we are standing for so they can then find a hole to poke and argue semantics Chaz Davis @ChazDM·39m @greyinkling Yeah the whole list of demands was not a good idea from the start, good thing vanguard opposed it and I agreed with him Stephen @greyinkling 38m @ChazDM It was another thing that many predicted, because this is the most predictable trolling I have ever seen on such a grand scale

DoctorWatkin's Response To Leigh Alexander.

Doc @DoctorWatkins Follow silly kids, i AM #GamerGate pic.twitter.com/BWvysZsO7F Reply t Retweet * Favorite More Leigh Alexander (a leigha!exander silly kids. i AM game journalisnm 7:23am-4 Sep 14 2:20 PM -28 Sep 2014

Doc @DoctorWatkins Follow silly kids, i AM #GamerGate pic.twitter.com/BWvysZsO7F Reply t Retweet * Favorite More Leigh Alexander (a leigha!exander silly kids. i AM game journalisnm 7:23am-4 Sep 14 2:20 PM -28 Sep 2014

Anthony Burch Accuses GamerGate Supporters Of "Further Abuse Of Various Degrees".

Anthony Burch @reverenda... 16d But no, yes, let's all just be super calm and treat the abuse-filled movement with respect, and be neutral Details Anthony Burch @reverenda... 16d @FartToContinue I love that you've posted a screencap of people blaming Anita for sharing abuse as evidence you're the good guys View Anthony Burch @reverendanthony @FartToContinue And your movement legitimizes and furthers abuse of variouS degrees, from CP to pressuring someone into quitting 4:54am 6 Sep 2014 Twitter Web Client 8 RETWEETS 6 FAVORITES

Anthony Burch @reverenda... 16d But no, yes, let's all just be super calm and treat the abuse-filled movement with respect, and be neutral Details Anthony Burch @reverenda... 16d @FartToContinue I love that you've posted a screencap of people blaming Anita for sharing abuse as evidence you're the good guys View Anthony Burch @reverendanthony @FartToContinue And your movement legitimizes and furthers abuse of variouS degrees, from CP to pressuring someone into quitting 4:54am 6 Sep 2014 Twitter Web Client 8 RETWEETS 6 FAVORITES

TechCrunch Article On GamerGate by Allum Bokhari. Dated September 25, 2014

GamerGate-An Issue With Two Sides

GamerGate-An Issue With Two Sides

gamergate techcrunch

He literally does it for free

TonioVent140 TonioVent 140-26m @int_Aristocrat Fantasic video, Aristocrat! Just out of curiosity, how much did it cost you to make? InternetAristocrat @Int_Aristocrat + Follow @TonioVent140 Zero dollars. わReply t3Retweeted ★ Favorited More RETWEETS FAVORITES 16 3:30 PM - 28 Sep 2014

TonioVent140 TonioVent 140-26m @int_Aristocrat Fantasic video, Aristocrat! Just out of curiosity, how much did it cost you to make? InternetAristocrat @Int_Aristocrat + Follow @TonioVent140 Zero dollars. わReply t3Retweeted ★ Favorited More RETWEETS FAVORITES 16 3:30 PM - 28 Sep 2014

free internetaristocrat gamergate #gamergate

Matt Baits GamerGate Supporters.

matt @power_crystals Follow Ever since I forbade gamers from my coffee shop, business is booming. They creep out female customers #GamerGate #GamerFree #NoGamers わReply Retweet ★ Favorite More RETWEETS FAVORITES 3 10:15 AM- 28 Sep 2014 Nathan McMinn @dylaer 5m @power_crystals pic.twitter.com/2iPa8px8F4

matt @power_crystals Follow Ever since I forbade gamers from my coffee shop, business is booming. They creep out female customers #GamerGate #GamerFree #NoGamers わReply Retweet ★ Favorite More RETWEETS FAVORITES 3 10:15 AM- 28 Sep 2014 Nathan McMinn @dylaer 5m @power_crystals pic.twitter.com/2iPa8px8F4

dobson...please...stop

VWait, sniling and Some people realy ob jected to me depicting Vivian Jamesaughing is a BAD smiling and laughing. So Luigi /thing? What the hel? is here to help rectify that Smi Still not sure what ANY of this has to do with the idea that movements don't need mascots thoug.. This sucks..

VWait, sniling and Some people realy ob jected to me depicting Vivian Jamesaughing is a BAD smiling and laughing. So Luigi /thing? What the hel? is here to help rectify that Smi Still not sure what ANY of this has to do with the idea that movements don't need mascots thoug.. This sucks..

luigi vivian james gamergate unfunny tom preston andrew dobson cattyn catty nebulart dobbo

Titanium Dragon talking about the low-point and dishonesty of his doxers

Titanium Dragon September 8, 2014 at 2:13 pm Reply Given that these folks are complaining about people harassing Zoe Quinn, you know, by doxxing her and her supporters, and then proceed to harass people who are trying to edit a Wikipedia article by doxing them, it kind of shows exactly what sort of person Zoe Quinn's supporters are No one named in this article has done anything wrong by trying to include reliably source information, appearing in places including Business Insider, Forbes, The Guardian, and numerous other sources. It is notable at this point - far more so than Zoe Quinn is as a person. I don't care about myself (as I noted, who I am is not a secret), but posting pictures of a minor - an apparently transgendered minor - is -completely- out of line, and the person in question, as a supposed advocate for social justice should KNOW this not only are they a minor, but they might also be trans, and thus, are part of a vulnerable population. This is exactly the sort of thing that Zoe Quinn is whining about happening to her, except this is worse, because the editor in question Tutelary- hasn't spent years harassing people on the internet. defend people from harassment, that's I mean, seriously, if you're t fine, and sometimes people DO make attack articles on Wikipedia. When something appears in literally hundreds of reliable sources (and over ten -million- places on the internet at this point, according to Google) I think the idea that it isn't noteworthy is pretty questionable. Wikipedia reports on what is notable, and it is hard to talk about the whole GamerGate nonsense without explaining what caused it (namely, an angry post by Zoe Quinn's ex posting evidence of her sleeping around with game developers and journalists). The original person who did it didn't realize what he was setting off; he was making an angry post about his ex, but because of the WHO, it blew up. It is really impossible to mention the claims of misogyny, corruption, censorship, ect. without explaining what started the whole thing. And yet, some folks are upset because they don't want it included because it reflects badly on Zoe Quinn rying to It totally does. But Wikipedia is NOT a platform for making people look good or bad - it is a platform for disseminating information about noteworthy events. We have details on the Monica Lewinsky affair and the affairs of various royal family folk, we have articles which touch on numerous scandals, we have articles about all sorts of random things. The key is notability When something shows up in hundreds of reliable source and millions of places on the internet, it is almost always notable to at least some extent. My interest is in documenting it. I sometimes try and go in to present events - shootings and the like - and make sure that the article maintains a neutral tone. People get emotionally charged about stuff

Titanium Dragon September 8, 2014 at 2:13 pm Reply Given that these folks are complaining about people harassing Zoe Quinn, you know, by doxxing her and her supporters, and then proceed to harass people who are trying to edit a Wikipedia article by doxing them, it kind of shows exactly what sort of person Zoe Quinn's supporters are No one named in this article has done anything wrong by trying to include reliably source information, appearing in places including Business Insider, Forbes, The Guardian, and numerous other sources. It is notable at this point - far more so than Zoe Quinn is as a person. I don't care about myself (as I noted, who I am is not a secret), but posting pictures of a minor - an apparently transgendered minor - is -completely- out of line, and the person in question, as a supposed advocate for social justice should KNOW this not only are they a minor, but they might also be trans, and thus, are part of a vulnerable population. This is exactly the sort of thing that Zoe Quinn is whining about happening to her, except this is worse, because the editor in question Tutelary- hasn't spent years harassing people on the internet. defend people from harassment, that's I mean, seriously, if you're t fine, and sometimes people DO make attack articles on Wikipedia. When something appears in literally hundreds of reliable sources (and over ten -million- places on the internet at this point, according to Google) I think the idea that it isn't noteworthy is pretty questionable. Wikipedia reports on what is notable, and it is hard to talk about the whole GamerGate nonsense without explaining what caused it (namely, an angry post by Zoe Quinn's ex posting evidence of her sleeping around with game developers and journalists). The original person who did it didn't realize what he was setting off; he was making an angry post about his ex, but because of the WHO, it blew up. It is really impossible to mention the claims of misogyny, corruption, censorship, ect. without explaining what started the whole thing. And yet, some folks are upset because they don't want it included because it reflects badly on Zoe Quinn rying to It totally does. But Wikipedia is NOT a platform for making people look good or bad - it is a platform for disseminating information about noteworthy events. We have details on the Monica Lewinsky affair and the affairs of various royal family folk, we have articles which touch on numerous scandals, we have articles about all sorts of random things. The key is notability When something shows up in hundreds of reliable source and millions of places on the internet, it is almost always notable to at least some extent. My interest is in documenting it. I sometimes try and go in to present events - shootings and the like - and make sure that the article maintains a neutral tone. People get emotionally charged about stuff

wikipedia dox zoe quinn gamergate

Wikipediocracy2 - Doxing disent. censored dox

WIKIPEDIOCRACY your BLP Wales Tak PageSear Wikipedia and women's dig crutiny into the dark With research contributions from tarannno, James P. Persica, and Eric barboUr ispedia and the war on misinformation, defamation, and Between what has become known as GamerGate and the Apple iCloud incident, you could be forth from one of the world's most frequently visted webstes, photographs of themselves published on 4chan and Reddit. Video game developer Zoe Quinn forgihen for thinking that the Internet has declared a full-on war on women's privacy. Over 100 rouble at Jimmy Wales Tak female celebrities have had their Cloud accounts hacked and personal, mostly nude ex-bayfriend publicly accused her of infidelity-including, and, as it turned out, wrongly,o having had an affair with ajournalist to ensure favorable coverage of her interactive fiction game, Depression Quest. In addition to being unfairly accoused of corruption and caled all kinds af names, both on the Internet and through anomymous phone calls, Quinn found her address How' yo can participate: the editors, administrators, eritics, Feminist meda cibic Anita Sarkeesan recently went rea and her parents and the publication of their home for misogynists. Attacks on the critic by men's rights advocates and Internet trolls included video game in which players soored points for a slew of Angry Indian Fakers Teach Wiki PR were predictably quick to suggest that she may have made up the death threats to gamer are now aslong you to part with your hard-earned cash to help fund a documentary on 12:32 pm . Sept eberL 2014 ☆ Mkpedia and the war on The Thin Bright Line (27) ipedia - Men and children How pranks, hoaxes and How does Wikipedia factor into this? The site is prime real estate for actvists of all persuasions, and gamers and men's rights advocates, like many others, have been trying to influence its contents from the beginning. Sarkeesian's wikipedia biography was infamously vandalized after she started her online funding campaign for Tropes vs. Women,Archives and has since been fought over by men's rights advocates and feminists alke. To this day, the artidle and its disoussion page focus prominently on the harassment she and her ar 2014 d--- here I comes as no surprise that e Quinn's ipedia biography has receved an equal amount f e 2014 Wkipedocracy press releases. negative attention. The issue: should a trumped-up non-scandal relating to someone's very private life be induded in their article? Should the harassment of Quinn kicked off by the actions of a vengeful, narissistic ex-boyfriend be perpetuated on a site that currently comes up as the first google hit for her name? Should Wikipedia be used to shame Quinn through quoting selective onine sources? For a few weeks, R looked like Wikipeda video game aficionado Woodroar and administrators like Mr. Stradivarius and Black Kite had been sucoessful in keeping Quinn's article free from mentions of the attempts at ruining her features a section devoted to the incident, and attempts have been made at induding a section ttled Acousations of personal and professional misconduct October 2013 2013 The talk page for Quinn's article tels a long but incomplete story of the sustained battle between men's rights activists and editors striving for neutrality. Some of the comments posted there were deemed so biased and intrusive that they were subsequently oversighted une 2013 that they are no Most of the main advocates for deprving Quinn and other notable women of their right to privacy have a history of tendentious editing on Wikipedia and excel at gaming the site's As you will see, they are an interesting bunch indeed. And by interesting, we mean that a screenwriter would have a hard time coming up with a selection of equally colorful character 2012 12 for the indusion of Quinn's t in her Wilsiped biography and fially une 2012 Tutelary. That was not the first April 2012 Until April 14, 2014, their poeudonym was RSS & Atom F user very briefty claimed a Posts -onthe ㄧ Ik pages for Zoe Quinn and reaso n terute i dude the frequently vandalized article about radical feminism, the 2014 Isla Vista ollings Newset challenges crease be quite subtle when masking their bias in artide talk page discussions, and unbl you look at the bulk of their contributions in context, you may come away with the impression that this is that tis wy gbo unequal rom an ant-feminist perspective. Smart offers free Wiipedia ccess Sun.Star The the And while TutelaryGing287 is a member of a Wikipedia task force aimed at countering the encyclopeda's bias against women, their actvity on the site as well as their overal Internet footprint suggest a misogynistic agenda. In addition to complaning about Wikipedia being overrun by feminists on the men's rights disoussion board of fellow soial networking site Reddt, they moderate r/womanlogic and r/unbirth, two extremely misogynistic subreddits, the latter of which is NSFW. The descriptions speak for themselves: Woman logic is logic ther contradicts tser, uses orcuer reasoning, er promotes speoil exceptions towards me woman and disqualifies males as an exceptionThis sutredor is for he display of images of me act of unbirthin: stuming someone (entvely) ahin female gentala for mostly pleasuring purposes. Since it's obhous that a female cannot accomplish this in real Me,彪 mostly rooted rowavds drawn images "r/sexyoentaurs, another subreddit Ging287 set up, is ikewise NSPW The opinion they express on Reddt about the idoud hacking incident indicates no empathy the female victims; they choose to view this partioular iolation of women's privacy and dignity as rothing more than a copyright issue: "There are no laws on the books that prevent people from shaving stolen images excet copyrignt law.J People are saying that speech mat they don't Sike should be censored, especially if they donike it. That's wrong. Morality = Cvil servants waste hours eries from Congress.. PBS kipedia Redesign Jimmy Wales Won't-Co.Design Wilspedia told Congrs co-exdst-Washington Post powered by RSS Just Bater 13 plugin Even though this information is publicly avalable to any Wikipedia contnibutor who is mystfiecd case of Tutelary, this rule, combined with Assume Good Faith, one of the fundamental principles of Wikipeda, means that whle the few actual women af dpedia may know that they're being played, the way the ste is set up prevents them from doing anything about it Over the past two weeks, he has made a staggering 100 contributions to Quinn's article talk page, a number of which have been oversighted. His other areas of activity on the encyclopedia include the articles on furry fandom, Satanism, and the Virginia Tech massacre. udging by this edt to his personal wikipedis page, he has lttle sympathy for the victims of school shooters and spree kllers in general. Yet while he daims that there is entirely too dlers, and that his favonite webcomic is probably more notable than they are, and Quinn that has also since been deleted. On iipedia's administrator's noticeboard, he ontve reason hat Zoe uwinn has gotten coverage is precsaly because of the controversies she hes been embraled io, and her notabsliry is pretty much entrely contingent upan these complasning about single sources here,it is worth remembering that Zoe Qunn's dlaims of Who is Ttanium Dragon, and what makes him a judge af Zoe Quinn's notability? Alt the time of wtbing. fantasy of Quinn's 기지 mdpendent game desiner Like many other Internet venues. Searching for his nickname will currently lead you to a site where male fans of the children's television series My Lttle Pony publish mastly erotic fiction about the equine cartoon characters from the show. Titanium Dragon is a frequent participant and has produced 16 stories of brony fiction for the ste·He also maintains a regularly updated blog where interested parties can read about his dislike for the prose of award- winning wniters Zadie Smith and Denis Johnson, whose short stories he considers "dreary. Many of his blog entries on the My Little Pony fan site make it clear that Mr. Dragon Iterary drdes. He is also fond of the odd Iiterary conspiracy theory, such as the one about that he added it to the Wikipedia artide for the dassic novel and sourced it to a blog entry written by his fellow My Little Pony fanbay, who goes by the name of Bad Horse You could call Taanium Dragon eccentrikc. We prefer to call him unning a one man wannabe games His lattude may well exceed his longitude, As far as we can tell this self-styled animosity toward Zoe Quinn be motivated by professional jealousy rather than outright misogyny? As the case of Qworty has shown, this can be a strong incentive for contributing to Wikipedia. Or is it more likely that, like so many members of his demographic, Merrill simply hasn't spent much time around women and blames this on the evis of feminism? pedia notability has yet to pubish a game of his own Could his mage credits: AickrDaniel Svensson, Flickr/exfordy, Pickr/Caro)n P SperanzaLicensed September 7th, 2014 1 Tags: Anita Sarkeesian, Gamergate, Titanium Dragon, Tutelary, Zoe Quinn

WIKIPEDIOCRACY your BLP Wales Tak PageSear Wikipedia and women's dig crutiny into the dark With research contributions from tarannno, James P. Persica, and Eric barboUr ispedia and the war on misinformation, defamation, and Between what has become known as GamerGate and the Apple iCloud incident, you could be forth from one of the world's most frequently visted webstes, photographs of themselves published on 4chan and Reddit. Video game developer Zoe Quinn forgihen for thinking that the Internet has declared a full-on war on women's privacy. Over 100 rouble at Jimmy Wales Tak female celebrities have had their Cloud accounts hacked and personal, mostly nude ex-bayfriend publicly accused her of infidelity-including, and, as it turned out, wrongly,o having had an affair with ajournalist to ensure favorable coverage of her interactive fiction game, Depression Quest. In addition to being unfairly accoused of corruption and caled all kinds af names, both on the Internet and through anomymous phone calls, Quinn found her address How' yo can participate: the editors, administrators, eritics, Feminist meda cibic Anita Sarkeesan recently went rea and her parents and the publication of their home for misogynists. Attacks on the critic by men's rights advocates and Internet trolls included video game in which players soored points for a slew of Angry Indian Fakers Teach Wiki PR were predictably quick to suggest that she may have made up the death threats to gamer are now aslong you to part with your hard-earned cash to help fund a documentary on 12:32 pm . Sept eberL 2014 ☆ Mkpedia and the war on The Thin Bright Line (27) ipedia - Men and children How pranks, hoaxes and How does Wikipedia factor into this? The site is prime real estate for actvists of all persuasions, and gamers and men's rights advocates, like many others, have been trying to influence its contents from the beginning. Sarkeesian's wikipedia biography was infamously vandalized after she started her online funding campaign for Tropes vs. Women,Archives and has since been fought over by men's rights advocates and feminists alke. To this day, the artidle and its disoussion page focus prominently on the harassment she and her ar 2014 d--- here I comes as no surprise that e Quinn's ipedia biography has receved an equal amount f e 2014 Wkipedocracy press releases. negative attention. The issue: should a trumped-up non-scandal relating to someone's very private life be induded in their article? Should the harassment of Quinn kicked off by the actions of a vengeful, narissistic ex-boyfriend be perpetuated on a site that currently comes up as the first google hit for her name? Should Wikipedia be used to shame Quinn through quoting selective onine sources? For a few weeks, R looked like Wikipeda video game aficionado Woodroar and administrators like Mr. Stradivarius and Black Kite had been sucoessful in keeping Quinn's article free from mentions of the attempts at ruining her features a section devoted to the incident, and attempts have been made at induding a section ttled Acousations of personal and professional misconduct October 2013 2013 The talk page for Quinn's article tels a long but incomplete story of the sustained battle between men's rights activists and editors striving for neutrality. Some of the comments posted there were deemed so biased and intrusive that they were subsequently oversighted une 2013 that they are no Most of the main advocates for deprving Quinn and other notable women of their right to privacy have a history of tendentious editing on Wikipedia and excel at gaming the site's As you will see, they are an interesting bunch indeed. And by interesting, we mean that a screenwriter would have a hard time coming up with a selection of equally colorful character 2012 12 for the indusion of Quinn's t in her Wilsiped biography and fially une 2012 Tutelary. That was not the first April 2012 Until April 14, 2014, their poeudonym was RSS & Atom F user very briefty claimed a Posts -onthe ㄧ Ik pages for Zoe Quinn and reaso n terute i dude the frequently vandalized article about radical feminism, the 2014 Isla Vista ollings Newset challenges crease be quite subtle when masking their bias in artide talk page discussions, and unbl you look at the bulk of their contributions in context, you may come away with the impression that this is that tis wy gbo unequal rom an ant-feminist perspective. Smart offers free Wiipedia ccess Sun.Star The the And while TutelaryGing287 is a member of a Wikipedia task force aimed at countering the encyclopeda's bias against women, their actvity on the site as well as their overal Internet footprint suggest a misogynistic agenda. In addition to complaning about Wikipedia being overrun by feminists on the men's rights disoussion board of fellow soial networking site Reddt, they moderate r/womanlogic and r/unbirth, two extremely misogynistic subreddits, the latter of which is NSFW. The descriptions speak for themselves: Woman logic is logic ther contradicts tser, uses orcuer reasoning, er promotes speoil exceptions towards me woman and disqualifies males as an exceptionThis sutredor is for he display of images of me act of unbirthin: stuming someone (entvely) ahin female gentala for mostly pleasuring purposes. Since it's obhous that a female cannot accomplish this in real Me,彪 mostly rooted rowavds drawn images "r/sexyoentaurs, another subreddit Ging287 set up, is ikewise NSPW The opinion they express on Reddt about the idoud hacking incident indicates no empathy the female victims; they choose to view this partioular iolation of women's privacy and dignity as rothing more than a copyright issue: "There are no laws on the books that prevent people from shaving stolen images excet copyrignt law.J People are saying that speech mat they don't Sike should be censored, especially if they donike it. That's wrong. Morality = Cvil servants waste hours eries from Congress.. PBS kipedia Redesign Jimmy Wales Won't-Co.Design Wilspedia told Congrs co-exdst-Washington Post powered by RSS Just Bater 13 plugin Even though this information is publicly avalable to any Wikipedia contnibutor who is mystfiecd case of Tutelary, this rule, combined with Assume Good Faith, one of the fundamental principles of Wikipeda, means that whle the few actual women af dpedia may know that they're being played, the way the ste is set up prevents them from doing anything about it Over the past two weeks, he has made a staggering 100 contributions to Quinn's article talk page, a number of which have been oversighted. His other areas of activity on the encyclopedia include the articles on furry fandom, Satanism, and the Virginia Tech massacre. udging by this edt to his personal wikipedis page, he has lttle sympathy for the victims of school shooters and spree kllers in general. Yet while he daims that there is entirely too dlers, and that his favonite webcomic is probably more notable than they are, and Quinn that has also since been deleted. On iipedia's administrator's noticeboard, he ontve reason hat Zoe uwinn has gotten coverage is precsaly because of the controversies she hes been embraled io, and her notabsliry is pretty much entrely contingent upan these complasning about single sources here,it is worth remembering that Zoe Qunn's dlaims of Who is Ttanium Dragon, and what makes him a judge af Zoe Quinn's notability? Alt the time of wtbing. fantasy of Quinn's 기지 mdpendent game desiner Like many other Internet venues. Searching for his nickname will currently lead you to a site where male fans of the children's television series My Lttle Pony publish mastly erotic fiction about the equine cartoon characters from the show. Titanium Dragon is a frequent participant and has produced 16 stories of brony fiction for the ste·He also maintains a regularly updated blog where interested parties can read about his dislike for the prose of award- winning wniters Zadie Smith and Denis Johnson, whose short stories he considers "dreary. Many of his blog entries on the My Little Pony fan site make it clear that Mr. Dragon Iterary drdes. He is also fond of the odd Iiterary conspiracy theory, such as the one about that he added it to the Wikipedia artide for the dassic novel and sourced it to a blog entry written by his fellow My Little Pony fanbay, who goes by the name of Bad Horse You could call Taanium Dragon eccentrikc. We prefer to call him unning a one man wannabe games His lattude may well exceed his longitude, As far as we can tell this self-styled animosity toward Zoe Quinn be motivated by professional jealousy rather than outright misogyny? As the case of Qworty has shown, this can be a strong incentive for contributing to Wikipedia. Or is it more likely that, like so many members of his demographic, Merrill simply hasn't spent much time around women and blames this on the evis of feminism? pedia notability has yet to pubish a game of his own Could his mage credits: AickrDaniel Svensson, Flickr/exfordy, Pickr/Caro)n P SperanzaLicensed September 7th, 2014 1 Tags: Anita Sarkeesian, Gamergate, Titanium Dragon, Tutelary, Zoe Quinn

wikipedia bias dox gamergate

Wikipediocracy1 - Doxing disent

HOME FORUM WIKIPEDIOCRACY All your BLPs are belong to us ... Why this Site? Trouble at Jimmy Wales Talk Page>Search Our Mission: We exist to shine the light of scrutiny into the dark crevices of Wikipedia and its related projects; to examine the WOmen's diqnit corruption there, along with its structural flaws; and to inoculate the unsuspecting public against the torrent of misinformation, defamation, andBetween what has become known as GamerGate and the Apple iCloud incident, you could be general nonsense that issues forth from one of the world's Believe it or Not: Our Wikipedia Page By Nathalie Collida With research contributions from tarantino, James P. Persica, and Eric Barbour Recent Posts forgiven for thinking that the Internet has declared a full-on war on women's privacy. Over 100 female celebrities have had their iCloud accounts hacked and personal, mostly nude photographs of themselves published on 4chan and Reddit. Video game developer Zoe Quinn endured a vituperative online harassment campaign from men's rights advocates after her ex-boyfriend publicly accused her of infidelity including, and, as it turned out, wrongly, of having had an affair with a journalist to ensure favorable coverage of her interactive fiction game, Depression Quest. In addition to being unfairly accused of corruption and called all kinds Wikipedia and the war on women's dignity Trouble at Jimmy Wales' Talk Page Why w Wikipedia The Battle for Wikipedia: How Your Donations May Be Destroying the Crowd-sourced Encyclopedia Wikimania 2014 most frequently visited websites, the "encyclopedia that anyone can edit." omen have no time for How you can participate Visit the Wikipediocracy Forum, a candid exchange of views between Wikipedia of names, both on the Internet and through anonymous phone calls, Quinn found her address revealed on Reddit together with illegally obtained nude photographs of herself.

HOME FORUM WIKIPEDIOCRACY All your BLPs are belong to us ... Why this Site? Trouble at Jimmy Wales Talk Page>Search Our Mission: We exist to shine the light of scrutiny into the dark crevices of Wikipedia and its related projects; to examine the WOmen's diqnit corruption there, along with its structural flaws; and to inoculate the unsuspecting public against the torrent of misinformation, defamation, andBetween what has become known as GamerGate and the Apple iCloud incident, you could be general nonsense that issues forth from one of the world's Believe it or Not: Our Wikipedia Page By Nathalie Collida With research contributions from tarantino, James P. Persica, and Eric Barbour Recent Posts forgiven for thinking that the Internet has declared a full-on war on women's privacy. Over 100 female celebrities have had their iCloud accounts hacked and personal, mostly nude photographs of themselves published on 4chan and Reddit. Video game developer Zoe Quinn endured a vituperative online harassment campaign from men's rights advocates after her ex-boyfriend publicly accused her of infidelity including, and, as it turned out, wrongly, of having had an affair with a journalist to ensure favorable coverage of her interactive fiction game, Depression Quest. In addition to being unfairly accused of corruption and called all kinds Wikipedia and the war on women's dignity Trouble at Jimmy Wales' Talk Page Why w Wikipedia The Battle for Wikipedia: How Your Donations May Be Destroying the Crowd-sourced Encyclopedia Wikimania 2014 most frequently visited websites, the "encyclopedia that anyone can edit." omen have no time for How you can participate Visit the Wikipediocracy Forum, a candid exchange of views between Wikipedia of names, both on the Internet and through anonymous phone calls, Quinn found her address revealed on Reddit together with illegally obtained nude photographs of herself.

wikipedia bias dox gamergate

Gamergate 2014

#0AMERGATE 2014

#0AMERGATE 2014

8chan gamergate not your shield infinite chan ultron

4Chan mod doxxes people.

KingofPol retweeted Unsettled @intothebleak 1m @ZooombieJesus @Kingofpol @RogueStarGamez @infinitechan Not sure if you dont know but some 4chan mods are friends IRL with said journos View conversation Retwe KingofPol retweeted Demias Demias20 3m @Kingofpol Yeah, I just saw that. That's f----- up, yo. halfchan a s---. View conversation Retweet KingofPol retweeted Christopher Marb @marblater 3m @Kingofpol @RogueStarGamez @infinitechan Bingo. The mod has your IP, the humblebundle has your IP name and potentially billing address. View conversation h Reply t7 Retweet ★ Favorite More

KingofPol retweeted Unsettled @intothebleak 1m @ZooombieJesus @Kingofpol @RogueStarGamez @infinitechan Not sure if you dont know but some 4chan mods are friends IRL with said journos View conversation Retwe KingofPol retweeted Demias Demias20 3m @Kingofpol Yeah, I just saw that. That's f----- up, yo. halfchan a s---. View conversation Retweet KingofPol retweeted Christopher Marb @marblater 3m @Kingofpol @RogueStarGamez @infinitechan Bingo. The mod has your IP, the humblebundle has your IP name and potentially billing address. View conversation h Reply t7 Retweet ★ Favorite More

Doom

THE U LTIMA T E TM Muh sojiny mu SOFTWARE .0/10 it's s--- MWhAk

THE U LTIMA T E TM Muh sojiny mu SOFTWARE .0/10 it's s--- MWhAk

doom gamergate not your shield