Hey! You must login or signup first!

Titanium Dragon September 8, 2014 at 2:13 pm Reply Given that these folks are complaining about people harassing Zoe Quinn, you know, by doxxing her and her supporters, and then proceed to harass people who are trying to edit a Wikipedia article by doxing them, it kind of shows exactly what sort of person Zoe Quinn's supporters are No one named in this article has done anything wrong by trying to include reliably source information, appearing in places including Business Insider, Forbes, The Guardian, and numerous other sources. It is notable at this point - far more so than Zoe Quinn is as a person. I don't care about myself (as I noted, who I am is not a secret), but posting pictures of a minor - an apparently transgendered minor - is -completely- out of line, and the person in question, as a supposed advocate for social justice should KNOW this not only are they a minor, but they might also be trans, and thus, are part of a vulnerable population. This is exactly the sort of thing that Zoe Quinn is whining about happening to her, except this is worse, because the editor in question Tutelary- hasn't spent years harassing people on the internet. defend people from harassment, that's I mean, seriously, if you're t fine, and sometimes people DO make attack articles on Wikipedia. When something appears in literally hundreds of reliable sources (and over ten -million- places on the internet at this point, according to Google) I think the idea that it isn't noteworthy is pretty questionable. Wikipedia reports on what is notable, and it is hard to talk about the whole GamerGate nonsense without explaining what caused it (namely, an angry post by Zoe Quinn's ex posting evidence of her sleeping around with game developers and journalists). The original person who did it didn't realize what he was setting off; he was making an angry post about his ex, but because of the WHO, it blew up. It is really impossible to mention the claims of misogyny, corruption, censorship, ect. without explaining what started the whole thing. And yet, some folks are upset because they don't want it included because it reflects badly on Zoe Quinn rying to It totally does. But Wikipedia is NOT a platform for making people look good or bad - it is a platform for disseminating information about noteworthy events. We have details on the Monica Lewinsky affair and the affairs of various royal family folk, we have articles which touch on numerous scandals, we have articles about all sorts of random things. The key is notability When something shows up in hundreds of reliable source and millions of places on the internet, it is almost always notable to at least some extent. My interest is in documenting it. I sometimes try and go in to present events - shootings and the like - and make sure that the article maintains a neutral tone. People get emotionally charged about stuff

+15

Titanium Dragon talking about the low-point and dishonesty of his doxers


Uploaded by ratalada Sep 28, 2014 at 12:50PM EDT

Share Pin Download More

Origin Entry: GamerGate

File type: png

Resolution: (499px x 763px)

File size: 59.4 KB


_"*I guess i had to do it if only because people are expecting me to do it. I didn’t even remember this was a thing till yesterday XD*"_ Had to add this because I thought that ppl would actually click the source link and look at the description after all this time
Like...is there any solution to this? Should we start something?
Jalen Hutchinson Studied Culinary Science at Culinary Institute of America (Graduated 2014). Author has 304 answers and 740.1K answer views. 5y Not that I care that much either way, but it did expose a lot of corrupt game developers and game journalists. X Journalists would make claims of people like Anita Sarkeesian "playing video games all her life" when she openly admitted many times she is not a gamer and only starter recently (when it wasn't for an interview). Various developers trading sex or money for good reviews got exposed, journalists who accepted got exposed. People became a bit more critical about supporting a game just because the developer has a victim complex stating tat their game could have only failed because of sexism, instead of their own poor developing skills. What really sealed the deal was opposition often faking their own harassment. Anita sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn have been caught multiple times screenshotting "harassment" while showing that the harrasser's account name in the login. Or when someone called the police to help Sarkeesian against a "very real threat" she was posting about, only for police to find the harasser's messages were coming from her IP address. I just want honesty from the community, and the lies were mostly exposed by the "dreaded" gamergate. 1.3K views • View upvotes 26
View All 4,079 Images

Load 5 Comments

More:

2
+15

GamerGate - Titanium Dragon talking about the low-point and dishonesty of his doxers

PROTIP: Press the ← and → keys to navigate the gallery, 'g' to view the gallery, or 'r' to view a random image.


◄ Previous View Gallery Random Image Next ►

Moar:

Top Comment


+ Add a Comment

Comments (5)


Display Comments

Add a Comment


+ Add an Image

Image Details

753 views (4 from today)

Uploaded Sep 28, 2014 at 12:50PM EDT

Origin Entry

GamerGate

Tags

wikipedia, dox, zoe quinn, gamergate

Claim Authorship Edit History
Textile Embed