Wizards of the Coast OGL 1.1 / Dungeons & Dragons Licensing Controversy - Images

Sorted By:

Preach on brother, preach on. | /r/dndmemes

Wizards OF THE амс We had a good thing going, you stupid son of a bitch! We had the community good will. We were the de-facto default choice for people going into fantasy ttrpgs. We had an OGL that had people agreeing to never challenge us on the ownership of game mechanics, which no court would ever give us. We had the 3rd parties publishing those supplements and adventures we did not deem profitable enough, causing new people to find D&D and buying the source books. You could've shut your mouth, created a GSL for 6e, create a convenient online play experience no third party vtt creator could ever hope to match. You could have just waited and see the people come to you in time, as you are the big name everyone knows and convenience is something people are willing to pay for. In five years you would have made all the money you needed by sitting on your ass and maintaining servers. But no, you just had to blow it up. You and your greed.
Wizards OF THE амс We had a good thing going, you stupid son of a bitch! We had the community good will. We were the de-facto default choice for people going into fantasy ttrpgs. We had an OGL that had people agreeing to never challenge us on the ownership of game mechanics, which no court would ever give us. We had the 3rd parties publishing those supplements and adventures we did not deem profitable enough, causing new people to find D&D and buying the source books. You could've shut your mouth, created a GSL for 6e, create a convenient online play experience no third party vtt creator could ever hope to match. You could have just waited and see the people come to you in time, as you are the big name everyone knows and convenience is something people are willing to pay for. In five years you would have made all the money you needed by sitting on your ass and maintaining servers. But no, you just had to blow it up. You and your greed.

Wizards of the Coast OGL 1.1 / Dungeons & Dragons Licensing Controversy
dnd /r/dndmemes

dnd

when you remember that critical role was originally a pathfinder home game Oh yeah, It's all coming together
when you remember that critical role was originally a pathfinder home game Oh yeah, It's all coming together

Wizards of the Coast OGL 1.1 / Dungeons & Dragons Licensing Controversy
dnd

Backpedaled so hard they tripped and lost their marbles

r/DnD OGL u/Baroness_Ayesha • 9h Ssssssssssssssssssssssso, uh, there are some. Terms. In the now-Creative Commons 5e System Resource Document. & Th twitter.com winke Elven Tower Cartography @ElvenTower On page 254 of the 5.1 SRD that is now Creative Commons, there is this mention of: ELVEN TOWER aboleths beholders mind flayers slaadi So, these names are not "Product Identity" anymore. They are CC-BY, in the wild, and irrevocable. Download the PDF! Aberrations are utterly alien beings. Many of them have innate magical abilities drawn from the creature's alien mind rather than the mystical forces of the world. The quintessential aberrations are aboleths, beholders, mind flayers, and slaadi. 3:46 PM 27 Jan 23 Baroness_Ayesha OP. 9h So, yeah, Wizards just threw up the existing 5.1 SRD with no editing on a Creative Commons license. And they forgot to include any language specifying protected terms, and didn't include any language defining specific terms as still protected as Product Identity under the OGL. This. Um. Opens up a lot of Terms. Elven Tower covers a lot of them in their thread, but it includes "beholder", "mind flayer", "slaadi", "yugoloth", "Waterdeep", "Baldur's Gate", "owlbear", "sahuagin" (as a specific spelling), "umber hulk", "yuan-ti", and. um. "Strahd von Zarovich". Moreover, beholders, mind flayers and slaadi are specifically called out as Aberrations, "utterly alien beings; [m]any of them have innate magical abilities drawn from the creature's alien mind rather than the mystical forces of the world", yugoloths are Fiends, Waterdeep and Baldur's Gate are places with a road between them, "owlbear" can't be much other than an owlbear, and Strahd is specifically described as a Count and a vampire. If people are a little lost, beholders and mind flayers have been absurdly protected parts of the Dungeons & Dragons IP for upwards of half a century, now. TSR famously reserved some of their nastiest legal fights for this part of the IP, down to fighting like an angry tiger over there mere names, asserting that both were completely protected in a tabletop sense. Others, like yugoloths and slaadi (and, well, F------ Strahd), were just protected under standard work-for-hire copyright and were easily considered integral to the D&D IP and not allowed for open use. In the OGL version of the 5.1 SRD, all of these elements were specifically called out as Product Identity, identifying them as protected terms that were not part of the Open Gaming Content allowed for use. Creative Commons has similar carve-out language available, but the released version of the CC 5.1 SRD doesn't use it. These terms, along with whatever descriptions were attached, are now free to use under CC, even for commercial use. The use of the Creative Commons license here in general was pretty clearly meant as a bludgeon against Paizo and the ORC License, because there have been a minority hitting them with "well why not just use Creative Commons", and was more done out of cynical one-upsmanship than any real desire to make things more open and convenient for users and third party authors. But once again, it seems the current crop of lawyers and executives at WotC and Hasbro have no idea what's actually in their product, and just gave away terms for open use that had previously been the subjects of decades of intensely bitter legal battles. Now, it can't be Literally Strahd or Very Specifically An Illithid Mind Flayer, as those will still be protected expressions of the terms. But if you want Count Strahd von Zarovich, vampiric bartender, or a strange alien creature that flays minds and may involve tentacles and is called a "mind flayer", all you need do to cover yourself is include the CC attribution now. The terms are otherwise completely open for use when they weren't previously. So bravo, WotC. Full applause. Thank you for your service. Absolutely incredible work, lads Reply ↑ 117 ↓
r/DnD OGL u/Baroness_Ayesha • 9h Ssssssssssssssssssssssso, uh, there are some. Terms. In the now-Creative Commons 5e System Resource Document. & Th twitter.com winke Elven Tower Cartography @ElvenTower On page 254 of the 5.1 SRD that is now Creative Commons, there is this mention of: ELVEN TOWER aboleths beholders mind flayers slaadi So, these names are not "Product Identity" anymore. They are CC-BY, in the wild, and irrevocable. Download the PDF! Aberrations are utterly alien beings. Many of them have innate magical abilities drawn from the creature's alien mind rather than the mystical forces of the world. The quintessential aberrations are aboleths, beholders, mind flayers, and slaadi. 3:46 PM 27 Jan 23 Baroness_Ayesha OP. 9h So, yeah, Wizards just threw up the existing 5.1 SRD with no editing on a Creative Commons license. And they forgot to include any language specifying protected terms, and didn't include any language defining specific terms as still protected as Product Identity under the OGL. This. Um. Opens up a lot of Terms. Elven Tower covers a lot of them in their thread, but it includes "beholder", "mind flayer", "slaadi", "yugoloth", "Waterdeep", "Baldur's Gate", "owlbear", "sahuagin" (as a specific spelling), "umber hulk", "yuan-ti", and. um. "Strahd von Zarovich". Moreover, beholders, mind flayers and slaadi are specifically called out as Aberrations, "utterly alien beings; [m]any of them have innate magical abilities drawn from the creature's alien mind rather than the mystical forces of the world", yugoloths are Fiends, Waterdeep and Baldur's Gate are places with a road between them, "owlbear" can't be much other than an owlbear, and Strahd is specifically described as a Count and a vampire. If people are a little lost, beholders and mind flayers have been absurdly protected parts of the Dungeons & Dragons IP for upwards of half a century, now. TSR famously reserved some of their nastiest legal fights for this part of the IP, down to fighting like an angry tiger over there mere names, asserting that both were completely protected in a tabletop sense. Others, like yugoloths and slaadi (and, well, F------ Strahd), were just protected under standard work-for-hire copyright and were easily considered integral to the D&D IP and not allowed for open use. In the OGL version of the 5.1 SRD, all of these elements were specifically called out as Product Identity, identifying them as protected terms that were not part of the Open Gaming Content allowed for use. Creative Commons has similar carve-out language available, but the released version of the CC 5.1 SRD doesn't use it. These terms, along with whatever descriptions were attached, are now free to use under CC, even for commercial use. The use of the Creative Commons license here in general was pretty clearly meant as a bludgeon against Paizo and the ORC License, because there have been a minority hitting them with "well why not just use Creative Commons", and was more done out of cynical one-upsmanship than any real desire to make things more open and convenient for users and third party authors. But once again, it seems the current crop of lawyers and executives at WotC and Hasbro have no idea what's actually in their product, and just gave away terms for open use that had previously been the subjects of decades of intensely bitter legal battles. Now, it can't be Literally Strahd or Very Specifically An Illithid Mind Flayer, as those will still be protected expressions of the terms. But if you want Count Strahd von Zarovich, vampiric bartender, or a strange alien creature that flays minds and may involve tentacles and is called a "mind flayer", all you need do to cover yourself is include the CC attribution now. The terms are otherwise completely open for use when they weren't previously. So bravo, WotC. Full applause. Thank you for your service. Absolutely incredible work, lads Reply ↑ 117 ↓

Wizards of the Coast OGL 1.1 / Dungeons & Dragons Licensing Controversy
srd 5.1 system resource document 5.1 product identity beholder abloeth slaadi mind flayers yugoloth waterdeep baldur's gate owlbear sahuagin umber hulk yuan-ti strahd von zarovich

Oh dang

WE ARE LEAVING OGL 1.0A IN PLACE, AS IS. UNTOUCHED. WE ARE ALSO MAKING THE ENTIRE SRD 5.1 AVAILABLE UNDER A CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE. YOU CHOOSE WHICH YOU PREFER TO USE. DUNGEONS & DRAGONSⓇ
WE ARE LEAVING OGL 1.0A IN PLACE, AS IS. UNTOUCHED. WE ARE ALSO MAKING THE ENTIRE SRD 5.1 AVAILABLE UNDER A CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE. YOU CHOOSE WHICH YOU PREFER TO USE. DUNGEONS & DRAGONSⓇ

Wizards of the Coast OGL 1.1 / Dungeons & Dragons Licensing Controversy
creative commons ogl 1.0a srd 5.1

OGL

imgflip.com SLAMMING WOTC ON ALL SOCIAL MEDIA OVER THE OGL 1.0 FILLING OUT EVERY PAGE OF THE ONEDND SURVEY WITH "I WILL NOT BUY ANY MORE WOTC OR HASBRO PRODUCTS IF YOU REVOKE/UNAUTHORIZE THE OGL 1.0"
imgflip.com SLAMMING WOTC ON ALL SOCIAL MEDIA OVER THE OGL 1.0 FILLING OUT EVERY PAGE OF THE ONEDND SURVEY WITH "I WILL NOT BUY ANY MORE WOTC OR HASBRO PRODUCTS IF YOU REVOKE/UNAUTHORIZE THE OGL 1.0"

Wizards of the Coast OGL 1.1 / Dungeons & Dragons Licensing Controversy
ogl

Wizards of the Coast OGL 1.1 Gizmodo Tweet

linda codega ✔ @lincodega Follow Yesterday, I received the full text of the OGL 1.1 from a reputable source. The updated Open Gaming License is incredibly restrictive, demands community surveillance and, most importantly, renders the previous WotC OGL an unauthorized agreement. 109 EXCLUSIVE gizmodo.com Dungeons & Dragons' New License Tightens Its Grip on Compet... An exclusive look at Wizards of the Coast's new open gaming license shows efforts to curtail competitors and and tighten ... 10:26 AM Jan 5, 2023
linda codega ✔ @lincodega Follow Yesterday, I received the full text of the OGL 1.1 from a reputable source. The updated Open Gaming License is incredibly restrictive, demands community surveillance and, most importantly, renders the previous WotC OGL an unauthorized agreement. 109 EXCLUSIVE gizmodo.com Dungeons & Dragons' New License Tightens Its Grip on Compet... An exclusive look at Wizards of the Coast's new open gaming license shows efforts to curtail competitors and and tighten ... 10:26 AM Jan 5, 2023

Wizards of the Coast OGL 1.1 / Dungeons & Dragons Licensing Controversy
lincodega wizards of the coast ogl 1.1 dungeons & dragons dnd gizmodo

Be careful what you wish for

I wish 5e players would be willing to play games other than D&D OGL 1.1
I wish 5e players would be willing to play games other than D&D OGL 1.1

Wizards of the Coast OGL 1.1 / Dungeons & Dragons Licensing Controversy
d&d 5th edition ogl monkey's paw the simpsons

New original magic item

egendary(requires attun OGL Wondrous Item, Legendary(requires attunement) This slip of paper can be given to any friendly creature and they will happily accept it as a gift. Using an action, you can destroy the paper from any distance causing 25% of the current owner's gold and treasure to be teleported to you. This permanently ruins the friendship between you and the owner. ported to you. This pern ween you and the owner
egendary(requires attun OGL Wondrous Item, Legendary(requires attunement) This slip of paper can be given to any friendly creature and they will happily accept it as a gift. Using an action, you can destroy the paper from any distance causing 25% of the current owner's gold and treasure to be teleported to you. This permanently ruins the friendship between you and the owner. ported to you. This pern ween you and the owner

Wizards of the Coast OGL 1.1 / Dungeons & Dragons Licensing Controversy
ogl magic item wondrous item legendary homebrew evil betrayal

dnd

It's ok to use WotC's ideas without paying them They don't own anything except some proper nouns NND
It's ok to use WotC's ideas without paying them They don't own anything except some proper nouns NND

Wizards of the Coast OGL 1.1 / Dungeons & Dragons Licensing Controversy
dnd

Paizo (Pathfinder) Joins the Kicking

My response to Paizo helping combat the OGL 1.1
My response to Paizo helping combat the OGL 1.1

Wizards of the Coast OGL 1.1 / Dungeons & Dragons Licensing Controversy
abbacchio joins the kicking jojo's bizarre adventure paizo pathfinder open rpg creative license (orc)

its not truly a leak when they were forceing companies to sign it before the public knew about it.

EVERYONE CANCELING DNDBEYOND SUBS DRAFTS DO NOT COME WITH CONTRACTS ATTACHED. IT WAS NEVER CALLED A DRAFT IN THEIR MEETINGS WITH CREATORS STOP LYING TO US DNDB TRYING TO CHANGE THE NARRATIVE BY SAYING IT WAS A DRAFT AND THEY WANTED FEEDBACK hartolo AD
EVERYONE CANCELING DNDBEYOND SUBS DRAFTS DO NOT COME WITH CONTRACTS ATTACHED. IT WAS NEVER CALLED A DRAFT IN THEIR MEETINGS WITH CREATORS STOP LYING TO US DNDB TRYING TO CHANGE THE NARRATIVE BY SAYING IT WAS A DRAFT AND THEY WANTED FEEDBACK hartolo AD

Wizards of the Coast OGL 1.1 / Dungeons & Dragons Licensing Controversy
the best men can be bro! not cool gillette psa guy blocks guy from girl

Paizo (makers of Pathfinder & Starfinder) is working on a colab to counter OGL 1.1

Their website looks to be flooded and can't handle this big news right now.
Their website looks to be flooded and can't handle this big news right now.

Wizards of the Coast OGL 1.1 / Dungeons & Dragons Licensing Controversy
paizo pathfinder colaboration

Wizards of the Coast OGL 1.1 Reaction

A Dislocating DM @ combat & #OpenDnD @mustangsart Follow seeing the new #OpenDnD #dungeonsanddragons news on the OGL like Our expectations for you were 12:20 PM . Jan 5, 2023 low HOLY F--- O
A Dislocating DM @ combat & #OpenDnD @mustangsart Follow seeing the new #OpenDnD #dungeonsanddragons news on the OGL like Our expectations for you were 12:20 PM . Jan 5, 2023 low HOLY F--- O

Wizards of the Coast OGL 1.1 / Dungeons & Dragons Licensing Controversy
our expectations were low but meme twitter tweet dnd wizards of the coast ogl 1.1 dungeons & dragons

Hasbro pretending it wasn't the fault

D&D community right now Wizards of the Coast Hasbro pretending it wasn't their choice
D&D community right now Wizards of the Coast Hasbro pretending it wasn't their choice

Wizards of the Coast OGL 1.1 / Dungeons & Dragons Licensing Controversy
woman yelling at a cat awkward look monkey

WotC Pretending the OGL is great step

OGL 1.1 Entire D&D community WOTC Pat on the back. Pat on the back come on. Me too cause ive been a a big part of it. WOTC WOTC oh boy I just got to say I'm proud of you all! This revolution has been a huge success! Yay us! and uh... its a tie WOTC Cant have a revolution without somebody to overthrow. So uh, you're welcome! WOTC
OGL 1.1 Entire D&D community WOTC Pat on the back. Pat on the back come on. Me too cause ive been a a big part of it. WOTC WOTC oh boy I just got to say I'm proud of you all! This revolution has been a huge success! Yay us! and uh... its a tie WOTC Cant have a revolution without somebody to overthrow. So uh, you're welcome! WOTC

Wizards of the Coast OGL 1.1 / Dungeons & Dragons Licensing Controversy
thor: ragnarok jeff goldblum

dnd

WOTC TOLKIEN ESTATE imgflip.com WOTC LOCKING DOWN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY BY RETROACTIVELY CHANGING THE OGL LOCKING DOWN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY BY RETROACTIVELY CHANGING THE OGL
WOTC TOLKIEN ESTATE imgflip.com WOTC LOCKING DOWN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY BY RETROACTIVELY CHANGING THE OGL LOCKING DOWN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY BY RETROACTIVELY CHANGING THE OGL

Wizards of the Coast OGL 1.1 / Dungeons & Dragons Licensing Controversy
dnd