Meme Encyclopedia

Popular right now

Want a Macaron meme and drawing.

Want a Macaron?

Owen Carry • 3 days ago

Italian Brainrot / AI Italian Animals image and meme examples.

Italian Brainrot Animals

Mateus Lima • 2 months ago

Deriod slang term and meme examples from tiktok.

Deriod (Slang)

Mateus Lima • 22 days ago

What Celebs Would Look Like Without Fame and Wealth Trend image examples.

What Celebs Look Like Without Fame

Mateus Lima • a day ago

Want a Taco meme.

Want a Taco?

Owen Carry • 2 days ago

Know Your Meme is the property of Literally Media ©2024 Literally Media. All Rights Reserved.

r/DnD OGL u/Baroness_Ayesha • 9h Ssssssssssssssssssssssso, uh, there are some. Terms. In the now-Creative Commons 5e System Resource Document. & Th twitter.com winke Elven Tower Cartography @ElvenTower On page 254 of the 5.1 SRD that is now Creative Commons, there is this mention of: ELVEN TOWER aboleths beholders mind flayers slaadi So, these names are not "Product Identity" anymore. They are CC-BY, in the wild, and irrevocable. Download the PDF! Aberrations are utterly alien beings. Many of them have innate magical abilities drawn from the creature's alien mind rather than the mystical forces of the world. The quintessential aberrations are aboleths, beholders, mind flayers, and slaadi. 3:46 PM 27 Jan 23 Baroness_Ayesha OP. 9h So, yeah, Wizards just threw up the existing 5.1 SRD with no editing on a Creative Commons license. And they forgot to include any language specifying protected terms, and didn't include any language defining specific terms as still protected as Product Identity under the OGL. This. Um. Opens up a lot of Terms. Elven Tower covers a lot of them in their thread, but it includes "beholder", "mind flayer", "slaadi", "yugoloth", "Waterdeep", "Baldur's Gate", "owlbear", "sahuagin" (as a specific spelling), "umber hulk", "yuan-ti", and. um. "Strahd von Zarovich". Moreover, beholders, mind flayers and slaadi are specifically called out as Aberrations, "utterly alien beings; [m]any of them have innate magical abilities drawn from the creature's alien mind rather than the mystical forces of the world", yugoloths are Fiends, Waterdeep and Baldur's Gate are places with a road between them, "owlbear" can't be much other than an owlbear, and Strahd is specifically described as a Count and a vampire. If people are a little lost, beholders and mind flayers have been absurdly protected parts of the Dungeons & Dragons IP for upwards of half a century, now. TSR famously reserved some of their nastiest legal fights for this part of the IP, down to fighting like an angry tiger over there mere names, asserting that both were completely protected in a tabletop sense. Others, like yugoloths and slaadi (and, well, F------ Strahd), were just protected under standard work-for-hire copyright and were easily considered integral to the D&D IP and not allowed for open use. In the OGL version of the 5.1 SRD, all of these elements were specifically called out as Product Identity, identifying them as protected terms that were not part of the Open Gaming Content allowed for use. Creative Commons has similar carve-out language available, but the released version of the CC 5.1 SRD doesn't use it. These terms, along with whatever descriptions were attached, are now free to use under CC, even for commercial use. The use of the Creative Commons license here in general was pretty clearly meant as a bludgeon against Paizo and the ORC License, because there have been a minority hitting them with "well why not just use Creative Commons", and was more done out of cynical one-upsmanship than any real desire to make things more open and convenient for users and third party authors. But once again, it seems the current crop of lawyers and executives at WotC and Hasbro have no idea what's actually in their product, and just gave away terms for open use that had previously been the subjects of decades of intensely bitter legal battles. Now, it can't be Literally Strahd or Very Specifically An Illithid Mind Flayer, as those will still be protected expressions of the terms. But if you want Count Strahd von Zarovich, vampiric bartender, or a strange alien creature that flays minds and may involve tentacles and is called a "mind flayer", all you need do to cover yourself is include the CC attribution now. The terms are otherwise completely open for use when they weren't previously. So bravo, WotC. Full applause. Thank you for your service. Absolutely incredible work, lads Reply ↑ 117 ↓

Share Pin Download More

srd 5.1 system resource document 5.1 product identity beholder abloeth slaadi mind flayers yugoloth waterdeep baldur's gate owlbear sahuagin umber hulk yuan-ti strahd von zarovich

Origin Entry: Wizards of the Coast OGL 1.1 / Dungeons & Dragons Licensing Controversy

File type: png

Resolution: (1080px x 6008px)

File size: 3.66 MB

Lards COAST OF THE амс We had a good thing going, you stupid son of a bitch! We had the community good will. We were the de-facto default choice for people going into fantasy ttrpgs. We had an OGL that had people agreeing to never challenge us on the ownership of game mechanics, which no court would ever give us. We had the 3rd parties publishing those supplements and adventures we did not deem profitable enough, causing new people to find D&D and buying the source books. You could've shut your mouth, created a GSL for 6e, create a convenient online play Ⓡ But no, you just had to blow it up. You and your greed. experience no third party vtt creator could ever hope to match. You could have just waited and see the people come to you in time, as you are the big name everyone knows and convenience is something people are willing to pay for. In five years you would have made all the money you needed by sitting on your ass and maintaining servers.

WE ARE LEAVING OGL 1.0A IN PLACE, AS IS. UNTOUCHED. WE ARE ALSO MAKING THE ENTIRE SRD 5.1 AVAILABLE UNDER A CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE. YOU CHOOSE WHICH YOU PREFER TO USE. DUNGEONS & DRAGONSⓇ

CRITICAL ROLE W OF Lards 1st party content Comunity paizo POLICE DO YOU HAVE ANY BETTER HOSTAGES?

View All 20 Images

More:

Mike tells it like it is

Lards COAST OF THE амс We had a good thing going, you stupid son of a bitch! We had the community good will. We were the de-facto default choice for people going into fantasy ttrpgs. We had an OGL that had people agreeing to never challenge us on the ownership of game mechanics, which no court would ever give us. We had the 3rd parties publishing those supplements and adventures we did not deem profitable enough, causing new people to find D&D and buying the source books. You could've shut your mouth, created a GSL for 6e, create a convenient online play Ⓡ But no, you just had to blow it up. You and your greed. experience no third party vtt creator could ever hope to match. You could have just waited and see the people come to you in time, as you are the big name everyone knows and convenience is something people are willing to pay for. In five years you would have made all the money you needed by sitting on your ass and maintaining servers.

Pin

Oh dang

WE ARE LEAVING OGL 1.0A IN PLACE, AS IS. UNTOUCHED. WE ARE ALSO MAKING THE ENTIRE SRD 5.1 AVAILABLE UNDER A CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE. YOU CHOOSE WHICH YOU PREFER TO USE. DUNGEONS & DRAGONSⓇ

Pin

soon the 3rd party will run out, then your left with nothing but... First Pary Content.

CRITICAL ROLE W OF Lards 1st party content Comunity paizo POLICE DO YOU HAVE ANY BETTER HOSTAGES?

Pin

WotC Pretending the OGL is great step

OGL 1.1 Entire D&D community WOTC Pat on the back. Pat on the back come on. Me too cause ive been a a big part of it. WOTC WOTC oh boy I just got to say I'm proud of you all! This revolution has been a huge success! Yay us! and uh... its a tie WOTC Cant have a revolution without somebody to overthrow. So uh, you're welcome! WOTC

Pin

Tried to pull a sneaky on a bunch of rules lawyers?

imgflip.com WOTC TRYING TO PULL A FAST ONE THROUGH OBSCURE LEGAL DOCUMENTS P4522A VENN A COMMUNITY THAT SPENDS AN OBSCENE AMOUNT OF TIME READING AND INTERPRETING LEGALITIES AND RULES

Pin

its not truly a leak when they were forceing companies to sign it before the public knew about it.

EVERYONE CANCELING DNDBEYOND SUBS DRAFTS DO NOT COME WITH CONTRACTS ATTACHED. IT WAS NEVER CALLED A DRAFT IN THEIR MEETINGS WITH CREATORS STOP LYING TO US DNDB TRYING TO CHANGE THE NARRATIVE BY SAYING IT WAS A DRAFT AND THEY WANTED FEEDBACK hartolo AD

Pin

Paizo (Pathfinder) Joins the Kicking

My response to Paizo helping combat the OGL 1.1

Pin

Paizo (makers of Pathfinder & Starfinder) is working on a colab to counter OGL 1.1

Their website looks to be flooded and can't handle this big news right now.

Pin

Wizards of the Coast OGL 1.1 Reaction

A Dislocating DM @ combat & #OpenDnD @mustangsart Follow seeing the new #OpenDnD #dungeonsanddragons news on the OGL like Our expectations for you were 12:20 PM . Jan 5, 2023 low HOLY F--- O

Pin

Wizards of the Coast OGL 1.1 Gizmodo Tweet

linda codega ✔ @lincodega Follow Yesterday, I received the full text of the OGL 1.1 from a reputable source. The updated Open Gaming License is incredibly restrictive, demands community surveillance and, most importantly, renders the previous WotC OGL an unauthorized agreement. 109 EXCLUSIVE gizmodo.com Dungeons & Dragons' New License Tightens Its Grip on Compet... An exclusive look at Wizards of the Coast's new open gaming license shows efforts to curtail competitors and and tighten ... 10:26 AM Jan 5, 2023

Pin

Be careful what you wish for

I wish 5e players would be willing to play games other than D&D OGL 1.1

Pin

Hasbro pretending it wasn't the fault

D&D community right now Wizards of the Coast Hasbro pretending it wasn't their choice

Pin

+2

Wizards of the Coast OGL 1.1 / Dungeons & Dragons Licensing Controversy - Backpedaled so hard they tripped and lost their marbles

PROTIP: Press the ← and → keys to navigate the gallery, 'g' to view the gallery, or 'r' to view a random image.

r/DnD OGL u/Baroness_Ayesha • 9h Ssssssssssssssssssssssso, uh, there are some. Terms. In the now-Creative Commons 5e System Resource Document. & Th twitter.com winke Elven Tower Cartography @ElvenTower On page 254 of the 5.1 SRD that is now Creative Commons, there is this mention of: ELVEN TOWER aboleths beholders mind flayers slaadi So, these names are not "Product Identity" anymore. They are CC-BY, in the wild, and irrevocable. Download the PDF! Aberrations are utterly alien beings. Many of them have innate magical abilities drawn from the creature's alien mind rather than the mystical forces of the world. The quintessential aberrations are aboleths, beholders, mind flayers, and slaadi. 3:46 PM 27 Jan 23 Baroness_Ayesha OP. 9h So, yeah, Wizards just threw up the existing 5.1 SRD with no editing on a Creative Commons license. And they forgot to include any language specifying protected terms, and didn't include any language defining specific terms as still protected as Product Identity under the OGL. This. Um. Opens up a lot of Terms. Elven Tower covers a lot of them in their thread, but it includes "beholder", "mind flayer", "slaadi", "yugoloth", "Waterdeep", "Baldur's Gate", "owlbear", "sahuagin" (as a specific spelling), "umber hulk", "yuan-ti", and. um. "Strahd von Zarovich". Moreover, beholders, mind flayers and slaadi are specifically called out as Aberrations, "utterly alien beings; [m]any of them have innate magical abilities drawn from the creature's alien mind rather than the mystical forces of the world", yugoloths are Fiends, Waterdeep and Baldur's Gate are places with a road between them, "owlbear" can't be much other than an owlbear, and Strahd is specifically described as a Count and a vampire. If people are a little lost, beholders and mind flayers have been absurdly protected parts of the Dungeons & Dragons IP for upwards of half a century, now. TSR famously reserved some of their nastiest legal fights for this part of the IP, down to fighting like an angry tiger over there mere names, asserting that both were completely protected in a tabletop sense. Others, like yugoloths and slaadi (and, well, F------ Strahd), were just protected under standard work-for-hire copyright and were easily considered integral to the D&D IP and not allowed for open use. In the OGL version of the 5.1 SRD, all of these elements were specifically called out as Product Identity, identifying them as protected terms that were not part of the Open Gaming Content allowed for use. Creative Commons has similar carve-out language available, but the released version of the CC 5.1 SRD doesn't use it. These terms, along with whatever descriptions were attached, are now free to use under CC, even for commercial use. The use of the Creative Commons license here in general was pretty clearly meant as a bludgeon against Paizo and the ORC License, because there have been a minority hitting them with "well why not just use Creative Commons", and was more done out of cynical one-upsmanship than any real desire to make things more open and convenient for users and third party authors. But once again, it seems the current crop of lawyers and executives at WotC and Hasbro have no idea what's actually in their product, and just gave away terms for open use that had previously been the subjects of decades of intensely bitter legal battles. Now, it can't be Literally Strahd or Very Specifically An Illithid Mind Flayer, as those will still be protected expressions of the terms. But if you want Count Strahd von Zarovich, vampiric bartender, or a strange alien creature that flays minds and may involve tentacles and is called a "mind flayer", all you need do to cover yourself is include the CC attribution now. The terms are otherwise completely open for use when they weren't previously. So bravo, WotC. Full applause. Thank you for your service. Absolutely incredible work, lads Reply ↑ 117 ↓

View Gallery Random Image

+ Add a Comment

Comments (0)

There are no comments currently available.

Display Comments

Encyclopedia	Media	Editorials	More
Cultures Events People Sites Subcultures Submit	Episodes Images Images Trending Images Templates Upload an Image Videos Videos Trending Upload a Video	News Explainers Collections Interviews In the Media White Papers Behind the Scenes Meme Review Poll Meme Insider Insights	Meme Insider Magazine Meme Store Forums Our Story Staff Contact Credits Site Rules Guidelines and Policies The Style Guide

Legal Information: Know Your Meme ® is a trademark of Literally Media Ltd . By using this site, you are agreeing by the site's terms of use and privacy policy and DMCA policy .

© 2007-2025 Literally Media Ltd.

KYM instagram

KYM tiktok

KYM youtube

KYM discord

KYM discord

Legal Information: Know Your Meme ® is a trademark of Literally Media Ltd . By using this site, you are agreeing by the site's terms of use and privacy policy and DMCA policy .

© 2007-2025 Literally Media Ltd.