FunnyJunk - Images

Sorted By:

We Shall Prevale

One day on funnyjunk i saw this jhelp (09/01/2012) stickied PMG #18850 13 and above users are able to post picture nt. Please don't post bug report for this Dont you get it? Admin is opressing us low level junkers like how the great nazi's opressed the jew's and other untermensch, soon they wont let us post pictures untill users reach level 10 - then they'll only let users who are over level 15 roll then they'll bann all underusers all together how can a low level user get high up in the commenting world so we must spam and riot and fight to keep equality in funnyjunk! we will spam the commenting page untill we get our wav! we shall spam admin and give it our message "We Shall prevale!" and fellow underusers shall thumb up each others comments to get other underuser's the privilledge to have a higher rank in this monstrocity that they call a site! I am Bluecatmando. And I see a whole army of level 0-2 funnyjunkers , here in defiance of Admin! You have come to fight as free men. And free man you are! What will you do without freedom? Will you fight? Fight and you may be removed. Run and you will comment at least awhile. And fapping in your bed many years from now, would you be willing to trade all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance, to come back here as young Funnyjunkers and tell Admin that they may take our accounts but they will never take our freedom to post as anon's! So even it we do get remove my fellow brothers and sisters remember We Shall Prevale As users and as Anon we will fight and we will be Victorious

One day on funnyjunk i saw this jhelp (09/01/2012) stickied PMG #18850 13 and above users are able to post picture nt. Please don't post bug report for this Dont you get it? Admin is opressing us low level junkers like how the great nazi's opressed the jew's and other untermensch, soon they wont let us post pictures untill users reach level 10 - then they'll only let users who are over level 15 roll then they'll bann all underusers all together how can a low level user get high up in the commenting world so we must spam and riot and fight to keep equality in funnyjunk! we will spam the commenting page untill we get our wav! we shall spam admin and give it our message "We Shall prevale!" and fellow underusers shall thumb up each others comments to get other underuser's the privilledge to have a higher rank in this monstrocity that they call a site! I am Bluecatmando. And I see a whole army of level 0-2 funnyjunkers , here in defiance of Admin! You have come to fight as free men. And free man you are! What will you do without freedom? Will you fight? Fight and you may be removed. Run and you will comment at least awhile. And fapping in your bed many years from now, would you be willing to trade all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance, to come back here as young Funnyjunkers and tell Admin that they may take our accounts but they will never take our freedom to post as anon's! So even it we do get remove my fellow brothers and sisters remember We Shall Prevale As users and as Anon we will fight and we will be Victorious

funnyjunk users admin fj we shall prevale

WHY WONT YOU LOVE ME FI

WHY WONT YOU LOVE ME FI

Stages of an Average FunnyJunk Career First Month OH MY GOD! I just love this website! l'm so popular and every- body loves me! I should try harder to make these users laugh and junk Fourth Month This user named pinkpimple and his friends seem to argue with everything I post. They make me look like a fool. I'll just ignore them. Don't want the other users here to think I'm rude Seventh Month WHAT THE HELL!! EVERYONE IS THUMBING DOWN EVERYTHING I POST! THIS IS PREPOSTEROUS! AM INOT ALLOWED TO SHARE MY OPINION?1?! I'VE HAD IT WITH THESE PEOPLE!! I'M DONE WITH BEING SILENT!! I TOO WILL CRITICIZE EVERYBODY AND EVERYTHING HENCEFORTH!! Nine Month Onwards HI FUNNYJUNKERS!! LOOK WHAT I'VE GOT FOR YOU!! DON'T WANT IT?!?! WELL YOU'RE GOING TO GET IT ANYWAY!! EVERYBODY WILL!! HAHAHAHAHA...uhhh. FI

Stages of an Average FunnyJunk Career First Month OH MY GOD! I just love this website! l'm so popular and every- body loves me! I should try harder to make these users laugh and junk Fourth Month This user named pinkpimple and his friends seem to argue with everything I post. They make me look like a fool. I'll just ignore them. Don't want the other users here to think I'm rude Seventh Month WHAT THE HELL!! EVERYONE IS THUMBING DOWN EVERYTHING I POST! THIS IS PREPOSTEROUS! AM INOT ALLOWED TO SHARE MY OPINION?1?! I'VE HAD IT WITH THESE PEOPLE!! I'M DONE WITH BEING SILENT!! I TOO WILL CRITICIZE EVERYBODY AND EVERYTHING HENCEFORTH!! Nine Month Onwards HI FUNNYJUNKERS!! LOOK WHAT I'VE GOT FOR YOU!! DON'T WANT IT?!?! WELL YOU'RE GOING TO GET IT ANYWAY!! EVERYBODY WILL!! HAHAHAHAHA...uhhh. FI

aMc

aMc

Winning Christmas Carol

On my fifth day of rehab my true love gave to me Five lines of Coke Four awesome Eccies Three caps of Acid Two bags of Shrooms And a Skunk plant trimmed like a Bonsai Tree

On my fifth day of rehab my true love gave to me Five lines of Coke Four awesome Eccies Three caps of Acid Two bags of Shrooms And a Skunk plant trimmed like a Bonsai Tree

The Oatmeal has won the internet.

Matthew Inman@Oatmeal As promised, here's the photo of $211,223 in cash we raised for charity is.gd/1kwawj Collapse ← Reply t Retweeted ★Favorited 2,697 RETWEETS 661 FAVORITES 7:14 PM-9 Jul 12 via TweetDeck - Details

Matthew Inman@Oatmeal As promised, here's the photo of $211,223 in cash we raised for charity is.gd/1kwawj Collapse ← Reply t Retweeted ★Favorited 2,697 RETWEETS 661 FAVORITES 7:14 PM-9 Jul 12 via TweetDeck - Details

is internet the of final boss theoatmeal the oatmeal oatmeal beaten

Hey Boys, Did You Know...

Boys, did you know... That üh Your underwearGoes inside eofyour .Vlad1k.com

Boys, did you know... That üh Your underwearGoes inside eofyour .Vlad1k.com

catchphrase image macro you pants of exploitable that know your tumblr wear uhm feminism did goes inside under slut shaming entry of june 2012 vlad bondarenko www.vlad1k.com hey boys a.

ANON

ANON

3. Im going to mail you that photo, along with this drawing of your mom seducing a Kodiak bear

3. Im going to mail you that photo, along with this drawing of your mom seducing a Kodiak bear

Charles Carreon, Attorney at Law ONLINE MEDIA LAW Telephone Fax: June 2, 2012 Via Personal Service Matthew Inman Seattle, WA Dear Mr. Inman: I represent FunnyJunk, LLC. ("Funnyjunk"), a competitor of TheOatmeal.com in the field of online humor. I write to demand immediate removal of false statements about Funnyjunk from TheOatmeal.com, where you posted the following: Here's how FunnyJunk.com's business operates: 1. Gather funny pictures from around the internet 2. Host them on FunnyJunk.com 3. Slather them in advertising 4. If someone claims copyright infringement, throw your hands up in the air and exclaim "It was our users who uploaded your photos! We had nothing to do with it! We're innocent! Cash six figure advertising checks from other artist's stolen material 5. (Attachment A.) This is a false accusation of willful copyright infringement. FunnyJunk hosts only user-uploaded content pursuant to a rigorous DMCA policy that includes termination as a sanction for repeat abusers. FunnyJunk takes immediate action on any DMCA notice it receives in the proper form. In addition to the above- quoted false statements, on the same webpage you say that FunnyJunk has "practically stolen my entire website and mirrored it on FunnyJunk." You illustrate this present-tense statement with a screencap that purports to be current, but in fact was taken long ago, and grossly misrepresents the current state of affairs. (Attachment A.) Below this barrage of false statements, you posted a series of hyperlinks with this false statement as an introduction: "There's still hundreds of C&H comics hosted on FunnyJunk.com, as well as thousands from other artists..." Clicking on those hyperlinks turns up a null result in every case. (Attachment B.) However, that string of apparently useless hyperlinks put the phrase "funnyjunk" into the source code for the page twenty-eight (28) times (Attachment C), thus causing TheOatmeal.com to come up whenever "funnyjunk" is punched into the Google search engine. (Attachment D.) The Alexa stats for TheOatmeal.com are equally revealing, showing that the "Query Popularity" of "funnyjunk" is 42, nearly as popular as "oatmeal" itself, at 44 (Attachment E.) Given your background in SEO, you clearly intended this result. (Attachment F.) Your false statements, recorded in Attachment A, accuse FunnyJunk of engaging in willful copyright infringement for commercial advantage and financial gain, a federal felony. 17 US.C. § 506(a)(1)(A) and 18 U.S.C. § 2319(b). Your false statements injured FunnyJunk in its trade, business or profession. Your false statements were made with the explicit, malicious purpose you announced in the source code of the webpage, screencaptured on page 2 of Attachment B, and reproduced below By maliciously accusing FunnyJunk of criminal conduct to injure its business reputation, you exposed yourself to a lawsuit for defamation per se, in which damages are presumed. Albert v. Loksen, 239 F.3d 256, 272 (2nd Cir. 2001) By publishing false statements about FunnyJunk to gain publicity, popularize TheOatmeal.com, and injure FunnyJunk's reputation in the marketplace, you engaged in false advertising in violation of the Lanham Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. 51125(a)(B). FunnyJunk is therefore entitled to file a federal lawsuit against you for injunctive relief to compel the removal of the false statements from TheOatmeal.com. McNeil-PCC, Inc. o. Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co., 938 F.2d 1544, 1549 (2nd Cir., 1991). FunnyJunk may also sue for enhanced damages and recovery of its attorneys fees under 15 US.C. §11 17·U-Haul Int. v. Jartran, Inc., 793 F.2d 1034, 1042-1043 (9th Cir. 1986) (upholding award of double damages and attorneys fees under Sec. 1117 to unregistered markholder in action for false advertising). In a Lanham Act lawsuit, both judge and jury will presume that your false statements deceived Internet users. Southland Sod Farms v. Stover Seed Co., 108 F.3d 1134, 1146 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, demand is hereby made upon you to perform the following remedial acts on or before June 12, 2012: Remove all mention of FunnyJunk and FunnyJunk.com from TheOatmeal.com from your website and any other website over which you have control. Deliver to me a check in the amount of $20,000 payabie to the order of Funnyjunk, LLC. I look forward to your prompt response Very truly yours, Charles Carreon 2012.06.02 17:13:44-07'00 Charles Carreon

Charles Carreon, Attorney at Law ONLINE MEDIA LAW Telephone Fax: June 2, 2012 Via Personal Service Matthew Inman Seattle, WA Dear Mr. Inman: I represent FunnyJunk, LLC. ("Funnyjunk"), a competitor of TheOatmeal.com in the field of online humor. I write to demand immediate removal of false statements about Funnyjunk from TheOatmeal.com, where you posted the following: Here's how FunnyJunk.com's business operates: 1. Gather funny pictures from around the internet 2. Host them on FunnyJunk.com 3. Slather them in advertising 4. If someone claims copyright infringement, throw your hands up in the air and exclaim "It was our users who uploaded your photos! We had nothing to do with it! We're innocent! Cash six figure advertising checks from other artist's stolen material 5. (Attachment A.) This is a false accusation of willful copyright infringement. FunnyJunk hosts only user-uploaded content pursuant to a rigorous DMCA policy that includes termination as a sanction for repeat abusers. FunnyJunk takes immediate action on any DMCA notice it receives in the proper form. In addition to the above- quoted false statements, on the same webpage you say that FunnyJunk has "practically stolen my entire website and mirrored it on FunnyJunk." You illustrate this present-tense statement with a screencap that purports to be current, but in fact was taken long ago, and grossly misrepresents the current state of affairs. (Attachment A.) Below this barrage of false statements, you posted a series of hyperlinks with this false statement as an introduction: "There's still hundreds of C&H comics hosted on FunnyJunk.com, as well as thousands from other artists..." Clicking on those hyperlinks turns up a null result in every case. (Attachment B.) However, that string of apparently useless hyperlinks put the phrase "funnyjunk" into the source code for the page twenty-eight (28) times (Attachment C), thus causing TheOatmeal.com to come up whenever "funnyjunk" is punched into the Google search engine. (Attachment D.) The Alexa stats for TheOatmeal.com are equally revealing, showing that the "Query Popularity" of "funnyjunk" is 42, nearly as popular as "oatmeal" itself, at 44 (Attachment E.) Given your background in SEO, you clearly intended this result. (Attachment F.) Your false statements, recorded in Attachment A, accuse FunnyJunk of engaging in willful copyright infringement for commercial advantage and financial gain, a federal felony. 17 US.C. § 506(a)(1)(A) and 18 U.S.C. § 2319(b). Your false statements injured FunnyJunk in its trade, business or profession. Your false statements were made with the explicit, malicious purpose you announced in the source code of the webpage, screencaptured on page 2 of Attachment B, and reproduced below By maliciously accusing FunnyJunk of criminal conduct to injure its business reputation, you exposed yourself to a lawsuit for defamation per se, in which damages are presumed. Albert v. Loksen, 239 F.3d 256, 272 (2nd Cir. 2001) By publishing false statements about FunnyJunk to gain publicity, popularize TheOatmeal.com, and injure FunnyJunk's reputation in the marketplace, you engaged in false advertising in violation of the Lanham Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. 51125(a)(B). FunnyJunk is therefore entitled to file a federal lawsuit against you for injunctive relief to compel the removal of the false statements from TheOatmeal.com. McNeil-PCC, Inc. o. Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co., 938 F.2d 1544, 1549 (2nd Cir., 1991). FunnyJunk may also sue for enhanced damages and recovery of its attorneys fees under 15 US.C. §11 17·U-Haul Int. v. Jartran, Inc., 793 F.2d 1034, 1042-1043 (9th Cir. 1986) (upholding award of double damages and attorneys fees under Sec. 1117 to unregistered markholder in action for false advertising). In a Lanham Act lawsuit, both judge and jury will presume that your false statements deceived Internet users. Southland Sod Farms v. Stover Seed Co., 108 F.3d 1134, 1146 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, demand is hereby made upon you to perform the following remedial acts on or before June 12, 2012: Remove all mention of FunnyJunk and FunnyJunk.com from TheOatmeal.com from your website and any other website over which you have control. Deliver to me a check in the amount of $20,000 payabie to the order of Funnyjunk, LLC. I look forward to your prompt response Very truly yours, Charles Carreon 2012.06.02 17:13:44-07'00 Charles Carreon

Charles Carreon. Attorney at Law ONLINE MEDIA LAW Telephone: Fax: June 2, 2012 Via Personal Service Matthew Inmarn Seattle, WA Re: FunnyJunk Dear Mr. Inman I represent FunnyJunk, LLC. "Funnyjunk"), a competitor of TheOatmeal.com in the field of online humor. I write to demand immediate removal of false statements about Funnyjunk from TheOatmeal.com, where you posted the following: Here's how FunnyJunk.com's business operates 1. Gather funny pictures from around the internet 2. Host them on FunnyJunk.com 3. Slather them in advertising 4. If someone claims copyright infringement, throw your hands up in the air and exclaim It was our users who uploaded your photos! We had nothing to do with it! We're innocen!" 5. Cash six figure advertising checks from other artist's stolen material (Attachment A.) This is a false accusation of willful copyright infringement. Funnyjunk hosts only user-uploaded content pursuant to a rigorous DMCA policy that includes termination as a sanction for repeat abusers. FunnyJunk takes immediate action on any DMCA notice it receives in the proper form. In addition to the above- quoted false statements, on the same webpage you say that FunnyJunk has "practically stolen my entire website and mirrored it on FunnvTunk." You illustrate this present-tense statement with a screencap that purports to be current, but in fact was taken long ago, and grossly misrepresents the current state of affairs. (Attachment A.) OH REALLy NOW What an adorable little fiction Here's a list of HUNDREDS of my comics that are STILL hosted on FunnuJunk.com (and have been for years)

Charles Carreon. Attorney at Law ONLINE MEDIA LAW Telephone: Fax: June 2, 2012 Via Personal Service Matthew Inmarn Seattle, WA Re: FunnyJunk Dear Mr. Inman I represent FunnyJunk, LLC. "Funnyjunk"), a competitor of TheOatmeal.com in the field of online humor. I write to demand immediate removal of false statements about Funnyjunk from TheOatmeal.com, where you posted the following: Here's how FunnyJunk.com's business operates 1. Gather funny pictures from around the internet 2. Host them on FunnyJunk.com 3. Slather them in advertising 4. If someone claims copyright infringement, throw your hands up in the air and exclaim It was our users who uploaded your photos! We had nothing to do with it! We're innocen!" 5. Cash six figure advertising checks from other artist's stolen material (Attachment A.) This is a false accusation of willful copyright infringement. Funnyjunk hosts only user-uploaded content pursuant to a rigorous DMCA policy that includes termination as a sanction for repeat abusers. FunnyJunk takes immediate action on any DMCA notice it receives in the proper form. In addition to the above- quoted false statements, on the same webpage you say that FunnyJunk has "practically stolen my entire website and mirrored it on FunnvTunk." You illustrate this present-tense statement with a screencap that purports to be current, but in fact was taken long ago, and grossly misrepresents the current state of affairs. (Attachment A.) OH REALLy NOW What an adorable little fiction Here's a list of HUNDREDS of my comics that are STILL hosted on FunnuJunk.com (and have been for years)

theoatmeal webcomic stolen content copyright infringement legal document online media law

Broke

Dear FunnuJunk users, Jour mass of comments on my Facebook page nas made me realize a few things- i. You don't know the difference between suing someone and sending them a cease and desist a. You think that calling someone a f----- is the same as arguing Dylan TheFlash Kraenzlein F----- DONT SUE FUNNYJUNK! 10 minutes ago Like Comment 顱: Sam Kean yo f--. we are more than you think. we are many. we are strong. we are witty, funny, and awesome. we are FJ and we will not take your s---. 16 minutes ago Like Comment Aric Travieso why dont you take up your female highschool drama s--- with f----- (previously reddit) tumblr and etc before you give the good sites like FunnyJunk flak. 3 You honestly believe that the guy who owns FunnyJunk (a website which gets MILLIONS of unique Visitors every month) is broke and "barely making it' 4. When puberty started last year it was a really tough, confusing time for you

Dear FunnuJunk users, Jour mass of comments on my Facebook page nas made me realize a few things- i. You don't know the difference between suing someone and sending them a cease and desist a. You think that calling someone a f----- is the same as arguing Dylan TheFlash Kraenzlein F----- DONT SUE FUNNYJUNK! 10 minutes ago Like Comment 顱: Sam Kean yo f--. we are more than you think. we are many. we are strong. we are witty, funny, and awesome. we are FJ and we will not take your s---. 16 minutes ago Like Comment Aric Travieso why dont you take up your female highschool drama s--- with f----- (previously reddit) tumblr and etc before you give the good sites like FunnyJunk flak. 3 You honestly believe that the guy who owns FunnyJunk (a website which gets MILLIONS of unique Visitors every month) is broke and "barely making it' 4. When puberty started last year it was a really tough, confusing time for you

facebook burn cease and desist

The Oatmeal wants to sue funnyjunk and FunnyJunk to me The Oatmeal wants to sue funnyjunk and shut it down! He thinks were nothing more than dirty content thieves. That FJ prev next» 6:48am doesn't have any real members, it's just a bot that steals content Go here Contact Oatmealanyway you can! here: http:litheoatmeal.com/pages/contact 1+ and here: http:/www.facebook comtheoatmeal Show him these links! delete

The Oatmeal wants to sue funnyjunk and FunnyJunk to me The Oatmeal wants to sue funnyjunk and shut it down! He thinks were nothing more than dirty content thieves. That FJ prev next» 6:48am doesn't have any real members, it's just a bot that steals content Go here Contact Oatmealanyway you can! here: http:litheoatmeal.com/pages/contact 1+ and here: http:/www.facebook comtheoatmeal Show him these links! delete

funnyjunk

funnyjunk

Repost Comin' Thru!

funnyjunk red vs blue repost original content tex tucker simmons donut grif

FRON- PAGE

FRON- PAGE

repost front page horse