Milo Yiannopoulos - Images

Sorted By:

Editor's comments

Comment [A191): DELETE UGH
Comment [A191): DELETE UGH

Milo Yiannopoulos
milo yiannopoulos editor's comments dangerous delet this

Editor's comments

Comment IA474) NO IT HAS NOT
Comment IA474) NO IT HAS NOT

Milo Yiannopoulos
milo yiannopoulos editor's comments dangerous

Editor's comments

- comment TA393E e eleaves re a耗waste analogiez out of this chapter
- comment TA393E e eleaves re a耗waste analogiez out of this chapter

Milo Yiannopoulos
milo yiannopoulos editor's comments dangerous excrement

Editor's comments

Comment [A205], Stick with virgios FeivertSiisunne essary,'…
Comment [A205], Stick with virgios FeivertSiisunne essary,'…

Milo Yiannopoulos
milo yiannopoulos editor's comments virgin pervert dangerous

Editor's comments

Comment [A2721. Absurd name calling
Comment [A2721. Absurd name calling

Milo Yiannopoulos
milo yiannopoulos editor's comments dangerous name-calling

Editor's comments

comment 1A4581 This would never happen -fcomment[A459]: Thisisnottruemea Comment 1a460], Tis is not true either
comment 1A4581 This would never happen -fcomment[A459]: Thisisnottruemea Comment 1a460], Tis is not true either

Milo Yiannopoulos
milo yiannopoulos editor's comments dangerous lies

Editor's comments

1 Comment [A416]: Delete entire Chapter The book is better overall without rittino these to people notes in the other chapters and better overall by delcting this one
1 Comment [A416]: Delete entire Chapter The book is better overall without rittino these to people notes in the other chapters and better overall by delcting this one

Milo Yiannopoulos
milo yiannopoulos editor's comments dangerous ugly

Dangerous is basically unreadable. I saw a thread where the OP focused solely on the editorial comments and I see why.

Dangerous is basically unreadable. I saw a thread where the OP focused solely on the editorial comments and see why. One of the two is clearly wrong, but their confusion-butlbust is so glorious that I almost don't want to correct either one of them. That is trolling them In my trollery, I am surpassed only by one man, or, rather one God-Emperor: Donald Trump, a man who essentially trolled his way to the presidency. Like me, Daddy, as I like to call him (in itself another troll, only went after deserving targets: the media, Hillary and Bill Clinton, political correctness A master showman, Donald J. Trump can command the media's attention despite the fact that most of their leading lights despise him. Forcing people who hate you and everything you stand for to point cameras at you for over a year? That's a level of trolling I can only hope to achieve one day
Dangerous is basically unreadable. I saw a thread where the OP focused solely on the editorial comments and see why. One of the two is clearly wrong, but their confusion-butlbust is so glorious that I almost don't want to correct either one of them. That is trolling them In my trollery, I am surpassed only by one man, or, rather one God-Emperor: Donald Trump, a man who essentially trolled his way to the presidency. Like me, Daddy, as I like to call him (in itself another troll, only went after deserving targets: the media, Hillary and Bill Clinton, political correctness A master showman, Donald J. Trump can command the media's attention despite the fact that most of their leading lights despise him. Forcing people who hate you and everything you stand for to point cameras at you for over a year? That's a level of trolling I can only hope to achieve one day

Milo Yiannopoulos
dangerous books @surfbordt

here's how a conservative editor seeks to whitewash Milo into something more acceptable and profitable

here's how a conservative editor seeks to whitewash Milo into something more acceptable and profitable Comment tA1]: Add a short and serious statement here that sets out why you do what you do without trolling without bombaSt without narme caling, and without ego This will make for a stronger opening than playing to your core audience Make the pont that in each and every chapter of this book what you intend to show is the stifling of soeech Acknow edge that you use bombast and over the top messaging n an attempt to break the strictures on free expression in the same way that comedians ike Lernny Bruce once did And make the point that liberals used to defend free speech out that the snoe the aovent of political correctness the iliberal left has become the oppressive censors in American society
here's how a conservative editor seeks to whitewash Milo into something more acceptable and profitable Comment tA1]: Add a short and serious statement here that sets out why you do what you do without trolling without bombaSt without narme caling, and without ego This will make for a stronger opening than playing to your core audience Make the pont that in each and every chapter of this book what you intend to show is the stifling of soeech Acknow edge that you use bombast and over the top messaging n an attempt to break the strictures on free expression in the same way that comedians ike Lernny Bruce once did And make the point that liberals used to defend free speech out that the snoe the aovent of political correctness the iliberal left has become the oppressive censors in American society

Milo Yiannopoulos
whitewash @suftbordt

here's the PDF link to Milo's manuscript with commentary from the editor. An interesting insight into an attempt to launder fascist views into mainstream consumption

here's the PDF link to Milo's manuscript with commentary from the editor. An interesting insight into an attempt to launder fascist views into mainstream consumption iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fbem/Documen tD ?amp=1
here's the PDF link to Milo's manuscript with commentary from the editor. An interesting insight into an attempt to launder fascist views into mainstream consumption iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fbem/Documen tD ?amp=1

Milo Yiannopoulos
@surfbordt bigotry

Will immediately start using “if you want to make a case for [fucking ridiculous thing], you’re going to have to employ a lot more intellectual rigor than you use here.” 🔥🔥🔥

Will immediately start using "if you want to make a case for [f------ ridiculous thing], you're going to have to employ a lot more intellectual rigor than you use here." Comment [A3131 This entire section is the most poorly thouoht out section i the book f yot want to make a case for gay mee going back into the closet and marrying women just to have children you te going to have to employ a lot more intelectua ngor than you use here Comment 4314] Thisjust doesnt any make sense hre Comment [A3151. Tnat does NOT nebessarilyfollow.
Will immediately start using "if you want to make a case for [f------ ridiculous thing], you're going to have to employ a lot more intellectual rigor than you use here." Comment [A3131 This entire section is the most poorly thouoht out section i the book f yot want to make a case for gay mee going back into the closet and marrying women just to have children you te going to have to employ a lot more intelectua ngor than you use here Comment 4314] Thisjust doesnt any make sense hre Comment [A3151. Tnat does NOT nebessarilyfollow.

Milo Yiannopoulos
@sarahmei editor

I didn’t read the manuscript. Just the comments. They’re...amazing. Even better than the excerpts in the filing. And a pretty good summary of the book I imagine.

l didn't read the manuscript. Just the comments. They're...amazing. Even better than the excerpts in the filing And a pretty good summary of the book l imaaine Comment [A164] No, t this at all Comment [A165]: Graf Comment [A166]: 1w mentally il Comment [411] Ctators neede e at abes Comment [A279]: Not a sertence Comment [A 280]: Le's loave-cuck, Q nem of it ,' , .| comment [A281): This whole paragrapn is e comment 14121 Delete ifrelevan supermluous ethnic joke Comment 14405sc anurtchangea in 0e in tis peticulaly chapter do NOT ligmen cur mesenge with huyar Thay srbly diminish Comment [A4081: Tisis not the ame or orurcther hhrk d---
l didn't read the manuscript. Just the comments. They're...amazing. Even better than the excerpts in the filing And a pretty good summary of the book l imaaine Comment [A164] No, t this at all Comment [A165]: Graf Comment [A166]: 1w mentally il Comment [411] Ctators neede e at abes Comment [A279]: Not a sertence Comment [A 280]: Le's loave-cuck, Q nem of it ,' , .| comment [A281): This whole paragrapn is e comment 14121 Delete ifrelevan supermluous ethnic joke Comment 14405sc anurtchangea in 0e in tis peticulaly chapter do NOT ligmen cur mesenge with huyar Thay srbly diminish Comment [A4081: Tisis not the ame or orurcther hhrk d---

Milo Yiannopoulos
@sarahmei edits books

I went to the New York county clerk’s website and found this filing. It includes the entire manuscript with allllllll the editor’s comments as exhibit B.

I went to the New York county clerk's website and found this filing. It includes the entire manuscript with alllIII the editor's comments as exhibit B Pinter @jasonpinter is section of Simon & Schuster's rebuttal to Milo's lawsuit over DANGEROUS.
I went to the New York county clerk's website and found this filing. It includes the entire manuscript with alllIII the editor's comments as exhibit B Pinter @jasonpinter is section of Simon & Schuster's rebuttal to Milo's lawsuit over DANGEROUS.

Milo Yiannopoulos
@sarahmei jason pinter publishing editor

This section of Simon & Schuster’s rebuttal to Milo’s lawsuit over DANGEROUS. 🤭

Jason Pinter @jasonpinter This section of Simon & Schuster's rebuttal to Milo's lawsuit over DANGEROUS E-mail"), summarizing the conversation he had with Plaintiff and his agent the day before in which he outlined his editorial concerns with the manuscript, including seven most critical overarching issues. He explained that these are the seven main issues that must be addressed in the revised manuscript, in addition to the edits and queries throughout." Ivers Aff. Ex. C. In particular, Ivers noted that the Why Establishment Gays Hate Me" chapter "needs a better central thesis than the notion that gay pcople should go back in thc closet" and the feminist chapter needed a "stronger argument against feminism than saying that they are ugly and sexless and have cats." Id Ivers made it clear that Plaintiffs first draft was not acceptable to the publisher: t goes without saying, that in addition to these seven points, given the level of revision being requested, we reserve the right of additional review and discussion of Ivers comments on the draft manuscript were even more detailed in identifying the substantial concerns the publisher had with the manuscript and spelling out what "revisions, changes or supplements" were needs to be a Preamble "On Freedom of Speech and Political Correctness" that would be a "short and serious statement here that sets out why you do what you do, without trolling, without hombast, without name-calling, and without ego." Id at 3. See also, eg, id. at 13 ("avoid gratuitous insults"), 17 (Unclear, unfunny, delete), 20 (This entire paragraph is just repeating Fake News.", 34 (MAJOR POINT. You will have to address the charge of racism clearly and with greater depth, 62 (when you discuss Leslie Jones in this book - AND YOU MUST), 107 ("This section feels phenomenally petty), 132 (This whole section has to go Too much ego"), 198 ("This entire argument is ridiculous", 146 (This entire section is the most poorly thought out section in the book."), 206 (This... doesn't make sense or pass intellectual muster. It's just trolling on an issue that many readers.might take scriously". As Ivers January 14 E-mail and manuscript comments demonstrate, Ivers considered Plaintiff's first draft to be, at best, a superficial work full of incendiary jokes with no coherent or sophisticated analysis of political issues of free speech. Ivers Aff. 11 15-16. Plainly, it was not acceptable to Simon & Schuster for publication. Id required. Ivers Aff. Ex. B. At the outset, he observed that there Under the Agreement, the determination as to whether the manuscript was "editorially acceptable" must be made "within 45 days." Agrm. 3(a) Given the crash schedule, Ivers made that determination and provided the editorial request in writing for revisions and changes within less than two weeks of receipt of the manuscript. 4819.9829.7688.12 3901014000688 11 of 31 INDEX NO. 65 C. NO. 62 RECEIVED NYScEF. 1:
Jason Pinter @jasonpinter This section of Simon & Schuster's rebuttal to Milo's lawsuit over DANGEROUS E-mail"), summarizing the conversation he had with Plaintiff and his agent the day before in which he outlined his editorial concerns with the manuscript, including seven most critical overarching issues. He explained that these are the seven main issues that must be addressed in the revised manuscript, in addition to the edits and queries throughout." Ivers Aff. Ex. C. In particular, Ivers noted that the Why Establishment Gays Hate Me" chapter "needs a better central thesis than the notion that gay pcople should go back in thc closet" and the feminist chapter needed a "stronger argument against feminism than saying that they are ugly and sexless and have cats." Id Ivers made it clear that Plaintiffs first draft was not acceptable to the publisher: t goes without saying, that in addition to these seven points, given the level of revision being requested, we reserve the right of additional review and discussion of Ivers comments on the draft manuscript were even more detailed in identifying the substantial concerns the publisher had with the manuscript and spelling out what "revisions, changes or supplements" were needs to be a Preamble "On Freedom of Speech and Political Correctness" that would be a "short and serious statement here that sets out why you do what you do, without trolling, without hombast, without name-calling, and without ego." Id at 3. See also, eg, id. at 13 ("avoid gratuitous insults"), 17 (Unclear, unfunny, delete), 20 (This entire paragraph is just repeating Fake News.", 34 (MAJOR POINT. You will have to address the charge of racism clearly and with greater depth, 62 (when you discuss Leslie Jones in this book - AND YOU MUST), 107 ("This section feels phenomenally petty), 132 (This whole section has to go Too much ego"), 198 ("This entire argument is ridiculous", 146 (This entire section is the most poorly thought out section in the book."), 206 (This... doesn't make sense or pass intellectual muster. It's just trolling on an issue that many readers.might take scriously". As Ivers January 14 E-mail and manuscript comments demonstrate, Ivers considered Plaintiff's first draft to be, at best, a superficial work full of incendiary jokes with no coherent or sophisticated analysis of political issues of free speech. Ivers Aff. 11 15-16. Plainly, it was not acceptable to Simon & Schuster for publication. Id required. Ivers Aff. Ex. B. At the outset, he observed that there Under the Agreement, the determination as to whether the manuscript was "editorially acceptable" must be made "within 45 days." Agrm. 3(a) Given the crash schedule, Ivers made that determination and provided the editorial request in writing for revisions and changes within less than two weeks of receipt of the manuscript. 4819.9829.7688.12 3901014000688 11 of 31 INDEX NO. 65 C. NO. 62 RECEIVED NYScEF. 1:

Milo Yiannopoulos
@jasonpinter simon & schuster

Time travelling Milo

zztZZZT SPACE UP THERE Hello Billy. I am you from the future! I have traveled What amI going to be when I grow up? here using this time machine! SPACE P THERE Wow A p--------. SPACE P THERE In the future_ HA HA HA! Priceless Why're you Such an a------ Childhood trauma
zztZZZT SPACE UP THERE Hello Billy. I am you from the future! I have traveled What amI going to be when I grow up? here using this time machine! SPACE P THERE Wow A p--------. SPACE P THERE In the future_ HA HA HA! Priceless Why're you Such an a------ Childhood trauma

Milo Yiannopoulos
time travel mashed up comics

Milo's sugar-daddy Robert Mercer calls it quits

The press has also intimated that my politics marches in lockstep with Steve Bannon's. I have great respect for Mr. Bannon, and from time to time I do discuss politics with him. However, I make my own decisions with respect to whom I support politically. Those decisions do not always align with Mr. Bannon's. Without individuals thinking for themselves, society as a whole will struggle to distinguish the signal of truth from the correlated noise of conformity. I supported Milo Yiannopoulos in the hope and expectation that his expression of views contrary to the social mainstream and his spotlighting of the hypocrisy of those who would close down free speech in the name of political correctness would promote the type of open debate and freedom of thought that is being throttled on many American college campuses today. But in my opinion, actions of and statements by Mr. Yiannopoulos have caused pain and divisiveness undermining the open and productive discourse that I had hoped to facilitate. I was mistaken to have supported him, and for several weeks have been in the process of severing all ties with him For personal reasons, I have also decided to sell my stake in Breitbart News to my daughters.
The press has also intimated that my politics marches in lockstep with Steve Bannon's. I have great respect for Mr. Bannon, and from time to time I do discuss politics with him. However, I make my own decisions with respect to whom I support politically. Those decisions do not always align with Mr. Bannon's. Without individuals thinking for themselves, society as a whole will struggle to distinguish the signal of truth from the correlated noise of conformity. I supported Milo Yiannopoulos in the hope and expectation that his expression of views contrary to the social mainstream and his spotlighting of the hypocrisy of those who would close down free speech in the name of political correctness would promote the type of open debate and freedom of thought that is being throttled on many American college campuses today. But in my opinion, actions of and statements by Mr. Yiannopoulos have caused pain and divisiveness undermining the open and productive discourse that I had hoped to facilitate. I was mistaken to have supported him, and for several weeks have been in the process of severing all ties with him For personal reasons, I have also decided to sell my stake in Breitbart News to my daughters.

Milo Yiannopoulos
milo yiannopoulos robert mercer steve bannon rebekah mercer alt-right white supremacy neo-nazi breitbart renaissance technologies hedge fund

I can't believe anyone saw this guy as anything but

Milo Yiannopoulos is not a conservative. Milo Yiannopoulos is a neo-Nazi Im not exaggerating. Here's are some pictures he posted on his old Instagram account. He's wearing the Iron Cross (an old symbol associated with the German military and long-beloved by neo-Nazis) and tenderly cradling some copies of Hitler books HITLER HE Yes, those are his hands in the above picture. He's wearing the same tacky ring in the picture below The above images were posted to his old Instagram account where he went under his old pseudonym Milo Wagner (perhaps taking the name of the German composer beloved by the Nazis)
Milo Yiannopoulos is not a conservative. Milo Yiannopoulos is a neo-Nazi Im not exaggerating. Here's are some pictures he posted on his old Instagram account. He's wearing the Iron Cross (an old symbol associated with the German military and long-beloved by neo-Nazis) and tenderly cradling some copies of Hitler books HITLER HE Yes, those are his hands in the above picture. He's wearing the same tacky ring in the picture below The above images were posted to his old Instagram account where he went under his old pseudonym Milo Wagner (perhaps taking the name of the German composer beloved by the Nazis)

Milo Yiannopoulos
milo instagram nazi

Milo's pitiful defense of Sunderland

Milo Yiannopoulos 3 mins Facebook Mentions. Like Page Sad to hear that Mitchell Sunderland from Vice is getting heat for shock, horror daring to have a laugh in emails to me. But this would hardly be the first time the left has hounded someone out of employment for wrongthink, would it? You can bully people into being politically correct in public but you can't change how they think in private and they will only grow to hate you if you try. I hope he doesn't lose his job but I'll offer him a new one if he does.
Milo Yiannopoulos 3 mins Facebook Mentions. Like Page Sad to hear that Mitchell Sunderland from Vice is getting heat for shock, horror daring to have a laugh in emails to me. But this would hardly be the first time the left has hounded someone out of employment for wrongthink, would it? You can bully people into being politically correct in public but you can't change how they think in private and they will only grow to hate you if you try. I hope he doesn't lose his job but I'll offer him a new one if he does.

Milo Yiannopoulos
milo yiannopoulos mitch sunderland vice breitbart alt-right ethics in journalism persecution complex

Olivia Nuzzi implicated

Gideon Resnick@GideonResnick 21 Dec 2015 Too scorching of a take to touch SEAR BIG GOVERNMENT BIG JOURNALISM BIG HOLLYWOOD NATIONAL SECURITY TECH V BREITBART LONDON BREITBART JERUSALEM BREITBART TEXAS BREITBART CALIFORNIA SCIENTISTS WHO ARE ACTUALLY REALLY STUPID: #1, NEIL DEGRASSE TYSON 1 4 Mitchell Sunderland @mitchsunderland Follow Replying to @GideonResnick @GideonResnick this started in @Olivianuzzi and my email chain with @Nero 9:05 PM-21 Dec 2015 2
Gideon Resnick@GideonResnick 21 Dec 2015 Too scorching of a take to touch SEAR BIG GOVERNMENT BIG JOURNALISM BIG HOLLYWOOD NATIONAL SECURITY TECH V BREITBART LONDON BREITBART JERUSALEM BREITBART TEXAS BREITBART CALIFORNIA SCIENTISTS WHO ARE ACTUALLY REALLY STUPID: #1, NEIL DEGRASSE TYSON 1 4 Mitchell Sunderland @mitchsunderland Follow Replying to @GideonResnick @GideonResnick this started in @Olivianuzzi and my email chain with @Nero 9:05 PM-21 Dec 2015 2

Milo Yiannopoulos
milo yiannopoulos mitch sunderland olivia nuzzi twitter breitbart ethics in journalism

"Mock this Fat Feminist" -Mitch Sunderland

In addition to tech and entertainment, Yiannopoulos had hidden helpers in the liberal media against which he and Bannon fought so uncompromisingly. A long-running email group devoted to mocking stories about the social justice internet included, predictably, Yiannopoulos's friend Ann Coulter, but also Mitchell Sunderland, a senior staff writer at Broadly, Vice's women's channel. According to its "About" page, Broadly "is devoted to representing the multiplicity of women's experiences.. we provide a sustained focus on the issues that matter most to women." Please mock this fat feminist, Sundertland wrote to YianonMay 1ó, along with a link to an article by the New York Times columnist Lindy West, who frequently writes about fat acceptance. And while Sunderland was Broadly's managing editor, he sent a Broadly video about the Satanic Temple and abortion rights to Tim Gionet with instructions to "do whatever with this on Breitbart. It's insane." The next day, Breitbart published an article titled "Satanic em ned Parentho In a statement to BuzzFeed News, a Vice spokesperson wrote, "We are shocked and disappointed by this highly inappropriate and unprofessional conduct. We just learned about this and have begun a formal review into the matter." (A day after this story was published, Vice fired Mitchell Sunderland, according to a company spokesperson.)
In addition to tech and entertainment, Yiannopoulos had hidden helpers in the liberal media against which he and Bannon fought so uncompromisingly. A long-running email group devoted to mocking stories about the social justice internet included, predictably, Yiannopoulos's friend Ann Coulter, but also Mitchell Sunderland, a senior staff writer at Broadly, Vice's women's channel. According to its "About" page, Broadly "is devoted to representing the multiplicity of women's experiences.. we provide a sustained focus on the issues that matter most to women." Please mock this fat feminist, Sundertland wrote to YianonMay 1ó, along with a link to an article by the New York Times columnist Lindy West, who frequently writes about fat acceptance. And while Sunderland was Broadly's managing editor, he sent a Broadly video about the Satanic Temple and abortion rights to Tim Gionet with instructions to "do whatever with this on Breitbart. It's insane." The next day, Breitbart published an article titled "Satanic em ned Parentho In a statement to BuzzFeed News, a Vice spokesperson wrote, "We are shocked and disappointed by this highly inappropriate and unprofessional conduct. We just learned about this and have begun a formal review into the matter." (A day after this story was published, Vice fired Mitchell Sunderland, according to a company spokesperson.)

Milo Yiannopoulos
milo yiannopoulos mitch sunderland vice breitbart buzzfeed feminism journalism