The whole notion of "hypersexualized" or "oversexualized" is just a modern woke-progressive reskin of old-school sex-negative puritanism. Just dress it up in academic rationalizations and change targets from "think of the children" to "think of the women". As long as you don't sound like a religious moralist, you can happily parrot them in functionally implying that sexiness in media is a bad thing.

"certain body types aren't inherently sexual or unsexual"
wh--
o-okay…? I'll need clarification and elaboration
since sexual attraction is largely based on the physical body, the physical act,
is rooted in archetypal primal concepts of masculinity and femininity in the real, physical world.
I don't even think that notion of non-inherent sexuality is entirely wrong, or wrong at all, but I'd like to hear more on that