-
What Does 'Reheat Nachos' Mean? The Slang Term About 'Reheating Nachos' Popular On Stan Twitter Explained -
What Does 'TS PMO ICL' Mean? Let's Explain The Meaning Of TikTok's Latest Slang Overload Trend -
Where Are They Now? Here's How 'Brent Rambo Approves' Came Full Circle 25 Years After His Iconic 'Thumbs-Up' Meme -
What Does 'Say That Again' Meme Mean? The 'Fantastic Four' Reaction GIF Explained -
What's The 'Friggin' Packet Yo' Meme? Jeff Bliss And His Famous 'Student Teaches Teacher' Video Explained
-1
Markiplier doesn't care if you're pro-life
Uploaded by SwipeWire Oct 24, 2023 at 06:12PM EDT
markiplier abortion women's rights twitter
Origin Entry: 2022 Supreme Court Overturning of Roe v. Wade
File type: png
Resolution: (750px x 392px)
File size: 52.1 KB
More:
-1
2022 Supreme Court Overturning of Roe v. Wade - Markiplier doesn't care if you're pro-life
| ◄ Previous | View Gallery Random Image | Next ► |
![Matt Ford @fordm In a solo concurring opinion, Thomas says the court should reconsider rulings that protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage. Cite as: 597 U. S. (2022) 3 THOMAS, J., concurring 381 U. S. 479 (1965) (right of married persons to obtain con- traceptives)*; Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U. S. 558 (2003) (right to engage in private, consensual sexual acts); and Oberge- fell v. Hodges, 576 U. S. 644 (2015) (right to same-sex mar- riage), are not at issue. The Court's abortion cases are unique, see ante, at 31-32, 66, 71-72, and no party has asked us to decide "whether our entire Fourteenth Amend- ment jurisprudence must be preserved or revised," McDon- ald, 561 U. S., at 813 (opinion of THOMAS, J.). Thus, I agree that "[n]othing in [the Court's] opinion should be under- stood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abor- tion." Ante, at 66. 19 For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precedents, includ- ing Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Because any sub- stantive due process decision is "demonstrably erroneous," Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U. S. (2020) (THOMAS, J., concurring in judgment) (slip op., at 7), we have a duty to "correct the error" established in those precedents, Gamble v. United States, 587 U. S. (2019) (THOMAS, J., con- curring) (slip op., at 9). After overruling these demonstra- bly erroneous decisions, the question would remain whether other constitutional provisions guarantee the myr- iad rights that our substantive due process cases have gen- erated. For example, we could consider whether any of the rights announced in this Court's substantive due process cases are "privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States" protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. Amdt. :](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/list/002/392/454/11f.png "Justice Clarence Thomas Suggests Overturning Gay Marriage")
Comments (0)
Add a Comment
Image Details
273 views (7 from today)
Uploaded Oct 24, 2023 at 06:12PM EDT
Origin Entry
Source
Tags
About the Uploader
SwipeWire
Cataloger & Conversationalist & Media Bus Boy
There are no comments currently available.
Display Comments