…what, and the other people aren't having fun? How judgmental.

Some people like to carefully consider their team's balance and roles to make a strategy. Some people like to carefully do repetitive tasks with the slight feeling of reward (darn you skinner!).

Plus, isn't it being rather hypocritical if you separate the clueless and the 'fun' havers? The only difference between the two is the experience gap in judgment. They both fundamentally just want to try and have fun with what the pokemon they found they liked. I think your 'fun' haver is just power playing as well, rather than just necessarily using the ones they 'like' (just saying- you have scizor and greninja. The others aren't necessarily bad either; maybe you only like them because they are powerful choices)

Plus, you also separate yourself from the 'namer' as well. The namer likes their pokemon because they are slightly comical. Is that any less valid than 'because they look cool'? Looking at it deeply…..I think your 'true Scotsman' here is just hollow and judgmental. I see no real philosophy that makes you better than most of the others here.

So I'm an Ev Trainer namer who does it for fun? Cool.