- The Creation Of 'Doomer Girl' Should Have Been A Bad Omen At The Beginning Of The Decade
- According To A Number Of Internet Artists, 2025 May Be The (New) Year Of The Gamer
- The Format Currently Known As 'Core i9... Installed' Launched In 2018 With Noticeably Lower Specs
- 'I've Played These Games Before!' Is One Of Seong Gi-hun's Most Memeable Moments From 'Squid Game' Season 2
- Truck Rams Into a Crowd Of People In A Suspected Terror Attack In New Orleans
+1
Jack is right. The logical endpoint of deeming advertisers to have endorsed the political messages of the shows they run ads on is that only milquetoast both-sidesism with a pro-corportate bent will be advertising-supported, if any political content is ad
Uploaded by Matt Dec 20, 2018 at 03:26PM EST
@natesilver538 nate silver advertising
Origin Entry: Tucker Carlson
File type: png
Resolution: (872px x 609px)
File size: 143 KB
Moar:
Dear FOX News, Advertisers pulling ads isn’t censorship. Advertisers pulling ads is “Hey, we don’t want to spend our money promoting a fucking racist asshole like Tucker Carlson.” Understand the difference. Thanks!
Share Pin
+1
Tucker Carlson - Jack is right. The logical endpoint of deeming advertisers to have endorsed the political messages of the shows they run ads on is that only milquetoast both-sidesism with a pro-corportate bent will be advertising-supported, if any political content is ad
◄ Previous | View Gallery Random Image | Next ► |
There are no comments currently available.
Display Comments