hate blacks luv ngubu simple as | Norf F.C./ "Simple As" | Know Your Meme
Meme Encyclopedia
Images
Editorials
More
Know Your Meme is the property of Literally Media ©2024 Literally Media. All Rights Reserved.

Norf F.C./ "Simple As"

5429 Views • Created 4 years ago By yoloswag462140 • Updated 4 years ago

Created By yoloswag462140 • Updated 4 years ago

hate blacks luv ngubu simple as

'Ate blacks luv ngubu simple as -carling clive NORF FC
Origin Entry:

Norf F.C./ "Simple As"

Source:

Original Content

Notes

Textile Embed 
!https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/665/037/e8d.png!

Related Photos ( 4 )

Comments ( 0 )

Sorry, but you must activate your account to post a comment.

    Latest Images


    Big Baz'za

    'ate tau'ri 'ate shol'vas 'ate asgard (not racist, just don't like em) luv dakara luv kelno'reem luv kree simple as 3
    'ate tau'ri 'ate shol'vas 'ate asgard (not racist, just don't like em) luv dakara luv kelno'reem luv kree simple as 3
    Norf F.C./ "Simple As"
    stargate stargate: sg-1 sg-1 jaffa star gate kree tau'ri shol'vas asgard kelno'reem dakura

    Napoli Soufman

    Pete
    Pete
    Norf F.C./ "Simple As"
    souf fc napoli neapolis piazza del plebiscito naples norfman /sp/

    NORF F.C. vs. Seagull

    F.FC
    F.FC
    Norf F.C./ "Simple As"
    british people norf f.c. seagull bird

    The Norfs are the pinacle of creation

    The Norfs are the pinnacle of creation. For them, the great struggle is won. They have evolved a society which knows no stress or angst. Who are we to judge them? We Anglos who have failed, or the Americans, on the road to ruin in their turn? And why? Because we sought answers to questions that a Norf wouldn't even bother to ask! We see a culture that is strong and despise it as crude. William Perfidus - Controversial Anglo Chronicler
    The Norfs are the pinnacle of creation. For them, the great struggle is won. They have evolved a society which knows no stress or angst. Who are we to judge them? We Anglos who have failed, or the Americans, on the road to ruin in their turn? And why? Because we sought answers to questions that a Norf wouldn't even bother to ask! We see a culture that is strong and despise it as crude. William Perfidus - Controversial Anglo Chronicler
    Norf F.C./ "Simple As"
    goalposting norf souf anglo wh40k 40k eldar orks ork

    The Goal Pill

    The four stages of red-pill 1. Generic conservative: The generic conservative realizes something about society doesn't quite sit right with him, there is a "gut feeling" that "something is wrong" with the way people conduct themselves in terms of behavioral norms, moral standards and so on. However, he is unable to articulate his opposition to liberalism outside of a liberal context and accepts liberal principles such as a belief in the moral goodness of equality as taken for granted, so liberals generally run rings around him. Typical argument: "First gay marriage, what next? Pedos marrying kids? B---------?" Typical liberal response: "Slippery slope fallacy much? They said the same thing about black people being allowed to vote. 2. Libertarian: The libertarian takes his opposition to liberalism and tries to establish a philosophical foundation for this belief. As most "generic conservatives" do not articulate an ethical system of their own that stands in opposition to liberalism and instead merely voice their opposition to the perceived impracticality of liberal plans, economically speaking, the libertarian takes this one step further and establishes his philosophical framework of one based around economic freedom taken to the nth degree, he is capable of attacking the current system effectively, but utterly ineffective in challenging it morally or ethically since libertarianism tends to adopt a non-interference attitude to ethics and morality. Typical argument: "You do not right have to right to appropriate other people's wealth. Taxation is theft." Typical liberal response: "Tel that to the Scandinavian states that achieve so much with high tax rates. I bet you believe in creationism too." Murray Rothbard 3. The radical right: Most people on the right stop at stage 2 of the red pill process, those who dig deeper go further however start to realize that something isn't quite right about libertarianism's general refusal (outside of people like Hoppe) to take a moral stand against degeneracy. This leads them to unorthodox political philosophies that stand well beyond the pale of acceptability, such as fascism. For the first time in their lives, they start to articulate moral and ethical opposition to liberal principles rather than aspects of liberalişm Typical argument: "If you import third world people, you import third world problems. We need to act for our people and our Nation, not for Jews, Blacks or Hispanics." Typical liberal response: "F------ RACIST!" 4. Traditionalism: penultimate The finat stage is traditionalism. The red-pilled individual starts to consume large amounts of rather esoteric (by present day standards) literature about the importance of inequality, hierarchy and moral authority. He realizes the West's entire trajectory for the past two centuries since the Masonic Revolt of 1789 has been disastrous. Typically the traditionalist will identify with traditional modes of European government, such as mediated Monarchies or Aristocratic Republics. Typical argument: "I will simply point out the error of principle that has provided the foundation of this constitution and that has led the French astray since the first moment of their revolution. The constitution of 1795, like its predecessors, has been drawn up for Man. Now, there is no such thing in the world as Man. In the course of my life, I have seen Frenchmen, Italians, Russians, etc. I am even aware, thanks to Montesquieu, that one can be a Persian. But, as for Man, I declare that I have never met him in my life. If he exists, I certainly have no knowledge of him. This constitution is capable of being applied to all human communities from China to Geneva. But a constitution which is made for all nations is made for none: it is a pure abstraction, a school exercise whose purpose is to exercise the mind in accordance with a hypothetical ideal, and which ought to be addressed to Man, in the imaginary places which he inhabits.. What is a constitution? Is it not the solution to the following problem: to find the laws that are fitting for a particular nation, given its population, its customs, its religion, its geographical situation, its political relations, its wealth, and its good and bad qualities? Now, this problem is not addressed at all by the Constitution of 1795, which is concerned only with Man." Typical liberal response: "Please don't hurt me great one, I promise to stop being degenerate!" 5. The Goal Pill: During your brief foray into traditionalism, you've been hit with the cold reality of the modern anglo and his impenetrable dense skull that deflects all logic, reason and hope (as well as Franky's fist at the derby). There is no solution to the problems of 21st century Britain - proles will always be proles. At this point the enlightened individual has either committed suicide or taken the Goal Pill - reverting back to a civic nationalism that has synthesised with extreme regional tribalism where you despise and seek the destruction of anyone and anything that doesn't live within 10 miles of your home. Don your teams jersey, drop some teeth and around 30 1Q points, brandish a Gregg's sausage roll in one hand and a tin of Carling in the other - you're going to the match. Typical argument: "COME ERE YA FOOKIN' DAFT C---, AL SMASH YA FOOKIN' FACE IN YA FAT SUVVAN BASSTAD! NGUBU WILL NEVAH FOOKIN' LEEV UZ, EE'S NORF F.C. FROO AND FROO!" Typical liberal response: "FACKIN' STOOPID NORVEN MANKEES! SAUF F.C. AHR GUNNA SOIN 'IM, WEEV GOT MORE MANNEY VAN YEW AND YA TEAMS FACKIN' S---! YOWR GETTIN' GLARSED UN THEN AM GUNNA SHAG YOR BIRD! GET ERE YA FACKIN' WANKER!"
    The four stages of red-pill 1. Generic conservative: The generic conservative realizes something about society doesn't quite sit right with him, there is a "gut feeling" that "something is wrong" with the way people conduct themselves in terms of behavioral norms, moral standards and so on. However, he is unable to articulate his opposition to liberalism outside of a liberal context and accepts liberal principles such as a belief in the moral goodness of equality as taken for granted, so liberals generally run rings around him. Typical argument: "First gay marriage, what next? Pedos marrying kids? B---------?" Typical liberal response: "Slippery slope fallacy much? They said the same thing about black people being allowed to vote. 2. Libertarian: The libertarian takes his opposition to liberalism and tries to establish a philosophical foundation for this belief. As most "generic conservatives" do not articulate an ethical system of their own that stands in opposition to liberalism and instead merely voice their opposition to the perceived impracticality of liberal plans, economically speaking, the libertarian takes this one step further and establishes his philosophical framework of one based around economic freedom taken to the nth degree, he is capable of attacking the current system effectively, but utterly ineffective in challenging it morally or ethically since libertarianism tends to adopt a non-interference attitude to ethics and morality. Typical argument: "You do not right have to right to appropriate other people's wealth. Taxation is theft." Typical liberal response: "Tel that to the Scandinavian states that achieve so much with high tax rates. I bet you believe in creationism too." Murray Rothbard 3. The radical right: Most people on the right stop at stage 2 of the red pill process, those who dig deeper go further however start to realize that something isn't quite right about libertarianism's general refusal (outside of people like Hoppe) to take a moral stand against degeneracy. This leads them to unorthodox political philosophies that stand well beyond the pale of acceptability, such as fascism. For the first time in their lives, they start to articulate moral and ethical opposition to liberal principles rather than aspects of liberalişm Typical argument: "If you import third world people, you import third world problems. We need to act for our people and our Nation, not for Jews, Blacks or Hispanics." Typical liberal response: "F------ RACIST!" 4. Traditionalism: penultimate The finat stage is traditionalism. The red-pilled individual starts to consume large amounts of rather esoteric (by present day standards) literature about the importance of inequality, hierarchy and moral authority. He realizes the West's entire trajectory for the past two centuries since the Masonic Revolt of 1789 has been disastrous. Typically the traditionalist will identify with traditional modes of European government, such as mediated Monarchies or Aristocratic Republics. Typical argument: "I will simply point out the error of principle that has provided the foundation of this constitution and that has led the French astray since the first moment of their revolution. The constitution of 1795, like its predecessors, has been drawn up for Man. Now, there is no such thing in the world as Man. In the course of my life, I have seen Frenchmen, Italians, Russians, etc. I am even aware, thanks to Montesquieu, that one can be a Persian. But, as for Man, I declare that I have never met him in my life. If he exists, I certainly have no knowledge of him. This constitution is capable of being applied to all human communities from China to Geneva. But a constitution which is made for all nations is made for none: it is a pure abstraction, a school exercise whose purpose is to exercise the mind in accordance with a hypothetical ideal, and which ought to be addressed to Man, in the imaginary places which he inhabits.. What is a constitution? Is it not the solution to the following problem: to find the laws that are fitting for a particular nation, given its population, its customs, its religion, its geographical situation, its political relations, its wealth, and its good and bad qualities? Now, this problem is not addressed at all by the Constitution of 1795, which is concerned only with Man." Typical liberal response: "Please don't hurt me great one, I promise to stop being degenerate!" 5. The Goal Pill: During your brief foray into traditionalism, you've been hit with the cold reality of the modern anglo and his impenetrable dense skull that deflects all logic, reason and hope (as well as Franky's fist at the derby). There is no solution to the problems of 21st century Britain - proles will always be proles. At this point the enlightened individual has either committed suicide or taken the Goal Pill - reverting back to a civic nationalism that has synthesised with extreme regional tribalism where you despise and seek the destruction of anyone and anything that doesn't live within 10 miles of your home. Don your teams jersey, drop some teeth and around 30 1Q points, brandish a Gregg's sausage roll in one hand and a tin of Carling in the other - you're going to the match. Typical argument: "COME ERE YA FOOKIN' DAFT C---, AL SMASH YA FOOKIN' FACE IN YA FAT SUVVAN BASSTAD! NGUBU WILL NEVAH FOOKIN' LEEV UZ, EE'S NORF F.C. FROO AND FROO!" Typical liberal response: "FACKIN' STOOPID NORVEN MANKEES! SAUF F.C. AHR GUNNA SOIN 'IM, WEEV GOT MORE MANNEY VAN YEW AND YA TEAMS FACKIN' S---! YOWR GETTIN' GLARSED UN THEN AM GUNNA SHAG YOR BIRD! GET ERE YA FACKIN' WANKER!"
    Norf F.C./ "Simple As"
    goal reactionary conservative redpill red pill politics political satire norf traditionalist

    Laser Norfman

    INGURUND
    INGURUND
    Norf F.C./ "Simple As"
    euro cup 2020 england vs denmark kasper schmeichel laserball crying wojak