O HAI! You must login or signup first!

WELL BACK IN THE DAY AFTER THEY LEGALIZED GAYI WAS FINALLY ABLE TO MARRIAGE, IT WAS JUST A In the year 2050 DIVORCE YOUR OTHER DAD HEY DAD, HOW COME YOU'RE MARRIED TOA GOAT? SLIPPERY SLOPE UNTIL GOAT MARRIAGE WAS LEGAL AND MARRY THE uNGULATE OF MY DREAMS TOO,* "Some people pretty much think this. I HAVE NO SON THAT'S COOL! 1 WANNA MARRY TWO GOATS WHEN I GROW Up Cyanide and Happiness © Explosm.net

+71

Meanwhile, in the future...


Uploaded by Serph Jun 27, 2015 at 10:33PM EDT

Share Pin Download More

Origin Entry: Supreme Court Gay Marriage Ruling

File type: png

Resolution: (701px x 599px)

File size: 60.4 KB


5 3.13 Gay marriage? No way. It's against nature. BIZARRO.COM facekeok.com/Bizarg iae
. In 2009, a man married a video game character . In 2007, a woman married the Eiffel Tower o In 2008, a man married a life- sized doll . Also in 2009, a woman married a roller coaster . And in 2005, a woman married a dolphin please explain to me why people still say that gays shouldnt be able to be married to preserve the sanctity of marraige Also please explain why this is not in chronological order it makes me very uncomfortable
by RUBEN BOLLING BuG THE TWO FISTSOF SUPREME JUSTICE UDGE SCALIA IS TRAVERSING THE LANDSCAPE, SEARCHING FOR HIPPIES TO HECTOR HIDGE SCALIAI JUDGE SCALIA! TEXTUAL || ORIGIMALISM WHERE IN BLAZES HELP! THE STATE COULD THOSE LONG- WON'T LET US HAIRS BE HIDING. MARRY! WHA,? THRILLS. CHILLS.... HE CONJURES THE ORIGINAL WHAT?NO SOONER IS THE JUDGE FRAMERS OF THE FOURTEENTH | 1 AMENDMENT H--- SEX.. WAIT, > BACK ON HIS WAY, WHEN... JUDGE SCALIA! CAMPAIGN CRYBABIES!I RULE ONLYASFNANCE LAWS WON'T LET スー JUST AS I THouGHT! YER OUTTA LUCkK THE CONSTITUTION WAS WRITENMY CORPORATION CONTRIBUTE TO POLITICIANS AS I'D LIKE! NERRE DID you INTEND TO INCLUDE HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE IN THE DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSES? 乙 ER!! WHoND so, JUDGE SCALIA O,DRAFTERS OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT, DID You INTEND CARES WHAT You THOUGHT?ONCE AGAIN PROVES HIS FOR CORPORATIONS TO BE COV- I'LL RULE WHAT You ERED BY FREEDOM oF SPEECH?SHouLD HAVE THOUGHT!JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION, A CONSISTENT APPROACH TO REGARDLESS OF OUTCOME. WHAT? NO ONE DID! COR- PORATIONS BARELY EXISTED THIS PROTECTED HUMANS. / HUSH, HuSH, MY SWEET CORPORATION WERE YoUR FEEL- INGS HURT? INC C.
View All 93 Images

Load 5 Comments

More:

Top Comments


+ Add a Comment

Comments (5)


Display Comments

Add a Comment


+ Add an Image

Image Details

2,066 views (13 from today)

Uploaded Jun 27, 2015 at 10:33PM EDT

Origin Entry

Supreme Court Gay Marriage Ruling

Tags

cyanide and happiness, gay marriage, lol

Claim Authorship Edit History
Textile Embed