-
New York Magazine's 'Cruel Kids' Table' Cover Is Catching Flack From Republicans Who Can't Decide If It's A Hit Piece Or Not -
Reese Youngn's 'No More Parties' Remix Is Back In Memes Following The Spread Of 'Dih,' 'TS' And 'PMO' -
2013 'Modern Family' Scene Has TikTokers Saying 'I Hate Vietnam' In New Lip Dub Trend -
'Warhammer 40K' Fans Are Hyped For The Much Awaited Sequel To The 2018 Fan Film 'Astartes' -
Villains Take Their Names In Viral 'I Think I Like That Name' Meme On Twitter
-2
Trump angry at Mitch for doing his job
Uploaded by BrentD15 Aug 23, 2017 at 04:31PM EDT
russiagate donald trump mitch mcconnell republican party united states senate gop collusion conspiracy obstruction of justice complicit
Origin Entry: Russiagate
File type: jpg
Resolution: (750px x 449px)
File size: 59.6 KB
More:
![Experts Debunk, Mock Trump Lawyers Claims Mueller Obtained Transition Emails Unlawfully GSA: Trump Transition Team Informed Communications Could Be Handed Over To Law Enforcement Specifically, Loewentritt said, "in using our devices," transition team members were informed that materials "would not be held back in any law enforcement" actions. (Buzzfeed) Renato Mariotti, Former Prosecutor: Not inappropriate or Unusual "Of course Mueller obtained emails from a third party," wrote former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti. "Prosecutors in most white collar criminal investigations do that. It's not 'inappropriate' or even unusual. Anyone who claims otherwise has no idea what they're talking about." (Business Insider Jeffrey Cramer, white collar former federal prosecutor: "Not a problem” This is not a problem," he said, referring to the way Mueller's team got a hold of the emails. "The server owner, in this case GSA, properly has the emails and can turn them over if there was a subpoena or court order," in the same way that internet providers and banks can provide emails and records about clients to law enforcement. More than that, Cramer added, the special counsel's team may not even have needed a subpoena to obtain the emails. An administrative request- a legally authorized and judicially enforceable demand for records issued by a government authoritymay have sufficed, he said. (BusinessS Insider Norm Eisen, Former White House Special Counsel for Ethics and Government Reform: "Executive privilege does not apply” "Executive privilege does not apply until you are the executive; these documents are from the transition, before Trump became the executive, QED no executive privilege. Grasping at straws here. (Twitter) William Jeffress, white collar defense attorney: No evidence of privileged information ."I seriously doubt there is anything here to taint the [Mueller] investigation," said William Jeffress, a white-collar defense attorney who represented Vice President D--- Cheney's senior aide, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, during the Valerie Plame CIA leak investigation. Jeffress added the letter included no evidence to prove any privileged information had been obtained by Mueller's team and that even if it were, there are procedures for retrieving them. (Politico) The Hill: Swalwell mocks report that Mueller obtained Trump transition emails illegally ."Private documents' on a US Government, public email system? What are they afraid was found? Baloney. This is another attempt to discredit Mueller as his #TrumpRussia probe tightens"](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/list/001/323/929/183.jpg "Trump allies don't law so good")
![of the influence operation. 18. On or about March 24, 2015, BUTINA emailed U.S. Person 1 with the subject line of The Second Pozner.". The body of this email also contained a project proposal. BUTINA noted to U.S. Person 1 in the email that she was sending the "Google Translator text. Maybe I could translate it myself but it would take at least a day because the text is very specific." She went on to note that she "will be happy to answer to any your questions [sic] and follow your recommendations before a [sic] finally send it." The first line of the proposal reads, "Project Description 'Diplomacy." It goes on to state that a major U.S. political party [hereinafter I believe that this statement likely refers to Vladimir Pozner, a propagandist who served in the disinformation department of the Soviet KGB and who often appeared on Western television to explain the views of the Soviet Union during the Cold War. "POLITICAL PARTY 1"], would likely obtain control over the U.S. government after the 2016 elections; that POLITICAL PARTY I is "traditionally associated with negative and aggressive foreign policy, particularly with regards to Russia. However, now with the right to negotiate seems best to build konstruktivnyh [sic] relations;" and that "[oJentral place and influence in th [POLITICAL PARTY 1] plays the [GUN RIGHTS ORGANIZATION]. The [GUN RIGHTS ORGANIZATION] [is] the largest sponsor of the elections to the US congress, as well as a sponsor of The CPAC conference and other events. 19. The March 24, 2015 email further highlighted BUTINA's relationship with the GUN RIGHTS ORGANIZATION's leadership, including her attendance at events in the United States](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/list/001/393/589/987.jpg "Republican Party and the NRA")
Comments (0)
Add a Comment
Image Details
26 views (4 from today)
Uploaded Aug 23, 2017 at 04:31PM EDT
Origin Entry
Tags
russiagate, donald trump, mitch mcconnell, republican party, united states senate, gop, collusion, conspiracy, obstruction of justice, complicit
About the Uploader
BrentD15
Treasurer & Elocutionist & Media Maid
There are no comments currently available.
Display Comments