+6
Trash is way cheaper
Uploaded by Y F Aug 13, 2018 at 07:56AM EDT
Origin Entry: Reddit
File type: jpg
Resolution: (700px x 620px)
File size: 75.2 KB
Moar:
![INTERNET DISCUSSION FLOWCHART litem involving differences between cultures] 會 Menial-Tasking. Score hidden . 52 minutes ago . stickied comment e le and sc Be nice people. Share Save](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/389/005/b11.jpg "Bad discussion vs no discussion")
![r/historyYou ve been banned from participating in r/history exp and all collapse all subreddit message via /r/history [M] sent 18 minutes ago You have been banned from participating in r/history. You can still view and subscribe to r/history, but you won't be able to post or comment. Note from the moderators: Please review rule 2 to understand this action If you have a question regarding your ban, you can contact the moderator team for r/history by replying to this message Reminder from the Reddit staff: If you use another account to circumvent this subreddit ban, that will be considered a violation of the Content Policy and can result in your account being suspended from the site as a whole permalink delete report block subreddit mark unread reply -] to /r/history sent 15 minutes ago Hello mods, I am wondering, why am I was banned? Was it this: Its the BBC, they are not even bothering hiding their agendas anymore... If it is, I do not understand, what is the problem, cause if I broke this rule "No current politics or soapboxing.", wel then half the thread broke it. I did not talk about any politics really, I just said that the BBC doesn't hide their agenda, I didn't say which one or called it out Honestly this feels like a huge overreaction to me permalink reply subreddit message via /r/history [M] sent 11 minutes ago Well, we can only handle a thread one comment at a time. However, you didn't try to clarify what the BBC's agendas that you object to are when trying to justify your post. . .and that really says it all permalink delete report block subreddit mark unread reply -] to /r/history sent 9 minutes ago However, you didn't try to clarify what the BBC's agendas that you object to are when trying to justify your post.. and that really says it all But shouldn't that better, if I clarify it I am making it more into a political slugfest.](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/383/067/219.png "Hisrtory and bans")
![SP The dangerous belief that white people are under attack (spsp.org) 0 nality Social submitted 20 hours ago by InDissent 67 comments share save hide report all 67 comments sorted by: best ▼ Want to add to the discussion? Post a comment! CREATE AN ACCOUNT [-] mrsamsa [M] [score hidden] 17 hours ago-stickied comment Just a reminder that this is a science sub so conspiracy theories and victim narratives about white people being "oppressed" aren't appropriate here. Keep the discussion about the scientific evidence and facts of the possible cause:s and effects of white people mistakenly believing that they're oppressed when they're not. permalink embed save report reply load more comments (10 replies) - Ideleted] 9 hours ago [removed] + [deleted] * (2 children) + InDissent [S] comment score below threshold (2 children,) -] [deleted] 19 hours ago [removed] +] gocast comment score below threshold (2 children) +] autimaton comment score below threshold (25 children) -] [deleted] 20 hours ago [removed] [-] 1nDissent [S]-2 points 19 hours ago None of your "facts" are cited and you want me to prove a negative? 14 days on Reddit and you're starting off the right way! permalink embed save parent report reply -] [deleted] 19 hours ago [removed] gocast 0 points 18 hours ago What a joke permalink embed save report reply + InDissent [S] comment score below threshold (10 children)](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/list/001/340/245/bc8.png "Meanwhile on reddit")
Comments (1)
Add a Comment
Image Details
257 views (10 from today)
Uploaded Aug 13, 2018 at 07:56AM EDT
Origin Entry
Source
Tags
About the Uploader
Y F
Digital Archaeologist & Treasurer & Media Maid
