The 'Chill Guy' Meme Has Been Copyrighted By Its Creator Phillip Banks, Who Says He's DMCA Striking Brands Using It For Profit
Where Are They Now? Here's What Kyle Craven, Better Known As The Meme 'Bad Luck Brian,' Has Been Up To Since His 'Advice Animals' Fame
John Lennon's 'War Is Over' Is A TikTok Sound Used To Express Joy and Relief
A Headline About Queen Elizabeth's II Final Diary Entry Has People Coming Up With Wild Guesses
TikTokers Are Explaining Their 'Pink Tote Lid Moments' After A Viral Video Showcases A Frustrating Example Of Emotional Parental Abuse

Only one possible justification for equitable jurisdiction remains: that Plaintiff is a former President of the United States. It is indeed extraordinary for a warrant to be executed at the home of a former president-but not in a way that affects our legal analysis or otherwise gives the judiciary license to interfere in an ongoing investigation. The Richey test has been in place for nearly fifty years; its limits apply no matter who the government is investigating. To create a special exception here would defy our Nation's foundational principle that our law applies "to all, without regard to numbers, wealth, or rank." State of Georgia v. Brailsford, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 1,4 (1794).

Share Pin Download More

fbi mar-a-lago donald trump

Origin Entry: 2022-2023 Donald Trump Confidential Documents Case

Notes:

Appeals court rejects Trump lawsuit in Mar-a-Lago documents case

File type: jpg

Resolution: (1376px x 760px)

File size: 127 KB

When you're getting indicted but your lawyer won't stop beatboxing

imgflip.com I MET DONALD TRUMP AND ALL I GOT WAS A SECRET DOCUMENT

JUSTICE F--- around. Find out.

View All 105 Images

More:

DOJ points out that Trump’s latest arguments in the Mar-a-Lago documents fight completely undercuts his argument.

Instead, Plaintiff has shifted tactics, unveiling a startling theory that all of the seized records including government documents bearing classification markings are his "personal" property under the Presidential Records Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. § 2201 et seq. That theory is meritless, and the Court need not consider it because it was not raised below and is entirely irrelevant: Even if the seized records were Plaintiff's "personal" property, they would still be lawfully obtained evidence, nothing in the law would prohibit the government from using or reviewing them, and there would still be no basis for an extraordinary injunction and special-master proceeding. There is no reason for the injunction and the special-master review to continue. Plaintiff has copies of every seized record except those bearing classification markings, to which he is clearly not entitled. And Plaintiff's single dispute with the government regarding attorney-client privilege can be resolved through the process originally directed by the magistrate judge. This Court should therefore reverse the district court's injunction and direct the district court to dismiss the case.

Pin

Kash Patel granted immunity and will testify

WASHINGTON-Kash Patel, a close associate of former President Donald Trump, is set to soon testify before a federal grand jury probing the handling of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago after receiving immunity for his information, people familiar with the matter said.

Pin

Some of the Mar-a-Lago classified documents that were seized during the Mar-A-Lago search held highly sensitive, top secret information about Iran’s missile program & highly sensitive U.S. intelligence work aimed at China & more.

Some of the classified documents recovered by the FBI from Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago home and private club included highly sensitive intelligence regarding Iran and China, according to people familiar with the matter. If shared with others, the people said, such information could expose intelligence-gathering methods that the United States wants to keep hidden from the world. At least one of the documents seized by the FBI describes Iran's missile program, according to these people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe an ongoing investigation. Other documents described highly sensitive intelligence work aimed at China, they said. Unauthorized disclosures of specific information in the documents would pose multiple risks, experts say. People aiding U.S. intelligence efforts could be endangered, and collection methods could be compromised. In addition, other countries or U.S. adversaries could retaliate against the United States for actions it has taken in secret.

Pin

Judge Dearie hates it when parties don’t respect court deadlines and unilaterally blow them off. Which is what Trump did and Dearie calls it out.

152 Oct 21, 2022 Oct 21, 2022 - Order (PAPERLESS or pdf attached) ORDER. The Special Master notes Plaintiff's counsel's letter of October 20, 2022 151. To the extent Plaintiff asserts that the government's letter of the same date 150 "is not fully accurate as to the Plaintiff's position on various documents," any submission by Plaintiff to the contrary is now untimely pursuant to my Order of October 7, 2022 138, which required the parties to submit their final log of positions regarding certain Filter Materials by October 20, 2022. Plaintiff may submit his position no later than the close of business today, October 21, 2022. Signed by Special Master Raymond J. Dearie on 10/21/2022. (Entered: 10/21/2022) Main Document Buy on PACER

Pin

Statement of Issues

STATEMENT OF ISSUES 1. Whether the district court erred in exercising jurisdiction over Plaintiff's request for injunctive and other relief to constrain the government's review and use of all records seized pursuant to a court-authorized search in an ongoing criminal investigation. 2. Whether the district court erred by enjoining the government from reviewing and using records seized during that search for criminal investigative purposes, including records bearing classification markings, pending a months-long special- master review of Plaintiff's claims of executive and attorney-client privilege. 3. Whether the district court erred by ordering a special-master review of all seized records, including records bearing classification markings, where Plaintiff has no plausible claims of executive privilege and where the government implemented filter procedures to identify and protect attorney-client communications. 4

Pin

SCOTUS refuses to hear Trump appeal over Mar-a-Lago documents. No noted dissents.

(ORDER LIST: 598 U.S.) 22A283 THURSDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2022 ORDER IN PENDING CASE TRUMP, DONALD J. V. UNITED STATES The application to vacate the stay entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit on September 21, 2022, presented to Justice Thomas and by him referred to the Court is denied.

Pin

Select all images with top secret documents

Select all images with Top Secret Documents 36 SECRETISCI SECRET SCI 2 TOP SECRETINGA RETO 2A

Pin

JUST IN: Appeals court grants DOJ motion to expedite appeal of Judge Cannon’s order appointing special master to oversee seized Mar-a-Lago docs.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DONALD J. TRUMP, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ORDER: No. 22-13005-DD versus Plaintiff - Appellee, Defendant Appellant. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Appellant's "Motion to Expedite Appeal" is granted. The Court directs the Clerk to expedite the appeal for merits disposition purposes. Having consulted with the Chief Judge, the appeal will be assigned to a special merits panel from the classified appeals log randomly selected by the Clerk. That panel will decide when and how to hear oral argument. The Court sets the following expedited briefing schedule, with no extensions allowed: Appellant's initial brief is due on or before October 14, 2022. Appellee's response brief is due on November 10, 2022. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on November 17, 2022. /s/ Adalberto Jordan UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE

Pin

Things Trump has to pay for

For one, a special master will cost a lot of money. Judge Cannon rejected Mr. Trump's proposal that taxpayers should foot half the bill of the review, instead saying he would be solely responsible. That includes the full cost of a vendor who will scan all the materials, as well as support staff for Judge Dearie, like an assistant who bills $500 an hour. Mr. Trump will also have to pay his own lawyers' fees as they filter thousands of pages of records and then litigate disputes about which ones can be withheld as privileged.

Pin

Updated Inventory

Item #2 - Box/Container from Office 99 10/2018 Magazines/Newspapers/Press Articles and Other Printed Media dated between 01/2017- 2 US Government Documents with CONFIDENTIAL Classification Markings 15 US Government Documents with SECRET Classification Markings 7 US Government Documents with TOP SECRET Classification Markings 74 US Government Documents/Photographs without Classification Markings 43 Empty Folders with "CLASSIFIED" Banners 28 Empty Folders Labeled "Return to Staff Secretary/Miliary Aide"

Pin

DoJ has asked Dearie for another day to secure a 3rd party vendor to create a portal to share info with Donald Trump

Judge Raymond J. Dearie United States District Court Eastern District of New York 225 Cadman Plaza East Brooklyn, NY 11202 Re: Donald J. Trump v. United States of America, Case No. 22-81294-CIV-CANNON - Government Motion to Modify and Adopt the Amended Case Management Plan (ECF 112) with Comments on the Amended Plan and Plaintiff's Objections Dear Judge Dearie: The government moves to modify the Amended Case Management Plan in order to contract directly with a document-review vendor. Besides that revision, the government moves to adopt the Amended Case Management Plan. See ECF 112, at 6-7. The government further comments on Executive-privilege review and Plaintiff's objections in the hope that the Special Master finds the comments helpful in administering the Amended Case Management Plan and considering Plaintiff's objections. Document-Review Vendor Plaintiff informed us this morning that none of the five document-review vendors proposed by the government before last Tuesday's preliminary conference were willing to be engaged by Plaintiff. To avoid further delay in the vendor's scanning and processing of the Seized Materials (defined to exclude "documents bearing classification markings"), the government issued a request for a task order this afternoon with a deadline of tomorrow (Wednesday, September 28, 2022) at noon. Based on its prior experience and discussions today with the vendors, the government is highly confident at least one vendor will respond and that it will be able to "agree upon and contract with a document review vendor that will host the Seized Materials in electronic form." ECF 112, at 3. Based on applicable procurement regulations, the government is not able to select and engage a vendor before tomorrow (Wednesday, September 28, 2022). Consistent with the Appointment Order (ECF 91 ¶ 14), the government expects Plaintiff to pay the vendor's invoices promptly when rendered. 1

Pin

Special Master tells Trump's lawyers to say once and for all whether they really think the FBI planted evidence

No later than September 30, 2022, Plaintiff shall submit a declaration or affidavit that includes each of the following factual matters: a. A list of any specific items set forth in the Detailed Property Inventory that Plaintiff asserts were not seized from the Premises on August 8, 2022.

Pin

-2

2022-2023 Donald Trump Confidential Documents Case - Rule of Law

PROTIP: Press the ← and → keys to navigate the gallery, 'g' to view the gallery, or 'r' to view a random image.

Only one possible justification for equitable jurisdiction remains: that Plaintiff is a former President of the United States. It is indeed extraordinary for a warrant to be executed at the home of a former president-but not in a way that affects our legal analysis or otherwise gives the judiciary license to interfere in an ongoing investigation. The Richey test has been in place for nearly fifty years; its limits apply no matter who the government is investigating. To create a special exception here would defy our Nation's foundational principle that our law applies "to all, without regard to numbers, wealth, or rank." State of Georgia v. Brailsford, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 1,4 (1794).

View Gallery Random Image

+ Add a Comment

Comments (0)

There are no comments currently available.

Display Comments

Image Details

164 views (17 from today)

Uploaded Dec 01, 2022 at 10:22PM EST

Origin Entry

2022-2023 Donald Trump Confidential Documents Case

Notes

Appeals court rejects Trump lawsuit in Mar-a-Lago documents case

click to expand

Source

Tags

Claim Authorship Edit History

About the Uploader

KZN02

Treasurer & Orator & Media Chauffeur

Textile Embed

!https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/002/488/564/c30!

Today's Top Image Galleries

Centurii-chan meme example depicting a character sheet art.

Centurii-chan

My New Character meme.

My New Character / Chill Guy

A photo of Furries at a furry convention.

Furries / Furry

Super Mario Italian plumber with a mustache

Super Mario