Hauu! You must login or signup first!

Copyright strikes Z! copyright strike A copyright owner asked us to take down your video because they believe it contains material that violates their copyright. As a result: • Your video was removed from YouTube • Your channel received a strike If you get 3 copyright strikes, your account (along with any associated channels) will be subject to termination. Learn more about copyright strikes Content removed The following videos have been removed from YouTube due to a copyright takedown request Strike on May 5, 2023 Expires in 90 days Content removed by Pro Sportority (Israel) Ltd. dba Minute Media Video 1:09:56 Man in Cave - Internet Historian ... Published Apr 27, 2023 Content found during 0:00 1:09:55 vial you can u • Do nothing. Strikes expire after 90 days, as long as you complete Copyright School. • Request retraction ? • Submit counter notification ? Deleting the video will not remove the strike. Content used The 1925 Cave Rescue That Captivat... The infringing video blatantly & unlawfully plagiarized verbatim text from our article i... Actions SELECT ACTION The infringing video blatantly & unlawfully plagiarized verbatim text from our article in its voiceover narration & the placement, pacing, & presentation of content is almost identical the article. (? X

Internet Historian's "Man in Cave" Video Plagiarism Strike


Uploaded by Zach Dec 04, 2023 at 01:13PM EST

Share Pin Download More

Origin Entry: Internet Historian Plagiarism Accusations

File type: png

Resolution: (1205px x 809px)

File size: 70.1 KB


K Lucas Reilly 7:50 AM to me v ... Hi Mike. I'm getting swamped with emails like this, so I'm going to keep it short. 1. It was very hurtful. I spent four months researching that story. I interviewed park rangers and historians, including the great Roger Brucker. I read four books. I visited Sand Cave. I explored newspaper archives and catalogued hundreds of newspaper clips. It took me more than a month to write. It's very hurtful knowing somebody just .... Copy-pasted huge chunks of it it. Hide quoted text 2. I'm aware the original video got taken down. I did not know about the second video until recently. 3. Internet Historian never contacted me. To my knowledge, they never contacted Mental Floss either. (I know MF's lawyers approached with him after the first video was found. I'm not sure what they discussed.) : ●●● On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 01:47 Mike Mitchells wrote: Hi Lucas Reilly, thanks for responding to the email, im thankful for it, also cool of other internet strangers to tell you about it, thats very cool, if you dont mind, could i ask you a few questions related to the video? 3: did the creator of the video, Internet Historian get in contact with you or someone at mental floss about this? 1: how did you felt having your whole article stolen word by word and turned into a whole video that got 10 million views, yet the original work didnt get mention once? 2: are you aware the original video got taken down and the reupload still uses your writing work but slightly changed, and the original work doesnt get mentioned by voice once, only in a few citations and nothing else? Also thanks for mentioning my writing, honestly it feels weird when writing big sentences like these, glad they are still understandable. hope i dont annoy you with these questions mister Reilly and i hope you have a great day.
EXtephie @St... 22h He literally spent more time covering iilluminaughtii and James Somerton each, two people who are openly left leaning, than he did covering Internet Historian. F--- off with that political bias accusation. BOI @Bolverk15.1d You can also tell how vindictive HB is by how he went after Internet Historian - bringing up a case where IH corrected his mistake and made amends and also dragging him for past videos But yeah Hasan stealing content is fine because he has your politics O 67 1626 12K ilıl 374K +₁
File: file.png (366 KB, 900x900) 00 Anonymous 12/01/23(Fri)19:48:49 No. 192686021 >>192686058 >>192686587 >>192686684>>192686920 >>192686931 >>192687021 >>192687142 >>192687143 >>192687216 >>192687223 >>192687237 >>192687636 >>192687666 >>192688614 >lemme just read a wikipedia article every 7 months ☐ Anonymous 12/01/23(Fri)19:50:48 No.192686058 ▶ >>192686141 >>192686021 (OP) >le wikipedia article Imao now laugh Anonymous 12/01/23(Fri)21:00:25 No.192687142 ► >>192686021 (OP) >reads an entire article from a site and gives zero credit >doesn't even know what he is reading so the pacing is all weird and the tone of his voice doesn't fit as it's his first time reading it ☐ Anonymous 12/01/23(Fri)22:27:24 No. 192688614 ► >>192686021 (OP) >tfw you actually know something about a topic he covers and it's clear he's a dilettante idiot s------- out content
View All 9 Images

Load 2 Comments

More:


+ Add a Comment

Comments (2)


Display Comments

Add a Comment


+ Add an Image

Image Details

1,606 views (13 from today)

Uploaded Dec 04, 2023 at 01:13PM EST

Origin Entry

Internet Historian Plagiarism Accusations

Source

Reddit

Tags

internet historian, man in cave, the cave story, plagiarism, youtube, reddit

Claim Authorship Edit History
Textile Embed