Ehh, both sides have been pulling punches at eachother over the Wikipedia article, and while I personally support GG, no one with any affiliation should participate at all. Knowing people, it would probably be best to lock down the article to a very small group of unnamed people who are proven to have no ties to either side. Anyone who dismisses anything on either side needs to stay away.

You know I am up for both sides of the argument to be put forth, but something like this is very difficult to achieve.

The side of gamergate has too much evidence for the other side to try and justify. Also not to mention their argument is just to say that we're misogynists when they don't have much, if any, to back that up.

Besides, you can't compromise with corruption.