No Lackin Challenge
Added 6 years ago by Don • Updated about a year ago by Brad
| Navigation |
| About • Origin • Spread • Search Interest • External References • |
Type: Social Game Parody Participatory Media
Tags: guns murder video snapchat
About
No Lackin Challenge is a video fad in which people film themselves brandishing firearms and pointing the weapons at unsuspecting victims to provoke them into displaying a firearm in return. The game is meant as a way to test the readiness of people who are living in high crime areas.
Origin
According to the HipWiki,[5] the slang expression "no lackin" was initially popularized among Chicago gang members. On June 13th, 2012, rapper Lil Mister released a song titled "No Lackin" (shown below).
On August 15th, 2014, Urban Dictionary[4] user Been Krill submitted an entry for "No Lackin," defining the term as "Not having a firearm on you" (shown below, left). The exact origin of the "No Lackin" challenge is unknown. The earliest known example was uploaded by YouTuber Chase BanzVIDEOS in a video titled "Never Get Caught Lacking in Chicago 'Challenge'" on September 11th, 2017 (shown below, right).
Spread
On October 4th, 2017, YouTuber Robert Michael uploaded a compilation of No Lackin Challenge videos (shown below). On October 7th, YouTuber King Bamm uploaded a parody video in which he walks in on somebody in the bathroom with a firearm (shown below, right).
Shooting
On January 25th, 2018, 21-year-old Sherman Lackland (shown below) shot a 17-year-old in the head while playing the challenge in Memphis, Tennessee.[3] On January 27th, a thread about the challenge which mentioned the shooting was submitted to the Kiwi Farms[2] forum, which gathered upwards of 30 replies in 24 hours. On January 28th, The Daily Mail[1] published an article reporting that the 17-year-old boy remained in critical condition "fighting for his life."
Search Interest
External References
[1] TheDailyMail – Internet craze the no lackin challenge where people pull guns on each other
[2] KiwiFarms – No Lackin Challenge
[3] Fox – Teen shot in head after new internet challenge goes wrong
[4] Urban Dictionary – No Lackin
[5] Hip Wiki – No Lackin – Meaning
Comments ( 136 )
Now I understand why those trends called "challenges". Because you have to be mentally challenged to participate.
Someday cop will see someone doing this challenge, shoot him and then Murican citizens will scream about racist police brutality and that he dindu nuffin.
Terrible grammar, but not a terrible point.
That situation had already happened before. That's how the #BlackLivesMatter Movement begun.
Society: "Don't let your kids play videogames or watch too much TV, those are unhealthy, uneducative hobbies and they'll end up imitating what they see on them and hurt themselves or worse."
Kids of pro-videogame families: [Quietly playing games/watching Let's Players at home, with being socially awkward being the worse case scenario]
Other kids: [Imitating literally every stupid thing they see celebrities doing no matter what it is, possibly killing themselves in the process, all just to get social acceptance from other kids raised with the same principles that their families allowed to happen]
Huh, never thought of it this way.
Not a parent, but i'd rather shove my kids in front of a video game for 10 hours a day than 1 hour in front of those aforementioned celebrities. And don't get me started on the violence you see on the news.
Terrible grammar, but not a terrible point.
That situation had already happened before. That's how the #BlackLivesMatter Movement begun.
Darwin Awards, dang this really takes the biscuit of foolish "Challenges" I have seen.
These seem to be done in already dangerous area and you are literally pulling guns on random people and EXPECT them to pull a gun on you in turn, the heck.
Quick, bust out the Rick & Morty seasons 1-3 box sets
How can anyone not see that this is a shitpost.
How can anyone not see that this is a shitpost.
Oh man, an utterly stupid social media """""Challenge""""" Where you do something stupid, suicidal or dangerous ends up with someone dead because they took it seriously.
This has been happening for over a decade, you'd think they'd start teaching how dangerous this stupid shit can be in schools alongside that mandatory drug/alcohol education.
Huh, never thought of it this way.
Not a parent, but i'd rather shove my kids in front of a video game for 10 hours a day than 1 hour in front of those aforementioned celebrities. And don't get me started on the violence you see on the news.
Ohohoho. From the moment I read the first sentence, I knew I was going to have some strong words for this one.
Some of the primary rules of gun safety are
-"Never point a gun at someone you're not willing to kill"
-"Never use a gun as a threat"
-"Even when you know the gun isn't loaded, the gun is loaded"
-"Don't draw a gun unless you're ready to be shot"
Guns are not fucking toys. The idea of a challenge, whose goal is to go into high crime areas, and pull a gun on someone as if you're ready to shoot them, to see if they pull their gun out ready to shoot you back, is the stupidest challenge you can ever come up with. You know, I was going to go for one of those infinite regression comment screenshots for every fake "challenge" meme, but fuck it on this one, this is too serious.
The main reason for the above gun safety rules is because once you pull a gun out at someone, intentions or not, you are legally threatening their lives, and not only do they have the right to end your life, but people around them have an obligation to. Pointing a gun at someone is the quickest way to get shot yourself, it's basic gun safety. I, who has never touched a firearm in his life, knows this. Not only that, but you are also never supposed to put your finger on the trigger unless you intend to shoot. If you have no intention of shooting your friend, why the fuck is your finger on the trigger? You are asking for accidental discharge.
How fucking stupid are you that you think this kind of challenge can end in anyway other than someone dead? I'm honestly surprised this is how the first victim is claimed, not the person the challenge is sprung on shooting back! It's not funny. AT ALL! Personally, if you ever tried this challenge at me, I'd call the police and have you charged for making threats on my life, I don't care who you are. I'm pretty justified in that stance given what happened here. Fuck this shit, and fuck everyone participating in this challenge, I hope you get the maximum sentence for manslaughter/attempted murder.
>Pulls a gun on someone expecting to get a gun pulled back
>Gets shot
How fucking stupid are you that you think this kind of challenge can end in anyway other than someone dead? I'm honestly surprised this is how the first victim is claimed, not the person the challenge is sprung on shooting back! It's not funny. AT ALL! Personally, if you ever tried this challenge at me, I'd call the police and have you charged for making threats on my life, I don't care who you are. I'm pretty justified in that stance given what happened here. Fuck this shit, and fuck everyone participating in this challenge, I hope you get the maximum sentence for manslaughter/attempted murder.
Blacks kill blacks all the time, nobody talks about it because it might lead to the impression that blacks are violent, stupid thugs.
Good riddance!
I have around 6,400 hours on Team Fortress 2.
If there's one thing I learned, is that even in friendly situations, always be ready for shit to go down. Even in a conga party, always keep an eye on that one scout that switched from his melee to his scattergun. That alone should be enough of a test of anyone's reflexes.
I really don't like saying things like this, but what an utterly retarded dumbass of a man. The same goes for any other idiot who tries to do this 'challenge'. There are so many things wrong with what goes through the mind of someone who decides 'I'm gonna pull my loaded gun on one of my friends for shits and giggles.' that I don't even know where to start.
Quick, bust out the Rick & Morty seasons 1-3 box sets
How can anyone not see that this is a shitpost.
You pull a gun out on someone for a "challenge" and someone pulls a gun out on you and shoots you dead. If this isn't the proof that humanity is slowly going down the shitty then I don't know what is.
If you pull out your gun on someone, that's felony menacing.
Humanity is not going down, just more people (retarded ones) get into internet fads.
"The problem with those who pretend to be idiots to get their laughs is that eventually they will get a community of real idiots who take them seriously"
Rough paraphrase, I saw it yesterday, I don't remember who, but the point is clear.
The quote you're talking about is "Any community that gets it's laughs by pretending to be idiots will eventually be flooded by actual idiots who mistakenly believe they're in good company."
The quote you're talking about is "Any community that gets it's laughs by pretending to be idiots will eventually be flooded by actual idiots who mistakenly believe they're in good company."
I mean, at least that will take those idiots out of the world.
"The problem with those who pretend to be idiots to get their laughs is that eventually they will get a community of real idiots who take them seriously"
Rough paraphrase, I saw it yesterday, I don't remember who, but the point is clear.
The quote you're talking about is "Any community that gets it's laughs by pretending to be idiots will eventually be flooded by actual idiots who mistakenly believe they're in good company."
The quote you're talking about is "Any community that gets it's laughs by pretending to be idiots will eventually be flooded by actual idiots who mistakenly believe they're in good company."
I think we've hit the peak of "it's just a prank bro" when it comes to dumb social media challenges.
Never in my wildest dreams did I think that someone would ironically point a loaded weapon at someone.
Tragedy and all, there is some irony in the shooter's name being "lackland"
""""""""""""""Tragedy""""""""""""""""
If you pull out your gun on someone, that's felony menacing.
What's next? Actinium-free diesel drinking challenge?
Humanity is not going down, just more people (retarded ones) get into internet fads.
"The problem with those who pretend to be idiots to get their laughs is that eventually they will get a community of real idiots who take them seriously"
Rough paraphrase, I saw it yesterday, I don't remember who, but the point is clear.
The quote you're talking about is "Any community that gets it's laughs by pretending to be idiots will eventually be flooded by actual idiots who mistakenly believe they're in good company."
The quote you're talking about is "Any community that gets it's laughs by pretending to be idiots will eventually be flooded by actual idiots who mistakenly believe they're in good company."
How can people be so fucking dumb? I mean, when does pulling a fucking at someone can be seen as a "prank" isn't logical to that person if they have a gun to just assumed that the only reason the "prankster" is saying that is a prank is because they have a gun pointed at them? I guess all this stupid trends a called challenge because the participants are acting like a mentally challenged.
I mean, at least that will take those idiots out of the world.
Kids have too much free time these days and come up with shitty ideas. If we don't teach them that their actions have consequences, they'll still be doing this sort of things.
People will always be stupid. The thing is now there's this little thing called the internet so they can post their stupid antics for the whole world to see.
"The problem with those who pretend to be idiots to get their laughs is that eventually they will get a community of real idiots who take them seriously"
Rough paraphrase, I saw it yesterday, I don't remember who, but the point is clear.
The quote you're talking about is "Any community that gets it's laughs by pretending to be idiots will eventually be flooded by actual idiots who mistakenly believe they're in good company."
""""""""""""""Tragedy""""""""""""""""
This challenge is legitimately the dumbest thing a human being can do. Have these people never fucking taken gun safety?
The literal first rule of firearms is DON'T POINT THEM AT OTHER FUCKING PEOPLE.
Don't assume is the dumbest thing. It's really dumb, but I'm sure that someone, somewhere, can develop an even dumber challenge.
No, that's the second rule of gun safety. The first rule is, 'the gun is always loaded and could go off at any time.' The 2nd rule is, 'don't point it something you don't intend to destroy.'
My Gun Safety Course had the rules swapped.
My Gun Safety Course had the rules swapped.
The quote you're talking about is "Any community that gets it's laughs by pretending to be idiots will eventually be flooded by actual idiots who mistakenly believe they're in good company."
"""""challenges"""""
So you just pull guns on people now to see if they too have guns? This is why the helpful aliens won't visit us.
People will always be stupid. The thing is now there's this little thing called the internet so they can post their stupid antics for the whole world to see.
We all know exactly where this challenge is going to take us.
We've come into 2018 eating laundry detergent and brandishing firearms at random people, the latter of which can not only get you killed (as this article shows), but is also illegal under U.S. jurisdiction.
What has this species come to.
Y'know what, there's only so much sympathy you can have for stupid people. This is just Darwinism in action.
There's going to be so many news reports on this in the future. I can already see it.
I hope many of them die.
We need to weed out bad genes somehow.
Don't assume is the dumbest thing. It's really dumb, but I'm sure that someone, somewhere, can develop an even dumber challenge.
This isn't a challenge, it's a display of retardation and the people who should be removed from the gene pool
No, that's the second rule of gun safety. The first rule is, 'the gun is always loaded and could go off at any time.' The 2nd rule is, 'don't point it something you don't intend to destroy.'
My Gun Safety Course had the rules swapped.
Hey look I think I can link videos now. This sort of thing reminds me of the phrase "if all your friends jumped off a cliff, would you do it too?" and I guess the answer is yes, but only if you call it a "challenge" and put it on youtube.
I honestly never thought this song would ever be relevant to anything other than being in the Transformers movie.
Optimus didn't die for this.
So, you're testing their readiness on pulling their own gun.
They "ain't lackin", so they draw and fire. What's your last words, "congratulations, you won"?
You know I think it really says a lot about modern ''''''challenge''''' culture when you hear about something you'd think would only be conceived as a complete parody of gun nuts or NRA like on South Park, American Dad, or SNL is actually a real thing that people are doing. And no surprise, someone got shot for pointing a real gun at somebody else in an area known for high gun violence.
Now the only thing I could be disappointed by is not seeing Jimbo Kern or Stan Smith do this as soon as possible.
'Lackland? For real??
Anyway, this is stupid and I'm surprised this is the first victim that has resulted due to this dumb shit.
Don't point guns at people, animals or things you don't intend to shoot, ffs.
"2018 is going to be a good/slightly less shitty year!"
Right. Sure it is.
So how is the NRA going to try and turn this around to say more people should carry guns?
If it wasn't guns it'd be tide pods or choking on cinnamon. Guns don't kill people, retards who don't know not to pull a loaded gun on a friend kill people.
I am very pro-guns. It is very clear that many people today are ill-equipped to handle a firearm. Many youngsters especially leave much to be desired in the cerebral department.
Which is why i never understand when americans tell us that we europeans should be able to openly buy weapons.
You can buy weapon in europe but you need to be in a shooting federation where you get a proper training on how to weild a firearm in the first place. Once that is done you can buy any small caliber or hunting caliber weapons. If you want a 9mm a .45 or other bigger callibers like that you also need to get a background check which you easily pass unless you are marked as a terrorist or a criminal of course.
It's the individualism that America was founded on. To your typical American (or, at least your typical gun owner), YOU are responsible for your own safety. That's why gun owning Americans usually scoff at the need to be approved by some bureaucracy in order to buy your own instrument of defense. Combined with the Second Amendment, that's why they scoff at mandatory safety/training courses.
Yet you have to pass driving tests right?
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Yet you have to pass driving tests right?
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
It's the individualism that America was founded on. To your typical American (or, at least your typical gun owner), YOU are responsible for your own safety. That's why gun owning Americans usually scoff at the need to be approved by some bureaucracy in order to buy your own instrument of defense. Combined with the Second Amendment, that's why they scoff at mandatory safety/training courses.
Yet you have to pass driving tests right?
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Yet you have to pass driving tests right?
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
You realize that the NRA are very into gun safety and would be livid at this blatant disregard of the most basic rules of gun safety, right?
Which is why i never understand when americans tell us that we europeans should be able to openly buy weapons.
You can buy weapon in europe but you need to be in a shooting federation where you get a proper training on how to weild a firearm in the first place. Once that is done you can buy any small caliber or hunting caliber weapons. If you want a 9mm a .45 or other bigger callibers like that you also need to get a background check which you easily pass unless you are marked as a terrorist or a criminal of course.
It's the individualism that America was founded on. To your typical American (or, at least your typical gun owner), YOU are responsible for your own safety. That's why gun owning Americans usually scoff at the need to be approved by some bureaucracy in order to buy your own instrument of defense. Combined with the Second Amendment, that's why they scoff at mandatory safety/training courses.
Yet you have to pass driving tests right?
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Yet you have to pass driving tests right?
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
It's the individualism that America was founded on. To your typical American (or, at least your typical gun owner), YOU are responsible for your own safety. That's why gun owning Americans usually scoff at the need to be approved by some bureaucracy in order to buy your own instrument of defense. Combined with the Second Amendment, that's why they scoff at mandatory safety/training courses.
Yet you have to pass driving tests right?
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Yet you have to pass driving tests right?
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Guns are not toys ffs.
Not in this universe, at least.
If it wasn't guns it'd be tide pods or choking on cinnamon. Guns don't kill people, retards who don't know not to pull a loaded gun on a friend kill people.
I am very pro-guns. It is very clear that many people today are ill-equipped to handle a firearm. Many youngsters especially leave much to be desired in the cerebral department.
Which is why i never understand when americans tell us that we europeans should be able to openly buy weapons.
You can buy weapon in europe but you need to be in a shooting federation where you get a proper training on how to weild a firearm in the first place. Once that is done you can buy any small caliber or hunting caliber weapons. If you want a 9mm a .45 or other bigger callibers like that you also need to get a background check which you easily pass unless you are marked as a terrorist or a criminal of course.
It's the individualism that America was founded on. To your typical American (or, at least your typical gun owner), YOU are responsible for your own safety. That's why gun owning Americans usually scoff at the need to be approved by some bureaucracy in order to buy your own instrument of defense. Combined with the Second Amendment, that's why they scoff at mandatory safety/training courses.
Yet you have to pass driving tests right?
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Yet you have to pass driving tests right?
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
It's the individualism that America was founded on. To your typical American (or, at least your typical gun owner), YOU are responsible for your own safety. That's why gun owning Americans usually scoff at the need to be approved by some bureaucracy in order to buy your own instrument of defense. Combined with the Second Amendment, that's why they scoff at mandatory safety/training courses.
Yet you have to pass driving tests right?
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Yet you have to pass driving tests right?
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
How can anyone not see that this is a shitpost.
You realize that the NRA are very into gun safety and would be livid at this blatant disregard of the most basic rules of gun safety, right?
Jesus wept.
Not in this universe, at least.
finally i can post my ironic memes
"The Hit new Internet Challenge! The overdose challenge! Eat an entire bottle of specifically medicated pills not meant for your consumption, and especially if you're only meant to eat one!See how long you can outlast the effects of the pills and triumph over them when you don't keel over!"
I say this as a joke, but I know I'm going to feel guilty somewhere down the line because it'll probably
ACTUALLY FUCKING HAPPEN
Isn't that basically the Tide Pods Challenge?
Yes, but let's be fair here. No one was saying to eat Tide Pods prior, because people assume it went without saying.
Meanwhile, you are told to not consume medications not meant for you, by not only guardians, but doctors as well, so you are deliberately ignoring instructions that a superior gives you.
Yes, but let's be fair here. No one was saying to eat Tide Pods prior, because people assume it went without saying.
Meanwhile, you are told to not consume medications not meant for you, by not only guardians, but doctors as well, so you are deliberately ignoring instructions that a superior gives you.
Isn't that basically the Tide Pods Challenge?
Yes, but let's be fair here. No one was saying to eat Tide Pods prior, because people assume it went without saying.
Meanwhile, you are told to not consume medications not meant for you, by not only guardians, but doctors as well, so you are deliberately ignoring instructions that a superior gives you.
Which is why i never understand when americans tell us that we europeans should be able to openly buy weapons.
You can buy weapon in europe but you need to be in a shooting federation where you get a proper training on how to weild a firearm in the first place. Once that is done you can buy any small caliber or hunting caliber weapons. If you want a 9mm a .45 or other bigger callibers like that you also need to get a background check which you easily pass unless you are marked as a terrorist or a criminal of course.
It's the individualism that America was founded on. To your typical American (or, at least your typical gun owner), YOU are responsible for your own safety. That's why gun owning Americans usually scoff at the need to be approved by some bureaucracy in order to buy your own instrument of defense. Combined with the Second Amendment, that's why they scoff at mandatory safety/training courses.
Yet you have to pass driving tests right?
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Yet you have to pass driving tests right?
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
-"2016 and 2017 sucked ass, let's make 2018 better!"
-Open up year by eating fucking tide pods and pointing guns at people in areas with high crime rates
Trash killing eachother
I couldn’t care less
Yes, but let's be fair here. No one was saying to eat Tide Pods prior, because people assume it went without saying.
Meanwhile, you are told to not consume medications not meant for you, by not only guardians, but doctors as well, so you are deliberately ignoring instructions that a superior gives you.
Well at least its just the hood rats doing this…..so far….
At least? no, screw that. they'd better stop.
"is a video fad in which people film themselves brandishing firearms and pointing the weapons at unsuspecting victims to provoke them into displaying a firearm in return"
HOW FUCKING STUPID ARE THESE PEOPLE
I believe some dude at the government thought AIDS was too slow so they came up with all these stupid "challenges" as a form of population control (Tide Pods, Hot Water, No Lackin, etc.)
this whole thing just shows how wildly the differences in cultures can be even within this country. to people living in the suburbs they cant ever imagine a game like this, because why would they? its an unsafe game with something that could kill you. its fucking dangerous to point a loaded weapon at people.
but in the rougher places in this country…….they are all carrying because that shit can happen for REAL at any time. and so this game was made to make sure your friends and acquaintances and even strangers whom you assume would not shoot you are prepared just in case. they do it because it can save your or your buddies life. one person died because of this game…….but how many died because they were lacking?
different cultures in the same country. its pretty fascinating. and its fascinating how certain areas of america are still pretty much the wild west in some ways too.
Concealed Carrying is actually very popular with many people in the US, no matter what their background is. Plenty of suburbanites carry a gun with them every day. The issue is that generally, those who carry a gun legally have respect for the law and respect the power their weapon has, whereas those who carry illegally are much more likely to do dumb shit with it, like this entry.
>No Lackin Challenge is a video fad in which people film themselves brandishing firearms and pointing the weapons at unsuspecting victims to provoke them into displaying a firearm in return.
This is just a pretense for suicide.
Back in the old days we just called this "suicide by cop"
At least? no, screw that. they'd better stop.
My Gun Safety Course had the rules swapped.
oh boy a game that Darwinism created seems to be working
what's the pistol? you shot a guy/girl in the head and he/she is not dead?
is it 22LR?
People can survive weird things done to the brain.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phineas_Gage
No words. Just no fucking words.
I guess its the year of the Darwin Awards.
I am so full of rage at the moment that it isn't even funny.
I live in Montana. I have an AR 15 with two magazines each with thirty rounds ready at all times.(1) Before you ask I keep my rifle unloaded, cleaned, and maintained at all times, making sure to keep the ammo away from the weapon out of respect for the power that each bullet as well as the rifle has. (1 Note: I know that keeping the magazine loaded could cause damage to it and because of that, routinely unload, clean and maintain them)
My weapon is a tool that demands respect. The only job it has is to kill. And anyone who jokes around with guns aren't just insulting the respectable gun owners who undergo years of training to master their weapon, they are disrespecting the hundreds of millions of people who have died because the misuse of it.
Don't take this shit lightly and knock it the fuck off.
i swear in the name of god almighty, eating tide pods and this sound like something out of the scp foundation.
The rate at which these "challenges" get worse do come close to the pacing of an SCP:
Part 1-2: Supernatural entity compels people to do something strange but harmless (Ice bucket challenge)
Part 2: Entity compels people to do something mildly dangerous to themselves (Cold water challenge)
Part 3: Entity compels people to do something very dangerous to themselves (Tide Pod challenge)
Part 4: Entity compels people to do something dangerous to themselves and others (this)
Part [REDACTED]: Entity compels people to perform ritualistic mass murder to summon a world-destroying monstrosity, SCP foundation armed forces show up and kill the challenge-takers to heroically save the world.
i would expect that part [REDACTED] would be something like scp-701, scp-2076 or, more likely, something like scp-3078. i don't think that whoever is behind tis wants to summon a monster, unless of course that people who will die due to this kinds of memes are humans sacrifices.
yes, i've been binge reading scps lately.
whats the cold water challenge?
i would expect that part [REDACTED] would be something like scp-701, scp-2076 or, more likely, something like scp-3078. i don't think that whoever is behind tis wants to summon a monster, unless of course that people who will die due to this kinds of memes are humans sacrifices.
yes, i've been binge reading scps lately.
SCP-2018
whats the cold water challenge?
Back in the old days we just called this "suicide by cop"
The rate at which these "challenges" get worse do come close to the pacing of an SCP:
Part 1-2: Supernatural entity compels people to do something strange but harmless (Ice bucket challenge)
Part 2: Entity compels people to do something mildly dangerous to themselves (Cold water challenge)
Part 3: Entity compels people to do something very dangerous to themselves (Tide Pod challenge)
Part 4: Entity compels people to do something dangerous to themselves and others (this)
Part [REDACTED]: Entity compels people to perform ritualistic mass murder to summon a world-destroying monstrosity, SCP foundation armed forces show up and kill the challenge-takers to heroically save the world.
i would expect that part [REDACTED] would be something like scp-701, scp-2076 or, more likely, something like scp-3078. i don't think that whoever is behind tis wants to summon a monster, unless of course that people who will die due to this kinds of memes are humans sacrifices.
yes, i've been binge reading scps lately.
whats the cold water challenge?
i would expect that part [REDACTED] would be something like scp-701, scp-2076 or, more likely, something like scp-3078. i don't think that whoever is behind tis wants to summon a monster, unless of course that people who will die due to this kinds of memes are humans sacrifices.
yes, i've been binge reading scps lately.
H E D I N D U N U F F I N
D
I
N
D
U
N
U
F
F
I
N
I guess reactionary racism wasn't cutting it, we're doing preemptive racism now.
>brandishing firearms and pointing the weapons at unsuspecting victims
It's the Commit a Felony Challenge. The winner's the first person to get a mandatory minimum sentence for a gun charge. Bonus points for: getting your suffrage revoked, being unable to own or possess a firearm again, and being featured in a Brady Center ad.
Clearly this will end very well for all involved and will not cause someone to panic and shoot back in self defense
It's already happened and in the article, dude.
I don't think the English language has a word for this level of retardation.
No, it dose. It’s “Liberal”
dose
looks closer.
looks closer.
>dragging politics into everything
nah fam, he needs to fuck off back to /pol/
When you get the first few Upvotes but then it goes down hill over night
When you get the first few Upvotes but then it goes down hill over night
nah fam, he needs to fuck off back to /pol/
When you get the first few Upvotes but then it goes down hill over night
When you get the first few Upvotes but then it goes down hill over night
dose
looks closer.
looks closer.
>dragging politics into everything
nah fam, he needs to fuck off back to /pol/
When you get the first few Upvotes but then it goes down hill over night
When you get the first few Upvotes but then it goes down hill over night
nah fam, he needs to fuck off back to /pol/
When you get the first few Upvotes but then it goes down hill over night
When you get the first few Upvotes but then it goes down hill over night
No, it dose. It’s “Liberal”
dose
looks closer.
looks closer.
>dragging politics into everything
nah fam, he needs to fuck off back to /pol/
When you get the first few Upvotes but then it goes down hill over night
When you get the first few Upvotes but then it goes down hill over night
nah fam, he needs to fuck off back to /pol/
When you get the first few Upvotes but then it goes down hill over night
When you get the first few Upvotes but then it goes down hill over night
dose
looks closer.
looks closer.
It's already happened and in the article, dude.
So, we came one step closer to the shoot YOURSELF in the head challenge.
School shooting challenge, here we come!
As gun-related stupidity goes, this is comparable to that time that one guy told his wife to fire a 50cal at him and he would block it with a book, hoping to be the next viral sensation.
He's dead, btw.
I want to clarify for anyone reading this post that it was .50 Action Express fired from a Desert Eagle. It wasn't a .50 BMG, which are anti-material rifle rounds.
That .50 BMG is an anti-everything, brah!
ye, bruh
I'm pretty sure it's the same as what we used as the default ammo for US planes till the end of Korea. They didn't go boom like 20mm, but they had lovely ballistics. So lovely, in fact, the Bell X-1 was modeled after a .50 cal. Not a bullet in general, specifically a .50 cal
also, they were incendiary.
ye, bruh
I'm pretty sure it's the same as what we used as the default ammo for US planes till the end of Korea. They didn't go boom like 20mm, but they had lovely ballistics. So lovely, in fact, the Bell X-1 was modeled after a .50 cal. Not a bullet in general, specifically a .50 cal
also, they were incendiary.
That .50 BMG is an anti-everything, brah!
ye, bruh
I'm pretty sure it's the same as what we used as the default ammo for US planes till the end of Korea. They didn't go boom like 20mm, but they had lovely ballistics. So lovely, in fact, the Bell X-1 was modeled after a .50 cal. Not a bullet in general, specifically a .50 cal
also, they were incendiary.
ye, bruh
I'm pretty sure it's the same as what we used as the default ammo for US planes till the end of Korea. They didn't go boom like 20mm, but they had lovely ballistics. So lovely, in fact, the Bell X-1 was modeled after a .50 cal. Not a bullet in general, specifically a .50 cal
also, they were incendiary.
I want to clarify for anyone reading this post that it was .50 Action Express fired from a Desert Eagle. It wasn't a .50 BMG, which are anti-material rifle rounds.
That .50 BMG is an anti-everything, brah!
ye, bruh
I'm pretty sure it's the same as what we used as the default ammo for US planes till the end of Korea. They didn't go boom like 20mm, but they had lovely ballistics. So lovely, in fact, the Bell X-1 was modeled after a .50 cal. Not a bullet in general, specifically a .50 cal
also, they were incendiary.
ye, bruh
I'm pretty sure it's the same as what we used as the default ammo for US planes till the end of Korea. They didn't go boom like 20mm, but they had lovely ballistics. So lovely, in fact, the Bell X-1 was modeled after a .50 cal. Not a bullet in general, specifically a .50 cal
also, they were incendiary.
People can survive weird things done to the brain.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phineas_Gage
That .50 BMG is an anti-everything, brah!
ye, bruh
I'm pretty sure it's the same as what we used as the default ammo for US planes till the end of Korea. They didn't go boom like 20mm, but they had lovely ballistics. So lovely, in fact, the Bell X-1 was modeled after a .50 cal. Not a bullet in general, specifically a .50 cal
also, they were incendiary.
Jump in an active volcano challenge!
Pics or it didn't happen, bros!!
Concealed Carrying is actually very popular with many people in the US, no matter what their background is. Plenty of suburbanites carry a gun with them every day. The issue is that generally, those who carry a gun legally have respect for the law and respect the power their weapon has, whereas those who carry illegally are much more likely to do dumb shit with it, like this entry.
It's the individualism that America was founded on. To your typical American (or, at least your typical gun owner), YOU are responsible for your own safety. That's why gun owning Americans usually scoff at the need to be approved by some bureaucracy in order to buy your own instrument of defense. Combined with the Second Amendment, that's why they scoff at mandatory safety/training courses.
Yet you have to pass driving tests right?
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
ye, bruh
Let me see if I've go this straight. The purpose of this challenge is to determine if an individual is armed with a live and loaded firearm. One does so by pulling their own weapon and scaring the piss out of them to test their reaction.
They are deliberately trying to trigger a fight/flight response in someone they expect to have a loaded gun.
I'm not surprised someone is dead.
I'm surprised that only ONE person is dead.
Let's advance this challenge to No Lackin': Cop Edition. If you're shot because you're an armed citizen threatening an officer, you lose. If you are arrested, you lose. The only winners are the civilians not participating because you're not roaming the streets anymore.
>dragging politics into everything
nah fam, he needs to fuck off back to /pol/
When you get the first few Upvotes but then it goes down hill over night
When you get the first few Upvotes but then it goes down hill over night
H E D I N D U N U F F I N
D
I
N
D
U
N
U
F
F
I
N
In 2018, people are eating TIDE pods, pointing REAL guns at each other for fun, and exploiting the dead for cash and relevancy.
I'm not sure about you guys, but I need a drink.
DANGIT!
just don't shake it: that kills more people a year than sharks
Fun Fact: The coconut is one of the few edible fruits with a confirmed body count, killing people by dropping from the tree, and onto the unsuspecting victim's cranium.
And yes, it too kills more people per year than sharks do, at an average of 150.
Fun Fact: The coconut is one of the few edible fruits with a confirmed body count, killing people by dropping from the tree, and onto the unsuspecting victim's cranium.
And yes, it too kills more people per year than sharks do, at an average of 150.
SCP-2018
School shooting challenge, here we come!
Darwin award coming right up…
nah fam, he needs to fuck off back to /pol/
When you get the first few Upvotes but then it goes down hill over night
2018 is just starting and shit already happen.
It's only January, and we already got this, Logan Paul's suicide video, Nutella and H&M riots, Tide Pods being consumed, a government shutdown, a major false alarm in Hawaii, and awards shows being more political than usual…
On the plus side, at least there's Nintendo Labo and Pop Team Epic
11 more months.
I don't think I can handle this.
11 more months.
I don't think I can handle this.
I guess reactionary racism wasn't cutting it, we're doing preemptive racism now.
When you get the first few Upvotes but then it goes down hill over night
just don't shake it: that kills more people a year than sharks
Fun Fact: The coconut is one of the few edible fruits with a confirmed body count, killing people by dropping from the tree, and onto the unsuspecting victim's cranium.
And yes, it too kills more people per year than sharks do, at an average of 150.
I'm pretty sure it's the same as what we used as the default ammo for US planes till the end of Korea. They didn't go boom like 20mm, but they had lovely ballistics. So lovely, in fact, the Bell X-1 was modeled after a .50 cal. Not a bullet in general, specifically a .50 cal
also, they were incendiary.
It's only January, and we already got this, Logan Paul's suicide video, Nutella and H&M riots, Tide Pods being consumed, a government shutdown, a major false alarm in Hawaii, and awards shows being more political than usual…
On the plus side, at least there's Nintendo Labo and Pop Team Epic
11 more months.
I don't think I can handle this.
How the fuck does my generation keep coming up with these kinds of challenges, and how do they keep getting so much worse over time?
I can't even imagine how can someone be so retarded to attempt this challenge.
11 more months.
I don't think I can handle this.
I could rant on how fucking retarded this is. But at this point, I'm completely desensitized.
just you?
thanks to KYM i can't even watch ye old NSFW sites anymore..
Yet you have to pass driving tests right?
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Kind of reminds me of this.
Also, why are people equating this with 2018 when the challenge itself started in 2017?
Coz someone finally died doing the challenge in current year
the kid died?
got link?
Sadly, I do not have a link and I'm probably wrong anyway but he did get blasted in the face so he's probably not coming out of this
Sadly, I do not have a link and I'm probably wrong anyway but he did get blasted in the face so he's probably not coming out of this
the kid died?
got link?
Sadly, I do not have a link and I'm probably wrong anyway but he did get blasted in the face so he's probably not coming out of this
Sadly, I do not have a link and I'm probably wrong anyway but he did get blasted in the face so he's probably not coming out of this
whats the cold water challenge?
No kidding. Thought that mugshot was John Boyega for a second
Optimus didn't die for this.
Coz someone finally died doing the challenge in current year
the kid died?
got link?
Sadly, I do not have a link and I'm probably wrong anyway but he did get blasted in the face so he's probably not coming out of this
Sadly, I do not have a link and I'm probably wrong anyway but he did get blasted in the face so he's probably not coming out of this
I don't even know how to respond to this "challenge", or the inevitable death that followed.
Like what the fuck.
just you?
thanks to KYM i can't even watch ye old NSFW sites anymore..
the kid died?
got link?
Sadly, I do not have a link and I'm probably wrong anyway but he did get blasted in the face so he's probably not coming out of this
Jesus, what was going through this kids head?
I mean, besides the bullet.
I think just one month into 2018 has already made me lose faith in humanity. This post proves why Rosseu was right.
I know that was going to happen.
"What could be more stupid than eating soap for a challenge"
>Point loaded guns a people challenge
Oh ok
So wait: did the 17 year old point the gun at the 21 year old to which he responded by shooting the younger man? Or did the 21 year old point his gun at the younger one, and it went off?
2018 is the year they're handing out Darwin awards like participation awards.
Driving isn't enshrined in our constitution as a right :^)
Even then, you only need to have a license to drive on public roads. You need no certification to drive on your own property, much like carrying a loaded weapon.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
So you DO need certification to carry a loaded weapon on the streets?
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
In many states, yes. Some states let you carry without a permit.
Sadly, I do not have a link and I'm probably wrong anyway but he did get blasted in the face so he's probably not coming out of this
Fun Fact: The coconut is one of the few edible fruits with a confirmed body count, killing people by dropping from the tree, and onto the unsuspecting victim's cranium.
And yes, it too kills more people per year than sharks do, at an average of 150.
Sorry, but you must activate your account to post a comment.