Forums / Fun! / Just For Fun

320,842 total conversations in 9,947 threads

+ New Thread


Battlefeld4 or MW4?

Last posted Apr 08, 2013 at 10:37AM EDT. Added Mar 21, 2013 at 07:01PM EDT
82 posts from 43 users

Dac wrote:

I actually liked black ops 2.

How? Seriously? What made you say" this is fun" i mean they have a season pass that dosent get you everything in the season. (You have to buy the camo packs and calling card dlc) whats good about it?

Rimshot wrote:

How? Seriously? What made you say" this is fun" i mean they have a season pass that dosent get you everything in the season. (You have to buy the camo packs and calling card dlc) whats good about it?

So being able to preorder downloadable content makes a game unfun.

You can go take your bandwagon cynicism of call of duty somewhere else on the internet
because noone here would care unless you can give criticism people can consider rational,
But lets just stay on topic.

Last edited Mar 24, 2013 at 03:57AM EDT

Dr. Eggman wrote:

I don't care about graphics, I care about gameplay, and as far as I'm concerned, Star Wars: Battlefront is my favorite FPS series out there.

I have no idea how many BFII hours I've logged, but I think it's somewhere in the hundreds. It used to be where it was all I'd play everyday for quite a while.

NottaWotta wrote:

So being able to preorder downloadable content makes a game unfun.

You can go take your bandwagon cynicism of call of duty somewhere else on the internet
because noone here would care unless you can give criticism people can consider rational,
But lets just stay on topic.

I didnt say that ibsaid that if you have a season pass you shoukd get everything, but you dont in bo2. Black ops 1 was the best.

Rimshot wrote:

How? Seriously? What made you say" this is fun" i mean they have a season pass that dosent get you everything in the season. (You have to buy the camo packs and calling card dlc) whats good about it?

Same insanely addictive multiplayer and 4 person zombie mode. The single player is pretty fun as well. Anyways, who gives a shit about camo packs and calling card dlc, it's not integral to the game.

Dac wrote:

Same insanely addictive multiplayer and 4 person zombie mode. The single player is pretty fun as well. Anyways, who gives a shit about camo packs and calling card dlc, it's not integral to the game.

This. except I still wanna buy the Kawaii pack for the lulz

I used to love

Free Game, loads of fun, I even had a nice Guild with people from Costa Rica and it was very pro.

It had its defects also… loads of lag and hackers and pay to win players but it was more fun than it was not.

Mungalo wrote:

If i'm playing a shooter that's meant to be realistic, I'll take a battlefield game any day.

In battlefield 3, i can fly a jet and get some kills, land it to fix it with my torch, fly some more, get shot down, jump out and before I deploy my chute, fire off an rpg, land, light up some fools with my gun, jump in a tank, pick up someone else's class and become a sniper, get some headshots, then become a medic and heal tank rounds to the face with a defibrillator, then get in another plane, all in one life. Battlefield is my favorite shooter, but its not realistic at all.

Operation flashpoint is pretty realistic as is rainbow six series, at least the most realistic I've played.

Dac wrote:

In battlefield 3, i can fly a jet and get some kills, land it to fix it with my torch, fly some more, get shot down, jump out and before I deploy my chute, fire off an rpg, land, light up some fools with my gun, jump in a tank, pick up someone else's class and become a sniper, get some headshots, then become a medic and heal tank rounds to the face with a defibrillator, then get in another plane, all in one life. Battlefield is my favorite shooter, but its not realistic at all.

Operation flashpoint is pretty realistic as is rainbow six series, at least the most realistic I've played.

Yeah, the only problem with Flashpoint is that it wasn't a very popular game. My friend and I had a blast with the co-op campaign, even though it was kind of slow.

Anyways, after seeing the seventeen-minute demo for BF4, I'm honestly excited. It does look similar to BF3, but that's because it's using Frostbite 3. I'm hoping that it will be available for next-gen consoles. I know that PC's have more power, but it would just be cool to play BF4 on the PS4 or the new Xbox.

You pussies argiung about war games, well, then this is by far the most realistic war game, with the most accurate graphics and story:


Next time you maggots want to bitch about a FPS, go to the real world and FIGHT like the men you're supossed to be.

Katie C. wrote:

I have no idea how many BFII hours I've logged, but I think it's somewhere in the hundreds. It used to be where it was all I'd play everyday for quite a while.

Oh man, same here. I love that game so much. I used to play it all the time, even before I started playing the Story and Galactic Conquest. The day I found out you could switch to a first-person perspective was one of the greatest of my adolescence. It's one of my all-time favorites.

Soldier wrote:

You pussies argiung about war games, well, then this is by far the most realistic war game, with the most accurate graphics and story:


Next time you maggots want to bitch about a FPS, go to the real world and FIGHT like the men you're supossed to be.

Lol

Soldier wrote:

You pussies argiung about war games, well, then this is by far the most realistic war game, with the most accurate graphics and story:


Next time you maggots want to bitch about a FPS, go to the real world and FIGHT like the men you're supossed to be.

Sorry, too many noobs.

Mungalo wrote:

If i'm playing a shooter that's meant to be realistic, I'll take a battlefield game any day.

In battlefield you can get shot point blank in the face and get brought back to life with defibalaters. If its so realistic where were these magic defibilaters urring sandy hook?

Dac wrote:

In battlefield 3, i can fly a jet and get some kills, land it to fix it with my torch, fly some more, get shot down, jump out and before I deploy my chute, fire off an rpg, land, light up some fools with my gun, jump in a tank, pick up someone else's class and become a sniper, get some headshots, then become a medic and heal tank rounds to the face with a defibrillator, then get in another plane, all in one life. Battlefield is my favorite shooter, but its not realistic at all.

Operation flashpoint is pretty realistic as is rainbow six series, at least the most realistic I've played.

i remember rainbow six
the old ones

it was a one shot one kill both for you and your enemies and if you lost a man he was gone forever not to come back anytime soon

i recall this one time where i opened a door to fast and was meet with a shotgun in the face

Soldier wrote:

You pussies argiung about war games, well, then this is by far the most realistic war game, with the most accurate graphics and story:


Next time you maggots want to bitch about a FPS, go to the real world and FIGHT like the men you're supossed to be.

now that makes me a sad person
because i will never get the chance to play in a real war

i was not allowed to enter the army
yeah they didn't want me i didn't even get to show up

This thread is going to derail… it's not about the best FPS out there, unfortunately… (which are hands down Goldeneye 007 and Star Wars: Battlefront). It's about whether you prefer Battlefield 4 or Modern Warfare 4. Personally, I prefer Battlefield 4, mainly because they DID NOT need to continue the Modern Warfare franchise. Makarov and the other three villains in MW1 are dead already, who else is there left to kill in the series?

Last edited Apr 05, 2013 at 12:33PM EDT
Skeletor-sm

This thread is closed to new posts.

Old threads normally auto-close after 30 days of inactivity.

Why don't you start a new thread instead?

Namaste! You must login or signup first!