320,842 total conversations in 9,947 threads
Last posted
Jan 31, 2011 at 01:21PM EST.
Added
Jan 29, 2011 at 10:32PM EST
13 posts
from
7 users
After hours of long cutscenes, 5 bosses, POINTLESS running and throwing alot of things around ranging from rubble to cameras to rusty swords.
I think…
THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN MOAR.
Time completed: 18:11
I feel that they should have put m ore effort into the game. They did good on the graphics but lacked somewhat in the the gameplay.
anyone else played this? Tell me what you think!
3.14
Attheshows ;) wrote:
After hours of long cutscenes, 5 bosses, POINTLESS running and throwing alot of things around ranging from rubble to cameras to rusty swords.
I think…
THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN MOAR.
Time completed: 18:11
I feel that they should have put m ore effort into the game. They did good on the graphics but lacked somewhat in the the gameplay.anyone else played this? Tell me what you think!
It's your fault for playing it. Crystal Chronicles has always been balls.
Crystal Chronicles= the bomb
any of the Sequels whatsoever= bad
any questions?
Piarte King wrote:
Crystal Chronicles= the bomb
any of the Sequels whatsoever= bad
any questions?
How about Mystic Quest?
Katie C. wrote:
How about Mystic Quest?
Mystic quest was alright for a game that wasn't a FF game at first.
Crystal Bearers is failed.
Katie C. wrote:
How about Mystic Quest?
At the age of 4 and 5 it was like the best game ever (because I could actually beat it.) I don't think I've played it since though.
The game had the most whacked off optional to mandatory gameplay balance. I finished it in 5 hours. One of these days im going to restart and attempt all the sidequests.
Which one are you referring to?
The one for Wii.
FIVE HOURS?! Holy shit.
Already a memeber? | Don't have an account? |