Forums / Discussion / Meme Research

Trying to make a kind of research and found it really hard to find relevant works that would criticize Dawkins' position..

I'm confused, why do you want a meme researcher if you're researching a person? Unless you mean meme in the more anthropological/sociological sense, like how fire building or the written word could be considered memes, in which case this site probably does not have the memes you are looking for.

Here are some links you might find useful anyway:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/richard-dawkins-atheism-criticism-atheist-study-rice-university-science-scientists-a7389396.html

http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/07-07-04/

http://www.salon.com/2014/10/03/new_atheisms_troubling_misogyny_the_pompous_sexism_of_richard_dawkins_and_sam_harris_partner/

maybe the problem is that my knowledge of english isnt so good, but you probably understood me wrongly..
im not researching a person, i research memes. and i need some scientific publications where memes are already studied somehow. but not the way Dawkins did it, because his position is not actual anymore, as you see

Ah, understood.

If I were you I'd look at the work of Luis Benitez-Bribiesca M.D. and John Gray.