Forums / Discussion / Q & A

I really think that this is something that we all want to know. I'm just downright baffled that this negative karma whore was brought back. He even went back to posting his annoying negative karma whoreing threads.

Honestly, I didn't think it warranted a ban and I don't think some of his threads deserved locks. Lots of the mods are still in the mentality before Riff-Raff existed. I didn't see him breaking any of the Riff-Raff rules. The joke suspensions weren't supposed to add up to a ban. I'm not saying I like or support him, just that he doesn't really deserve to be banned.

who moved this to riff raff? it's a pretty straight forward question. he was prematurely banned for being annoying (which is against the rules?) so he was unbanned. now suspended for threatening PMs i guess.

i did not unban him though.

e: the riff raff bans weren't part of the reason, mostly the pokemon stuff.

Well, like other users have pointed out, he doesn't make any contributions, at all. His ban was probably not serious, and he's back since there's no real reason to keep him banned forever.

I don't really understand Slime, but if he wants negative karma, we can't exactly stop him.

I'd just assumed he was tempbanned tbh

but yeah, I agree with sam here. Slime's shitposting was pretty much confined to riffraff where it belonged.

there really is no such thing as a temporary ban, if we want to ban someone for a certain amount of time we just suspend them. if someone is banned the mod fully intends it to be final.

Ban deletions are anonymous. We won't know who did it until they come forward

cough Chris cough

Oh yeah, it was me, sorry for not responding.

I didn't think that bans based on being annoying are fair.

I was hoping he would come back and contribute.

I didn't expect him to start threatening users, but after this suspension we'll have to see where he's at.

But I still believe that it's not fair to ban based on some user being irritating.

One thing I have to say about him is that I thing people are downvoting his posts just because he posted them, even when he isn't shitposting.

They're sent to your email, just like any kind of user requested reactivation messages.

@Moon

I looked around the mod mail trying to find one that says "User was unbanned". None to be found. If the system sends such emails then they don't go to me

I only receive emails of when users are banned/suspended. NOT when bans/suspensions expire or when they are deleted

@BSOD

Check August 18th, approx. 5:25 am (your TZ): "User 'Slime Cap' has been reactivated."

Ah, okay. Thanks

I don't think he was banned just for being annoying.

I mean, yeah, he was pretty freakin annoying, but that's not all he did… He threw countless tantrums, cursed out RandomMan, he's threatened me in PM TWICE now, (Or three times, I kind of lost count) not to mention that after he was banned he and "4chan" raided the KYM Usermon's request doc, deleting everything and putting things in like "pingas pinas douchebag."

that was only because he was deactivated as well. revoked bans are anonymous.

Ah, I see. Oh well, just a once-in-a-while thing I guess.

A ban bans the account and deactivates it. So in order to properly unban an account, it needs to have both the ban revoked and the account reactivated.

So you'll see who it was indirectly.

hmm. i did not know that. everyone is learning the science of banning today.

Who the mega heckers is Slime Cap

A nobody.

And given how the question of the thread has been answered, we can leave it with that as well.